TL;DR~ GiveawayAnother use I could think of, is when you give away some amount of Bitcoin for some occasion. Let's say a family member gets a baby, and you want to give the kid $100 in Bitcoin, but you don't want to risk it never being used. You can fund a good looking paper wallet, and give the parents the instruction to give it to the kid when he/she turns 18. You keep a Locktime Recovery Sheet with Locktime 25 years in the future, and if the kid doesn't use the funds (by then hopefully worth a small fortune), you'll take it back after 25 years. If you don't trust the parents not to touch it, you can give them a Locktime Recovery Sheet with a Locktime 18 years in the future, and keep one with a Locktime 25 years in the future for yourself. That way (when properly generated), nobody can access the funds earlier. No spamPlease  On-topic posts are welcome! Holy Cow!! This is one of the best ways to give a gift to a newborn. I definitely will follow this method to give some babies a better chance for a easy future, I don't need to look for some stupid gifts they gonna trow in a year or two. Great work man, as always!! Just love reading your posts and ideas. Let's spread love and bitcoin Edit: just shared it on my twitter  |
|
|
|
|
There is not so much interes abot this project so I'm giving it one last chance.
If people are not iterested, then I'll just lock the topic.
The choise is yours.
|
|
|
|
|
At first, I though that Calvin Ayre got mad on CSW for not being Satoshi and the scammer got what he deserved* , but then I saw India and things changed.
I still get calls from "Microsoft Support" from time to time so, I can't say I really sorry for the guy. Stealing/scamming that kind of amount of money should be seriously punishable. Of course in this case big part of the politicians should be electrocuted which will never happen..
|
|
|
|
Let me help you a little, I had some early records, but unfortunately no dates.  Anyway here what I have as info > I just saw now that the merit sources are 77 now. This s a big increase from 57. There are 77 merit sources with a total merit generation of up to 17650 sMerit per 30 days Looks like theymos is staking out applications and then approve them all together at once. This happened with the previous applicants , from 49 to 57. OK, let me add some calculations too then. We stated with 35 Merit Sources (MS for short) on the first day of the Merit system. On 26th Jan. were already 49 MS. / reference/ Today they are 57 MS. So for one month from 35 till 57 this is 22 new sources, awesome but... 14 were added for 1 day, so we exclude them to be more realistic /see the reference link above/ Then there are minimum around 8 new MS added per Month! Since this is the first and only month till now and the data is not enough, we need to give more time to the system to actually see how it is working. Now it's just speculations.
P.S. The image in the OP is not loading. You have now, pretty much the whole history of the Merit Sources from the day 1 |
|
|
|
Kindly verify thanks. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I, Daboy Lyle, signing this message that I will settle things with LogitechMouse, I'm really sorry for the lack of communication between us. And to clarify things, the accounts mentioned by cabalism13 was not my alts but my relative's (except for BitcoinExplorer).
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 3FgHbbQdeuW6L51T4ewe8fm9pD3f8zXCoM
H9kJ79G9lp/qMj8HCC28b3bN9xaCFoYAJM31UwKpHdTjb/LB0IL1C5lCtUp1b74JwSjT82GmVro4mUBH7nvbmtA=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- The signature doesn't verify with the message in blockchain.info. please sign another message or wait for others to verify it. Also, that relatives stuff you said is always a generic alibi since 2017 and it always fail. anyway good luck with that. Just for the record, the signature is valid and verified in Electrum. See proof picture below.  Same address used to requrest a loan with darkstar_ again application message is missing anyway here is a quote : ~ Request For a No Collateral LoanRequired BTC Amount: 0.012 Estimated Loan Duration: 3 weeks BTC Address: 3FgHbbQdeuW6L51T4ewe8fm9pD3f8zXCoM -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Daboy_Lyle from bitcointalk, applying for a 0.012 BTC loan.Today is 7th of July 2019.
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 3FgHbbQdeuW6L51T4ewe8fm9pD3f8zXCoM
IO0QiEZcdljTlAwj1gKcNBvB88X80CocphdDwAO58wcxBdGpZxCblmvsLeFgBp2ppuGoCvDjfjnmf2AdPnkobeg=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Thanks Dark! Denied, you have an active loan already and have been quite inactive recently. |
|
|
|
~
you can check spreadsheet which I've updated. I've added everyone who submitted their tasks and didn't paid. you should be included. Thanks BTW.
Yes, I found myself in the spreadsheet now. I didn't notice the Finale Data sheet until now. Thank you Atriz for your work and thank you Gunthar for the campaign. Waiting for the outcome |
|
|
|
|
They are still off with many days and they keep reducing the gap between the real top 5 ones.
Bump for theymos' attention.
|
|
|
|
As the subject line says, from 2019-08-09 there is a new version, 0.18.1 of Bitcoin Core. You can update the torrent link as well. There are some minor changes but it's always good to have the last version. Cheers I'll lock this topic to avoid spam |
|
|
|
|
I think those bottom 5 accouts are scraping/reporting bots maybe part of Cyrus' task force Cryptios. We would never know for sure but they are still messing up with the stats.
... so bump for visability...
|
|
|
|
Good to know. Unfortunately not everyone will get his reward. My Twitter account was deleted together with many others around the Twitter crypto purge time . Anyway Im happy to help the others who took the time to participate in this campaign and are eligible for reward. Cheers |
|
|
|
Welcome to me😍
I am new member here,
Bitcointalk name has been heard in many telegram groups.
I am small trader only and I find this forum link in telegram. So many people discusse about bitcointalk and some people share this forum link. I find some useful knowledge here as guest. I have only little knowledge of cryptocurrency, I want to learn and that is reason why I register today. I like to participate in discussion.Everyone is a respected person.Hope everyone helps me.I will help as much as possible.
I want help from this forum user, also I like help to other people if possible. Sorry for bad english.
Welcome mate, before you start with the forum, read the pinned threads in this section. The rules will help you to avoid being banned. If you ever copy something from another source, always post a link to it. Plagiarism is not tolerated at all, one single stupid mistake and you no longer can post on the forum, ever. |
|
|
|
Before to move to the bitcointalk domain, the forum with the same SMF was on bitcoin.org/forum (or something like that, if I remember correctly) . That was the first transition from sourceforge to SMF. Seems that the database was moved to the new domain so that's why you can find the posts prior to the domain registration date. I do not have a PC around me but if you check the wayback machine you'll find all you need to know. If you want I can check it out tomorrow |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is wndsnb from bitcointalk.org. August 28, 2019
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
31wndsnb1Mfe4QaKsSVMyDKRX1hoMxkt6g
H7oHe5KmTQHhIpyAAevRxNLa3pi+4JKbEAMIPPcQRD96TUeSdaqG0QM8e8U5fd8EtSV+W4y7JPvqe0o5caEjcus=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Quoted, but I cannot verify it... what wallet are you using?  Most of the common verification systems are unable to verify "3-type" addresses... and it's not verifying in Trezor (which is the only one I know that works with P2SH addresses)  I manage to verify the address with mycelium on my phone. Here is the proof :  I manage to verify if from Electrum as well Proof here:  Archived > https://archive.fo/3MTNN |
|
|
|
Hello guys.. Browsing the forum stats I found something wrong. The user papperbag was registerd back in 2018.. Date Registered: August 17, 2018, 09:40:02 AM
Last Active: Today at 08:50:50 AM If you check the top 10 of Most Time Online base on the stats he was online for 1238d 8h 12mHow this is possible when he was registerd 379 days ago?? hmblm1245 2387d 17h 35m
keewee 2318d 4h 26m
bitpop 1843d 12h 35m
Lauda 1540d 3h 36m
grv 1388d 15h 2m
randomnessie 1248d 10h 43m
papperbag 1238d 8h 12m
whitesark5 1228d 14h 54m
flagge 1202d 2h 48m
x-ample 1197d 12h 44m
BTW, those accounts are registered on the same day except the first one: randomnessie August 14, 2018, 06:40:12 AM papperbag August 17, 2018, 09:40:02 AM whitesark5 August 17, 2018, 09:15:12 AM flagge August 17, 2018, 09:32:29 AM x-ample August 17, 2018, 08:40:52 AM |
|
|
|
More and more threads like this start to appear, that means that the system is working properly. Congrats, we need more HQ members  |
|
|
|
|
DT has nothing to do with trust (feedback) as a forum measure.
We coming back to the same thing over and over again.
The trust feedback does not put you in the DT.
Adding a person to your trust list is not based on your trading experience with that person, but people are still mixing trust feedback with trust.
We have to change the name of one those so people can stop mixing them.
I bet that only 10% of all the activite users know the difference between the feedback and trust.
|
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
<This is efialtis from bitcointalk, please verify my adress, todays date is 26/08/2019>
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
<33su7w86rwrm2w2iQGCwA242sYyuoVrqde>
<IHtsOoOc3QTsUSl5+r7WmkmjpN6d7wZQJyirz/Nho/AzXKETwkxOSGSSX3SuMmc2tMRob6KcqtNkJ5cyYMJWpCA=>
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Quoted, verified with mycelium, archived see below. http://archive.fo/XSzt5http://imgur.com/gallery/lvnkqGn Btw I had to alter the message a little to verify it. I remove the "<>" and it went well. |
|
|
|
I'm probably making a giant understatement here, but a lot of these sig spammers seem to be following each other's posts and posting in the same threads. I see the same names appear constantly in the same threads. Makes me believe that many of them are one and the same person. In the cases quoted above, it's even more obvious: coin_1122 and BTC_1856 have the user numbers 925742 resp. 925744, and crustycrab666 and dongosquad are 995891 resp. 995892. I suppose the numbers are created in order of forum subscription? Of course those a part of an account farm, but in order to get them banned/tagged you need to find a solid proof like similar wallet address or social media accounts. Unfortunately, it's not an easy way. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
