Looks like he wanted to create the hype to renegotiate with them again as he clearly said binance was not interested in purchasing this domain when he approached them and scammers will always go for .com domains and he has a point there according to one of his response.

I do not think any scammer will spend 5BTC to get a . exchange extension

2020-04-27 Mon 08.50h: Merit received by iasenko in the last 120 days: 475 (sent: 237)

I'm only intending to run the charity one for a few weeks while I build up my post count/merit.  It'll probably stay until the end of May at the latest when I go back to work when I'm more likely to be active on the mobile UID.  (I've been re-reading the terms of the Campaign I'm currently in and it almost reads as though no alts can be in *any* campaigns).

Hello again, my main UID is now above 100 merits in the last 120 days and my "mobile alt" has ticked over eleven in the last 120 days.  I should have joined a SigCamp much earlier.   More threads to post in, new people to receive merits from ... that sort of thing.

You can add me again, if there is still a slot for me in the first page. =)

Made my status already to put in the table.

| User	| Avatar	| Signature	| P.text	| Payment in	|120d merit	| PM the user	|BPIP stats	| Trust score |
bitmover	FR	IC	FR	BTC	60+	Send PM

The secret question just works fine. But whatever was in this link(why is this blank?) next to the answer box was disabled. It's what i was inquiring about.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=helpadmin;help=secret_why_blank

It has been disabled for many, many years IIRC, it was because of a vulnerability in SMF that allowed hackers to obtain a database dump with the unencrypted security questions.. So if these questions were left as they were, the hackers could have used them to attack accounts, so Theymos disabled the feature.

@iasenko
Looks like you can add me to the ranked up list as of today.  
An activity of 994 was my magic number by the way.

Description: Binance.Exchange Domain Name
Start: 5 BTC
End date: 2020-10-28
Payment methods accepted: BTC or ETH
Additional information: If Sell price is not met we will start negotiations with the top-3 high bidders.

Thank you for replies hilariousandco and mprep. I wasn't sure if I reported a few duplicates (but thought I did). However, those were 5 at most. I opened a tab for each shilling post and maybe I opened a few twice. It is understandable, since I opened about 100 tabs while looking over ~600 posts. Also, about the ones mentioned by hilariousandcofor being marked as bad, they are still shilling of that website, as you can easily see just by looking at the respective posts.

Indeed, as Lauda said, I didn't know that duplicate reports are marked as bad, nor I understand why. For example, if I report a post and then another user reports it as well, the report of second user is bad

If you say many are still in the queue, I'll keep waiting for all to be solved... But until now there is no change since yesterday. First user still has 194 posts out of 202 and the second one has no post deleted.

Also, about the two other posts reported in 2015 and marked as bad... I hope it won't come true what I said above, worrying me lol.

I don't care too much about the 100% accuracy. It's just in this particular case, if even 1 link would be considered correctly reported, I assume then all of them should be considered the same as all the reported posts contain links of goanadupabitcoin.ro.

This link shows why they are making these topics.
All of them should be deleted ASAP.

We need a rule against paid articles published on forum? (It is usually difficult to prove it of course and those posts can be removed for advertisement as well.)

Edit: Three out of five threads haven't been deleted yet. I reported them and referred to that link on Medium. Let's see how moderators will handle my reports.

Edit 2: All three reports were marked as good.