They are probably starting to truly understand Bitcoin's underlying nature. It's breaking barriers, and it can weaken political strongholds. Plus its price volatility is a feature for adoption because it tempts people's greed, and their need to speculate and take risks. Some of them will become HODLers.

These are the first signs that we might be approaching the bottom of the current cycle.

Proshares released their "Bitcoin Short ETF", https://www.proshares.com/fund-highlights/short-bitcoin-etf-biti

They are betting against the Honey Badger, and when legacy institutions, and investors start playing stupid games with Bitcoin, they surely will win stupid prizes.

It was the Fed who just admitted that THEY currently now understand that they have little understanding about the current inflation, and how to fix it. Because, they did the necessary steps, but inflation keeps going higher and higher.

BUT this is what EVERYONE of plebs should understand. The Federal Reserve doesn't care about our investments in stocks, in commodities, or in Bitcoin. They're main concern is to fight inflation, and maintain the U.S. Dollar's value AND its status as a Global Reserve Currency. Because if hyperinflation happens, it will END the U.S. Dollar's status as a Global Reserve Currency, and END the United States' global dominance over the world. I believe the Fed will crash the economy through more tightening and rate hikes if they need to, to save the Dollar.

Blame Bitcoin's continuing journey in its path to price discovery, the hype during the bull market, and partly the speculators for the volatilty, the same speculators who are attacking it with FUD now because the probably lost money.

I admit my mistake for believing it to be a good inflation hedge. It's still a hedge, but less a financial hedge. Because of the underlying nature of Bitcoin that makes it censorship-resistant, and gives its owners sovereignty over their own money, it's a hedge against the cabal and their manipulation over the financial system. Buy the DIP, and HODL.

Because OP missed the absolute point of Bitcoin. From his post, his perspective is of a no-coiner's viewpoint that Bitcoin should be the same as regular fiat-currencies.


Actually wrong, OP. Bitcoin is needed not to correlate with the "real economy". It's actually needed to be a fall-back/back-up in case the cabal breaks the financial system.

Let's blame the lack of education, or the lack of honest people who are in the position to truly educate us the plebs. Too many are the people who focus more in the financials/economics of Bitcoin, and not enough focus on the technical/development/technological side, which can give us wider path in understanding what this technology is. It's obviously more than "just money".

But ser, even the big, "trusted" exchanges, and other Bitcoin companies are not truly safe with your data too. Ledger was hacked, and all I.D. and emails were stolen, assumed to be sold in the dark markets. Coinbase, were also reproted to have sold geo-location data to the U.S. government. Laziness and procrastination might save some of our fellow users. Hahaha.

Or another reason could be laziness/procastination, or they probably don't trust the site. I remember the first time I was asked to KYC by an exchange, it was a trusted exchange and one of the oldest, but out of lack of trust, and a little laziness I didn't upload the requirements and my coins stayed in the exchange for 6 weeks. There's something about KYC that makes me feel nervous, and anxious.

It's actually not. In the context of how he said it, I believe he was trying to give everyone the thought that the might not have no other choice but to let the economy go have a "hard landing", because in his words it was something like, "their options in how to fix inflation without causing a recession is narrowing".


Ser, it's either raise the interest rate, or hyperinflation. Save the Dollar, or the economy? History has taught us that since 2008, the Fed always tightened after QE, and went to QE again.

Hahaha. If you ask me, I get neither any satisfaction from demo mode, nor any entertainment from playing fake money. It's better to play freerolls and have the opportunity of winning some real money to use in the casino. Demo modes are implemented for the users to try the site's UI/UX, but playing them for satisfaction/entertainment is a waste of time for me.

I believe it's true. Inflation might not fall to 2% in two years. Probably longer. Jerome Powell released a statement yesterday during an FOMC meeting and said that they ave started to understand that they now have no understanding about the current inflation.

What? It's a joke by me? NO, he actually said something like that!

Or maybe before making your first deposit to a blocked casino by your ISP, why not tell the casino itself ahead of time that you will be using a VPN, and the reason WHY you're going to a VPN. I believe most of the online casinos in crypto are OK with it because privacy is more valued by the users in crypto than the no-coiners who play in fiat online casinos.

Was that about Roger Ver and his fireworks business before he became a popular Bitcoin personality? I believe that didn't give him a bad reputation as a Bitcoiner because no one cared about it. What destroyed it was his support of Jihan Wu and the Chinese Mining Cartel's "big block" hard fork.

PLUS, if he literally did NOTHING from an investment standpoint, his Bitcoin would all be in profit and he would have enough capital for himself, and his grandchildren's grandchildren. Has he really lost everything that he has defaulted on a leveraged trade in Bitcoin Cash?

I'm curious how large are the surges and declines from winning to losing, or from losing to winning within that three week period of auto-betting.


If I make $1.00 auto-bets for the same three week period as yours, how much profit would I have using the "farming method"? I believe you discovered something very nice there.


Is using external software while playing allowed by Blackjack.fun?

 

5 BTC wagered in just three weeks? That's very impressive, ser. We mere newbies would like to be taught how you do it. What games were you playing, how much do you bet per roll/game/pull, how large is the weekly cashback, and most importantly, what's your profit - loss ratio like? Plus how do you not become emotional during playing? That's the problem for me, I easily get angry at a loss of $50.00.

Roger Ver is one of those Bitcoin personalities who has destroyed his own reputation, and probably wasted his precious Bitcoins to invest in business/companies based on his forked-shitcoin Bitcoin Cash. It would have been his best move if he kept quiet and did nothing. He would probably be one of the biggest Bitcoin billionaires in crypto.

During the scaling debate, I believe Jihan Wu used him.

Is that true? Because what is implemented by the El Salvadorian government is their Chivo Wallet app, which I believe to be a custodial wallet. The transactions made through the app are not Bitcoin transactions. They're mere IOUs that can be censored.


It can become quite technical if you want to use it non-custodially. I will ask the Lightning experts how to use it without depending on a third party.

It's because it's VERY HARD to bootstrap a non-scam/non-shitcoin POW cryptocurrency network, which instead makes shitcoin "developers" print tokens out of thin air to bootstrap their "POS network". I'm not saying POW is perfect, or Bitcoin will never die, BUT it has been running for more than 10 years, chugging along without downtime. Bitcoin's life expectancy will be longer than expected. The Lindy Effect.

Which should be very easy for BlackJack.fun to fix. But after withdrawing $50.00 - $100.00 at a time, and I just remembered I also had a withdrawal of about $25.00, I'm confident the minimum withdrawal amount isn't very high, and that it's very easy for many people like me who are only "light users".

I'm sorry, I only assumed that it MIGHT also be the size of the withdrawal. I never said that it was definitely the case.

For the question, "What's the minimum?", this is only another assumption, but I believe it might be for as long as you can pay the withdrawal fee, your transaction will go through. But who will withdraw $1.00 of Bitcoin if his/her entire balance is $2.00 with a withdrawal fee of $1.00?

Everything might be clear in Version 3.0 with its UI/UX improvements.