Nije me bilo neko vrijeme pa rekoh da vidim šta je sa EXP-om.
Znači još nisu prebacili expb na novi sustav?
Jel se i dalje može gledati i primati tokene ili je to stopirano?
Vrijednost EXP-a me strah uopće gledati s obzirom na stanje tržišta.
banana, među ostalim su ulovili lika koji je streamao sa 120 accounta...taj je pokupio više nego svi mi ostali zajedno To sam glavnom developeru nebrojeno puta rekao, kad god što napravi prva stvar bi mu trebala biti da se upita kako će to neko zloupotrijebiti EXP je koma pao, iako imam u walletima još takvih bisera, trenutno što jest jest, BTC je najsigurniji, što se vidi po stalnom porastu udjela u odnosu na altocine |
|
|
|
@Branko and @Samarkand If you guys want to bash me about my merit that is received in Meta Section, then it is okay for me, i get it with my style and my work, so i hope you guys dont mind it like this.Well, To make it clear too, there is nothing wrong in getting merits in meta section. The main purpose of merit is to make a quality post, and i am 100% believe that you 2 guys only know quality as it is a "good" or even "great" post, well you are wrong. In a forum (note this is a forum, okay?) besides a "good" or "great" content, you need the engagement and other things. Whats the point of making a good post if you are posting in a mega-thread, or if you dont even try to talk to other members? And please read this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3093768.0, this is and old statistics, but you know, meta is not the only section that is getting merits a lot. You guys should stop talking merits received in meta section is not well deserved without a data. You didnt received merits in your favorite section doesnt mean people dont get merits there, or the fault is at other section. The demography is different so if you want to blame then blame people in your section that doesnt want to give you guys merit. O ya, have you 2 ever made a post like this link i am talking about? I bet you have because you re getting merit, but really you cant compare things like that. You re looking at your neighborhood's grass and comparing them while the types of the grass you have is different, until judgement time come you still cant make an on point comparison. Its not about speaking in meta, its about speaking about merit. I'd compare it with a general becoming general by speaking about military ranks, instead been on battlefields |
|
|
|
...
I am in the brink time of making my way to a full member when the Merit is introduced, yet now i am a Senior Member. Look on how i post and my made topic, or look to some of top merit receiver, and compare it to your post. Learn from that and i believe you can rank up even in this sytem.
...
It is great that you managed to rank up since the introduction of the merit system. However, I´m not sure if this is really a viable recommendation for Branko´s problem. Just take a look at the merit that you have received in the last 120 days: August 16, 2018, 05:05:34 AM: 1 from vphasitha01 for Re: Disable delete option from merited post.
July 02, 2018, 04:54:20 AM: 1 from Silent26 for Re: Done with this forum
June 25, 2018, 10:10:00 AM: 1 from xIIImaL for Re: [FANCHAIN] by SportsCastr 🔥Signature campaign🔥Earn up to $115/week for posting
May 17, 2018, 02:43:56 PM: 1 from zentdex for Re: Merit & new rank requirements
May 17, 2018, 11:57:54 AM: 1 from zentdex for Re: 100 Days of Merit
May 14, 2018, 03:39:54 AM: 1 from Foxpup for Re: Merit & new rank requirements
May 13, 2018, 05:10:46 AM: 1 from vendy86 for Lets Break The QuestionAuthority NOW !!!
May 11, 2018, 06:01:13 PM: 1 from DdmrDdmr for Re: All About Merit.
May 09, 2018, 05:18:06 PM: 1 from TMAN for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
May 07, 2018, 06:31:23 PM: 1 from Lazada for Another "Thanks Merit For This Rank Up" Thread
May 05, 2018, 02:31:35 AM: 1 from Nellayar for Another "Thanks Merit For This Rank Up" Thread
May 04, 2018, 12:52:19 PM: 2 from TMAN for Another "Thanks Merit For This Rank Up" Thread
April 28, 2018, 06:00:43 PM: 2 from suchmoon for Another "Thanks Merit For This Rank Up" Thread
April 27, 2018, 04:44:56 PM: 1 from Indohunter for Another "Thanks Merit For This Rank Up" Thread
April 27, 2018, 04:27:37 PM: 1 from Husna QA for Another "Thanks Merit For This Rank Up" Thread
April 27, 2018, 10:24:32 AM: 1 from numanoid for Another "Thanks Merit For This Rank Up" Thread
April 26, 2018, 07:44:12 PM: 3 from DdmrDdmr for Another "Thanks Merit For This Rank Up" Thread
April 26, 2018, 06:29:46 PM: 1 from JayJuanGee for Re: Merit & new rank requirements I have bolded every merit that was awarded for a post that was somehow related to the merit system or its ramifications. Does anyone notice a pattern here?! To sum up, you have earned exactly a single merit for a post that was not somehow related to the merit system in the last 4 months. And you, athanz88, are definitely one of the better posters on Bitcointalk. If this is the result of 4 months of posting activity for a good poster, then the merit system is definitely an utter failure not working as intended. We don´t really need Branko (or any other user) to start making tons of posts in the Meta subforum just for the purpose of gaining merit in order to rank up. It is a well-known fact that merits are awarded quite freely in the Meta subforum. It is much harder to earn merit in other parts of the forum, which is kind of sad. This leads to hilarious results like the fact that a user like TMAN, who constantly berates newbies in the Meta subforum, has earned more merit than guys like gmaxwell, HeRetiK or DannyHamilton. One of the possible solutions to improve the merit system would be the complete removal of the ability to award or receive merit in the Meta subforum at all. You beat my by few seconds, I wrote almost same reply, then forum warned me someone wrote something meantime  Yes, kind of beat the purpose to get most merit by writing about merit...since I came to BTT my main point of interest was altcoins mining, and at start 90% my posts were there, until I started posting in Croatian subforum too. I feel most of my "good" posts are in altcoins/mining, but I got majority of my merit in Croatian subforum, and when I checked around, it seems that many people got most in either meta or BTC subforums, or in their local boards |
|
|
|
Igrom slučaja nedavno sam bio u CHT kampanji, dobio nešto njihovih coina, i pošto sam kolegi na poslu objašnjavao kako se većina njihove zarade zasniva na botu koji (bar tako tvrde) dobro predviđa trenutke pogodne za shortanje, nakon toga sam mu morao objasniti i što je shortanje, pa rekoh možda nije zgorega podijeliti to i širem auditoriju Ukratko, većina nas pokušava zaraditi na nečemu što je upravo obrnuto od shortanja: kupimo neki coin za koji mislimo da će porasti, i prodamo kad naraste, a mi nismo previše pohlepni da čekamo da i dalje raste, ili smo sretni sa dotadašnjom zaradom. Shortanje je upravo obrnuto, zaradimo kad coin koji smo kupili padne. Kako je to moguće? Postoji nekoliko načina kako se to može napraviti u praksi. Najjednostavniji: pozajmite od prijatelja 1 BTC koji u tom trenutku košta $10000 i odmah ga prodate. za tjedan dana (kako ste mudro predvidjeli) cijena padne na $8000, vi kupite 1BTC, vratite ga prijatelju, a vama ostane $2000 Klađenje: okladite se s nekim osobno, kroz escrow ili na nekoj od online kladionica da će cijena pasti Prediction markets - predvidite da će cijena biti unutar nekih granica, i ako ste pogodili, dobijete novce za to, a ako ne...bad luck. Ima čak i blockchain (možda i više njih, ja znam za ovaj) koji to pokriva: https://www.augur.net/Trgovanje marginama (margin trading): Prva mjenjačnica gdje sam napravio account ima ovo pokriveno, osobno nisam nikad koristio jer se ne smatram dovoljno dobrim u tome, a nisam ni kockar u duši https://poloniex.com/marginTrading#btc_etha ovdje imate objašnjeno kako to radi na Poloniexu (malo je poduže pa nema smisla da opisujem, uglavnom umjesto da posudite od prijatelja iz prvog primjera, posuđujete od drugih korisnika, naravno uz kompenzaciju) https://poloniex.com/support/aboutMarginTrading/Futures: to je onaj novitet s početka godine za koji se očekivalo da će katapultirati BTC u nebesa, a kako sad stvari stoje izgleda da je napravio upravo obrnuto. To funkcionira tako da se dvojica (kupac i prodavač) dogovore o kupoprodaji po zadanoj cijeni negdje u budućnosti. Ako dogovore cijenu $10000, a BTC krahira i cijena dođe na $1000, prodavač je zaradio jer će dobiti $10000 iako je trenutna cijena $1000, a ako cijena poraste, onda zarađuje kupac jer će dobiti BTC ispod cijene To su varijante shortanja za koje ja znam, ako ima još slobodno nadopišite. Ja sam amater pa sam prepustio Countinghouseu da radi shortanje za mene https://www.countinghousefund.com/a ima naravno i drugih fondova, najpoznatiji je bio Bitconnect |
|
|
|
It seems that many people have their personal reasons to be unhappy with current system, and here is mine: friend who made his account week before me is Sr Member from start of new system, and has 250 merit, same as on day one of new system introduction I have 177, as you can see Mere fact that he started week earlier, with no contributing at all (if we equal merit = contribution, I got 77 meanwhile, he got zero) outweighs all my efforts How about when system was introduced we all got merit based on our activity back then (in my case, I get 249 or 248 instead 100)? I can only imagine how someone who was on the brink of attaining legendary feels |
|
|
|
Good to know! Thanks. I like 'Smerit' - Is it labeled like that? Lol.
If you did what I said, you'd see its actually called sMerit (along with explanation that you lose nothing by giving it away)  |
|
|
|
In case anyone else has this question here - Must an account be 'full member' status to send or receive merit?
No. Please read at least the first post of the thread before posting if you want to earn any merits ever. Thanks for the clarification. My question really should have been specific to sending merit, however I do indeed see that apparently you must have merit already to send it. Does this mean If I received 10 merit, if I gave 5 merit to others would my account still show 10 merit or are they spent as a form of merit currency? Your merits difefr from those you send...those are called "sendable merit" or smerit and you can see how many of those you have if you click as if you're trying to send merit to someone...you will see that that number differs from your own merit |
|
|
|
In September only in Kyiv (capital of Ukraine) there will be 4 big blockchain conferences
(i.e. this one cryptotexty.io/blockchainua-is-coming/)
Not many other countries host so many conferences and have such big blockchain community
That's why we need separate local board.
Seeing how us from Croatia have our own board, I don't see why you guys, as much larger country, should not have one, specially as I see many teams and devs in crypto space come from Ukraine So +1 from me |
|
|
|
10 years is not a fast time, you can forget the coin. Eth and Btc are held to see very high prices immediately released, why should CHT hold for long? Less effective when logged. You think BTC will be 3000x in 10 years? Also, who said you HAVE to wait that long...if you're happy with 10X, get out after a year |
|
|
|
I don't think there is anyone willling to hold any coin excep bitcoin for 10 years. I would even not hold ethereum or litecoin for 10 years.
Well, you won't have to...also, BTC will not rise 3000X in 10 years  Anyway, at 3% average per week, you can leave and take profit at any moment, don't even have to use exchange as they will buy back at liquid value by themselves |
|
|
|
Exchanges are listed here: https://www.countinghousefund.com/exchangesso low volume/DEX for now, they're waiting for LAtoken to list them (it seems its a bit trickier than for ordinary tokens, as this one is security, so requires longer process before listing) |
|
|
|
I had not liked ripple because they are not appropriate for blockchain world they are not decentralize etc. but investor of ripple earned big money, at this crypto world manipulations is more vaulable still unfortunately.
If you think BTC is not manipulated, I feel really sorry for you |
|
|
|
Its indeed very bad there...I can name quite a few people there that helped community a lot and got near zero merit, and I saw
posts like "BTC is the king, all altcoins suck" get tons of merit
People like nerdralph, notbatman, doctor83 and few more did lots of stuff for free, with not much award...its either lack of merit sources there or that subforum tend to collect lots of misers The altcoin boards collect so much spam, it's a pain to find a decent post. I've checked your list of names: - nerdralph last posted on July 1. His posts look okay, but if it's at page 54, not many people are going to read it. That means if the users who read it don't have Merit, they won't receive anything from a Merit source. Without knowing the details about mining, it's hard to assess the value of a post there.
- notbatman has red trust from Vod. In the last month, he's mainly posted in Off-topic and Politics and Society. Those boards are infested with spam too.
- User doctor83 doesn't exist, it's doktor83: his account is active, but just like nerdralph, he posts on page 191, which is only read by people who follow the thread.
In my example, I'd get reward for "link clicked 20, 50, 100, 250, 500..." times automatically That would be abused, spammers can have an army of Newbie (bots) click the link to rank up. Well, I observed altcoin mining thread a bit longer, so pretty well informed whats going on there: For example, notbatman did tons of bios-es in his own thread here (and on request): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2163949.0doctor83 made most used BIOS editor (for free, too): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1882656.0nerdralph is one of main contributors in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1758267.0that is probably THE thread not only on BTT forum, but on whole web, when it comes to deciphering AMD straps and memory timings and optimization for mining What you said about spamers is true, but theres a ton of rewards on anorak forum, it would probably be hard to abuse all stats (although, I agree that when theres a demand for high rank, people are generally ready to do anything) |
|
|
|
|
Nije ni ovo baš vic, al svejedno me nasmijalo kad sam juče pročitao
navodno Arsen Dedić u nekom društvu kad su ga pitali kako bi najkraće opisao Mišu Kovača odgovorio
"karizma neokrnjena talentom"
|
|
|
|
Be warned that many will consider this merit begging, but like the other two people that gave you merit, I haven't used your BIOS but gave you a merit anyway because I am sympathetic to your plight. The problem seems to be that the altcoins/mining subforum doesn't get a lot of merit distribution, despite that it has a very high signal-to-noise ratio and is generally free from the useless sig and bounty campaign spammers. Not much you can do about it except bring attention to the issue here in meta (though, again, be warned that doing such can backfire by getting you put on ignore). Its indeed very bad there...I can name quite a few people there that helped community a lot and got near zero merit, and I saw posts like "BTC is the king, all altcoins suck" get tons of merit People like nerdralph, notbatman, doctor83 and few more did lots of stuff for free, with not much award...its either lack of merit sources there or that subforum tend to collect lots of misers Personally, I'd like to see advanced system like Anoraks forum use...not sure what forum software it uses, but I think I saw it somewhere else too, so its not proprietary...it has very developed automatic reward system (plus ability that users say "thank you" manually too) In my example, I'd get reward for "link clicked 20, 50, 100, 250, 500..." times automatically |
|
|
|
Najtuznije u celoj prici je sto vrednost Bitcoina, koji je zamisljen da bude nezavisan od drzava i mocnih koriporacija, zavisi bas od odluka drzavnih organa i velikih korporacija. Ovo je udar na samu sustinu Bitcoina.
Problem je u korisnicima...niko te ne može prisiliti da da u panici prodaješ, osim ako ne vjeruješ u budućnost crypta, a onda si ionako dio onog drugog tima protiv kojega se BTC bori, tj gledaš na vrijednost BTC-a isključivo kroz fiat (ne ti osobno, govorim općenito) |
|
|
|
It is normal, sometimes the OP gets less merit for his topic than someone who gave a comment. Contribute to the forum and the merit points will come sooner or later. So its normal that 800 people get my help, but are not grateful enough? I mean, I'd understand 2...or 20...but 800? Let that number sink and think about it for a bit...its a BIOS that I spend numerous hours tweaking it, flashing, rebooting, testing... They even get monetary gains because their cards can hash faster |
|
|
|
There is something wrong in the timings, thats true But what it is? EDIT: 999000000000000022AA1C00736A6D48A0551316BC8E260B00600600050A1420EA8980AC0300000 013143236B2334617 How about this one? I don't have that much time lately to play with it...but it would be nice if you warned me about first one, I thought you posted it because its good |
|
|
|
I don't mean bounty entries at all. Should I stop doing bounty for merit? Of course not. I just started earning merit. I've made 2 posts 300 words each and got nothing, I thought I posted usuful info. One of the post disapeared. I think it's not so easy to earn merit as you said. Anyway thanks for the answer.
I'm curious as to see what you consider to be a high quality post. Link me to a post that you believe to be of your highest quality, and if I agree, I'll merit it. As others have stated, just because a post is long doesn't mean it's a good one. Is this good enough? More than 800 people downloaded it, and I got 2 merit from people that didn't download it, but felt sorry for me, lol https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3052745.0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
