+1, the old testament could have promoted death instead of forgiveness... oh wait it does! And BADecker still believes in it. The personality of god as you say could also be drastically different between the books that shows the inconsistency in the writing...oh wait it does! And BADecker still believes in it.
Don't be like BADecker.
^The above could literally be in a commercial.
God entirely promotes salvation forgiveness in the Old Testament. The reason that it seems to be revoked in places, is that the people involved entirely deny the salvation forgiveness for themselves. What other choice is there for them in any way? Either you are saved by the only salvation available... God's salvation. Or you are destroyed. The offer of salvation by God is blaring forth to YOU. Yet, like the examples of many of the people of the Old Testament, you seem to be denying it. Wake up and accept. Don't be like they were. Choose salvation.  Promotes salvation forgiveness you say:  Oh funny. The Bible is how many pages long? And you promote some little chart? Keep it up. There is no limit to the mercy and grace God will have for you if turn to be on His side. But He won't keep you from pushing yourself away from His mercy and grace forever. Can you refute anything that says there? Then that proves how shitty and evil God is. And it doesnt matter how big the bible is, it shouldnt have anything like that in it. Once again... and again... You cannot reason with faith. BADecker is no different than from the rest of the "faithful" in his denial of acknowledging any reason that may contradict that faith. Am I ever finding that out! Atheists are some of the most blind, stuck-in-the-mud faithful that I have ever seen. You still didnt refute anything, are you trying to ignore it? |
|
|
|
Matches for today
1st match
France U19 - Azerbaijan U19
Half Time/Full Time win by france
Odd:1.58
2nd match
Bahrain - Colombia
Colombia wins second half
Odd:1.67
3rd match
Fjolnir - Fram
Over 2.5 goals
Odd:1.40
4th match
Grotta - KR Reykjavik
Both teams score
Odd:1.55
Good luck
investors will get premium picks,contact me if you want to join the premium club !
I will try your picks for today see how it goes, 0.05 bet in total |
|
|
|
+1, the old testament could have promoted death instead of forgiveness... oh wait it does! And BADecker still believes in it. The personality of god as you say could also be drastically different between the books that shows the inconsistency in the writing...oh wait it does! And BADecker still believes in it.
Don't be like BADecker.
^The above could literally be in a commercial.
God entirely promotes salvation forgiveness in the Old Testament. The reason that it seems to be revoked in places, is that the people involved entirely deny the salvation forgiveness for themselves. What other choice is there for them in any way? Either you are saved by the only salvation available... God's salvation. Or you are destroyed. The offer of salvation by God is blaring forth to YOU. Yet, like the examples of many of the people of the Old Testament, you seem to be denying it. Wake up and accept. Don't be like they were. Choose salvation. Promotes salvation forgiveness you say: Oh funny. The Bible is how many pages long? And you promote some little chart? Keep it up. There is no limit to the mercy and grace God will have for you if turn to be on His side. But He won't keep you from pushing yourself away from His mercy and grace forever. Can you refute anything that says there? Then that proves how shitty and evil God is. And it doesnt matter how big the bible is, it shouldnt have anything like that in it. |
|
|
|
+1, the old testament could have promoted death instead of forgiveness... oh wait it does! And BADecker still believes in it. The personality of god as you say could also be drastically different between the books that shows the inconsistency in the writing...oh wait it does! And BADecker still believes in it.
Don't be like BADecker.
^The above could literally be in a commercial.
God entirely promotes salvation forgiveness in the Old Testament. The reason that it seems to be revoked in places, is that the people involved entirely deny the salvation forgiveness for themselves. What other choice is there for them in any way? Either you are saved by the only salvation available... God's salvation. Or you are destroyed. The offer of salvation by God is blaring forth to YOU. Yet, like the examples of many of the people of the Old Testament, you seem to be denying it. Wake up and accept. Don't be like they were. Choose salvation. Promotes salvation forgiveness you say: |
|
|
|
What about this:
The drastic alteration of God’s personality is the quintessential biblical contradiction. His attitude goes from that of a vocal, evil, and vengeful god in the Old Testament to a silent, benevolent, and forgiving god in the New Testament. It’s ridiculous to imagine a perfect, eternal being undergoing this 180-degree makeover at some arbitrary and unverifiable point long in the past. The real reason behind this change is the Bible’s allowance of representation by no less than two dozen authors living centuries apart. Since fallible authors void of divine inspiration should have variant perspectives on the nature of God, we should not be surprised when we encounter the anomalous behavior change between the two testaments. Still, this doesn’t explain why people were applying this new personality to the Hebrew god at the start of the Common Era.
The likely answer to this riddle may be related to the life cycle that all ancient religions have undergone. Belief systems must evolve with their followers or face extinction. Perhaps people grew tired of the threats made in the Pentateuch and felt there were no true rewards or consequences for their actions. Out of their desires for change, they may have created the Christian notion of Heaven. By this point, someone obviously grasped the notion that you could catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.
As I’ve said many times before, we have conflicting opinions on the omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence of God. Hosea would have us believe that God’s knowledge is limited: “They made princes: and I knew it not” (Hosea 8:4). Pentateuch author J would have us believe that God cannot be everywhere: “And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord” (Genesis 4:16). The author of Hebrews would have us believe that there are some things even God cannot do: “It was impossible for God to lie” (Hebrews 6:18). These passages fly in the face of everything that the Bible and contemporary Christians claim about God’s infinite qualities.
Similarly, an omnipotent creator would have unlimited power. However, consider this ages old question: “Can God make a burrito hot enough that he can’t eat it?” This might seem silly at first, but it demonstrates a fundamental flaw in the existence of an omnipotent being. If he can eat any burrito he makes, he can’t make one hot enough; thus, he’s not omnipotent. If he makes one too hot to eat, he can’t bear the product of his own creation; thus, he’s not omnipotent. As I hope you realize from this illustration, an omnipotent being cannot exist. There can be no power strong enough to make squared circles, duplicated unique items, or any other interesting paradoxes that you can imagine.
What about the human qualities of fury and fatigue? Can God experience these feelings? With the new biblical insight that you should have gained over the past few chapters, it should be immediately obvious that God has the capacity to become quite upset at times. Nahum provides us with a nice example: “God is jealous, and the Lord revengeth; the Lord revengeth, and is furious” (1:2). Even so, Isaiah unambiguously claims that God told him “fury is not in me” (27:4). If fury is not in him, how can he experience fury? Even though it may be superficially obvious that God wouldn’t experience fatigue, it wouldn’t be wise to jump to such a conclusion. According to Jeremiah, God says, “I am weary with repenting” (15:6). According to Isaiah, however, “The everlasting God, the Lord, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary” (40:28). Either God can experience fatigue or not. Either God can experience fury or not. Nahum, Isaiah, and Jeremiah simply presented their contrasting, divinely uninspired, human interpretations of their god. In the process, they inevitably end up contradicting one another.
How about those who call out to this mysterious being? Will he always save them? Most Christians believe that God will acknowledge these cries for salvation because most Christians only read the New Testament. After all, Paul proclaims, “whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved” (Romans 10:13). Contrast that statement with the one given by Micah: “Then shall they cry unto the Lord, but he will not hear them” (3:4). In other words, Paul claims that God will save anyone who calls out for the Lord. However, Micah provides a specific situation in which Paul’s unconditional statement wouldn’t apply. Sure, one can try to assert that Paul was referring to the time before judgment while Micah was referring to the time after judgment, but this doesn’t validate Paul’s statement. He plainly tells us that whosoever calls to God will be saved. If we only had Paul’s statement to go on, and we were given the scenario of people crying out to the Lord as described in Micah, we could only assume that God would save them. Such an assumption would be contradictory to what Micah claims. If Paul was simply being careless with his diction, consider what other important information he might have neglected to mention.
This is not a change in God or of God. This is God responding, the same as always, to the changes in people. What do you mean responding? Like he thought killing people was ok back then but now is not? |
|
|
|
Well betting 1 btc wont be a good strategy since you can encounter loses and lose all your bankroll unless you have a really big bankroll like 100 btc, the ideal would be to bet
1% of your bankroll to be safe and not die when a lose streak happens.
Wrong again. The best amount to bet as a % of your bankroll would be based on the Kelly Criterion - which is in turn based on how large your edge is. Man, with the amount of misinformation and foolishness around I should start a dice site - I see why Stunna keeps upgrading his service - he's raking it in. Wrong again in what, betting 1% of your bankroll is being safe, what is wrong about that |
|
|
|
I'm not sure if my theory is right but I believe you should eventually profit. If you bet at 50% you will have 49-100 to win. If you roll 100 times on average you should win more than 50%. Therefore if you bet 1BTC at 50% on 100 times, you should win 51 times and lose 49 times. Therefore it's a profit.
Well betting 1 btc wont be a good strategy since you can encounter loses and lose all your bankroll unless you have a really big bankroll like 100 btc, the ideal would be to bet 1% of your bankroll to be safe and not die when a lose streak happens. |
|
|
|
How do you intend to prove they do exist? 1) By giving the simplest explanation for observations in various cases discussed on AECES top 40 website. 5) I will see if you can adequately explain the actual observations that were recorded in Eisenbeiss on AECES top 40. I think this is the most powerful case, and your explanation for it is inadequate. You do not provide an adequate reason to reject the evidence, and so you do not disprove the conclusion (from parsimony) that the source was communicating factual information that had "survived" death. I see no basis for rejecting the evidence of Eisenbeiss and AECES top 40. You failed to plausibly explain ALL OF THAT, just like BADecker and the joint!! THERE IS NO EVIDENCE, just philosofical thoughts or whatever you want to call it but that is not evidence and some of it is like this: Ghosts exist but they are invisible to us, now reject that, ofc you cant reject that because disproving something is pretty much impossible but then again you miss the phisical evidence, not just thoughts and vague theories that are not scientific |
|
|
|
It is accepted by most here that a positive house edge will ultimately wipe out your deposit (rather sooner than later). But we could try to look at this issue from another angle. That is, whether the house is predetermined to lose in the long run if it had a negative house edge? As I see it, a positive house edge doesn't guarantee per se that a casino won't suffer heavy losses, but why should it necessarily suffer them if it had a small negative edge (to attract new users)? In other words, how long will it take till we see a casino claiming just that?
I've never seen a mention of the negative house edge here, so I decided to create a new topic on this issue (and added a poll)
According to what I learned, the users will lose in the end, assuming bankroll of player < house and there is a max bet limit. The player will go on playing till he lose everything. What if the player are just flat betting, say 1% of his bitcoin, over and over again? He will win 50.5% of the x2 bets and lose 49.5% only. While he may have bad luck to have more loses than wins in the short term, it is not easy for him to lose everything with flat betting. Yes thats exactly what i said its pretty much impossible to lose it on flat betting if you adjust your bankroll and after a few thousand bets the odds must equal to 49.5 and 50.5 |
|
|
|
|
The edge of tomorrow for me was in the top 5 best movies ive ever seen
|
|
|
|
If there was a 50.5% chance of winning a 2x, I promise you greed would still make many people lose more than win.
With only 1 smart person the casino would go broke since he can win indefinitely |
|
|
|
People get % from every loan thats how they profit from loans
Also mostly full members and higher rank get loans,other lower ranks never receive
Yes but the % is low, 5-15% and when someone fails to return the loan you lose 100% so i dont see how it is profitable yes but why would an sr.member risk his account for 0.10 btc or something like that because his account is much more worth,why should he get negative trust for such a small loan maybe if it was 1 btc or something then it would be ok But its not only if they plan to scam, maybe they just cant pay the loan back because they lost their money and they really cant pay it back. The thing is that you should always ask for collateral and escrow is the best and safest way |
|
|
|
Martingale is just one of many possible strategies of playing casino games. In casino games there is negative expected value, it means that any strategy eventually leads to loss. From this point martingale isn't better or worse that other strategies in general. And IMHO it's incorrect to blame martingale about losses.
Well you cant say that betting everything on 5% chance is a good strategy |
|
|
|
Sure, I will do that as soon as you acknowledge this FACT: Is life to be explained ONLY by its chemistry? The fact that inheritance
is particulate, linear and digital shows that life must be more than just
complicated chemistry. Alternatively, you may dispute this by providing YOUR interpretation of Yockey's information. Why are you bringing up the Bible? This thread is about science. But yet again you dont have any evidence of that. For example when scientists accepted evolution, they didnt accept it because someone said it, they accepted it because there is evidence like fosils and a lot of different methods of dating their age, DNA proofs. You dont have any of that just a quote from some guy who i really dont give a fuck about |
|
|
|
Hi XinXan, I edited that post a bit; I think you will find the proof in the book "HUMAN THE SCIENCE OF MAN" (I may have quoted it already) and also at the "AECES TOP 40" website.. SO I ASK THIS THREAD: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE TO TALK ABOUT GOD WHEN THERE IS PROOF OF THE AFTERLIFE RIGHT HERE AND NOBODY WANTS TO TALK ABOUT IT?!
Where is the proof of the afterlife that you are talking of? I could post hundreds if not thousands of articles and websites of science that explains how old is the earth, what is the evolution and how it works, how life "possibly" originated because science admits its mistakes but the religion people is always like " yeah god did it and i cant possibly be wrong" wich makes me really mad but then again why should i believe what 3 articles you quoted there instead of millions of scientists around the world? I say read it ALL and then you can judge in wisdom of knowledge. Don't let anger get in the way because God is NOT ANGRY, HE IS NOT JEALOUS EITHER. Why dont you read this instead http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/index2.htmlAnd judge by yourself |
|
|
|
Hi XinXan, I edited that post a bit; I think you will find the proof in the book "HUMAN THE SCIENCE OF MAN" (I may have quoted it already) and also at the "AECES TOP 40" website.. SO I ASK THIS THREAD: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE TO TALK ABOUT GOD WHEN THERE IS PROOF OF THE AFTERLIFE RIGHT HERE AND NOBODY WANTS TO TALK ABOUT IT?!
Where is the proof of the afterlife that you are talking of? I could post hundreds if not thousands of articles and websites of science that explains how old is the earth, what is the evolution and how it works, how life "possibly" originated because science admits its mistakes but the religion people is always like " yeah god did it and i cant possibly be wrong" wich makes me really mad but then again why should i believe what 3 articles you quoted there instead of millions of scientists around the world? |
|
|
|
It's far more reasonable and interesting seeing your arguments than that of BADecker's array of incorrect, inaccurate, and mostly plain false "information".
I am trying to go beyond what the joint and Herbert Spencer are saying: If I succeed in proving the afterlife while failing to prove God, it is fine with me; at least the truth is known! I am happy to agree with you that God exists within. I think that is where the "proof" of God will come from: within you! debating whether God exists in an empirical context is a flawed approach. It is a flawed approach because God has no limitations. God's WORD is very real and I suspect that is a better topic for debate/discussion. IS HATONN REAL?
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE IF THAT WHICH I OFFER IS VALID TRUTH? Sir, where is the reply to the scientific evidence I have posted in this thread?
SO I ASK THIS THREAD: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE TO TALK ABOUT GOD WHEN THERE IS PROOF OF THE AFTERLIFE RIGHT HERE AND NOBODY WANTS TO TALK ABOUT IT?! Where is the proof of the afterlife that you are talking of? |
|
|
|
I think he doesnt know because sometimes he mentions the bible but when someone destroys the bible with facts and proofs he says that the bible has nothing to do with god so i dont know. Sir, what about the evidence I have posted in this thread? Don't you think that skeptics should read it? The Phoenix Journals gift you with facts and proofs of God; in my opinion, the Journals contain the best explanation of the Bible; the emphasis is on personal responsibility, and it is important to realize that God is not JEALOUS and is not wrathful. That is the only suggestion that I have for my brother BADecker. There is no evidence of god, im sorry but there is no evidence of god at all, Then how can you explain this? Is life to be explained ONLY by its chemistry? The fact that inheritance
is particulate, linear and digital shows that life must be more than just
complicated chemistry. why do you think we dont study about god in history class? I don't know. I certainly did not learn the above quoted information in my science class! "Must be" what if its not. What you said there doesnt show anything, the fact is that we dont know exactly how life originated and you didnt explain it either so as i said before, no evidence of god |
|
|
|
hi i am looking for a small btc loan for 2 days Loan Amount: 0.01 - 0.025 Collateral: none (my btctalk account?) Length: 2 days Interest: 5 - 10% btc address: 18uS7oAVPW7Lq83hoBne1gYao1isvyawsG if anyone can help id really appreciate it  I can do it! Amount :0.025 BTC,interest :10%, can u confirm to me?
confirmed i will pay you 0.0275 on friday not a problem, thanks pm me if you want my btctalk account as collateral Not require collateral! I trust you! https://blockchain.info/zh-cn/tx/a9fa9a0c71a5c190820f7568aee318b25ae07b84d39233d74f0885c1865fca0bReturn address is:1PvdjK1qcmhZyRkwgmUtsm9vYMiQ3XEMf7 Please repay this Friday! Thanks.
untrustworthy guy! Not happy to deal
with!amount: 0.02 btc
interest: 15% first day and 5% per day no more than 7 days after that
collaterol: none
my btc address: 18uS7oAVPW7Lq83hoBne1gYao1isvyawsG
Are you the loaner?? And why are you posting this now, the loan repayment was 2 days presumably and it has been a month and something |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
