Username: Wind_FURY
BTC SegWit Address: bc1qtt3pwkxzd7r842dxtghh2w6y04nzr36l2j64yc

Bitcointalk Username: Wind_FURY
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=844914
Post Count: 8966
Forum Rank: Legendary
Are you able to wear our Signature, Avatar & Personal Text? Yes, if accepted
Stake Username: urukhai12

Zoomed out to the maximum, it doesn't deflate, BUT there could be cycles of deflation possible, especially if the cabal behind the Federal Reserve over-adjusts with QT.

Percentage Change, Year on Year illustrates that the money supply is dropping. It's currently -0.70%. It's possible that inflation rate will drop quickly too, probably near ZERO PERCENT by June, 2023, and deflation by the end of the year.


I know it's debatable, it's also laughable to discuss "deflation" in the middle of an inflationary period, but I'm the stupid one.

There's no strategy for all market conditions, but there's always a strategy for each market condition. The programmer's job is simply to identify the market condition, then use the right script.

Plus you're wrong in believing that no trader has successfuly ultilized bots for profit because there are many of them in the top 10% of the most profitable traders. Plebs like us can't compete against them, with their large capital, and their army of bots.

That's obviously a statement you don't hear many people say, but if we review the history of the cabal that decides if they should implement QE or QT, the cabal has the susceptibility to over-adjust in one side causing inflation, and probably deflation after over-tightening. When one act causes an outcome, they over-adjust to stop the outcome, which causes the opposite outcome.

I'm not an economist, but if deflation happens in 2023 that causes further recession, what would the Federal Reserve do? MAXIMUM ORDERS OF BRRR-MONEY PRINTING.

Prepare to experience a big surge for Bitcoin like it was 2015 - 2017

Current number of post (Including this one): 8961
Rank: Legendary
bech32 address: bc1qtt3pwkxzd7r842dxtghh2w6y04nzr36l2j64yc
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 77

Current number of post (Including this one): 8960
Rank: Legendary
bech32 address: bc1qtt3pwkxzd7r842dxtghh2w6y04nzr36l2j64yc
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 77

OP, isn't the user to be the one who programs a script for OpenAI or a bot to function? If that's true, then your bot would only be as good as your trading strategy. But what's probably good about it is it will remove human emotion from trading, and it will absolutely follow all the rules of your trading strategy, making it have less mistakes, and therefore probably also make it more profitable in trading IF you programmed the bot with a good trading strategy.

Casinos are probably the very best places to try a "cashless system", with government interest starting to grow in digital payments, and CBDC. What I want to know is, under such a system, would it be possible for the casino to attach identity with a transaction and have an ability to cancel transactions? It's probably for the benefit of some gamblers to control their irresponsible spending, but giving up the ability to spend your money wherever you want it is a basic human right. It should be respected.

Ser! You continued to respect Barry Silbert "a lot" after he tried to organize the top Bitcoin miners, exchange owners, and top Bitcoin merchants in New York to co-opt Bitcoin, and fork it without any agreement with the Core Developers or reach consensus from the community?


I don't know Zhusu, or his opinion towards Barry Silbert, but I know what to think = Barry Silbert is a BAD ACTOR!

But the withdrawals that I have made in BlackJack.Fun have always been instant, during the time when I was in their signature campaign, and after the signature campaign. Although all those withdrawals were small that never went more than $500.00.

I believe withdrawals of more than $10,000.00 in any given period from new registered players would warn the admins.


Centralized casinos currently in BitcoinTalk probably should build part of their site to function like DirectBet and give their users a new UX.

Ser, you cannot be more inaccurate in your post. Gambling companies are centralized entities that are regulated by another centralized governing entity. That itself makes it very impossible for a gambling company to be permissionless UNLESS it was built and implemented directly to use the Bitcoin blockchain, like DirectBet. But if you're demanding for BlackJack.Fun to be "permissionless", no, that can't be possible.

There was literally nothing in what you said that proves Luke Dashjr was compromised. LITERALLY NOTHING.

You merely said his religious beliefs, which many people already know, is very conservative to put it mildly. But that doesn't prove he is compromised. You continue with Segwit and start to try and gaslight everyone again with one long, senseless post. The franky1 we know. Haha.

Why is it that it's always, ALWAYS a brand new account that's always "accused" of multiple accounts, always has KYC problems, and always has withdrawal problems? I believe many people in the forum would be very patient in handling each of their situations. Where did the brand new accounts come from?

"Cashless gambling" is just an experiment. KYC will be easier with CBDC because your identity will be attached to each CBDC transaction. What does the future hold for casinos in a CBDC World? A world that a nefarious cabal, a centralized entity that doesn't have your best interests at hand, has absolute control over money.


That's what they want us to believe. Haha.

"Compromised". If there was proof that Luke Dashjr was truly "compromised" and he's working for the Flat-Earthers, then remove him from Bitcoin Core. OR if he starts a public declaration that Craig Wright is the "Real Satoshi". But currently, Luke Dashjr is simply a person who had his Bitcoins stolen from him. A mere victim of a hack.

The person just lost his livelihood, it's not his fault/he was a target by hackers, then you want him, an experienced Bitcoin developer who has written thousands of lines of code, to be removed from Bitcoin Core development team? I believe not. If your house was robbed, I believe it would be unfair for you to be removed from the job. Plus there's no negative impact in my opinion. Bitcoin is OK, and he didn't intentionally write a nefarious line of code to break the protocol.

I have read two good advice in the topic, 1. GET A JOB, and 2. SAVE MONEY. If it's possible in your situation, it's also good to get a second job, ANY job.


"A successful trader"? It's going to be very hard to convince anyone with only four years experience to give OP the money for him/her to gamble. Would you give him/her your hard earned money because he has four years of experience? I believe there's a high probability that you can outperform his/her portfolio by simply HODLing Bitcoin bought during the bear cycle, then HODLed through to the next bull cycle.

Your list is definitely more familiar, and actually better than OP's list. Before anyone reacts that I'm being very biased, I'm not. CGRevu's list is better because we can verify easily if those casinos are truly good or bad casinos. The casinos' in OP's list, who has played there? Which campaign manager has interacted with their admins, their team, and their developers? How have they interacted with the BitcoinTalk community?

That's a coordinated/targeted-attack, and probably his way of securing the keys were not very good enough. I believe we should learn from this, and start using different paths/strategies to secure our keys. If you have your whole savings in Bitcoin it's probably better to use different wallets and secure them differently to confuse the attacker. Use - Hardware Wallets, Encrypted Wallets, and other wallets written down and secured through lock/key vaults.