I've been using this for some time now, if you ask they should add CK'spool, it tracks well, if set right should track all this for you .you may need a Premium Account, but to me it's really cheap . one way that might work . https://cryptfolio.com/cost is for a Premium Account, it's free other wise . 0.01 BTC per month, or 0.1 BTC per year |
|
|
|
What am I missing here? the club has only x spots open, first come, first serve, for only a month? I can understand you can only take care of so many people.
I thought the original idea was everyone runs the sticks with the solo, if block, even split between the total people running sticks (no share counting), so if there is 50 people running 200 sticks the 50 people get 0.5BTC each which would pay back most people sticks (if all 50 people had 4 sticks each, they would profit with 0.1btc)
Hey man I'm lost do you want a slot or some one you know that wants one . I'll give mine up for now till we get the Pods sooner or later he gonna remove me any way, i may not log in for days . if some one wants my slot just ask . I'm only here helping out, if we do hit, i was gonna tell phill to keep it . i like the GEN idea I'm able to help some how . but I'm starting to get bored with the solo idea . i mean that in a good way . |
|
|
|
You put in a lot of work keeping track of all this Phil. I wish the process could be more automated and save you some time. Thanks for doing this!
Well I am retired and do have some time to spare. I also do wish to get this idea fully off the ground. The goal for me is to get sidehack to the next level of gear and then one more level of gear. My math shows me that a s-7 chip can be used for a .17 watt underclocked piece of gear. maybe this could be inside a 600gh board using 102 watts even 120 watts. If bitmaintech would sell sidehack enough chips to make 100 of these we are talking 60th. If most were hashing in a sidehack solo/club we would hit blocks and the gear would be the most efficient gear around. We would turn a profit and since the chips are limited to 60th it really would not hurt bitmaintech's bottom line. In fact after we run this for 90 or 120 days they (bitmaintech) could use sidehack's design to mass produce a s-7+ piece of machinery. Every one wins on this idea. nice ideas but bitmain being who they are now to big for there own good forgot us , in there S1 s3 days they would replace any thng you didn't have to buy it direct they just would etc then the S5 came they started going down hill in that respect . . it would be nice if they would consider it and do it even give him a really nice price not the going rate it won't hurt them at all but greed tends to do that once they get a taste for having it all. |
|
|
|
http://aperiodic.net/screen/startif you don't want it to auto load get http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/download.html putty .. Then SSH into the PI type sudo apt-get install screen sometimes it is not installed screen bash CD to the directly of CG or BFG miner something like this CD bfgminer or CD / cgminer-gekko whatever and were ever you happen to put it, then type ./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://yoururl -u USER -p x --compac-freq 150 ./bfgminer -o stratum+tcp://yoururl -u USER -p x --set compac:clock=x0b83 then type once it loads if you need to turn off that PC and let the PI do it''s thing . CTRL + A D then again D that should close out that window . to check it either type screen -list gives a list of all running screens detached or not or type screen -r in most case that shows the running screen then runs it . type CTRL + A D to detach it then type D again to close it out . if want to do it the manual way  .
|
|
|
|
Why i asked your list is not what i see just making sure i really don't care to me this a waste of time but i like to help out . my sitck {"hashrate1m": "11.7G", "hashrate5m": "9.79G", "hashrate1hr": "4.64G", "hashrate1d": "2.07G", "hashrate7d": "362M", "lastupdate": 1444772355, "shares": 268871, "bestshare": 117619.58086441034} just the S3 i took the S1 out . {"hashrate1m": "494G", "hashrate5m": "461G", "hashrate1hr": "438G", "hashrate1d": "130G", "hashrate7d": "21.2G", "lastupdate": 1444772475, "shares": 11909883, "bestshare": 31307429.902860325} I just restarted the stick testing some other stuff . |
|
|
|
Anyone familiar with Minera? I have 1 stick throwing multiple hardware errors and would like to single that particular stick out. All Minera shows is Compaq0 to Compaq8
I'm using it with one stick but all you have to do in minera is set once the speed with either BFG 5.3 or CGMINER by novak you may need to compile and put in your own copy's, if you know how to do it with one software miner it's the same way with the other one with the custom folder or replace the default miners all to gather in minera. if you need a walk thu let me know . In minera you should be able to plug all you have in at once then it's list them all with BFG or CG. no need to run it with two or three mineras, unless you run separate controllers. |
|
|
|
|
I would use /#xnsub in your case like below and the command line to disable the coin base check is /#skipcbcheck per pool . not sure how that works in a BFG.config like you im still learning and loving it .
but per pool like this
9;stratum+tcp://miner-control.de:3330/#xnsub#skipcbcheck (mind the slash '/' before #xnsub) -u NTYNy7JWo1LyK9Z51ZxdcpsdzEpfT5C6VV -p egalo
or in the config maybe
{
"quota" : "9;stratum+tcp://miner-control.de:3330/#skipcbcheck", that slash is needed.
"user" : "NTYNy7JWo1LyK9Z51ZxdcpsdzEpfT5C6VV",
"pass" : "egalo",
"enableExtranonceSubscribe" : true this > /#xnsub in the config file ( sorry never had to add /#skipcbcheck to a config file ).
},
"pools" : [
{
"quota" : "1;stratum+tcp://miner-control.de:3335",
"user" : "13gtAPBFkrTq5QEnyd4pBKF2wDWvdKd7mw",
"pass" : "egalo",
"enableExtranonceSubscribe" : true
},
{
"quota" : "9;stratum+tcp://miner-control.de:3330",
"user" : "NTYNy7JWo1LyK9Z51ZxdcpsdzEpfT5C6VV",
"pass" : "egalo",
"enableExtranonceSubscribe" : true
},
{
"quota" : "0;stratum+tcp://mint.bitminter.com:3333",
"user" : "Buchinger84.Buchi",
"pass" : "egalo",
"enableExtranonceSubscribe" : true
}
]
|
|
|
|
sorry not really sure what you want to know but here is link to that coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310939.0I see the 4 Bi*Fury and 7 RedFury USB mine on the BFG Command line GUI. they are all loaded it looks like ? and "api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1,W:192.168.1.0/24" i know you can use it your way but i all way use it like this,but I'm not to sure how that would work in your case never used either of those miner. but really don't know whats wrong ? it all looks good now ? . I'll bet you can tweak out some of those Hardware error by speed adjustments but there i might be wrong never used either of those miner so don't really know the command line other then do what you did and do auto load . |
|
|
|
|
it was the bug everyone i got hit with some one told me i believe it now
ty for all the help and excuse me for getting upset it won't happen again .
cya
|
|
|
|
Your low fee problem may be because you didn't leave bitcoin core up long enough. Bitcoin core needs to be up for some time in order to actually analyze the blockchain to determine the best fee. If you just start it up to send a transaction, then it won't have enough time to estimate the proper fee since it doesn't have enough data.
there is no low fee problem if you look up i got upset over some thing stupid sorry for that it was the bug . most of the time mine is up 8 to 9 hours a day and i normally don't send anything for maybe two hours after it's up . |
|
|
|
I Know i read it , it upset me i shouldn't have let it upset me sorry for that .
but what would happen if it hit some one that has tons of coins and he or she lost them . we wouldn't hear the end of it. this stuff needs to be fixed before something really bad happens.
I didn't cause it but I 'm small fish think how a big fish would be he wouldn't lol it off either
Cya
There is no way to lost coins this way, at last one of the 2 transactions will always confirm. I'm just learning about this kind of attack and what i can say is "It sucks". [/quote all ways remember nothing is a sure thing or 100 % even if it looks that way there is all ways that 1 to 2 % rather you or me except or not . unless your that higher power we wont go there about him . |
|
|
|
|
I Know i read it , it upset me i shouldn't have let it upset me sorry for that .
but what would happen if it hit some one that has tons of coins and he or she lost them . we wouldn't hear the end of it. this stuff needs to be fixed before something really bad happens.
I didn't cause it but I 'm small fish think how a big fish would be he wouldn't lol it off either
Cya
|
|
|
|
there is littte bar that lets you set it to fast which is one block so it says in the bitcoin core https://bitcoin.org/en/download I have it set to fast but for some reason it keeps sending it at a low fee amount that just started so i checked my PC etc nothing on my PC, network etc is causing it i can find . I even went as far to do a new windows 10 install . so i will set it manually from now on and watch is as i send it i hate having coins tired up i need to make more coins with. my problem is how many day before that clears Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: Conflicting Transactions [DBBitcoinTx [txIndex=105767687, getEstimatedBTCSent()=0, isGeneratedBlockReward()=false, getTotalBTCSent()=0, getHash()=c3543e667f17f68c5ecab6081ec558b0c6e178465419d76f3b02f37b2dad315a, getVersion()=1, getSize()=339, toString()= and my wallet just resent the same thing again and it was at a ZERO balance . guess that good it looks like it just cleared . then the ass messing around with blockchain tried to send it i got this back but it cleared I got the coins back. Status: conflicted, broadcast through 29 nodes Date: 10/9/2015 20:03 To: miningrigrentals 1AFTf43ApNSqPvy5sES3GJfAWWaFhXQ6Nc Debit: -0.03543927 BTC Transaction fee: -0.00037629 BTC Net amount: -0.03581556 BTC Transaction ID: c42aa518e0d35710e58b7851f56ccae7a449213f3229af0c7396e83afe52643a-000 see that fee thats what i thought it sent at . here is were i got the coins back Status: 2/unconfirmed Date: 10/9/2015 20:03 To: miningrigrentals 1AFTf43ApNSqPvy5sES3GJfAWWaFhXQ6Nc Debit: -0.03543927 BTC Transaction fee: -0.00037629 BTC Net amount: -0.03581556 BTC Transaction ID: b7cc7d67d389a431dfdb7375a95e621895b97e57f0ea26c39005852dbfd89082-000 so my fee was not low . Time to get a hard ware wallet it looks like cya sorry for all the heart ack but that was annoying. now i double spend really Warning! this transaction is a double spend. You should be extremely careful when trusting any transactions to/from this sender. 105767687 what a joke . i got the coins that warning means jack to me i find it funny how it says you do something you don't . cya |
|
|
|
Do you really think 0.00000340 is a high fee? It should have been more around 0.0001 if you wanted a decent confirmation time.
This transaction will take a while to confirm.
The malleability attack is definitely not the main cause.
I clean it up some does that make better sense to you . I am well a ware 0.00000340 is to low that's not what i sent it at . SO now i am gonna keep it set at 0.00111000 manually, i can't trust that smart fee crap any more i see. |
|
|
|
|
@ OP
1. it may be ok to run 1750 watts off one non decated 110 15 amp if you don't push it, try not to . spend it out
2. map out your Electricital system not just for mining know what you have
3. no one line is safer over the other they all can kick you on your but, be carefull 110 or 220
4. surge protector can help but in some cases do nothing
5. i think this was missed what is the 1000 psu is it a server PSU atx etc it may only do 900 or less on a 110 line look in to that to .
6.above all be safe don't burn down were you live at .
I guess they all mean and are saying .
hope you can plug it in some how were you live and feel safe and have some mining fun.
GL
|
|
|
|
my BTC wallet is set to send at fast ,i thought it did then i go look to see why it was taking so long and it sent it like. Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 21 nodes Date: 10/9/2015 01:05 To: miningrigrentals 1AFTf43ApNSqPvy5sES3GJfAWWaFhXQ6Nc Debit: -0.03581216 BTC Transaction fee: -0.00000340 BTC Net amount: -0.03581556 BTC Transaction ID: c3543e667f17f68c5ecab6081ec558b0c6e178465419d76f3b02f37b2dad315a-000 and this was waiting when i went to look sorry forgot to put that in to . Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: Conflicting Transactions [DBBitcoinTx [txIndex=105767687, getEstimatedBTCSent()=0, isGeneratedBlockReward()=false, getTotalBTCSent()=0, getHash()=c3543e667f17f68c5ecab6081ec558b0c6e178465419d76f3b02f37b2dad315a, getVersion()=1, getSize()=339, toString()= whats up ? . NM Guess this is why https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1198032.0 some one is playing around with the block chain again trying to make a point about some thing i guess . sigh .. |
|
|
|
|
hey i have a request instead of sending me that pod could you maybe do some kind of give a way for it on the forums ? . i was thinking i really would rather pay for one even thu i donate .
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
