Well we would lose those institutional investors we wanted to get in for so long. At your scenario there wouldn't be instant ban, as laws don't move as quickly we would have some time to prepare. But that prepariing would most likely be massive panic and people would try to escape out before fiat pairs would be banned.

This would lead to lack of liquidity and total price crash. Most likely lots of people would even short it with leverage. I could see we might go back to 2013-2014 prices. As that what was happening before legit investors came. There were few big whales but it was a joke compared to current markets.

In the end we would be coming back to roots. People trading p2p, hard to say how many people would do that but it would be way harder and charts wouldn't really exist as they are now.
Some people would keep trading altcoin pairs (not stable coins tho). This would totally be a nerd and geek game after that. Some might think it would be a step up.

I am assuming you are younger. So why why not get involved in politics? You really can't complain of wrong people doing wrong politics if you are not doing anything. You can obviously vote for younger candinates, but you also can be a candinate. Politics only change by people changing it. If young people won't vote, there will be most likely old people in charge. As old people might not trust young and inexperienced politicians.

They are dealing with some serious capital. I mean there are people winning millions and it doesn't even scratch them.
To get some idea how much money flows trough them, you can watch live bets people are making in casinos and sports in front page of stake.com for example
You can see that people are playing tens of thousands in a second and that's just in the casino side. There are plenty more bets made in sports section.

They have a house edge, so from pure mathematical probability.

If you get scammed, there are several ways to do it, but if you suspect foul play, don't deposit or connect your wallet into it.
You can tell that casino is safe when it has a long history and strong community behind it. Preferably they are also talking in open forum.

I am with you on this, bonuses are what they say they are, they shouldn't be goals, just nice bonuses you can get when you play enough. Most of the bonuses i got i was surprised to get them. And i got them to the top of winning strike too. I find that trying to gamble because of the bonus is just an excuse i tell myself to gamble when i am losing. Fighting against that urge when you don't want to gamble is part of the game, and can feel pretty good when you have control over yourself.

Article doesn't name one skill based slot so i am not aware of any of those. Can we try those out in any crypto casinos and could someone name one of the slots or slot provider that makes those?
But i remain skeptical. As you couldn't beat the house, otherwise they wouldn't be builded. That means that even with best outcome you would probably make less winnings then with some of the other slots out there. Those could be fun though.

In Finland we actually had physical slot machines in 80s that could be beaten by real skill, they were called payazzos. They were very difficult to beat but not impossible and technically you could have build a device that helps you but you couldn't use them without anyone noticing.

Well that seemed to have very small effect but didn't hurt the small bullrun to current value at all. Imho they timed it just perfectly. I hope that it will play out as well during next 3 patches.
I wonder if they are looking at the charts to decide when to sell or do they bother to do that. I am not even sure it would be lawful for them to do that as any kind of tactical manoeuvres could be counted as market manipulation from their part.



I guess that would have twice the effect if bitcoin would be twice as valuable.

I would rather go and buy land and estate. Land is going to be scarcer as population grows and it's needed for every sector of life. It might not bring anything to me in my life time but it also could be worth more eventually.

That is if i want to invest safely, which i don't do in real life. In real life i don't trust just one asset. I buy and sell low caps as i don't have enough capital for huge purchases. Those have been very profitable to me. It's kind of like gambling as in small bets i can get huge rewards, but unlike in gambling i can sometimes be part of the team and work in grass root level.

Off topic? Oh critizing your sources by saying that *insert any country* has pro russian news sites that have their own small following. How convenient that it's off topic to you. Like posting fake news from fringe Georgian news sites isn't that?

And just by inserting word NATO in your fake news doesn't make it linked to NATO.
But i guess it's all natos and nazis in your book. No proof needed. So in your case you are either to being lied to or you are lying yourself, i would go for latter as you are playing for Putin here.

Well it's better then GTA4. When i timed my bird movements just correctly i found the secret level where i could talk with the founder and got in to play the real game.
But don't think my computer can run it correctly, i get weird these weird glitches when ever gods are speaking to me.
Physics engine really kicks ass on the city mission where the tsunami hits to white house, and AI was acting so human like it freaked me out a little bit when it knew what i was thinking but in overall it was greatest experience of gaming history i ever had. I am not going to post screehots as that was permitted but what a ride!!
I can't wait to talk with people who found it.

I wonder what's their stance is going to be against mining as that's an essential part of some crypto infrastructure. Or are they just now fully embracing and regulating any other then POW based cryptos?
I could definitely see them fighting against any permissionless systems and use environmental argument to drive POW away. Later on they can move to other arguments where they regulate away any unwanted people (criminals, opposition, etc)

If you had use a minute to think about it you would know i would speak about Finnish perspective. But it's quite telling that you rather focus on irrelevant stuff when you know you would fail miserably defending your position otherwise.

Oh yeah, we have pro russian "news sites" too, but we also have enough education to tell the difference between trustworthy sites and utter garbage.
But if i print a pro putin zine with a vague article about secret moon trans nazis, you would use it as a source, wouldn't you.

Funny enough pronews has same exact % of weekly usage that pro russia fake news site has in finland
https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/digital-news-report-2018.pdf

I see some of these things as profitable investments as well, buying good shoes is just benefiting someone's health and so he/she can work more efficiently. And when they are good enough, they can be repaired and by doing that the, this person saves money. Investment doesn't need to pay back directly, we also need people to be able to enjoy enough to be able to work.

Depends. It wasn't a good idea to buy estate from invaded areas of Ukraine for example. precious metals you have to store in somewhere and be sure that place is guarded well enough.

I would say this is just simplifying things. Investing in general is wise, but that doesn't mean every method of investing suits everyone.

This is why we invest literally in anything. But we shouldn't be only focusing on investing in monetary value. Investing life worth living is valuable as well.

I wouldn't borrow money for investing in something as volatile as Bitcoin, no. I would use my own money and not be greedy wanting more then i can afford.

So is Trump complaining that Biden didn't put make new regulations fast enough after Trump removed them? I mean trump removed those safeguards that oversee banks exactly for preventing something like this. It's faster to get rid of regulations then make new ones that are airtight. And Trump did ton of rollbacks affecting all areas from life to tech and nature.

Even a toaster would have done less damage to US and world as a president.

It's could be kind of cute how you guys believe anything pro-putler in the internet. No proof needed because when it supports your agenda and any shady website or rumor will do. And just because some part of the news is true, most of it doesn't have to be.

Or could it be that you are not believing that either and this is just part of that transparent Russian misinformation campaign to muddle reality so that people wouldn't trust any source.
I understand that tactic as it's designed to hurt democracies but dictatorships like Putler's Russia are resistant to it as they don't really do well with real information anyway.

Now i say it could be cute how gullible some people are believing Kremlin propaganda but but guess why these people are hated by everyone?
After all they themselves might not understand why people get heated over this, they see themselves as outsider as they are not being affected, but that's understandable when one lacks empathy.
But while they are knowingly spreading Russian misinformation they are directly part of Kremlin organized disinformation warfare therefore responsible of the atrocities that Russian armed forces are doing.

Next what's going to happen is that Russian economy is going to crumble (Even Putin knows it) and after Russian dictatorship will fall, their murderers and rapists will face justice. I only wish that some of these Russian trolls could be charged as well as when they are citizens of other countries, what they are doing now is a borderline treason.

And meanwhile Finland is just joining NATO. All thanks to Putin as before all this we were never wanted to.

Why would they risk doing that when they can rely on pure math giving them profits in the long run? I mean i understand that people want more proof especially when it looks like game could cheat them, but by doing so they would be risking their whole legitimacy, and it's not like they haven't been building that trust for a long time.

If they would be cheating all it would take is one person who could spill the beans and take the whole operation down that they have been building for so long. And its not like that person would need to do that for free. I am assuming that there's ton of competition that would pay millions just for anonymous leak of proof.

And that said, i don't believe they are cheating but i admit that there could be always more transparency and proof for customers.

Well good luck with that approach. I am dca:ing in all the time. I think that after airdropped tokens sell pressure is off this token is going to fight from some serious marketcap top places. I am thinking 10x minimum. Like absolute minimum and i am not even selling then. I am also considering leverage trading this. This is like the first token in a long time i actually like and believe in. And i feel i am now junxing it by talking about it .

Well i might join on that prediction as that definitely looks like a bull flag. But it's hard to say if it's going to retrace after hitting your target. (i am thinking of elliot wave as that wiould be the 3rd rise). But in overall that it would be obviously bound to rise again higher later this year.

Do you have any technical analysis behind this or is it just a feeling?

Topic of OP makes it sound like these women wouldn't be crypto traders. That only men are crypto traders. I know that it might not be intented so but wording is weird.
I seriously wonder why people think that this is "manliest" game of all. I know several women that are investing and trading that are actually doing better than me

And like the data shows there are ton of women players in this game


This might have started as a male game but it's totally not that anymore. And unless you think they are kids you can call them women vs men.
Also it would be nice to have data about actual research about this rather then news of hear say from the net

It's definitely just a marketing tactic. Most of those projects are not going to deliver anything even mediocre if anything. They drive on buzz words and promises and eventually blame others for not adopting their tech that isn't wanted or needed anyway. New people don't remember but we already have seen this hype years ago in crypto. None of those projects that were working on AI didn't provide anything, or anything interesting. And i am not saying there wouldn't be people working hard to build some cutting edge AI, but i am saying it's unlikely it will have anything to do with crypto.