I think that people avoid KYC in gambling casino just because they want to stay anonymous and doesn't want to let someone know that they gamble. Other reason could figure something like money laundering, or play with money earned with criminal methods. That's why is really important for a casino ask for a KYC, in this way they will protect they self from bad situation.

If he had said this statement, it is a good step forward, as the lack of knowledge of the nature of inflation suggests that they will not continue with a single monetary policy, but that policies may change according to the variables, and therefore we may not witness more interest rate hikes in the coming months.

Continuing to raise interest rates would be disastrous.

In playing gambling without using real money is just for entertainment or the satisfaction of the player but most slot games are for this, if you will play with the demo mode you can only spin and after that is nothing no pressure just the knowledge itself. Playing with real money you will get excitement at the same time is fear and anxiety if you bet will win the game. If you are just playing for the fun most of the gambling casino have their free to play of slot using demo modes.

Maybe for unrestricted use of DNS but I don't know if it's a VPN because if someone can win a lot of money from various games, they can be asked to verify their account and the casino will ask about the VPN they are using. Somehow, the casino can tell if someone is using a VPN or is using their real IP. Therefore, it is better to be careful when using a VPN for gambling and make sure that the casino allows the use of a VPN. Even if we are not active gambler, it is better if we subscribe to a VPN to avoid tracking from hackers who want to know our location.

His reputation was already exploded when people got to know about his ebay fiasco 
But this time, he's left with no reputation+probably no money either




https://www.reddit.com/r/Buttcoin/comments/vmvq8g/whistleblower_reveals_inside_look_at_coinflexs/

I no longer play roulette because there is no auto bet now I prefer to play on Rocket dice and Plinko it's easier with auto bet.

Yes that's right, I recover losses from hourly/daily/weekly rewards and at least I should finish in 5-6th place
Overall I still make a profit even if it's only a few mbtc not bad  

I will share you my trick. Download auto clicker for desktop and setup the pointer of the auto-clicker to the position of play and skip button since it’s same position. The only downside of this method is you can’t use your computer while running it. Been using this trick before but now I rarely gamble due to my personal business needs to be manage directly by me.

Roulette will give you less risk compared to dice and plinko while you can save a lot of balance and take more profit. Good luck!

Finally today I reached 5 BTC wagered   I did it in 3 weeks because I started actively betting since the last 3 weeks
Not as imagined when I thought it was so difficult but I hear discussion here how they use the best strategy and I follow it
Even today my wager is 900mbtc because I hunt daily contest , so how about you guys?

To understand all the advantages of the Lightning Network, you must, of course, try to use this network yourself.  This is not difficult.  By the way, after the legalization of bitcoins in El Salvador, the use of LN there has grown many times over.  Of course, at first it may seem difficult when you need to block a little Satoshi in the channel.  But then everything becomes easy. 

I support those casinos that will introduce such a form of payments as LN.  The more such casinos, the better.

Listen Kat,  

If PoW Tech were superior , then the majority of new coins would be using it.

The fact that you guys , have failed to name even one new PoW since 2020 points to your failure to promote it as a consensus technology.

@Pmalek will definitely get only an exact answer since he will write it down on his table for the casino withdrawal fee.

Is the UI/UX improvement is part of the major changes on version 3.0 aside from additional social features such as PM, tip and sharing achievements. I really like the current aesthetics because I can choose my preferred background and theme on the settings which only this casino have.

The fees shouldn't depend on the size of the withdrawal but solely on the current network congestion and if the casino has to break up multiple UTXOs to send you your coins. But what is the minimum amount that the casino allows to be withdrawn in BTC? Neither you nor Eternad mentioned that. Don't they post the information somewhere on the withdrawal page/tab like almost all other casinos?

I agree on this narrative. Before, wheneve we hit a bear market, there were those negativity spreader and they're telling that bitcoin was dead and it will never recover.

But this time, it's all about the craze and desire to buy at the dip so that they can buy some and collect as many as they can while we're seeing the dip of bitcoin.

I do not think implementing lighting is even a question. You just need to see that even if a limited number of users are willing to use it because it confers and advantage then is a question of using it to create an advantage to gather more users to use your site. From my user perspective, sure lighting is much welcome. The more alternatives the better for me.

Hi blackjack.fun,

I would like to know what is the minimum withdrawal amount in your casino and how much are you charging your players in withdrawal fees?
I would check this myself on your site, but the information isn't public, and players who don't have any funds in their accounts can't open the withdrawal page.

In my thread about Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos, BlackJack.Fun is mentioned as not having any minimum amounts. Apparently, that's no longer the case. If you take a look at the last couple of posts in the linked thread, you will see that a player attempted to withdraw 0.0001 BTC, but he/she received a message that the amount is too small.   

i'm actually a big fan of the history of money and one of my big ideas is if bitcoin could have a physical representation without needing verification digitally. so you could just hand a bitcoin to someone as a payment without any government or central entity backing. but that's a separate topic for another thread sometime. perhaps if you know so much about money and how it evolved over human history you could contribute to this idea of mine. we need to keep this thread on topic though...

im no trader but to my untradered eye this chart appears to contain confirmations indicating there are more ticks before, in fact there are more than 6. The chance of double spend here is astronomically small.

Isn't this Merged mining Proof of Stake?

It is definitely backed by bitcoin, and since bitcoin relies on PoW, it's indirectly backed by PoW. Not something "environmental evangelists" like LegendaryK are going to support of.


So... Why don't you buy bitcoin?