That is same with the clickbait articles as well. You just create something that gets clicks, that is the key for the metrics to be found as well. If people see your thumbnail and click on you, you get suggested to more people, and when everyone starts t click on you because they see it, not just searched for it but saw it on homepage or something like that and start clicking on you, the ranking metric says "whoever sees this, clicks on it, let's suggest it to everyone!".

Same goes for google ranking, same goes for articles, basically everything gets listed higher because of click rates, bouncing also matters, if people click and leave right away without watching or reading, then it doesn't work well.

How will he know if he can mine or not when he doesn't have a miner yet? Currently, he is asking for a second opinion here if what's best for him but surely he had an experience with bitcoin because anyone can buy bitcoin cheaply by buying at smaller amounts.

If buying/investing in bitcoin works well for him then there is no point of asking here but he can just stick with it but he is still here, maybe he isn't getting enough profits according to his expectation with bitcoin? But, it doesn't mean that mining is the solution to that because mining was also hard based on the feedback of others and some of them have already tried mining.

But there wouldn’t be a time that everybody would be making use of Bitcoin right? It’s just going to be that there would be those who would choose to make use of Bitcoin and there will also be those who wouldn’t want to make use of it. There are those who would prefer to make use of fiat, same way there are those who prefers Bitcoin.

So, it shouldn’t really be that much of a problem right? But the government would always want everything to benefit, and with the level of misconception that they are having about Bitcoin, it’s part of the reasons why they are always acting against cryptocurrency.

If it brings help then why would the price drop? the beginning of the war had shock every market including in crypto and that makes the price fall but eventually countries are now in favor with crypto and that helps the price recover. The effects of war can last a little longer because Russia have targeted the nuclear power plant of Ukraine and that can cost more damage in the country. It's in the news too that other forces are now joining Ukraine, that is a sign that war's are getting extended. It seems that Russia have no plans to stop.

It's crazy to think that the war have started by two countries but later on, more and more countries are not getting involved with it.

The meaning behind it was the fact that if the only reason why you are buying a token is "it will go up in dollar price" then you are not buying something for real life utility. Obviously making more fiat is a very much real-life utility, but it is not by nature, it is just byproduct of what you are doing. Like dogecoin is a thing people made money, and that's a real utility, because you have more money now. However, do you use doge anywhere? I mean not many places accept it.

So, the approach you have is a correct one and a good one, but that doesn't mean that it is what OP meant. They meant something like using it for a good purpose that would help your life.

Metaverse tokens and coins are new kind and we are not sure if it will last a long time. We have other trends before like ICO but ICO didn't last a few years, that's what I'm worrying. Binance coin is related to binance exchange but we are also not sure if this exchange is still going to be strong in the next five years or so, because there are now lots of exchanges that are competing with each other.

I am afraid that if binance will collapse its coins bsc and binance coin are also going to crash too but if there is one altcoin I'm sure of that will last on the given year, that will only be Ethereum because if we check the date of this coin, it's already over five years or more since this coin existed so I am sure it will go for another five years or more.

It's going to be a bad experience because it was your first time to lose but when you know that it was your first time and you don't have knowledge yet, why would you put too much money? It was also your fault on why you feel really bad.

If you keep on losing you will soon realize that there must be something wrong with the way you trade. You're not stupid enough to continue your old strategy because that can only lead to more losses but you will rework it and you will find yourself researching on how to improve yourself in trading. The chance to earn a profit should now be possible but I won't say it's now easier. Nothing is easy on here.

Even Amazon is not making any move that shows that they are ready to accept Bitcoin at all, despite the rumors in the past that they were going to be accepting Bitcoin as a payment method on their platform. But, one thing I do know for sure is that whether these two choose to accept cryptocurrency or not,  there is still going to be growth, Bitcoin will keep growing and the adoption will keep on increasing, it doesn’t matter whether they would do it or not.

All these years Bitcoin has steady been growing, even when none of these institutions cares about it. So this shouldn’t be seen as any much of a big deal, the market  keep on moving regardless.

Obviously, it will have some impact on Europe and that is undoubtful, and it may even cost a little more for them. But what Europe is trying to do here is that, since they are rich and they can pay top price for these things, and since Russia is sanctioned from them, that means Russia will have to sell it to other nations who are not as rich as the west.

And that means Russia will have to sell it for cheaper, sell to china, sell to India, sell to anywhere that accepts it, even Africa if they have to. In that case the cheaper product would be bought from that third nation, for a lot less and Russia would not make that profit as the same. Like assume there is a thing costs 100 bucks to sell to west, west declines it, so you sell it to 50 to Nigera, then west buys for 80 from Nigeria. You see west made a profit of %20 on each sale, and Nigera made a profit as well, whereas Russia made a 50% loss.

Monaco is trying their best for having something good in this season, but their performance is unpredictable, and their luck is also not favoring them for having some better chance in this cup, so they drop two penalties and give Nantes a dream entry into final. Now they have two very tough tasks in their coming matches first against inform Marseille and second against Braga in Europa cup if they want to do something positive in this season then surely they need to do something special against these teams because if they fail to give better results then surely they are going to be in hot waters.

With very good form surely Nice is hot favorite for winning this cup but nothing is sure in these cup games and any team can give shocking result with Nantes is coming after very long time in this final, and they already beat PSG, so we can expect some good game from these two teams.

I agree with your statement it's 12 edition of world cup with nearly 49 years, and we have never any good marketing or better things from ICC or any relative board about this event and Australia is dominant power in this competition with 6 wins and England is second team with 4 wins and besides them New Zealand is other team who won this event mean it is doing around just very few teams with few others like West Indies and India have chance for qualifying into final.

But here we have no complaint because this is only sports authority which is never been involved in any progress of this game so just because of their policies now we are losing teams in men's cricket so having not good quality and too many teams in women's are not unusual. But if they do some work surely we can have some good number of teams in both events because now with new formats it has some good chance.

It looks you are not really sure because there is an error the way you type the text. If there is only 33 percent that are interested then why 60 percent of them are going to buy a crypto? I'm expecting that the buyers are lower than 33 percent.

Women are more on the long term because they are thinking about the future of their kids but men are more on a short term satisfaction only. They take profit because they gamble it and do the things that gives them instant gratification. Women holds btc eth and doge because these three coins are the safest and the most popular. They are new in cryptos anyway so they don't take risk on unfamiliar assets.

I wouldn't say "unethical", I would say unfair, but unethical is something else. It means doing something outside of ethics, and you could compare any two person without going into ethical deal of the situation. Unfair however is the right word because Pep took a team of superstars, the roster Barcelona had those years were already awesome and he left as soon as he realized that his players were getting older and he needed something better. Bayern and then City and now he is happy all over again.

Xavi on the other hand took over after a team that sucked so badly that they had to fire their manager. Give him some time and he could turn Barcelona around in a few years and make them awesome again fighting for a UCL title.

That knowledge that nobody really knows and everyone is just predicting makes you feel a lot more relax. That way you could say anything you want, you could say it will go up, you could say it will go down, you could say anything and everyone will have to just say okay and move on. Doesn't mean that they will be making investment just because you said something, that would be weird and that wouldn't probably happen.

However, nobody could say "how do you know!" anymore, because you are just going to respond with "everyone makes a prediction, and this is mine" and get away with it. The moment I realized that, life became a lot more easier for me.

It is, because not all people are using the cryptos that they currently support and a bunch of these people would also want to try to donate but they can't do it for now, for the same reason. I don't know but maybe they are now negotiating the people that handles the donation to support more cryptocurrencies.

This is an eye opener to some people that who thinks cryptos are only meant to be for investment, they will now know that cryptos can also work well for this purpose or anything related to it. Cryptocurrencies will be adopted not only because of its different use cases but also because it can pass thru some heavy restrictions.

So, it is basically a dating site? Sorry that’s not my thing. But if you feel it’s going to be worth it for you then you can invest in it. But, dating sites don’t really make that much, do they? I hardly even see anyone saying that they are making use of dating sites and the few that I see who are using are only making use the most popular ones and they even don’t make use of constantly, it might be just once in a while.

It’s not a like a social media where you post contents and people engages in it. So, do you think this one will be able to compete with what it’s already there? Investment is all about risk, anyways, you can still give it a shot, but left for me it is a no.

I wasn't sure about what to say neither. I mean we never know what bitcoin will do and that is always a shock to all of us. Maybe it will be 100k by the end of march, maybe it will be under 30k, and none of us would "know" it, we can try to predict or guess or assume but we would never really "know" it because that's something else.

Knowing is like for certain things, like saying I will breath to stay alive, or 2+2 is 4 and those kinds of things, we never really know anything. That's when I realized, if knowing is impossible then I could say what I predict or what I guess because that's all we are asked for. That's why I said yes, because I guess it could stand higher than that, but I just guess it of course.

Right? I also have the same thought , that he definitely had it in mind that this was going to happen and he had himself prepared for it before going for this. But sometimes it can always backfire, things won’t usually go as you have planned it , so it is also possible that whatever he had planned would end up failing him, it does happen.

So in a situation like that, when he starts to notice that things has become tough and that his subjects are no longer happy with him, he’s definitely going to feel the need to stop, because they are really going to pressure him when the economy becomes screwed and his plans ain’t working no longer.

Why would it be wrong not to punish people from Russia when it is Russia that is doing this? I mean I always hated that type of "it is Putin, not citizens" type of deal. Yeah sure there are some citizens who dislike this situation, but it is Russian soldiers who are attacking, those are citizens, it is Russians who supported Putin thus far, even if rigged elections, not many out there in the world saying bad things about him all the time.

How many players came out against Putin when playing another nation? Out of fear? Well Ukrainians are getting bombed and still against Putin, I am sure nothing worse could happen to them. So, do not give me players were innocent. All sanctions against Russia from Fifa is welcomed by me.

A good project is definitely the one that would talk about their project and not the ones that would consistently be talking about the profit that their investors would be getting from it, because they already know that showing true investors their plans is what would convince them to invest in the project and not really talking about the profit.

You don’t just be telling investors that they would be making up to 20% and you can’t elaborate on what it is really all about and how that profit would be coming. Such thing wouldn’t make sense to any investors that has been in the business for long and knows the in-and-out of it. So, it’s definitely a red flag for most of the people.