|
The more trades you publicize, the bigger target you become. I wouldn't mind this but it would generally not show the whole picture.
|
|
|
|
That video is probably a parody about leftists and libturds. Why single out some random guy when whole Bitcointalk is full of libturds, leftists, anarchists, capitalists, communists and lemmings?
Ironically, I am completely against libtards and most policies made by liberals. It's simply cancerous to the world. |
|
|
|
I post here links trying to show that the attitude was not toward copy & pasting and plagiarism. I found about 56 links from posts with quotations. I will posts first 10 most recent ones and all of the links
-snip-
What exactly are you trying to say here? That if you don't do it all the time, then it is okay? No. |
|
|
|
|
I believe it falls under acceptable behavior as long as it doesn't break the > 1 bump per 24 hour rule. I'd actually encourage automating bumping where possible.
|
|
|
|
I simply never understood why all of you fight one another. That's the politics/power-part that I hate most about the current DT-system. On the one hand it means DT doesn't just accept things from other DTs, on the other hand it now means some of the biggest names on the forum are fighting each other. I do believe the forum and Bitcoin ecosystem would be better off following theymos' advice: All that being said, I still discourage retaliatory ratings, and with these changes I encourage people to try to "bury the hatchet" and de-escalate rather than trying to use any increased retaliatory power you now have. - You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again. Last time I checked we don't live in an Utopia, do we? From what I've seen, most of the time when such advice was followed around here it turned out to be mistake. Although this mostly has applied to randoms and people that are very-shady like Quickscammer. |
|
|
|
I have posted an encrypted message below that I am calling a signed message that will entirely absolve me from any wrongdoing in making this thread, and if you disagree, you are a scammer, and want to help scammers.
This does not work if one is already a scammer such as yourself.  |
|
|
|
It's about being right or wrong... Don't be a pussy your trust is outstanding. Stand up for whats right. would you trust Ognasty with a $ knowing he has a great full history of trades or would you trust Lauda with your $ knowing she has never made a trade deal in her entire history with BCT? Lauda has a higher Rating than Ognasty LOL
Lauda has never done a deal via Bitcointalk?  Lauda offers escrow services among other things.  Perhaps you should do a bit more research before typing nonsense. You do realize that P2P trades aren't the only economic activity going on within this forum. Correct? Which is absolute nonsense; yet more lies being spread by a random alt and then they complain that they get tagged for untrustworthy behavior. Their lack of knowledge is why they are unable to do trades without damaging their own privacy. I simply never understood why all of you fight one another.
I excluded almost everyone from my list due to being attacked for jacking my score up and have been off DT1 list for a while.
I don't like getting dragged into these arguements.
-snip-
This is actually what I've observed with quite a few people. The rational decision solely for the individual is to not do anything, i.e. it's not worth getting involved for them. I wouldn't either; being out of DT is simpler/easier/better if one already isn't tagging abusers anyways IMO. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Why is the DT list made up of almost NO ONE who has traded a single $ on BCT?
The DT was implemented for trade reasons right?
What is this nonsense? Most of the new DT1 members (at least from the collectibles section) have traded goods worth very large amounts of BTC. You may be talking about DT members from local sections; but that was the goal if I understood my master correctly. |
|
|
|
|
Multiple IRC ops have not seen him for many years, and based on what they've told me I don't see why he would come back at all. One of the OPs confirmed that losing all BTC and PGP keys does not sound like something that BTC_Bear would allow to happen; he has not heard from him for about 5 years.
Update: I did not mean to delete this post.
|
|
|
|
For protection, I can't leave names of those I disagree with before I end up on their blacklist.
This kind of behaviour is something we need to fight in here: you disagree with someone, it is your right to do so, you shoudnt be afraid to publicly expose your thoughts because you would get on a "blacklist". This has nothing to do with trust/distrust, this is your freedom to speech, stand up for it. I don't know what the context of a "blacklist" here is. Trust list exclusions? If so, then that is just backwards. People should be willing to accept exclusions as it is every user's right to exclude someone else i.e. they should not be afraid of getting excluded. Besides, it's not that uncommon for exclusions to be lifted. |
|
|
|
taikuri13
WhiteManWhite
What are these people doing in DT1? Looks like the ruskis have succesfully colluded their way into DT1. I have been working with Taikuri13 for quite some time. If you look at some of his posts and my posts you will see that he has done translations for me regarding some of the historic topics and scam warnings. He has helped me a lot behind the scenes and is a highly merited user on the Russian forum. I don't see any collusion there. I think Lauda has paranoia. If she had suspicions without evidence, then the user will be painted. I would not be surprised if she painted me red. I want to add this here))) IIRC you've been excluded by me for quite some time now, so the posts that you are quoting have nothing to do with this. My full list is public (despite the existence of those tools). |
|
|
|
I understand that trust is not moderated, but we have someone who has altered forum's html code.
You just alter what you view in your browser i.e. this was done client side. It isn't a big deal as you can do it on any site, but it really depends on why you did it. It is an extreme violation to falsify such information, at least in my eyes, regardless of the means and should be dealt with accordingly.
As I've said, sadly this isn't a bannable offense. |
|
|
|
I'm also wondering if this type of obvious framing is ban worthy?
If I understand correctly it's refers to a trust and not regulated by administration ( forum rule #19). It's not a bannable offense, sadly. The forum would be much cleaner if they banned others for stuff like this as confirming the authenticity of a PM like that by a moderator is relatively trivial (the accusing side just has to report it to staff). |
|
|
|
|
I'll begin:
I hate Lauda. Do we really want Lauda in DT?
|
|
|
|
yet still think I’m in a childish fight? I’m trying to stop others from being bullied the way you are being bullied right now by Lauda. I don’t think that’s childish.
Your intentions might or might not be legit and my opinion might or might not be in agreement with you and/or with Lauda, this is something we have discussed in PM many times and my opinion is clearly stated on both my left feedbacks and my trust list. What I'm trying to say here is that both of you, as opinion leaders of this forum, are literaly (without awareness) inducing dozens of respective followers/haters to literaly spam the boards with a continuous annoying "Lauda-vs-OG" threads creation that is of zero contribution to the forum IMO. This is what I meant by "motel room". It takes both sides to completely drop the dispute. I have long been willing to permanently ignore him, but he is way too stubborn to let go of anything. Look at this thread i.e.: completely hijacked (and this is a pita because I would have seriously spent my time contributing to OP initiative instead to have to put this post to ignore list)
|
|
|
|
Your continued actions are the best evidence for theymos to get involved. What Lauda is doing to rmcdermott927 and now me should not be allowed.
What I am doing, i.e. rewriting old ratings to improve them is absolutely allowed and by the guidelines. If it it wasn't I would expect someone to contact me already OR introduce the edit feature - neither of which has happened; besides counters are appropriate anyways. rmcdermott927 continues proving that he is shady/untrustworthy as long as he keeps lying. It is simple really. You can keep screaming at everyone, at theymos at me; theymos can blacklist me, can blacklist everyone that doesn't trust you, but the fact is that rmcdermott927 will remain a liar. You copy/pasted your trust on rmcdermott927. You didn’t rewrite anything. You are the liar, not rmcdermott927. Anyone who reads your statement and looks at my post can’t see that. -snip- Read the last sentence again. Do it several times as you clearly need it. I will probably redo it to fit the new limitations and I don't like the insults in it either. |
|
|
|
So you only removed Gunthar temporarily to see if you could bully him into removing me?
I am sure my old partner will notice changes in my trust list in about a week or two. Why are others who have joined into your exclude OgNasty campaign trying to silence those speaking out against your DT abuse?
There is no such thing; people just do not trust your judgement. It's simple really. Your continued actions are the best evidence for theymos to get involved. What Lauda is doing to rmcdermott927 and now me should not be allowed.
What I am doing, i.e. rewriting old ratings to improve them is absolutely allowed and by the guidelines. If it it wasn't I would expect someone to contact me already OR introduce the edit feature - neither of which has happened; besides counters are appropriate anyways. rmcdermott927 continues proving that he is shady/untrustworthy as long as he keeps lying. It is simple really. You can keep screaming at theymos, at me, at everyone; theymos can blacklist me, and everyone that doesn't trust you, but the fact is that rmcdermott927 will remain a liar. I believe this is an education problem where some people think that if you have 2 and take the same 2 and move it around a bit, that it equals 4.
Can we move the childish mudslinging to the Reputation board? It's getting kind of annoying seeing it in every Meta topic. Remind me again who starts this in almost every thread in Meta and why they don't get banned for off-topic posting? Re-applying this: Mods will not do anything. |
|
|
|
Well, I see Lauda removed you from his trust network because you added me back on. I never removed you, even when I was removed from your list. That tells you a lot right there. Do what Lauda says or face punishment. You have experienced this first hand, yet still think I’m in a childish fight? I’m trying to stop others from being bullied the way you are being bullied right now by Lauda. I don’t think that’s childish. They’re trying to spin it that way, but the evidence is mounting...
Nobody is removed from anything until they are removed from here, so what you claim is a lie. My personal trust list changes are all temporary. I wonder who and why is tracking my trust list in real time? |
|
|
|
-snip-
Lauda is clearly abusing the system to attack anyone who exposes his constant involvement in scams. Something tells me this isn’t what theymos had in mind.
#BlacklistTheCat because thermos didn't include an edit future. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
