He has tried to withdraw over 330 BTC since 2nd January 2019 so 40 days ago and there is still no resolution because Cloudbet are trying to manufacture excuses to keep hold of crypto that belongs to the user.
If the image is real, player withdrew 50 BTC the same day their 52 BTC was rejected, day before 40 BTC and 54 BTC on Dec. 29. So why would they allowed player to withdraw 144 BTC and then reject other withdrawals? Makes no sense. |
|
|
|
@DireWolfM14 not all threads are real scam accusations. Some threads are questions like " is Cloudbet scam?", I noticed one scam accusation where player didn't want to share their account name even asked several times by Cloudbet, most scam accusations are resolved and in some cases player cheated site (created account and then created another account using referral link of their first account). I always thought gambling was a tax on people who are bad at math. Maybe arithmetic is lost on the younger members?
Thrill, excitement, chance to win... Players who beat house and have won life changing amounts exist but they are extremely rare. But yeah, mostly tax on...  |
|
|
|
Has OP stated whether the funds can be returned to the address that they came from or not?
I couldn't find it in this thread. OP only mentioned that they will sign message if Cloudbet ask them to sign it.
Can Cloudbet confirm this:  |
|
|
|
hilariousandco - Is he just ignoring everything? I still see his endorsement in his topic. As a global moderator that's something very wrong.
That was originally "Bitcointalk's English Premier League Football Pool" which was renamed to "Cloudbet's English Premier League Football Pool" later. I don't remember any more how much funds Cloudbet added because I left it long time ago. Hilariousandco should probably rename it back to "bitcointalk's pool" until Cloudbet resolve scam accusations. |
|
|
|
Some thing made me surprised: I saw other day some of the DTs red tag but I can not see them now. Why did they remove them? Why are they so nice to couldbet?
Tag was for other scam accusation which was resolved. as I've suggested earlier: Release the initial deposit and then investigate the winnings later.
They can't do that because they said: There have been several people from different territories contacting us via different channels to claim ownership of the account, with varying degrees of evidence provided.
But Ronnie doesn't want to talk about: Regarding 330BTC scam accusation, how many people actually have access to account?
|
|
|
|
In case Cloudbet missed this: Regarding 330BTC scam accusation, how many people actually have access to account?
Just put game-protect on ignore, your lives will be so much more easy. I've had email conversations with casino operators who have fled this forum due to the systematic bullying and trolling that game-protect engage in. They add nothing of value to this forum nor any of the topics they participate in. They are delusional and should not be given the attention to continue with their immense shitposting. Trust me on this one . They made some valid points in this thread which have never been addressed by Cloudbet. It is not all black and white. |
|
|
|
You seemed to overlook it in your rant of nonsense.
You mean, this nonsense https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49514571#msg49514571 ? As I said, read again posts starting from "question" and you will eventually end up hereHey Og, why don't you message my clients again telling them they should stop working with me? That went so well last time  The scams you've been promoting? Why would they kick their golden goose? You seems using word scam many times but I can't find anything related in your trust ratings. Don't you want to warn community about these scams you are aware of? Isn't that important part of default trust network, to tag scammers when spotted? |
|
|
|
marlboroza where'd you go? This was your scam fight...
Sorry, I was busy, "trying to keep newbie accounts off the forum". However, unless I’m vastly mistaken, I believe my thoughts and actions are in line with how the administration of this forum would like to see things being done. If I’m wrong, please theymos or Cobra reach out to me via PM and help me see the error of my ways.
You don't need theymos and Cobra to PM you something that many people see. It was presented to you many times, it is just you have ignored everything people have told you. You don't appreciate anyone nor anyone's work here. It's only about you, you and you and how great and trustworthy you are. This is impression I got about you lately. Just read your replies. And to be honest, you have completely lost it, sending merit to someone who is suggesting people in reputation to exclude all people who are actively tagging scammers and to add several scammers to their trust network? Just because you have this fight with Lauda? You want to talk about: EDIT: Where are all the scam busters when an ACTUAL THREAT appears? So where are you? You have time to reply in scam accusation against fortune jack several times for reason which is very well known to everyone here, but when someone has real problem with cashing out 33 BTC from another gambling site, where are you? I am asking you, where are you? I don’t spend my time looking for people to tag... who scam
FTFYThen don't insult people who do with your " questions", " assumptions" and " conclusions". Great example. I've excluded the user who was promoting this operation from my trust network. I see you went the opposite way and included him in yours. I like the way how you cut half post. Edited with full quote. Point - missed. I don't see why you have excluded Hhampuz based on thread which was locked exactly 4 months before scam accusation, but as I said you missed point. Maybe to re-read few posts again. Because someone is tagging those they consider "scammers" does not mean they should be allowed to use the trust system for personal selfish reasons or to stifle free speech. I consider those sorts of persons very dangerous to this movement. If they must remain then they need to be tagging scammers only not tagging anyone they choose for any reason they choose. This is the main issue here.
You mean someone like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49514571#msg49514571 ? Oh, again you didn't see this post which was pointed to you many times. I see you have no problem now advertising the other gambling house mentioned in marlboroza's quote as facing a scam accusation. How convenient. Strange to mention Fortunejack: If you take a compensation (in this case a bug bounty), you are legally entitled to nothing.
This is my current opinion on bugs and compensations and we can leave it at that. Of course it is... Considering it is the exact opposite response you would and have had if/when you weren't wearing their signature. Funny how your ethics depend on whether or not you're paid by the offender. Your word is meaningless and your opinions clouded by greed. This is yet another example of why you belong nowhere near any sort of position of trust. You really need to stop spreading unecessary lies and derailing the thread. Thanks. . ICOs you escrow, signatures you wear, somehow people always end up having their money stolen, and it always seems to not be your fault, then it happens again. However, it seemed a good opportunity to display how useless the current tagging efforts are, that they literally don’t even tag actual scam threats because they’re too busy trying to keep newbies off the forum.
Sounds like something for you, others are too busy with newbies.
So you won't be changing anything about the paused campaign for a scam, as alleged by marlboroza? I assume marlboroza has no issue with this and will keep Hhampuz in his trust network, but has an issue I didn't spend the time to research this issue to tag whoever was behind it (because I wasn't aware of it)? Wow...
I see you have no problem now advertising the other gambling house mentioned in marlboroza's quote as facing a scam accusation. How convenient. Yes, ignore away. That'll fix the problem here...
marlboroza where'd you go? This was your scam fight...
You were not aware of it, yet you just said you excluded me from your trust network due to it? That seems... conflicting. No? but it does seem to reinforce my judgement as being correct. Cutting quotes again? http://loyce.club/trust/2019-01-25_Fri_22.33h/18321.html This confused me! OG excluded Hhampuz for this reason but didn't excluded Hhampuz for this reason, and wasn't aware of this but excluded Hhampuz for it  Best part - scam accusations have been opened after January 25. 2019  You guys are just pointing out how much more trustworthy my actions have been than yours and how hypocritical your trust networks are...
 |
|
|
|
However, unless I’m vastly mistaken, I believe my thoughts and actions are in line with how the administration of this forum would like to see things being done. If I’m wrong, please theymos or Cobra reach out to me via PM and help me see the error of my ways.
And to be honest, you have completely lost it, sending merit to someone who is suggesting people in reputation to exclude all people who are actively tagging scammers and to add several scammers to their trust network? Just because you have this fight with Lauda? Because someone is tagging those they consider "scammers" does not mean they should be allowed to use the trust system for personal selfish reasons or to stifle free speech. I consider those sorts of persons very dangerous to this movement. If they must remain then they need to be tagging scammers only not tagging anyone they choose for any reason they choose. This is the main issue here. You mean someone like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49514571#msg49514571 ? |
|
|
|
However, unless I’m vastly mistaken, I believe my thoughts and actions are in line with how the administration of this forum would like to see things being done. If I’m wrong, please theymos or Cobra reach out to me via PM and help me see the error of my ways.
You don't need theymos and Cobra to PM you something that many people see. It was presented to you many times, it is just you have ignored everything people have told you. You don't appreciate anyone nor anyone's work here. It's only about you, you and you and how great and trustworthy you are. This is impression I got about you lately. Just read your replies. And to be honest, you have completely lost it, sending merit to someone who is suggesting people in reputation to exclude all people who are actively tagging scammers and to add several scammers to their trust network? Just because you have this fight with Lauda? You want to talk about: EDIT: Where are all the scam busters when an ACTUAL THREAT appears? So where are you? You have time to reply in scam accusation against fortune jack several times for reason which is very well known to everyone here, but when someone has real problem with cashing out 33 BTC from another gambling site, where are you? I am asking you, where are you? I don’t spend my time looking for people to tag... who scam
FTFYThen don't insult people who do with your " questions", " assumptions" and " conclusions". |
|
|
|
However, it seemed a good opportunity to display how useless the current tagging efforts are, that they literally don’t even tag actual scam threats because they’re too busy trying to keep newbies off the forum.
  Don’t let that stop you from trying to find a way to turn my positive action into a negative though...
Why would you say such crazy thing? I am happy that you have found scammer and warned community about them. The way you have presented this, well, it is whole different story. |
|
|
|
Actually, shouldn't possible malware links be reported to mods for deletion? I responded to OG's "question". It should be reported to moderator if user is spreading malware, but moderators won't ban account every time and sometimes thread will remain there. So, it is best to tag account, report them to moderator and post warning for guests who can't see -ve Hence why I tagged them and reported the post for deletion. Good thing I didn’t wait until they successfully scammed and a post was made in the scam accusation section. If I am looking correctly, this is first account OG has tagged for spreading malware since 2011 Go ahead, brag around, first time is something to remember Edit: https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/541b91f5074afb04d6749f10bb860d5a9035d73a22534cb73fe4f50b140b9c72/detection here you go OG, for better reference and if you want to report them to moderator. This is your big case fella. |
|
|
|
Minex shill TemHuk sent me negative feedback after my comment in meta  Of course, without reference link to post in meta
There scam official Minex thread now shows:
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (91 posts by 14 users with 1 merit deleted.)
Just archive your replies and quote them in the scam accusation thread. Questions should be addressed, not removed. They can also quote posts from inbox. |
|
|
|
|
^
It is not good practice to ask people to remove exclusion and it is definitely not good practice to PM them to do so, so please stop doing this.
|
|
|
|
Ok. I searched through my PMs, and I found something:  While I can't really remember everything from back then, it seems we already talked about that. I really have no idea what lead me to post that rating especially since we've had a PM exchange. From the timestamps, it seems that the information I gave him in the PM lead Joel to falsely accuse me as a scammer.However, I hope everything's good, now. Joel_Jantsen's PM --> 15:53:03 (3:53 PM) PM information --> January 31, 2016, 17:35:19 (5:35 PM) Joel_Jantsen's "connection" --> January 31, 2016, 01:50:34 PM Correct me if I am wrong, 1 PM comes before 5 PM?
Anyway, everything is resolved so thread can be locked. |
|
|
|
But Minexcoin is 100% legal company.
Where is it registered? Could you show us the registration documents? which providing bank card service to their customers.
Cards (That are not working any more) are issued by Upay for the company called UAB KRISTOLINIS DUGNAS which is a Lithuanian tableware trading company. The people that received or are waiting for cards have nothing to do with the company mentioned above. Could you please explain That? I think it's time to create another topic at Bicointalk where devs of all coins can cooperate against extortionists and thru the court or by free will of Bitcointalk get their personal data and pass that to the police to judge them by law. That is pure crime which happens in Bitcointalk
I think it is time to get the personal data of all Minexcoin developers and forward it to police, because of online fraud, card fraud, and illegal financial activities. But don't worry, people who received fraudulent cards and lost their money in your scam will do that without our help and all of you will go to the jail. One scammer Yurii Pogrebnijak is already exposed and believe me all others will join him very soon. That looks bad.  I would be very pissed if I had ordered Minex's VISA card and received UPay's mastercard.  Minex should revise this: The Future of MinexMinexBank’s monetary policy serves the main purpose of making MinexCoin a global reserve cryptocurrency. In order to attain it, MinexCoin will have to meet the following principles:- Simplicity and high speed of transactions- Exchange rate stability and predictability against U.S. Dollar- Market cap of $1 trillionMinexBank will consistently administer the policy of increasing MNX price against USD on the basis of the growth rate of 33.6% annually. Once MinexCoin issuance is over at block 5,400,000, its price will reach $52,600, and market cap $1 trillion. To this:  ^^^I'm requesting Bitcointalk admins to prosecute Jollygood and thunderjet for slandering now. They are breaking criminal law at your forum.
Which law this breakes? - If you have a copyright claim, you have to PM/email me a valid DCMA takedown notice with all required elements, including your address, a declaration under penalty of perjury, etc. Note that I will forward your notice to the affected users.
Somehow I have feeling this won't happen. |
|
|
|
[size=14pt][color=red]DOWNLOAD - [b]http://satoshibox.com/kfnx6bjqhctm4rtmph7r222q[/b][/color][/size] I added them on code tag. I am scared to click this link. Suspecting the link might have any malware which can infect my computer. I am not sure if this is allowed in the forum. Is this a direct download link? It is link to satoshibox where OP sells whatever it is inside. You can't download it unless you pay for it. If you decide to buy whatever is in that file, run antivirus after you download file ( https://www.virustotal.com usually gives best result). Keep in mind that no one knows what is inside that link, it might be script, malware or something else. |
|
|
|
What kind of illegal things?
Who mentioned illegal usage of photos, you or me? The last straw was the publication of insults and trolling with the illegal usage of my photos in other topics that were not even in the "scam" section. 2. Only the court has the right to establish the legality or lawlessness of some facts.
Is this court of law? Or discussion forum? 3. The fact that the user once did a favor and then slandered other people 100 times is useful?
Isn't the fact that user posted facts? 4. The user has the right to only assume, suspect, have an opinion or an inclination (like - do not like the project).
Can we say that user, based on facts presented in thread, have right to assume and suspect that minex is scam and discuss about it? And also indicate that no investigations are legally binding, as they are not conducted by authorized services, but in turn, these “false accusations” can be prosecuted.
Ever heard of news reporters?
Now you are complaining that someone is using your picture and personal information. As you said this isn't your name, and now you are pretending to be a guy which you claim you are not, luring people to register under your referral link for your own financial gains, isn't that called identity theft? Identity theft is the deliberate use of someone else's identity, usually as a method to gain a financial advantage or obtain credit and other benefits in the other person's name, and perhaps to the other person's disadvantage or loss. The person whose identity has been assumed may suffer adverse consequences, especially if they are held responsible for the perpetrator's actions. Identity theft occurs when someone uses another's personally identifying information, like their name, identifying number, or credit card number, without their permission, to commit fraud or other crimes. sourceIn case identity is really yours (which you claim it isn't), there are also other laws for this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5046331.msg49587152#msg49587152 so make sure to read all laws regarding your... referral link. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
