It works for me, I need some more confirmations that miner has this problem. Right now it looks like a problem of your system, probably overclocking.
|
|
|
Aeon and Duck are supported.
|
|
|
v2.0 is available:
- Added support for CPUs that don't support AES-NI. - Added Windows XP support for 32-bit version.
any performance increase for 4770k? Only 1-2% so I did not even mention it. alright,then any news from faster gpu miner? you used to release new xpm version every 3-5 days . I like XPM much more than other coins, it has the most complex and scientific PoW, a lot of space for improvements I have no time for GPU miner right now, but I will check it soon.
|
|
|
Stupid virustotal still thinks that v2.0 32-bit has a virus. But good antiviruses report that file is ok.
|
|
|
v2.0 is available:
- Added support for CPUs that don't support AES-NI. - Added Windows XP support for 32-bit version.
any performance increase for 4770k? Only 1-2% so I did not even mention it.
|
|
|
v2.0 is available:
- Added support for CPUs that don't support AES-NI. - Added Windows XP support for 32-bit version.
|
|
|
At least logoff is required. Actually I'm not sure if you have enough rights on ec2, with admin rights miner must show "scfg: 1" at starting.
Can this be bypassed or changed in future revisions? I don't think that it's possible to bypass it.
|
|
|
At least logoff is required. Actually I'm not sure if you have enough rights on ec2, with admin rights miner must show "scfg: 1" at starting.
|
|
|
WinXP support will be added in 1-2 days, support for CPUs without AES-NI too.
|
|
|
I see same thing on 290, and clock is stable on 280X. Some algos don't use memory heavily so driver reduces mem clock, it must not cause less mining speed if driver knows what it's doing. The questions is why it reduces clock for 290 only.
|
|
|
This version requires AES-NI support, miner will not work if your CPU does not support it. Support for older CPUs will be added soon.
Do you have a rough ETA for a non-AES-NI version? I've got a bunch of older servers I'd like to try it on. 2-3 days I think.
|
|
|
i am using the the http 1111 port seems i am giving more shares(claymores gpu and cpu) but as i read on the web page it says Switch to TCP protocol. i tried it and it doesnt give shares as much as http.
That's quite surprising but if it works better for you, keep using the http. You have to know that the http can miss more shares than stratum resulting in lower payout. If everything is ok with pool, Stratum must work better, but not much, may be 3% better for GPU miner since for http miner checks new job every 5 seconds and GPU round time is about 3 seconds (original simpleminer checks new job only every 20 seconds). For CPU miner Stratum must work better by about 5% than http since round time is very small.
|
|
|
I've just checked it, you are correct, www.virustotal.com does not like 32-bit version of miner. False alarm 100%, my antivirus cannot find any viruses there, but if you believe to this antivirus - don't use 32-bit version of course.
|
|
|
What is "Archive-652b.zip"? File size is incorrect too. If you are sure that you use original archive from link in OP, it is false alarm of some bad antivirus. I don't write viruses. I write miners. EDIT: I've just checked it, you are correct, www.virustotal.com does not like 32-bit version of miner. False alarm 100%, but if you believe to this antivirus - don't use 32-bit version of course.
|
|
|
v1.1 is avalable:
- Added 32-bit version. CPU with AES-NI support is still required.
There are 32-bit CPUs with AES-NI? Since when? Why do you think that this version is for 32-bit CPUs? It is for 64bit CPUs with Windows 32-bit installed.
|
|
|
where new ver Pretty sure Claymore completely abandoned XPM. Why do you think so? I'm busy with other miners but I still have ideas for XPM miner speedup. Next update will be available in several days.
|
|
|
It seems the best choice currently is: stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80
|
|
|
v1.1 is avalable:
- Added 32-bit version. CPU with AES-NI support is still required.
|
|
|
I'm only getting ~185 h/s on an i7-4770, with -t 4 and fast mode enabled. Am I doing something wrong?
No other miners started? Try to reboot, start miner and do not start anything else at all, even browser, skype etc. If is still 185 h/s in fast mode and CPU load is about 50% (not higher) it means that fast mode does not work for your Windows or hardware for some reason. I have several systems on 4770 and they all show about 270 h/s (Windows 7). i am getting around 213-219 with my 4770k @3.9 is that normal? Low. Windows7 ?
|
|
|
I'm only getting ~185 h/s on an i7-4770, with -t 4 and fast mode enabled. Am I doing something wrong?
No other miners started? Try to reboot, start miner and do not start anything else at all, even browser, skype etc. If is still 185 h/s in fast mode and CPU load is about 50% (not higher) it means that fast mode does not work for your Windows or hardware for some reason. I have several systems on 4770 and they all show about 270 h/s (Windows 7).
|
|
|
|