DefaultTrust changes

[OgNasty]

Ahem.....I gave my stance already in this post:

1.- i am not Lauda proxy and still I am in Lauda list. I dont change my opinion on you or others based on Lauda opinion: this is your assumption and I invite you to honestly review the way you think about it. Read my trust list and read Lauda list, you will find people in my trust list (like OG) that are excluded in Lauda list. You will find people excluded in my trust list that are excluded in Lauda list (like QS). Both examples above come from my personal interaction with mentioned users and I (as I'm sure 100% of DT members do) compile this list based on our personal opinions, thoughts and experience. I have Lauda on my list because I'm 100% sure if I let him handle my personal money, It would be cared like it was myself doing it. I have OG in my list because I am 100% sure I can do the same with him, based on my past and present interaction with him. Still Lauda tildes OG and viceversa.

Their childish fight instead is something annoying to me, they should take that in a motel room not on the forum.

Well, I see Lauda removed you from his trust network because you added me back on. I never removed you, even when I was removed from your list. That tells you a lot right there. Do what Lauda says or face punishment. You have experienced this first hand, yet still think I’m in a childish fight? I’m trying to stop others from being bullied the way you are being bullied right now by Lauda. I don’t think that’s childish. They’re trying to spin it that way, but the evidence is mounting...

[1714171267]

1714171267

[1714171267]

1714171267

[1714171267]

1714171267

[1714171267]

1714171267

[1714171267]

1714171267

[Lauda]

Well, I see Lauda removed you from his trust network because you added me back on. I never removed you, even when I was removed from your list. That tells you a lot right there. Do what Lauda says or face punishment. You have experienced this first hand, yet still think I’m in a childish fight? I’m trying to stop others from being bullied the way you are being bullied right now by Lauda. I don’t think that’s childish. They’re trying to spin it that way, but the evidence is mounting...

Nobody is removed from anything until they are removed from here, so what you claim is a lie. My personal trust list changes are all temporary. I wonder who and why is tracking my trust list in real time?

[TheNewAnon135246]

Can we move the childish mudslinging to the Reputation board? It's getting kind of annoying seeing it in every Meta topic.

[OgNasty]

Well, I see Lauda removed you from his trust network because you added me back on. I never removed you, even when I was removed from your list. That tells you a lot right there. Do what Lauda says or face punishment. You have experienced this first hand, yet still think I’m in a childish fight? I’m trying to stop others from being bullied the way you are being bullied right now by Lauda. I don’t think that’s childish. They’re trying to spin it that way, but the evidence is mounting...

Nobody is removed from anything until they are removed from here, so what you claim is a lie. My personal trust list changes are all temporary. I wonder who and why is tracking my trust list in real time?

No, the list is here not what you post on a thread that you want people to see. So you only removed Gunthar temporarily to see if you could bully him into removing me? Why are you worried that your trust manipulation is being pointed out? Why are others who have joined into your exclude OgNasty campaign trying to silence those speaking out against your DT abuse? Your continued actions are the best evidence for theymos to get involved. What Lauda is doing to rmcdermott927 and now me should not be allowed. I’m confident theymos sees this, and hope the community can act appropriately so that we can continue with this new trust system. Otherwise, I think theymos will have to step in and start blacklisting people, starting with Lauda.

[Lauda]

So you only removed Gunthar temporarily to see if you could bully him into removing me?

I am sure my old partner will notice changes in my trust list in about a week or two.

Why are others who have joined into your exclude OgNasty campaign trying to silence those speaking out against your DT abuse?

There is no such thing; people just do not trust your judgement. It's simple really.

Your continued actions are the best evidence for theymos to get involved. What Lauda is doing to rmcdermott927 and now me should not be allowed.

What I am doing, i.e. rewriting old ratings to improve them is absolutely allowed and by the guidelines. If it it wasn't I would expect someone to contact me already OR introduce the edit feature - neither of which has happened; besides counters are appropriate anyways. rmcdermott927 continues proving that he is shady/untrustworthy as long as he keeps lying. It is simple really. You can keep screaming at theymos, at me, at everyone; theymos can blacklist me, and everyone that doesn't trust you, but the fact is that rmcdermott927 will remain a liar. I believe this is an education problem where some people think that if you have 2 and take the same 2 and move it around a bit, that it equals 4.

Can we move the childish mudslinging to the Reputation board? It's getting kind of annoying seeing it in every Meta topic.

Remind me again who starts this in almost every thread in Meta and why they don't get banned for off-topic posting? Re-applying this: Mods will not do anything.

[OgNasty]

Your continued actions are the best evidence for theymos to get involved. What Lauda is doing to rmcdermott927 and now me should not be allowed.

What I am doing, i.e. rewriting old ratings to improve them is absolutely allowed and by the guidelines. If it it wasn't I would expect someone to contact me already OR introduce the edit feature - neither of which has happened; besides counters are appropriate anyways. rmcdermott927 continues proving that he is shady/untrustworthy as long as he keeps lying. It is simple really. You can keep screaming at everyone, at theymos at me; theymos can blacklist me, can blacklist everyone that doesn't trust you, but the fact is that rmcdermott927 will remain a liar.

You copy/pasted your trust on rmcdermott927. You didn’t rewrite anything. You are the liar, not rmcdermott927. Anyone who reads your statement and looks at my post can see that.

10/06/18: Lauda noticed that rmcdermott927 was no longer showing a red trust rating so he once again removed/replaced his rating:


01/15/19: Lauda noticed that rmcdermott927 was no longer showing a red trust rating so he once again removed/replaced his rating:

[Lauda]

Your continued actions are the best evidence for theymos to get involved. What Lauda is doing to rmcdermott927 and now me should not be allowed.

What I am doing, i.e. rewriting old ratings to improve them is absolutely allowed and by the guidelines. If it it wasn't I would expect someone to contact me already OR introduce the edit feature - neither of which has happened; besides counters are appropriate anyways. rmcdermott927 continues proving that he is shady/untrustworthy as long as he keeps lying. It is simple really. You can keep screaming at everyone, at theymos at me; theymos can blacklist me, can blacklist everyone that doesn't trust you, but the fact is that rmcdermott927 will remain a liar.

You copy/pasted your trust on rmcdermott927. You didn’t rewrite anything. You are the liar, not rmcdermott927. Anyone who reads your statement and looks at my post can’t see that.
-snip-

Read the last sentence again. Do it several times as you clearly need it. I will probably redo it to fit the new limitations and I don't like the insults in it either.

[Gunthar]

yet still think I’m in a childish fight? I’m trying to stop others from being bullied the way you are being bullied right now by Lauda. I don’t think that’s childish.

Your intentions might or might not be legit and my opinion might or might not be in agreement with you and/or with Lauda, this is something we have discussed in PM many times and my opinion is clearly stated on both my left feedbacks and my trust list. What I'm trying to say here is that both of you, as opinion leaders of this forum, are literaly (without awareness) inducing dozens of respective followers/haters to literaly spam the boards with a continuous annoying "Lauda-vs-OG" threads creation that is of zero contribution to the forum IMO. This is what I meant by "motel room". Look at this thread i.e.: completely hijacked (and this is a pita because I would have seriously spent my time contributing to OP initiative instead to have to put this post to ignore list)

[Lauda]

yet still think I’m in a childish fight? I’m trying to stop others from being bullied the way you are being bullied right now by Lauda. I don’t think that’s childish.

Your intentions might or might not be legit and my opinion might or might not be in agreement with you and/or with Lauda, this is something we have discussed in PM many times and my opinion is clearly stated on both my left feedbacks and my trust list. What I'm trying to say here is that both of you, as opinion leaders of this forum, are literaly (without awareness) inducing dozens of respective followers/haters to literaly spam the boards with a continuous annoying "Lauda-vs-OG" threads creation that is of zero contribution to the forum IMO. This is what I meant by "motel room".

It takes both sides to completely drop the dispute. I have long been willing to permanently ignore him, but he is way too stubborn to let go of anything.

Look at this thread i.e.: completely hijacked (and this is a pita because I would have seriously spent my time contributing to OP initiative instead to have to put this post to ignore list)

[OgNasty]

What I am doing, i.e. rewriting old ratings to improve them is absolutely allowed and by the guidelines. If it it wasn't I would expect someone to contact me already OR introduce the edit feature - neither of which has happened; besides counters are appropriate anyways. rmcdermott927 continues proving that he is shady/untrustworthy as long as he keeps lying. It is simple really. You can keep screaming at everyone, at theymos at me; theymos can blacklist me, can blacklist everyone that doesn't trust you, but the fact is that rmcdermott927 will remain a liar.

You copy/pasted your trust on rmcdermott927. You didn’t rewrite anything. You are the liar, not rmcdermott927. Anyone who reads your statement and looks at my post can see that.

10/06/18: Lauda noticed that rmcdermott927 was no longer showing a red trust rating so he once again removed/replaced his rating:


01/15/19: Lauda noticed that rmcdermott927 was no longer showing a red trust rating so he once again removed/replaced his rating:

Do we really as a community feel this sort of behavior has a place in the default trust network?

[suchmoon]

Do we really feel this sort of behavior has a place in the default trust network?

This way please: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106904

[TECSHARE]

yet still think I’m in a childish fight? I’m trying to stop others from being bullied the way you are being bullied right now by Lauda. I don’t think that’s childish.

Your intentions might or might not be legit and my opinion might or might not be in agreement with you and/or with Lauda, this is something we have discussed in PM many times and my opinion is clearly stated on both my left feedbacks and my trust list. What I'm trying to say here is that both of you, as opinion leaders of this forum, are literaly (without awareness) inducing dozens of respective followers/haters to literaly spam the boards with a continuous annoying "Lauda-vs-OG" threads creation that is of zero contribution to the forum IMO. This is what I meant by "motel room". Look at this thread i.e.: completely hijacked (and this is a pita because I would have seriously spent my time contributing to OP initiative instead to have to put this post to ignore list)

Unfortunately due to the state of the forum, this is the only way anything ever gets done. You will notice civil rational debate is either totally ignored, or attacked and distracted from continuously with drama. Be careful not to confuse petty bickering with a specific strategy of distraction and attrition. This is how these control freak cliques get their way. Do some simple analysis of means motive and opportunity. Who has what to gain? Who has what to lose? I see a lot more on the lot to gain by distracting with drama side personally. This discussion needs to happen here because less people read in reputation, and wouldn't you know it that also serves their goal of having even less people consider these arguments by moving the debate to reputation even thought it clearly applies here.

[Gunthar]

This discussion needs to happen here because less people read in reputation, and wouldn't you know it that also serves their goal of having even less people consider these arguments by moving the debate to reputation even thought it clearly applies here.

Fair enough, we might want then open Cats-vs-Dog thread in Meta, without hijacking every single post: I seriously expect to write/read about OP in here, nowhere OP wrote "hey let's do this change if you like Lauda, else let's do this other change if you like OG"

Hijacking at a certain point might be considered on the same level than spam/OT.

[TECSHARE]

This discussion needs to happen here because less people read in reputation, and wouldn't you know it that also serves their goal of having even less people consider these arguments by moving the debate to reputation even thought it clearly applies here.

Fair enough, we might want then open Cats-vs-Dog thread in Meta, without hijacking every single post: I seriously expect to write/read about OP in here, nowhere OP wrote "hey let's do this change if you like Lauda, else let's do this other change if you like OG"

Hijacking at a certain point might be considered on the same level than spam/OT.

It is kind of hard to have a civil discussion when not having one serves one of the parties more than having one. This is again a fundamental flaw with this system. There is no real accountability for these people once they gain a certain amount of control, then we need a whole fucking blowout like this that ends up creating divisions to obtain redress when we could have just started with some simple universal guidelines to avoid all of this in the first place.

[OgNasty]

This discussion needs to happen here because less people read in reputation, and wouldn't you know it that also serves their goal of having even less people consider these arguments by moving the debate to reputation even thought it clearly applies here.

Fair enough, we might want then open Cats-vs-Dog thread in Meta, without hijacking every single post: I seriously expect to write/read about OP in here, nowhere OP wrote "hey let's do this change if you like Lauda, else let's do this other change if you like OG"

Hijacking at a certain point might be considered on the same level than spam/OT.

It is kind of hard to have a civil discussion when not having one serves one of the parties more than having one. This is again a fundamental flaw with this system. There is no real accountability for these people once they gain a certain amount of control, then we need a whole fucking blowout like this that ends up creating divisions to obtain redress when we could have just started with some simple universal guidelines to avoid all of this in the first place.

We did get some guidelines from theymos yesterday...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49600801#msg49600801

It took less than 24 hours for Lauda to spit in the face of those guidelines by leaving me negative trust with a ridiculous reason (spoiler alert: Lauda is guilty of the same trust abuse behavior I pointed out in the feedback reference link I was left.  Also, don't let them bury the fact that Lauda is a confirmed liar about his feedback motivations.).

[TECSHARE]

This discussion needs to happen here because less people read in reputation, and wouldn't you know it that also serves their goal of having even less people consider these arguments by moving the debate to reputation even thought it clearly applies here.

Fair enough, we might want then open Cats-vs-Dog thread in Meta, without hijacking every single post: I seriously expect to write/read about OP in here, nowhere OP wrote "hey let's do this change if you like Lauda, else let's do this other change if you like OG"

Hijacking at a certain point might be considered on the same level than spam/OT.

It is kind of hard to have a civil discussion when not having one serves one of the parties more than having one. This is again a fundamental flaw with this system. There is no real accountability for these people once they gain a certain amount of control, then we need a whole fucking blowout like this that ends up creating divisions to obtain redress when we could have just started with some simple universal guidelines to avoid all of this in the first place.

We did get some guidelines from theymos yesterday...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49600801#msg49600801

It took less than 24 hours for Lauda to spit in the face of those guidelines by leaving me negative trust with a ridiculous reason (spoiler alert: Lauda is guilty of the same trust abuse behavior I pointed out in the feedback reference link I was left.  Also, don't let them bury the fact that Lauda is a confirmed liar about his feedback motivations.).

Indeed we did, and I did find that encouraging. However I am of the opinion that these very subjective guidelines are the source of much of this conflict as everyone interprets them differently leaving an environment of confusion, arbitrary enforcement, and abuse. The standard should be something that is more universally understood and factually based. We should use a standard that requires evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws before leaving a negative rating. The community can be the arbiter of what specifically those words mean in detail, the staff need not be involved short of issuing the standard to operate from.

Largely what we have been getting is the illusion of decentralization. If this is going to continue to be the case there should be some firm and clear limits placed upon those in control of the trust systems. I go into more detail why we need this here.

[ac2eugenio]

What I am doing, i.e. rewriting old ratings to improve them is absolutely allowed and by the guidelines. If it it wasn't I would expect someone to contact me already OR introduce the edit feature - neither of which has happened; besides counters are appropriate anyways. rmcdermott927 continues proving that he is shady/untrustworthy as long as he keeps lying. It is simple really. You can keep screaming at everyone, at theymos at me; theymos can blacklist me, can blacklist everyone that doesn't trust you, but the fact is that rmcdermott927 will remain a liar.

You copy/pasted your trust on rmcdermott927. You didn’t rewrite anything. You are the liar, not rmcdermott927. Anyone who reads your statement and looks at my post can see that.

10/06/18: Lauda noticed that rmcdermott927 was no longer showing a red trust rating so he once again removed/replaced his rating:


01/15/19: Lauda noticed that rmcdermott927 was no longer showing a red trust rating so he once again removed/replaced his rating:

Do we really as a community feel this sort of behavior has a place in the default trust network?

Hell no,if we have a forum poll here which questioned who should be blacklisted DT member definitely Lauda,and the gang will be excluded..If i am Theymos i will ask the whole community who should get blacklisted,remember the voice of of the people is the voice of God.Anyone who commits crime will sooner or later be.......hHmmm.

[JayJuanGee]

~OMG Theymos is really getting pissed.....

He was so angry that he accidentally DOXed himself by leaving his camera on. 

Cat is out of the bag, now.  Sucks to be theymos.

For easy reference, see below image:

[madnessteat]

taikuri13
WhiteManWhite

What are these people doing in DT1? Looks like the ruskis have succesfully colluded their way into DT1.

I have been working with Taikuri13 for quite some time. If you look at some of his posts and my posts you will see that he has done translations for me regarding some of the historic topics and scam warnings. He has helped me a lot behind the scenes and is a highly merited user on the Russian forum. I don't see any collusion there.

I think Lauda has paranoia. If she had suspicions without evidence, then the user will be painted. I would not be surprised if she painted me red. I want to add this here)))

Do not trust me:




As I see these users with my trust list:






She believes that I am in collusion with someone)))

[Lauda]

taikuri13
WhiteManWhite

What are these people doing in DT1? Looks like the ruskis have succesfully colluded their way into DT1.

I have been working with Taikuri13 for quite some time. If you look at some of his posts and my posts you will see that he has done translations for me regarding some of the historic topics and scam warnings. He has helped me a lot behind the scenes and is a highly merited user on the Russian forum. I don't see any collusion there.

I think Lauda has paranoia. If she had suspicions without evidence, then the user will be painted. I would not be surprised if she painted me red. I want to add this here)))

IIRC you've been excluded by me for quite some time now, so the posts that you are quoting have nothing to do with this. My full list is public (despite the existence of those tools).