|
The legal documents and the source of money are requested upon the registration of any project but this is not the final destination for listing any coin in the well-known exchanges. The considerable amount of the BTC is also in the requirement list and the small projects avoid to promise the getting listed on big exchanges like Bittrex as far as I know. Bittrex also doesn't publish the specific requirements for listing the project, by the way. I think the required BTC amount for listing is near the 10 BTC but this sum is not included the particular cases.
|
|
|
|
I guess I download a virus altcoin wallet and the hacker found my private key in my desktop
It is quite unfortunate mate but there is nothing you can do to regain your assets. I advice u should be more careful what u download on line im the future so as to prevent this from happening again..Always use recommended wallets also to avoid looses like this in the future. After downloading the crypto wallet from the untested websites, checking the malware with different virus-checking software can save the cryptocurrencies. The safety comes first, the experienced traders understand this but only inexperienced people keep ignoring this, unfortunately. The more we don't educate the people, the more people will be a victim of the hackers. Recommended wallets can be found after making a short search with search engines, lazy people don't like to waste their time with this nonsense. |
|
|
|
I have some eth.Everybody know many altcoin price bottom now.Do you recommened to buy Dent ,Waves ,PPT,Strat for longterm Investment.Or suggest me Your best altcoin which is bottom now.
If i where you i will just hold Ethereum as it was proven most reliable Altcoin for many years. Majority of the Altcoins and ICOs are using the Ethereum platform that once those Altcoins become bullish then expect Ethereum will become more bullish too. I don't advise to invest in the Ethereum anymore. The average market price is below than top altcoins considering total supply in small market cap altcoins. IEOs don't require the ETH from the investors, BNB reconstitutes ETH slightly in my opinion. ICOs were the main source of the demand for the ETH but now the situation changed against the top altcoins. The buying power is not enough in the bear market, the price reacts emotionally to any bad news from my experience. |
|
|
|
Paid advisors can't give the honest review if they look at the project review as an additional income from nowhere. The long experience is not a small thing but it is not enough to measure the success of the ICO with the only experience. There are teams with the anonymous LinkedIn social media pages but they get the C- rating by the advisors. l would really like to point out it is a very helpful topic. On the hand there are no advisers, who can help and on another hand who create ICO project, they sometimes don't want to get the achievement. They are only thinking about making a lot of money. l would like to mention that, l have no doubt that is true. Personally, they are extremely greedy and l despise it. It discourages me like other investors.
It absolutely they just making money. Advisers are not helping anymore and project owners never rely on them for any help that they could give. The future of crypto relies on the project owners and whatever it happens to their project, advisers are still safe. What is promoted more than average promotions was not attracted me, the quality product speaks for itself instead of seeing the banner ads on the social media page corners. Advisor's opinion can help me to cover the minus sides of the project, opinion without any critical evidence will not change my mind to invest in the project or go for another one. Paid youtube reviews are also vulnerable while investors look for review of the famous people. |
|
|
|
Real good projects are hard to come by this days,i spend most of my time doing research on any upcoming projects just to stay updated maybe they will introduce any bounty campaigns for bounty hunters,the few projects i have seen this year are mostly IEO projects from binance but id say do not give up,good project will show up and once they do just grab the chance
Just a suggestion, go to check the ICO rating websites which share the weekly upcoming ICO analyze. After carefully analyzing the ICOs you can make a list with the proper, legit projects. Next step should be to find the bounty campaign of the organized projects, this is the hardest part. Some of these projects will not have the bounty allocation or small percentage of raised BTC, some projects use the bounty platforms but it is a skill that you should develop it as a bounty hunter. The alternative choices are also obtainable but it is everyone's personal liking at the end of the day. |
|
|
|
I have never seen such case in the bounty campaigns, the bounty pool is divided to equal parts and it is distributed to all participants which can't be less than 50(some bounty managers put such rule on the first lines of general bounty campaign). The bounty earnings are the passive income, I don't like the idea of turning bounty hunting something can be done seriously. 1 participant can earn up to the allowed amounts of the token, in another situation he can dump the tokens right after the end of the bounty campaign. It's not possible for a campaign to have just one participant not even scam projects can have one participant and if the amount of participants in a campaign is small the bounty manager's usually cut the allocation and add it to other campaigns.
There is a fixed token bounty pool for each campaign in the bounty. If bounty manager distributes the tokens from one part to another part it should be agreed with the marketing team before taking such a deal in my opinion. |
|
|
|
We are all ready but it's gonna take a whole lot of time to see it happen. In terms of altcoin, only few will increase in price and many will fade away.
Accept the fact that few alts will dominate if we see the bull run again. Those that didn't survive last year until now can easily be eliminated and does have no longer chance to be alive. For now let's keep acquiring more altcoin cos you never can't tell the actual altcoin that will skyrocket with bitcoin during the bull run
Better to acquire more bitcoin. The fact is the predictions are based on the historical price movement which can be extracted from the chart data over the limited period. I am sure that not all altcoins will survive if the bear trend breakout happens before the original Bullrun. You can't tell the difference between the same type of traders who have no bias in the market to both sides. Fake breakouts happen in every timeframe, this trap is used for the early buyers. The early birds got slaughtered in every up and down trend, there is no accurate tools for finding the right side of the market. |
|
|
|
There is one thing I have realized from my experience with KYC for bounties. Almost all the projects I have provided my personal information to them failed to even get listed on exchanges and the project dies off. Surprisingly, those that didn't require KYC paid me and the project is truly developing. My point is, am beginning to think those project requesting hunters to go through KYC are just in for their information to trade and do not have any intentions to develop their crypto project so let's be vigilant about whom we carelessly give our details to, for some peanuts...May God bless our hustle
Not all bounty projects that required KYC for all the people who participate to the campaign will succeed, KYC is made to prevent fraud and it's like a security precaution. We need to choose smarter on every project we wanted to participate so our time will not be wasted. Smarter choices come from the experiences, the other requirements are not important in my opinion. KYC is for the investors, applying the same rules to the bounty hunters will not lead to the fraud-free environment. The bounty allocation is limited and KYC is used by the team in order to prevent the higher anonymous token buy limit. KYC is not only for the investors like what OP think about it. Years prepare us to be ready for the KYC required situations which can be asked bounty manager or the directly from the team. Realizing the facts will change the look of the box that looks closed for inexperienced bounty hunters. Timing the KYC can be wrong by the team but asking for the extra week from team will be the solution instead of the blaming the whole procedure. |
|
|
|
I think its more better to use well-known exchange wether its small or large amounts so you wont have doubts on your money at least a reputable exchange will be more actively respond to your problems because they dont want to lose their reputation.
Well said, the reputable exchanges will be able to solve any problem quickly and their support team is always responsive. The money related movements should be checked dobule times before executing it. Well-known exchanges are my priority choice than risking my hard-earned money with the small exchanges. For small amounts, big exchanges will not risk the year's reputation in my opinion. Hey.
Is it safe to exchange big amounts on non-custodial exchangers like changelly or shapeshift, or are they designed for small transactions?
I'm a newbie and I want to know if it's safe. Also, I want to know if it's safe to exchange crypto on classical exchanges like binance.
If they do not have limit, then you can process your transaction. If you do not trust them, then do not do it. But both company belong among the largest cryptocurrency exchanges, so where do you get that they are designed for small transactions? KYC is essential for the big amounts and Shapeshift management keep the right to ask the source of the funds if they see the suspicious transaction from the same IP address from my experience. That's why using the bigger exchanges will be more acceptable by the majority of the traders with considerable knowledge. |
|
|
|
nothing . alts have thier own life . if people only sells thier btc then btc is the one that could fall but alts are still stable because they dont sell thier alts but if the scenario happens to be different , let say people will sell both of thier cryptos ( alts and btc ) then this should cause an overall market dump but the chances are low since most people know are hodlers . in case the price drops due to some sellers , ,buyers will still take that oppurtunity and the price will regen again
You're wrong here, once Bitcoin crashes and back to $5000. Alts will suffer a major decline and even some of them are going to burned out. Remembered what happened with Stemmit after Bitcoin crashed a months ago? they fired 70% of their staff and struggling. And if Bitcoin reaches that price again, that explains people is starting to doubt it and the demand is decreasing. If people think no matter what, the price will eventually go up, then why people do not buy it right now? The project decisions can't depend on the investor's opinion, the market circumstances don't dictate in every project. The struggling projects can fire the developers and this is somehow understandable. Bitcoin can go to $5000 in single candlestick but not all projects will go to all new assembling. Maybe the market will punish the weak hands which can't command the invested projects but strong minds know how to handle the temporary market trends. The focus is important in this example. People don't like to hear the truth, they like to see the realized predictions. The market is not only controlled by the logic, but the emotions also move the market mostly. The only logic is not sufficient for understanding the price velocity, emotional traders are like the middle man between the changing market trends. Half of the traders may not agree with my statement, there are a lot of variables that explain the pointed approach in the market. |
|
|
|
I wonder why bounty mangers, project managers and their advisors keep blaming bounty hunters for dumping. How much of a projects funds are mostly dedicated to bounty campaign, apparently less than 10% whiles team and investors keeps the rest and why blame bounty hunters for dumping whiles both team and investors too dump.
The huge percentage of the dumping is from the bounty hunters, the unnecessary tokens are not burned, these tokens are airdropped to the bounty hunters. Investors blame the team why they distributed the 4% of the bounty allocation to the bounty hunters and they are able to dump. The unanswered questions are there and I doubt no one will answer these questions in the future. The bounty hunters deceived and they acknowledge why the bounty hunting becomes stressful step by step. New projects also reduce the bounty rewards used for dumping. The main idea is to decrease the dumping pressure with the distributed bounty coins among the hundreds of the bounty participants. |
|
|
|
Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.
If ever I saw an ICO that has a multiple rounds from round 1 to Round 6, usually I never join in that particular projects, because most of the time that projects ended up into scam, aside from very long period of running they are cheaters and deceiver to their community and mostly they said promises and hyped people to buy their token it is good and has a good plan. The no real use case projects with special problem-solving idea always attract the investors and these investors don't look for the projects with ICO rating services. The best projects usually make one or maximum two round ICOs in order to satisfy the needs of the project investors. Aside from the scam projects, small teams also face with the marketing troubles and they choose the multiple round ICOs as an exit method from the being out circle of the investor's interest. I also asked comparable proposals from the teams at the real meetings but they used the psychological strategies in order to avoid the main debate. Projects should be launched if there is a real need for their coin. Oppositely, the pump-dump coins will spread their toxic in the crypto industry which is not good from the future perspective. |
|
|
|
|
The crypto market is in the depression stage and the recovery time will not be less than 3 years in my opinion. I don't want to invest in the negative yield investments and the technical indicators show the availability of the bigger room for the next arm of the market downtrend. Altcoins are in trouble but the traders use these projects in order to get more Bitcoin from the market. The true believers know the reasons for HODLing the any altcoin and the reason can be mixed by the different investors. Launching the new project and promoting it don't guarantee the success factor, the investors look for the other points in order to gain the maximum available profits with trading the new coins as an early buyer.
|
|
|
|
yes the fact is like that, in this crypto industry there is no full guarantee for you. Even in traditional investment, nothing guarantees you profit. There will be no certainty in future income, and if a project claims their tokens will become more and more expensive over time, it is very likely that they are lying. Of course, that does not mean that they are wrong, however, ensuring that everyone in the inevitable benefit is not responsible, to say the least. If you see a project that claims that your profits will grow tenfold in just six months, it's far more likely to be a good old Ponzi scheme than it really is, as seen in BitConnect.
So, no matter how this promise actually looks, if you see that the project offers you sky-high profits for literally no effort, it probably means that they want to make that profit out of you.
The wise investors know this fact and they avoid to invest in these projects: If there is no product, the product is you. The probabilities are not going to solve the problems caused by the teams, the team is responsible to deliver the product by the promised idea. Investment strategies are not prepared in one night, the Ponzi scheme projects are carefully filtered by the smart investors. Great rewards can be 5% of the total coin supply in bounty campaigns, but the experienced bounty hunter avoids to participate in the highly ridiculous boutny allocation projects. The similar logic is also used by the investors and they don't want to be a part of the shilled crypto projects as a shareholder. |
|
|
|
It's all about the bears and the bulls, doesn't seem like much gray area. It's simple really, just pay attention to the patterns and trading become a lot easier. Or just use a trade bot, right? They seem to be more popular these days than before, granted the improved technology.
It's true in a way, AI is definitely revolutionizing the trading world and its providing us a lot of features to help us get better at trading, and not just the usual analytic chart. Yeah, that's what I was getting at, AI is a better term to use. Calling it a trade bot just seems too robotic. So far, Smartbot Coin's AI trader seems to be doing pretty good so far on the test trades I've done. I am using a trading bot also and it works pretty well for me, right now I am just doing other things and still having a profit using my bot, every news is important but when you are using a bot it will filter the news and get those legit one. News trading is risky and the traders who love the risks use the manual trading tools for earning maximum from the volatility created by the last news. The important news is tradeable but the situation changes often which can not be traded by the trading bots. Otherwise, the trading bots become a dangerous in the crypto trading, right modifications don't help the trader to catch the right price movement from my experience. Escaping from the wrong side of the market should be executre with corrected money management and it is hard to apply these settings in the bear market while the whole market is going down. Imaging the huge percentage of loss due to the flash crash caused by the big crypto-related news can be a source of depression in the altcoin trading. |
|
|
|
Until now, IEO is the best way to help investors and exchange have profits. But after a few months have passed, IEO's profits have dropped a lot from the beginning. I fear for the next few months. IEO will also die like ICO
IEO trend now in bored point, investors will thinking its profitable anymore since little exchanges also launch their own projects and the quality will decrease alot and risky to dump. This year was not great in terms of both new projects and the real product offered projects. IEOs are not going to pay the expenses of the investors who get scammed by the scam projects. I don't think this comparison will add any value to the argumentation of ICO lovers, they never want to buy the exchange coin in order to be in the priority list designed by the launchpad makers. The STO model didn't satisfy the investors due to the lack of the necessary features which can be discovered in the IEOs. The mechanisms for the token sales are complex but the main purpose is as equivalent as in the ICOs |
|
|
|
Christian Dekker: “I think that everyone will use bitcoin in one form or another. I’m not sure in what form this will happen, whether each person will have their own wallet or bitcoin will be part of some other mechanism in the hidden form "However, this is a very important tool, and people will use it."
What do you think guys? how many years do we need for all people using BTC?
Bitcoin is becoming more and more popular in the world, more and more people learn about it every day. However, mass adaptation is not the fame of bitcoin; it is an opportunity to pay with bitcoins in any store or cafe. So far, Bitcoin is still far away. The block size problem will not let the Bitcoin holders spend their holdings in coffee shops, restaurants. The Litecoin and Ripple coin suit the payment gateway mode better than Bitcoin transactions. The 25000 transactions per second are quite large to handle the worldwide payments if the post terminals ever accept the Ripple ledger as a payment method. Even Visa and Mastercard companies want to use the advantages of the blockchain technology that can help them to pass the big size transactions faster than traditional methods. Adoption of the faster altcoins will be more accurate idea than the adoption of the only Bitcoin in my opinion. |
|
|
|
IEO is a crypto exchange-like format, one of the largest crypto trading platforms in the world with the right platform, and if an IEO is proven to be a scam, they will lose their reputation and customer base.Below are the reasons why IEO is interested in launching.
1.First, it broadcasts primarily for a cryptocurrency exchange, which is responsible for holding an IEO. The reason for this is that by promoting smart platforms by trading platforms, they can broadcast very nicely. General Chat Loung So, a cryptocurrency exchange is to promote the market for IEO like the counter.
2.Secondly, IEO investors need to open an account in Exchange where the fund is being worked on, then earn from it Another feature of the IEO is that contribut.ors send them exchange money directly to their account but not in smart contracts
3.Finally, it helps cryptocurrency exchanges achieve better performance and better performance, and helps with trading. If a token economy in IEO is not correct then an IEO fails before it even starts. Once incomplete, there is no more trading.
Yes, this is the persistence of the IEO project. I agree with what you tell us that we need a trustworthy project. IEO has excellent potential, let alone the project is backed by a major exchange. Perhaps what is often complained by bounty hunters and investors is that this project is not immediately listed in the exchange. And with this IEO project, you will no longer be confused because the project already exists in exchange. And you can also directly monitor the movement of sales and purchase of coins. The bounty hunters don't have the intention to use the token in the real world because of the general trend of selling bounty rewards for the payment. IEOs are usually safe for the investors due to the less possibility of getting scammed by the fake team or scammers. Trustworthy projects are listed immediately after ht successful IEO but the average projects wait for the decisions of the exchange management. |
|
|
|
The BNB token has already proved that it can grow even when the entire market falls throughout 2018. The exchange is very popular and it affects the token very well.
Can I ask how the past successful can impact on the future? BNB was great when grow up the whole crypto market from the deep. But now we need some more than new lending and IEO. No new investors, no new and revolutionary ideas, nothing. Do you see any stocks exchanges with own currency? I didn't. But BNB becomes ordinary token. This is sad The proven track record of any coin can be used for guessing the future but the disadvantages of the exchange coin will be there no matter how strong fundamentals lie behind it. After the Kucoin shares and Idex crypto, the new exchange trade reward-based coins started to pop up in the altcoin market. The Binance exchange is developing their trading conditions every month and the investors who invested in the Binance coin don't feel guilty for making the right decision in the biggest altcoin exchange. |
|
|
|
as we see now many project are using IEO system to collect funds from investors and I feel IEO is very popular at the moment, besides that I also see a lot of IEO that are currently successful, therefore I am sure that the price of ETH will definitely increase too if many project use blockchain from Ethereum (ERC-20). because as we know in 2017, where ETH prices increase very high due to ICO very popular and successful, so if this year IEO will experience the same thing as ICO in 2017 (popular and successful) then it will make ETH prices increase again (bull run).
IEO projects are of course popular, but the problem for ETH is that there is no need to buy Ethereum for each IEO, as a rule, exchange tokens are used to participate in investing, which are bought and stored for a long time. All this reduces the turnover of Ethereum and does not contribute to its growth. You nailed the foremost point here, the demand for the ETH decreased due to the fewer requirements by the most advanced IEOs. The Binance exchange now requires to hold the BNB for participating in the IEOs on the Binance Launchpad. The more difficulties inaugurate to explain the reason why the price of ETH decreased after the launch of the new IEOs by different exchanges. Of course, it will happen, the event of IEO is very good right now, it is doing that very well than expected. It will definitely cause an increased price of ETH. It is waiting only for a bull run, right from the begin ETH was the best such as now. But l advice instead of relying on the short time we must expect longterm, ETH needs time to carry out it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
