looking at the photo alone seems a very difficult game to understand. but basically, it's just that 3 dice there. lots of combinations that you will actually think you could in every throw of the dice. tried going to bitcoincasino to check the site loads very slow though, i don't have an account to the ones listed. i wish to just try it to learn without betting anything though. probably just bet my altcoins to see what happens. no other popular crypto casino that has this one i guess. |
|
|
|
|
high priority can go up to 13 sat/vB which is less than $1 but i can sometimes see it goes up to 25 sat/vB, most of these transactions are worth a lot too. obviously, it's still very low compared to sending ETH.
this is in the LN. low priority is 1satvb when the price of BTC reaches up to $100K, its the value in USD will rise but it's still going to be 1sat/vb. it'd be interesting if the mili sat will be added.
|
|
|
|
Because we all favour Davis here, he has the tools and has slowly gaining experience. As compare to Romero who hasn't touch any fighter in the level of Davis.
I like Davis chances on this fight, but a boxer with the power to knock out can pull out an upset, I'm looking at Barrios performance against Davis, Barrios has the power the skills but cannot find a good opening to land his big punches and when he initiates he always get caught by Davis counterpunch, and Romero keeps calling Davis little man, now this is a bad strategy, he is undermining Davis power if he takes that mindset against him, he will be in big trouble. i bet for Barrios that day expecting an upset, it was me that's upset by the outcome. luckily we just have to bet small to win big in betting for an underdog. Tank is just too good to make mistake. he knows the value of making his record clean because they are influenced by Floyd. Romero surely will review that fight. if he sees himself having a chance, he can brag and trash-talk all the time on youtube but it's different inside the ring. |
|
|
|
Day trading will look like gambling if the trader does not analyze to find the coin instead of using the other suggestion to buy the coin.
That can lead them to select the wrong coin and in the end, they will just lose the money and can not make a profit.
If you can analyze your trade and not just listen to other people, that will not be considered gambling because you have the basic thing you use to analyze.
Maybe trading could be considered as gambling as we hope that the coin will increase in the next few hours/days.
But for me, trading is not similar to trading if we know how to trade.
Just my 2 cents.
its individual outlook of the traders on speculating the price. if 1 out of 100 that says trading is like gambling, that 1% will look at it as gambling even with candlestick charts are analyzed. i don't see it as a problem if they are just going to win but if they lose even in the spot market. if he buys ETH at $3600 and then sells at $3300 because his speculation went wrong then he is a bad gambler as much as a trader. i guess it's fair to call a hotline since he calls it gambling anyway. |
|
|
|
|
not gonna happen, countries today are developing their own stablecoin through CBDC. this is the path where governments are going through where cryptocurrencies are going to work along with it.
But I think there will still be a debasement of fiat when it comes to currency trading. it could be Yuan or YEN or probably in the future where BTC will be the reserve base currency.
|
|
|
|
|
it no matter who you are whether you are a retail investor, a fund manager, or a trader the risk is the same, you lose money/clients when you don't know when to exit your trade when the market is beginning to collapse so the outcome is the same, loss.
the risk is what drives the thrill in trading cryptocurrencies, you enjoy the ride or loss more when holding the coins for a long time. determining when to buy and sell will always be a good tool for us.
|
|
|
|
If I am correct Gambling is banned in India and the same applies for betting. There are some states that allow lottery, not sure which states do. This kind of a ban does not make any sense as offline and online gambling falls under the ban. That is why there are so many incidents of illegal gambling and betting activities happening in India. I do not think such bans will affect a gamblers because if they want to gamble they will find a way.
it's a bit of a test for one state only to see what effects would do if they ban online gambling in one area. this is big and a progressive state in India known for its commercial businesses. the pandemic has created more people to go online and do stuff in there as gambling and then addiction. the government is up to stop addiction. suicide because of gambling loss, is the outcome of addiction and this is just one person. there are more out there that might kill themselves without calling hotlines so the government steps. |
|
|
|
Clearly this is a professional boxer, I often watch davis in the ring, davis has a good career in boxing, from 25 fights 24 wins KO, this is awesome, I remember the time Davis vs. veteran JM at that time, it only took 5 rounds to win and so on in the period of continuing to win 8 times in a row without losing.
What I remember most about Davis' opponents back then was: Pedraza, Fonseca, Walsh, Cuellar and many others all KOs.
To be honest, I'm not very active following Romero's boxing, of course everyone has a boxer they are proud of but for this time I bet Davis is my hold, whatever happens.
yes this is a pro boxing but this one could be compared to pro versus midget. not to look down on romero skills. he is absolutely good base on his record. i'm not sure if i ever heard his name before or the name of his opponent either. but he has serious gap to eat to reach that heights. it would be okay if this is an exhibition fight but this is a real fight. who ever made this deal hates romero so much. 😁 |
|
|
|
For many this all has not been much of a surprise at all. My former manager at a large financial firm I used to work for sent me an article one day that was titled something like "the ghost cities of china". The article predicted exactly what's going on today. China has had these major real-estate issues for years now and the writing has been on the wall. How will this all play out? Who knows, China lies about everything, so it's hard to truly know whats going on over there.
there are serious problems besides that evergrande debts and ghost cities of china. the growing threats on the expansions thay build and taiwan conflict which could cause war. but all thes also affecting other nations as this all started with money printing. if china prints their currency too thru the CBDC, the debts of other countries to china will also starts to bubble up. all countries with trade relations to china has to keep printing money from now on. this will lead to BTC domination. |
|
|
|
|
countries like brazil or panama will apply the same way how el salvador do that their local currency will work along with BTC.
for first world countries i think will also do the same but with CBDC coin. it may take another cycle before they will decide to also make BTC a legal tender. right now they will have to take advantage of printing more of their currency, its more favorable.
|
|
|
|
|
its been said on some threads that septermber is always the bear months even on stock market. october is also said to be the opposite of it.
hope to see this bulrun will continue til december after all the US regulation is already losen up and FED has no plans to ban. and institutions are back in buying up.
|
|
|
|
i think this is also related to SEC wanting to regulate stablecoin which issuers like Circle are to be mandated to register as banks. this is meant for government to regulate crypto still and so they could also bail out investors. this will not be good for the market because while it's going to remove risks, it will not make good profit for speculators. investors who are holding stablecoin today are buying back their BTC for fear of this regulation to come. 10% may just be small. source: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/public-filing-from-crypto-company-circle-reveals-ongoing-sec-investigation-134752992.html |
|
|
|
|
dice is an easy game to play. You don't even have to do anything but click the button. but when you start losing its not going to be fun. as for me, i will look for another game to try my luck like the lottery. once you try to learn a new strategy to game the game, it starts to get serious if you wanted to earn a living through it. it's still fun when you are winning but we'll see a gambler creating a new thread about how he is tricked by the house when he experiences a losing streak.
|
|
|
|
I’m not sure how many people from El Salvador use the forum but I’m guessing not that many. I think Bukeke is a legend though & his forward thinking & risk taking is going to be really good for getting the people of El Salvador out of poverty. People doubt him but I think he will go down in history as one of the best South American presidents ever.
maybe. there are already latin countries also interested to make BTC as legal tender like Brazil. these are the presidents that will be appreciated by their people whenthey do it at the right time and i think its the right time to do it while the world is also i n transistion to digitize everything. companies now will be using the blockchain technology. |
|
|
|
|
casascius bitcoin is a physical BTC, that should represent. butnwe all know BTC is meant to be a digital currency so it has to exist on the internet which today is just too big to fail. not even a government can stop it now so its not possible that we all will be uninterested to BTC and sell. its not gonna happen.
|
|
|
|
~
What country if you do not mind me asking lets to get off the hook for operating a illegal gambling website? AFAIK you cannot get a permit if it is illegal in that state because the people who give the permits will check where the business is located and where it is offering a service to. Even if the company and the servers of the website are located in another country where gambling is legal it is still illegal to offer gambling services to states that have made it illegal. It's the Philippines, the illegal gambling industry here is big, one president was even impeached because they're involved in the protection of a big illegal gambling syndicate. its not illegal in our country we have casinos in every city by pagcor. erap was just the president that time while he was playing and he got lots of enemies like duterte. its was the time when erap wage a total war against the insugents in the country which the phil arm force took over camp abubakar. many politicians got mad at him too and the media doesnt like him. he wasnt oust thru the impeachment case decison but thru the coup. phil offshore gaming operators (POGO) is allowed in the country. |
|
|
|
~
Well, in Thiago Santos case he is really a counter puncher, that is why he is waiting for Walker to strike, not an ideal style in MMA, but if this could be boxing then this could be a different story, in regards to the coach I am just speculating things, well Johnny Walker has changed his style because he now has John Kavanagh as his coach, I think there is a huge connection between the two, but as I said this is all speculation, on what has to change Walker's fighting style. Thiago Santos and Johnny Walker are aggressive fighters who look for a knockout with every punch they throw and not counter punchers, but in this fight there were aware of their reputation and both were cautious and so is the reason it was a boring fight even though i expected to have some fireworks and Johnny Walker who usually starts aggressive was a shell of his old self and the new coaching camp did not help him one bit. Both Thiago Santos and Johnny Walker were not willing to take any risk and we saw a fight that we could forget in no time. Well, we all have our speculation on what happens in the fight, I really think that Thiago is a counter puncher sometimes, and he can also be aggressive, but being cautious on the ring is not really Johnny Walkers style, and you are right that his camp didn't really help him one bit if he can surely dump his coaching camp the sooner the better because I really like to see him again with his old self, but the faints might help him in other matches, but if he could see an opening an aggressive approach might be better. Kevin Holland VS Kyle DaukausI have to discuss this fight and I have recently watched this, Kevin Holland a fighter that really wants to be active inside the octagon has fought on March 20, 2021, and immediately on April 10, 2021, that both was a loss, and in this recent fight a No Contest one because of the accidental clash of their heads that have knocked Holland unconscious, when I have seen how Holland handle the situation with a sportsmanship manner I have become a fan, I really like a fighter with a humble personality, I really think he can still make it when he does not stop with his career, and the way he funnily commented DC on how long it is I really think he is a humble and funny guy, I would surely love to see him fight again. it was scary to watch both santos and walker got inside the cage, i knew one could drop instantly but the two show they can be very careful to last til the decision. expectation not met but enjoyed it. been a fan of holland too since the time he knocked someone while on the ground, i think he did this twice in his career in mma. i was really expecting him to win in that match if it werent for that accidental headbutt, i think he will really win. he handled it well despite it. we'll be seeing him again. |
|
|
|
We were in different bubble stage back then in 2017, different volatility, different emotions but yes, we pushed hard. I copied 2017 price action 1.5 month before segwit activation. Thats how chart should look like now:  100k+ in dec 2021. By the way, take a look how it will perfectly dance around my "bubble support line" which I which I drew about 4 months ago when we were testing 30k. Thank you for the chart and the dance of history. Bitcoin would not dance exactly as your chart shows in a few coming months but I am not doubtful that it will make a new all time high. It would be a waste of preparation from whales and developers for Taproot development and activation. 4 years, we have a halving event and a big upgrade. It won't make sense if Bitcoin simply test $64,000 for Taproot and won't make a new all time high. New all time high would not be a few thousands above $64,000. If it is made, it would be x2 from $64,000. it's still going to be a big update for taproot improves features that the community will appreciate the most especially the investors for BTC privacy improvement and scalability. it's highly anticipated next month, probably more than $64k will happen maybe this December or early next year. a representation in the video made everyone celebrate https://taproot.watch/ |
|
|
|
where did you post your number that anyone calls you to invest in crypto? if you once answered a call and you sounded like you are a pushover, they will call you every time they find out something will make you buy. What would happen if everybody wants to exchange for a real money?
If it is so good why there is a need for exchange rate to the real money?
if EVERYBODY did it for once maybe the price will drop filling up all the buy orders of lowballers. they should be lucky. the exchange rate is for us to determine the value of the coin. if there will be no rate, it's good as if there is no value. |
|
|
|
Okay I think im confusing myself.
Well if im selling an altcoin or bnb for btc... obviously the fee im paying would be in btc right since i would get btc and they deduct the btc percentage fee?
Yes, that's correct. The commission will be taken from BTC. Again, may be you've not noticed that Binance has a way of charging commission too once you pend a trade. Whether the trade triggers or not, Binance takes its commission immediately you pend it. Even if you decide to cancel it after pending it, the commission is still taken. I don't know if it's just me or any other trader experiences that. Honestly, Binance (yes, I know it's the most trusted exchange to trade on with real trades going on unlike many other big exchanges that are peopled with bot traders) is becoming an expensive exchange to trade on. You dare not withdraw in BTC if you aren't a large volume trader because the 0.0005btc constant withdrawal charge is a killer. Binance needs to review that too but for the best of reasons best known to itself, it has left it that way. no, they don't charge when you cancel an order. i have tried it several times that i cancel buy orders because when i see the prices are dumping, i will adjust the price of my bid to get more. nothing is taken. as far as i know we have the option to just click that only BNB are to be taken as fees when we trade on Binance. i'm not sure if the option is offered still i have not traded on binance for a long time already. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
