Sam Altman either specifically mean Chat GPT with that "technology" and not AI in general, or he is so out of touch what sort of jobs people are going. Because AI will revolutionize everything in a way we don't even grasp yet. In good and bad, but i am afraid that if it won't be regulated, the impact will affect so fast that we don't know what hit us and we have to fix our society suitable for GPT and AI afterwards.

Because, sure, this tech "will solve things we never even knew about", but it most likely creates ton of new problems we haven't foreseen yet. Do we trust black box AI to solve those issues as well? If people think that internet polarizing people and everyone living bubbles was hard to see beforehand. It will be peanuts to what blind trust to AI with closed source does.

If you want to give yourself something to think about, read "The Loop: How Technology Is Creating a World Without Choices and How to Fight Back" by Jacob Ward
It was written before chatgpt was a thing and it mostly talks about algorithms and how they make choices for us. Title is little bit preachy and biased but in overall that was most interesting book i read last year.

I am not certain that i understand you. You don't wan't to invest into altcoins because they are volatile? For most of us that's the main reason we are buying them. If you want something to moon hard it needs to be very volatile. If you are looking for something more stable you should play at traditional markets and be happy with 5% -5% movements.

At the moment i am out of all crypto and waiting for my the entry point for high leverage trade.

Are you seriously claiming that people who earn most, are most knowledgeable persons? That's just not true, and what are you basing your maths on?

I mean it's smart to read a lot but knowledge doesn't guarantee you success, nor your iq. Being smart and fast learner can land you basically any job you want.
But if you are from wrong economic background, you have a trauma, mental health issues, you are on the spectrum or anything really.
The fact that you are smart and knowledgeable can just compensate for that you can keep your head on the surface and not drown.

Also you can be stupid and still end up insanely rich. Let's say that you inherit millions, bet them on the market, surround yourself with people who are useful to you. That can take you very far
If you are lucky, you can end up being the richest man in the world just because your insticts were right.

Also being ruthless liar with moral ambiguity is a recipe for success. And if you are a psychopath it will most likely will be good for your career.

Dude you just literally said this.

It's directly from Kremlin book of propaganda and you are not even trying to hide it. How was that fair and balanced view of anything?

That quoted part wasn't even critique against US, you made it up. US didn't create the Russian invasion. Russia attacked to Ukraine so get your facts straight. US just understands that if they would not help us now this humanitarian catastrophe might escalate to WW3. Because if Russia succesfully conquered Ukraine, they are not stopping there. We who live closer to this situation and have our own history with Russia, we know how they operate. So maybe we understand the bigger picture and stakes in this little better.

Mainly they oppose disruptive tech because it could disrupted the government itself. And frankly it could. No one knows the future of new tech when it comes. I would be more afraid of GTP AI then cryptos though. As we can roughly predict what cryptos could bring for us, but no one can see full picture of AI generated content. We could lose real, trusted, verifiable information for example

Many accountants sticked to pen and paper for a long time, and many people opposed the internet when it came, it wasn't just governments, but people themselves. Computers were clumsy, and no one really could have predicted where they were going at the time.

When you say that "The world was enjoying the benefits of Internet from 1985", it wasn't even near the internet we know of. And public wasn't using it. I started to use internet in university in 1995 in Finland. And even then it was mostly ftp and irc for me. http wasn't really useful for anything else then homepages for a long time and homepages were a wild west. Just finding anything remotely true was a shot in the dark. So i don't think you were too much behind on that.

Same thing goes with cryptos. Even now people aren't really "using" cryptos for anything as tech isn't ready. They just send it back and worth and swap it. There are no big scale innovations build on top of blockchains. And when people are interested from things like nfts, it's only the speculative value that matters to them. So you are early on cryptos too. This is the altavista phase or earlier if we compare cryptos to internet history.

If crypto is an option i would see that there's no bonus big enough worth using credit card instead of cryto. And that sounds so shady luring in high credit score card holders. Is this really your irl friend and can you confirm the story? Or is he a friend made with crypto who wants to boast about their winnings? Because there are ton of those people and you shouldn't take those seriously.

Disadvantages are obvious and i am not sure why you even ask if giving a credit card to random casino is a good idea. But if it's a casino you 100% trust, then you need weigh how much you want that bonus and what are the requirements to get it.

What do you consider medium cap then? at the moment Pepe has $563M marketcap, Which is more then fair retrace for going immediately to $1.6 Billion dollar marketcap.

I mean don't get me wrong, you might be right and it's now time for high and mid caps, but that's usually because when newbs want to enter they pick what they first see, and they pick from the top of the marketcap because they think they are ranked being best or something weird. They don't get what marketcaps are, and they will pick coins that have low $ value per coin, even though that doesn't make any sense, they tend to do that.

And since they pick on those conditions. Pepe would fit in perfectly, it's been on news and everyone knows about it. And now they think it's cheap too.

You say it has less fees than uniswap? How does it have less when uniswap also offers Arbitrum to use? And can you explain the passive income thing. That's the only thing that sounds semi-interesting in here but i remain skeptical on that as someone gets to pay that income. So either fees are close to zero and you get no significant dividends or fees are high, which you said it won't be. So how does that work?

I must be doing something wrong, i tried to register and right after i give name and address it asks for the bonus code. When i try to give it it says "no _user_id supplied" and gets jammed. I cant exit by clicking the x on the top right. It's not sending me any confirmation email so i am not registered yet and it seems i can't do anything at all.

Why tesla though? Chart doesn't look that promising so i am not seeing anything from the point of technical analysis that would.

Google on the other hand seems to recover strongly and i has a change for a very bullish year coming but that montly candle seems too strong at this point. I would wait for retrace before entering.

For fundamental side of TSLA, for any bigger investors this is a truly high risk bet, as when CEO is unhinged and pretty much destroys his PR in his free time, that naturally affects to company PR. I would avoid that. And looking at the charts, investors avoid it as well as while it's not in a free fall it needs ton of confidence to start the recovery.

Exactly. Your changes are better when the token or coin is new and no one is yet talking about it. I'll look at fundamentals and tokenomics, but most overlooked thing is, is it going to be memeable? Is it something that moves masses and maybe it has a logo that might as well be a tattoo as it's so cool. That has always been a winning combination for me.

If it's outside of real world markets, like not real estate etc. further from it the better. Rebellious people of the web and young people are not so interested in traditional markets. Leave that to suits, this is crypto. Traditional is boring. Buy a token that basically has no marketcap and a funny name. Or picture of diamond eyed wasted duck and flp it with $10k-$100k and we are talking. That keeps people talking.

Plus side is of it is that it annoys the hell out of old traditional investors that someone is making millions with things that they are never going to grasp. At some point they try to copy the idea but fail as unoriginal hacks.

Well to some of us big wins isn't the only reason for gambling. Point is to spend time and winning can make it more fun past time.
I know that might sound unreasonable but big wins aren't always a good thing. It might sound like the goal of the whole casino but those big wins are what get people with addictive personalities addicted. Brain is funny that way it remembers big wins better more clearly then hundreds tiny losses. This is where we lose track and wonder how we end up losing.

For example, i am not playing my winnings. My budget is tiny but it keeps my gambling habit fun and i can continue to gamble weekly without getting broke, i am using only half of the money i used to buy tobacco each week. Now that i quit smoking, i count gambling as better addiction. When i decided this i understood that addiction isn't always a bad thing. I for example am not denying my addiction, but i am easily addicted to anything fun. Gaming, social media, tik tok videos, walking in a forest. But i keep unhealthy addictions in check with set of personal rules i don't break.

So i don't need to quit gambling. Not quitting after winning big might not make sense to people who are trying to get rich with it. But it's comparable to my gaming habits.

I hear you, i do combo bets all the time and i even tried to reduce the amount since it failed always towards the end of the list. If you are anxiously waiting and watching live, the dissapointment is even more crushing.

Now i am thinking that if i am not at all sure about the outcome, i just leave those bets out and keep it in 3-5 combo bets. That's not going to bring me millions but maybe after a while it adds up. I save the bets not taken and put those to slots machines. So maybe i'll get lucky there

Obviously not. Their whole name is a synonym of everything that failed in last bubble. Even nocoiners know the name FTX. They might not know what really happened but since everyone is blaming FTX the whole brand is tainted to the point of no recovery. I think that people reviving this smell the money as FTX has infra in place to make money so people believing in this might get themselves some big play money and important titles easier then by starting a new exchange, which they would do if they were serious.

I don't get this argument. Some Nfts are still doing fine, i would say better then most memem coins. Obviously there are ton of rug pulls and projects that are not taking off as market is overly saturated by garbage, but there are few good ones still.

They aren't as liquid as meme tokens but if you buy nfts i don't think instant liquidation is something you are looking for. But i have personally flipped some garbage nfts as well with pretty good profit. I have also aped in into some rug pulls. but that comes with the territory.

That doesn't make much sense, it's not "easier" if you don't know markets are going down. Bull market could com in the middle of your shorting so "easier" is not the word in here any more then if you claim it's easy to predict market direction. Obviously you can say it would be easy to make million dollars if you bought in crypto in 2012 but you would be wrong. It's easy only in hindsight.

I understand their argument but those aren't really "gamblers" in traditional sense. If they are occasionally throwing a buck in a slot machine or what ever, they are just normal people having fun and they can't believe their luck if they win. It's their right to quit while up and hats of to them keeping it fun. But i don't get that how big they need to win in order to completely leave? Because i haven't won life changing amounts but i have won big. If i would left right after i won first time, it would have been 20 bucks or something. Is that really worth leaving?. I wonder what they see as a limit for quitting.

I really don't understand why people have taken these rumors seriously. Even Forbes india publihed an article where they stated that GTA6 is reportedly including cryptocurrency rewards.

But no one from rockstar has said anything even close to crypto being implemented in any form. Even mobile developers are struggling with the concept of pay tp play as it's just not sustainable nor it makes any sense.
I would see that in the future some people get paid to do chores in games, but those are paid by other players. Similar to people selling accounts that are grinded to high levels.

You might not ever get users no matter the tactic, and most likely if you are paying with that promotion campaign with your own tokens, those are just going to be a sell pressure now or later. Those people will not be your customers, they are advertising because you pay them, and in twitter it's most likely that their followers are just other spamming bounty hunter accounts.

People spamming in telegram is a sure way for me not to buy that something because that type of advertisement is borderline harassing.

What comes to your token, i could see myself buying it if it was trading in L2 like arbitrum or polygon. I am not fan of the eth fees.

This is weird claim. How would they know about it and how would that be against terms of service?

I see no reason to use AI either but people have been using scripts for crash-type games since forever. And at least one casino has their own window to write that script. It doesn't help because there are no algorithms that could beat casino's edge. But people still keep trying. I guess fot that same reason they would try AI as well. Casinos would know that it doesn't help so they wouldn't or couldn't ban it.