Somebody who hacked the most important social platform in the world only wants Bitcoin not shitcoins.
No way someone that could gain that type of access was only scamming BTC. Is this a cover for something much bigger?
Oh well, free advertising is always nice i guess.
Ofcourse, this is a very big advertisement for BTCitcoin. But, I'm afraid that it might throw more negativity towards it 
Just for fun. https://twitter.com/Cryptanzee/status/1283538246635380736 |
|
|
|
Well, it seems that after a period of active time on this forum with old negative feedback, Betnomi started building their reputation on this forum, and this is their signature campaign https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5262425.0The payment is too attractive for anyone to join it  Payments
10x Hero spots 45$ per week Paid to Betnomi account
10x Legendary spots 55$ per week Paid to Betnomi account Actually the required number of participants for the Betnomi campaign has increased to 30(15+15). Payments 15x Hero spots 45$ per week Paid to Betnomi account
15x Legendary spots 55$ per week Paid to Betnomi account |
|
|
|
The English team intentionally left out Broad since they wanted to give more opportunities to new bowlers like Archer etc and West Indies is not great in tests usually which is why his omission completely makes sense.
I don't think they will include Broad just because they lost the 1st test. Also, Root is another intentional omission for the same reasons. They never expected West Indies to win so convincingly in the 1st test itself. I am not expecting any major changes in the squad.
And i am sure they are regretting this decision. Imagine England playing Test against Australia or India and leaving their premier bowler who happens to take 450+ wickets in the Test format, will never happen btw. But yeah what could go wrong against WI so leave broad out lol Not major change but only 2, Broad and Root. If they replace Wood with Broad, it would be good but I too think that they won't bring Broad for the second test as he was left out intentionally for reasons unknown. However, Joe Root is definitely going to replace Denly, that's for sure. |
|
|
|
@bobyhodob Do you want him to say this every time? There are other slots with the same symbol - Chinese Treasures, Divine Ways and Ten Elements. the winners got lucky that's all. It is a guessing game. If slots share the symbol then it doesn't matter as everyone compete on the same terms. |
|
|
|
I guess I was lucky, I decided to go all the way in from the time this round began yesterday, I was chasing 1001x from the onset and I reduced it to x700 after about 300 rolls with no luck, I knew the probability was very close, then I hit the 712 in about 100 rolls, after some hours I decided for x1000 again and I hit that in less than 140 rolls.
You were definitely lucky. Don't expect probability to work in your favour in crash  While making over 1200 rolls, I was always having the same thought that I am close to hitting it but none of them crossed 300  I'm still watching  |
|
|
|
Ok I think time's up  | Username | | | Points | | Harkorede | | | 62(42+20) | | akhjob | | | 37(27+10) | | hyde09 | | | 20 | | arallmuus | | | 10.5 | | whis | | | 8.5(3.5+5) | | roycilik | | | 3 | | Brokeback Trade | | | 2.5 |
Harkorede you were already eady at the top and no one had a chance to defeat you. I thought I should keep the second spot so I started rolling since morning as I was afraid that hyde09 or arallmuus would make a high roll and take me down. But since morning none of the roll crossed 300x. So this devastating final I chased 1111x for hours...
Same here 
Congrats to Harkorede, myself, hyde09 and whis. Hmm what a coincidence, everyone who posted here today is winning something |
|
|
|
@Harkorede Superb. Its good that you chased a higher number yesterday. I have been rolling for over 1000 rolls since morning. None of the rolls reached even 300 and I went bust |
|
|
|
I'm sorry, Hhampuz. I can't help you with a time stamped screenshot.
If it helps, these are predictions that could be closest to the actual result. Maybe you can eliminate some given the information you have.
281,000,000 Cryptpogz1
281,304,127 frmracc
281,409,131 Betwrong
281,456,154 Luzin
@Hhampuz, I too don't have a timestamped screenshot and I guess no one would have. But approximately 10 minutes before the deadline, when I checked the numbers were 281,414,xxx. So it should be Betwrong or Luzin. Why not split the amount between the two, if no-one took the screenshot. Just a thought though |
|
|
|
100% like the title, guessing!
Are we having a level 3 then  Damn, Hhampuz finally breaks the resistance. |
|
|
|
Nothing more interesting than an unpredictable match This is the type of game I wanted to see after the long pandemic break. Now ENG has the upper hand as WI are down by 3 wickets. But WI batsmen are unpredictable, so a target of 165 runs is still gettable in 2 sessions. Wow, I clearly didn't expect that my words would come true. Blackwood played really well but he has to go now without a century. WI now need 11 runs with 4 wickets in hand. Can ENG work some magic, I'm eager  Edit: WI won by 4 wickets. Superb effort. |
|
|
|
But the transaction #15 doesn't show up on etherscan.
Try to find it in another eth explorer like ethplorer or etherchain. Was not able to find it in other explorers too. Looks like the transaction #15 didn't go through. Btw, thanks for the guide you shared. But the thing I don't understand is that transaction #14 is already dropped as per etherscan and not found in other explorers but it is also shown as pending in Metamask Restart your computer and if it still shown as pending transaction then there's possibility that its still pending cause i sent a transaction last week which shows as dropped transaction on etherscan but confirmed on Metamask and when i check the wallet i sent it to i saw that it was indeed confirmed. Actually the issue is existing for 4 days now so I don't think restarting the computer has anything to do with this. So if what you claim is true, then I have to ask him to cancel the transaction. @coupable, Sure if he agrees, I'll share the hashes by tonight. |
|
|
|
With the loss of two wickets of West Indies the bets have completely twisted.  How many twists will come in this match ? Nothing more interesting than an unpredictable match This is the type of game I wanted to see after the long pandemic break. Now ENG has the upper hand as WI are down by 3 wickets. But WI batsmen are unpredictable, so a target of 165 runs is still gettable in 2 sessions. |
|
|
|
But the transaction #15 doesn't show up on etherscan.
Try to find it in another eth explorer like ethplorer or etherchain. Was not able to find it in other explorers too. Looks like the transaction #15 didn't go through. Btw, thanks for the guide you shared. But the thing I don't understand is that transaction #14 is already dropped as per etherscan and not found in other explorers but it is also shown as pending in Metamask Speaking about ethereum transactions - can someone explain why the transactions cost more than they were half a year or year ago? Devs are making updates, blockchain is developing, but it is getting more expensive to make a transaction or cost more. That doesnt look like a healthy development to me.
When the ethereum network is more congested, the transaction fees automatically increases as the miners prefer the transaction with higher gas. The reason for network congestion could be the growth in usage of Erc20 based Tether and awareness about DEXs and DeFi |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
