Lied and lied to save myself from your witch hunt and prove me not being an harm to the community. Yet even when I have agreed to the mistakes you can't say in what way am I harm to the community as far as supporting people to post my personal information here. Keep laughing.


As I have previously proved you can brag up anything to suit your allegation, you thinking of it as above is just another wild assumption...

You should be laughing at yourself yet and enjoying the fun here. But you accused me totally out of spite and you cannot denide this.

For those of you judging geniunely, none of the account listed out by marlboroza are my alts. I already posted about me being in that business some time back, same indicates and defines those ETH transactions. The accounts are not connected to me or I am not much aware about the info of the owners of those addresses.

You blaming him of speaking about this issue or getting engaged in it due to the BTC he got paid from the campaign I managed shows how low you can go to frame anyone here according to your agendas and double standards and even makes other attempts of you damaging others reputation here more clear.

All of that is bullshit and a genuinely judging person would catch your deflection pretty quickly.

How do I know all this ?...

They are not alts connections as you try to frame it here, they are just simple one side ETH transactions, and it doesn't prove I own those accounts or have anything solid to do with them. What a laughter, keep enjoying.

I cannot, thats again your deflection from me being an ICO bump account yet.

None of them are mine or in control of me, ETH transactions from one address to many doesn't proof they are my alts.

As I already said, I can't defend myself when the accuser thinks that everyone should be perfect here. I agreed about my involvement in the service and me not been engaged in it from long time, as soon as I was aware of the rules around it and I even discouraged such practices thereafter.

The baseless attacks of plagiarist and similar others thing's deflects my replys and legitimate explainations about my past mistake. Him yet thinking of me as an ICO bump account is a big lapse in judgment.

Indeed, I do and learn programming everyday FYI.

---

I never stopped speaking about some of your double standards and selective abuse here that made you not forgive me. Don't roll your own words, you are proved to be more evil than anyone else here.

I would assume you already got that I meant not equal to, the programmer.

Forgiveness ≠ Help !

Even check the difference between attacker and defender here.

It's already there :

https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostposts

I think Vod you should avoid supporting flags by just looking at the names involved and once check if the accused is really willing to scam someone out here. Your general statements would not seem true always.

I asked forgiveness which you kicked on my face as I didn't wanted to curb my openions on some matters here, with threating me with posting my dox. Don't act as you don't know what you did. I can't even imagine someone as evil' as you in IRL.

2 PMs explaining I not willing to engage in similar beheviour again and with my reasons to get stuck into it back then. And I am harrsing a person who finds fun in getting hands on others personal info, classic.

Yet that doesn't change the fact that most of your flags are baseless and indicate no possible high risks. Asking for opposition from who can judge it without double standards unlike you.

Nice attempt to show your support and political side's here, but I never support or said it's an bad idea to stop alt voting or manuplating it that way. Stop pretending.

You have an history of creating shitty flags out there. Go through yourself.

Edit : Funny how most of the people supporting it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me and due to me speaking about your double standards and abuse, not a relevant flag at first place.

Requesting opposition for the unwarrant flag by Lauda, due to me not actively involved in the accusations made in the linked thread and not having any history of anyone being at high risk of losing money with me. I even think it is not a proper use of flag.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412

Your above mentioned details doesn't effect ranking in anyways as you would still need to wait for your activity to reach 500 to become a Hero. I mean activity and merits together gives desired effect to the ranking system of putting both efforts and time as an criteria, leaving no need for an edit in the ranking system or making it more difficult until.

Babbling about some hidden motives of the OP behind this thread. Take it as it suits you.

Until it's proven to be alt (ex. with IP connections), I don't think theymos would act on it. And it's even logical to shoot the messenger as he explicitly mentions the names of the user's he distrusts or doesn't like ! Inspite of knowing they have no control over others trust lists. Not including your name and counting it at minimum 2 inclusions to avoid it in the list makes it a bit tricky.