As far as I can see it's just Chaeplin being Chaeplin and repeating himself over and over.

The dev isn't going to keep responding to the same thing again and again. This isn't a shouting match of who has the loudest voice.

Standard crypto variance.

Being immune to DDoS is huge. That's a big weakness of DRK.

Similarly not requiring master nodes.

I would like to see these having prominent mention in the OP if possible  

How are we picking a winner?

Is there going to be a vote?

Was an official apology ever issued about that? The FUD caused XC price to drop 75% in 30 minutes. I imagine some innocent investors panic sold due to reading it.

It's a black mark against DRK's name in the history books that's for sure.

Too many coins get produced per day to sustain a high price. Until the market interest is higher I don't see the down trend stopping.

DRK approach vs XC approach

DRK


Imagine if you will that you had a message and you wanted to send it to a friend. Delivering this message is the highest priority of your life and no other person can find out where this message came from.
The standard method used by most coins would require that there are web servers (see above image), “judges” if you will that will be the point of contact between you and your friend. They may pass the message among themselves and or with other individuals until they finally transmit the message to its destination, which will be your friend.


XC approach



The alternative approach to the crowds method is the dual path method. XC has implemented this within its wallet POS feature. This method benefits from the lack of need for a node as each individual is treated independently (see above image). It is fully decentralized and anonymous.

If we were to render the same situation of needing to send a message to a friend using this method instead we would get a completely different scenario.
In this case the request is bounced around independent individuals at random intervals until it has reached you. You would then send your message using the same method although in this case it will follow a completely different path. This means that there is no way of actually telling who the requester or the sender was. There are no nodes or “judges” and each individual will only need to decide the next movement. A complete free form of requesting and sending data.

Its approach to a complete anonymous POS wallet that not only is private but at the same time: its much faster at dealing with network changes, node drops and overall handling of data compared to the crowds approach mentioned above.

XC is also encrypted. And the dev is also working on blockchain v 2.0 later on with encrypted messaging, peer to peer exchange. And to the people spreading lies, the developer is here on linkedin and mentions XC on his page: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dan-metcalf/12/1a8/b82

DRK approach vs XC approach

DRK


Imagine if you will that you had a message and you wanted to send it to a friend. Delivering this message is the highest priority of your life and no other person can find out where this message came from.
The standard method used by most coins would require that there are web servers (see above image), “judges” if you will that will be the point of contact between you and your friend. They may pass the message among themselves and or with other individuals until they finally transmit the message to its destination, which will be your friend.


XC approach



The alternative approach to the crowds method is the dual path method. XC has implemented this within its wallet POS feature. This method benefits from the lack of need for a node as each individual is treated independently (see above image). It is fully decentralized and anonymous.

If we were to render the same situation of needing to send a message to a friend using this method instead we would get a completely different scenario.
In this case the request is bounced around independent individuals at random intervals until it has reached you. You would then send your message using the same method although in this case it will follow a completely different path. This means that there is no way of actually telling who the requester or the sender was. There are no nodes or “judges” and each individual will only need to decide the next movement. A complete free form of requesting and sending data.

Its approach to a complete anonymous POS wallet that not only is private but at the same time: its much faster at dealing with network changes, node drops and overall handling of data compared to the crowds approach mentioned above.

XC is also encrypted. And the dev is also working on blockchain v 2.0 later on with encrypted messaging, peer to peer exchange. And to the people spreading lies, the developer is here on linkedin and mentions XC on his page: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dan-metcalf/12/1a8/b82

It's not meant to be an investment tool.

MINT has a high staking percentage and look what happened to that. Puts extra downward pressure on the price.

One of the beauties of a pure PoS coin with low interest is the minimal amount of new coins produced. Compared to Litecoin producing 20,000 coins per day to be dumped for profit on the market by miners. This is what we will enable us to go sky high in price in the future. The only coins being dumped are by people who bought lower.

Yeah it's taking the piss a bit lol

To any potential investors reading this madness ask yourself this, why would DRK holders spend so much time and energy trying to smear XC and spread fear, uncertainty and doubt about this legitimate project?

Answer: They are scared of our potential.

Mark my words, next time XC rises, DRK is going to fall so hard not even a 2000 BTC buy order will save it.

Don't worry. What happened that day which caused a 75% drop in XC price in 30 minutes will go down in the history books. It's a permanent black mark against DRK's reputation as far as I am concerned until the DRK team issue an apology. It was on the official DRK twitter account after all.

Ok Barabbas www.reddit.com/r/blackcoin/comments/25oda8/ie_and_barrabas_one_and_the_same/

Nope. This guy posts between 2am and 8am UK time when I'm fast asleep.

We're not all suffering from multiple personality disorder like you.

Btw guys, looks like Christopher Bouzy forgot to switch accounts and posted as Barabbas here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631053.msg7024800#msg7024800

What a wacko.

Like Satoshi did you mean?  

Most of the coins in the top 10 were founded by anonymous developers. It will be nice to get further verification of the dev, but it's dis-ingenious of you to say it's needed as a first step to "gain trust".


BlackCoin went through far worse. Yesterday was a walk in the park compared to that.

Surely you saw yesterday DRK plunging as XC rose spectacularly? People will invest in XC and dump DRK if they see the facts. And the facts can't be hidden forever.

To add to Teka's comment, if you click on atcsecure's profile and read his last 5 messages you will see what he has to say about the claims (it's all hot air).

In terms of the future I have this post which collates a few snippets from the dev:

The mixer technology will be multi-path across a cluster of xnodes which runs over the encrypted protocol, so it won't be a central server, it would be similar to a distributed cluster, and the data is encapsulated inside that encrypted tunnel to prevent off-the wire sniffing (or off-the-air* for the mobile platform)...  DRK didn't "invent" supernodes or the concept, and while some of concepts are similar and/or overlap, we are on a different path than DRK and as we refine the platform, it will be clear why our design, implementation and infrastructure is superior as we will have autonomous supernodes using PKI that can scale up and out to become a distributed anonymous application platform

This is why the multi-path paradigm network I built back in 2005 still functions to do this day and scaled up to meet the demands of 2014... think back to 2005, granted we had the internet, but not the mobile technology - and that is a key part of my background is mobility that will be leveraged in the android anonymous POS wallet

(http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdf
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf)
(The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day )

If your waiting for NSA proof anonymity - well that is the goal of our REV 2 release..

No, mixing is only part of it, XC now contains a completely new transaction protocol layer that is encrypted and will be leveraged as a platform for all sorts of concepts.... and it will leverage multi-path paradigm topology (which again is a custom developed concept based on dual-path paradigm)So mixing is just the first application to run on top of this new protocol........ Don't want this key point to get lost --- mixing is just the first application, the list is long and the potential is huge, and since the foundation has been built and deployed, it is now time to build on that foundation.... with some revolutionary concepts and idea's.....

Also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform

Well done and thank you. I think it was only a matter of time until we had to take this step and it's better we do it now than at 1500 pages.

I recommend linking to this topic at the very top of the first page of the original locked topic as well. You may also want to share your account password with a couple of other trusted people in the community so they can moderate the topic in different time zones when you're asleep. Just an idea.

A good tip for identifying a troll is to spend 1 minute going through their post history.

Looking forward to a mostly troll free discussion  

I would rather he was coding than wasting time talking to trolls on here. He spoke briefly earlier to clear the FUD.

Thanks. Just wanted to say btw I am very impressed with how you are representing the community with your posts. Professional and cordial at all times.