As others have mentioned that if a child board is created for Campaign Managers others services like designers, escrows, translators would also ask for their respective child boards. I am not going into the unofficial rule regarding unsolicited PMs. I think the main concern here is the lack of visibility of the service thread of reputed campaign managers which somehow forces them to PM potential customers. We already have these in the service discussion Board. List of Campaign Managers - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228596.0List of Escrows - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=276897.0List of Translators - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214430.0List of Designers - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1610428.0So, instead of creating a new child board which clearly is not needed, I would suggest that some reputed member to create a thread with all the four lists and then ask the mods to pin it on top of the Service Board. I think that would solve the problem. |
|
|
|
Very impressive OP. I really appreciate it.
I would like to ask what are these exchanges that included in OTHERs, are those unknown exchanges? It soaring high since 2017 until now but it is wondering to see that some reputable exchange has out from the race(where are they now) even Binance that we think it hits the market. It seems to see that Coinbase only has taken the lead over the others.
I thought it was Kucoin but a mistake in my eye it is Okcoin. Not really familiar to this.
I think binance might be included in others. But I cant know for sure I didnt collect the data, just used it from that source I mentioned in op I think Binance, Kucoin and the like are not even included in the data provided. Because if you check the data dump for the last 6 months, you'll see that only the following were included - Coinbase, Kraken, Bitstamp, Bitfinex, Bit-x, Bitflyer, Bitbay, Gemini & Exmo So, I think the others mentioned in the animation would be - Bit-x, Bitflyer, Bitbay, Gemini & Exmo |
|
|
|
Congrats Harkorede and hyde09. You guys are lucky  Although I am not into slots, I started playing honey rush but had a very bad first day and lost around 100$ with a max multiplier of 66x and only 2 Queen bonus triggered. The following days I got busy so I stopped it. I wonder why Mbean didnt participate, his a tough player also on Roobet contest here.
He is inactive these days, or else I wouldn't have had the chance to get 2nd spot in the Crash contest  |
|
|
|
Damn I thought it was a Play'N Go Slot as the Roobash was going on so I didn't check other gaming providers Congrats to @mu_enrico & asbotag3x |
|
|
|
@Indymoney I'm also watching the live match on TV. West Indies has been a disappointment in the last match and now. I don't know how they performed well in the first test maybe they were just lucky  Even if rain washes out two days of the game, clearly Windies are going to lose this match. |
|
|
|
|
Casineos Username: Alfr3d
User id (Casineos): 947663680
Tx Bet with Roll Between 25 and 42:http://explorer.casineos.com/#/tx/694BF1454BB69BFF38157154606E114F8FEFE62D9E1507CC9432D9C1897A274A
Tx Results:http://explorer.casineos.com/#/tx/a148018c7f605dfee003cb842cc01bd763a8ad7c5b7feb499b17f0fd144bff18
Tx Bet with Roll Between 25 and 42:http://explorer.casineos.com/#/tx/25D308CC4AF361E0B4918A5F9E6FCC55122CB3C480C7BEB2FB9C01C610DA8731
Tx Results:http://explorer.casineos.com/#/tx/4ff9b2ca2f6f1862f088288321818cb492c17ee4364fa7043be9db660230e448
Tx Bet with Roll Between 25 and 42:http://explorer.casineos.com/#/tx/FC1E6EEC7F905AE18FEF2BE4CF0D3F590F8332EC34826D176503409D1206D2B2
Tx Results:http://explorer.casineos.com/#/tx/4bf4bcc419f28959c55d0f2439d963b77c9d4fa359822898edb7ed05c5e713e1
Tx Bet with Roll Between 25 and 42:http://explorer.casineos.com/#/tx/97B047E4E62297878D461017A1486A1CF81FCF6D7E9ADF573BAC8474385857D1
Tx Results:http://explorer.casineos.com/#/tx/57e3d8aae608a0b5d4092a93ced05532c988c5289219d33050ffe0fa193e4d93
|
|
|
|
What if he comes back and decides to sell everything,only to create a price crash and do some damage to all the traders and whales?
Damn, that would be a dream come true for me. I will have a chance to buy quite a lot of BTC at cheap rates. Yes, it would do some serious damage to traders, but for Hodlers, I don't think that would matter as most of the hodlers are willing to take their Bitcoin to their grave. So it really doesn't matter in the long term perspective. |
|
|
|
Does this look promising guys  Possible rain on all five days of the match I dont think we'll have a result out of this match even with the likes of Board, Anderson, Jofra and Woakes, unless the Windies were stupid enough to throw away the wickets as they did in the last day of the previous test. |
|
|
|
akhjob
Im getting worse at slot guessing lol
You are not getting worse, Hhampuz is getting better  |
|
|
|
So after yesterdays meeting, IPL to set on the Diwali slot as mentioned earlier by JSRAW. IPL to be played from September 19 To November 8 in the UAEIPL in all likelihood will start on September 19 (Saturday) and the final will be held on November 8 (Sunday). It is a 51-day window which will suit the franchises as well as the broadcasters and other stakeholders Bowl a no ball to get the wicket |
|
|
|
I planned to take part in the Roll Hunt Game #3, and made bets with XRP. But my bet history page is not getting updated so I'm not able to submit the transactions. I faced the similar issue 2 days back when I tried the site with PLAY token and when asked in chat it was mentioned that the new game was just launched so the issue will be fixed soon. But the issue still persists, I can only see my 2 day old bet history not the recent ones. I made few bets on dice and blackjack both are not getting updated. You can check my recent winning bets here - https://imgur.com/a/XXuDffV. My current bet history page without updated results - https://imgur.com/a/peoYp3S |
|
|
|
I understand but im the receiver nit the sender so can't increase fee.
Maybe it will stay stuck
Why not ask the sender to rebroadcast the transaction with a higher fee? Or try CPFPOP received this transaction from a website. I doubt if they will broadcast another transaction with a high fee just for him. As OP is the reciever, the only available option is the CPFP. But the amount in the transaction is too low (about 12$) so he may lose the half of this amount in fees for a second transaction. Just checked the amount transacted and as you said it's pointless to go for CPFP option. But how do you say that the transaction is from a website because OP hasn't mentioned something like in the thread. And I don't think any reputed websites will send a transaction with such low fees. |
|
|
|
I understand but im the receiver nit the sender so can't increase fee.
Maybe it will stay stuck
Why not ask the sender to rebroadcast the transaction with a higher fee? Or try CPFPNot sure if the fee will be fine with them or too low though.
The set fee is too low to be accepted by viabtc, they'll only accept transactions that has included a fee of at least 10 sats/byte. |
|
|
|
Edit: target 312 runs in 85 overs
That's 3.67 runs per over if Windies plan to chase the target, but I highly doubt they'll go for given the circumstances that they have already lost Campbell in the first over itself. So I think they'll try their best to not lose their wickets and look for a draw. Edit: Wow, three down Looks like England is going to win. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
