Gee whiz. It would have been nice for your video to have some kind of audio. Music, verbal instructions, anything!   That was just plain dreadful to watch from start to finish.  

Edit:

What the hell, is this offer still good?


My user name on the web page is      skeptic


Please note, if your promo involves me giving payment information upfront or a "refundable" BTC payment. I'm not interested.

Further edit: When I go to your registration page. It has me agree to terms of service. However, when I click on the link, it just redirects me to the registration page with no terms of service. Furthermore, when I click your privacy policy, it goes to this link https://www.btcgamblepro.com/waf/public/privacy.html which appear to be a dead page.
Don't bother giving me a free trial. Tell your team to get their shit together.

Flagged

     I'm not certain how your algorithm is supposed to detect a sufficient bias using a "positive or negative" trend. The next result in a dice game is not dependent on what happened in any of the previous results, unless there is some kind of flaw in the random number generator. (Unlike a card game where the cards are not shuffled, which is dependent on previous results since the same card can't be dealt twice.) With live casino roulette, it is possible to get a reasonable calculation on where the ball will land to overcome bias, while the ball and wheel are in motion and bets are still being allowed. However, It does not appear that your program is capable of detecting such things and making the needed calculation.
    Also, I do not think the casual gambler is going to have enough sessions to detect a bias near the middle of a particular session. This appears especially true when it appears that your program requires the user to manually input the results. In order to detect a bias, you would need a large sample size, probably in the billions, and that is being overly generous.
   

    Your claims are rather extraordinary. Therefore, us skeptical gamblers are going to need more proof than just taking your word for it. (Which we are not going to get, since your proof would probably involve valuable secrets you don't want others to copy, if true.)Also, your free trial period is not long enough for a casual gambler to get a large enough sample to verify with a high level of certainty that the results are sound. Somehow, your algorithm has to have the capability to detect some kind of bias in the results of the game, in a reasonable number of trials, and the bias has to be big enough that it can be used to overcome the casino's advantage. If all your algorithm is doing is implementing a convoluted version of a martingale betting strategy, coupled with bankroll management, in the end, it is not going to work.
   Perhaps if your program focused on games that were not randomly generated, with the new results independent of the previous results, it would have more credence. Otherwise, the dice have no memory nor does the roulette wheel.

   You must remember that Trump never held any political office until becoming president. If Megan wants to "meddle" in politics, it is her right as a US citizen. However, the Democrats already have enough candidates, so she probably wouldn't have much success getting support from that party. Also, most third party/independent candidates don't fare too well. I personally think the 300 to one odds are a suckers bet, however. I think her real chances of winning the election are more like one in a billion.

    Well, Trump doesn't get around to dissing Libra until the 2nd response tweet. I think if push comes to shove, Mark will apply for a US Banking charter. Also, Trump is trying to imply that Libra coin will be used for criminal activity. With Facebook's record for tracking every single thing it's users do, only an idiot would use Libra for criminal activity. In fact, only an idiot will use Libra for any type of transaction.

Trump just doesn't get it when it comes to Bitcoin. Plus, if it wasn't for banks willing to lend him lots of that fiat that they conjure out of creating debt, he wouldn't have been able to create his real estate empire. You would think after a couple of the bankruptcies, that the banks would be leery of lending to his business . However, when it comes to fiat, easy come, easy go.

    Yes, I think increasing the source allocation to those who are using it up, and are distributing it to good posts, should get a bit of an increase. Also, we could use a couple more good merit sources. Even with the increase, I do not suspect account farmers and spammers are going to get too much love.

   Wow, you exhaust your source merit and only give out one at a time? That is a great deal of reading and rewarding! I give out 2 at a time and with the smerit that I earn, I only tend to run out every once in a while. I'm not certain that I am capable of meriting 500+ individual posts per month. You are a true merit cycling legend.
    BTW, if theymos is taking into consideration whether to up certain individual's source merit, I personally think that I am in the Goldilocks zone.

Since Libra will be based on the blockchain, I would hope someone can integrate Libra in LN too. Also, the merchant can accept BTC and then do an atomic swap for Libra, Tether, or whatever "stablecoin" that they prefer.

Well, if a gambling site requires KYC info, I am probably not going to play. I live in the US and AFAIK, the US does not consider it legal to offer gambling online to its citizens, unless the are abroad. also, in the US, brick and mortar casinos are required to gather KYC info for AML purposes if someone tries to cash out 10000 USD or above, in one day. It has been a while since I last cashed out so much; but I recall them asking for my ID; they recorded the transaction and my identifying information  in a log; and I believe that I had to sign for it.

You probably have more experience than me when it comes to playing poker. For some reason, I always felt intimidated by playing against other players. I usually played Blackjack, which is a pretty straight forward game, although I am amazed at how many people don't know the proper strategy. Also, if you play online, you don't have to worry about keeping a poker face. However, I believe that their are programs out there that can track a player's betting habits. So I would gather that a good poker player has to also be able to change up their betting strategies, so their opponents are kept guessing.

     If you are going to put forth this theory, you need to get some facts straight.
1) Lauda excluded the Pharmacist from her trust list. If Lauda was truly a champion for him, this was an odd way to go about it.
2) Lauda has recently been blacklisted from DT1. (She still is on DT2 though.) With this recent development, the "gang" needs to be reorganized.

     Not all forms of gambling are just based on luck. If someone is a sports better, they can just randomly pick teams to win; however the more skilled gambler knows the players and what is going on with the teams to attempt to make a better determination. Also, in the game of Blackjack, some people keep track of the cards that have been dealt by card counting, which does take quite a bit of thinking. However, even in games that are purely chance, some gambler's still do a great deal of thinking because they believe they have a "system" for picking out certain outcomes.

      Well, it could have been more disgusting and involved corndogs. I read on the internet that many people outside the US do not understand what the appeal is with the things. I happen to agree. Every time I eat a corndog, I am rather disappointed. I suppose that it would be really dangerous to have an eating contest involving corndogs. That stick could do all kinds of nasty things to someone's throat.

     It would be nice if the price of BTC got all the way up to 20,000 USD by tomorrow. However, I am almost positive with such a rapid rise, we would have a very deep correction, since many people caught in the December 2017 parabolic rise would love to unload and be done with BTC.

The only flag that I am aware of is the OP. He gives the link in the first post. However, here is the link, again.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=308

From the amount of merits you have earned, I would say that you are a quality poster too. Thanks for your willingness to take the back seat. I will be willing to take a lesser position too. We will let Hhampuz decide. He may want both of us, only one of us us or neither of us.

Edit: I have decided to pursue another offer. Good luck CryptopreneurBrainboss, you deserve it. 

The OP is claiming to have bought Mona coins for about 40K sats each. If he was allowed to withdraw his Mona coins, he could sell his Mona coins for 20K sats for a 50% loss.(BTC wise) His only option now, if Livecoin reactivates his account, is to sell them for about 4300 sats each on Livecoin. That is almost a 90% loss.(BTC wise) If Livecoin invoked the option to make all current Mona asset holders take a haircut, the OP will probably still be better off, since withdrawals will be re-enabled, which is likely to have a positive effect on the market price at Livecoin, and if not, he can dump elsewhere.

  How on Earth is demanding to withdraw coins that you purchased, "blackmail?" This is like going into a store, purchasing a product, and then the store refuses to let you leave with the product that you just purchased. Is it blackmail if that customer then proceeds to write a scathing review on Yelp? I think not. If Livecoin does not want to allow withdrawals on Mona or Monero because they now have a fractional reserve due to the acts of malicious miners and vulnerability exploiters, then the right course of action is to suspend trading as well, until they can come up with a resolution to the issue. The right course of action is not to continue to allow people to trade the asset and profit off of it indefinitely. Furthermore, since both of these assets are trading much lower on their exchange, it is quite possible that Livecoin is buying the asset for a discount oin their own exchange and then selling the asset on another exchange for a huge profit. Due to Monero being a privacy coin, they could probably get away with this. I certainly hope that Livecoin is not resorting to such measures. However, they need to suspend trading, and come up with another resolution to solve their insolvency issue with both of these assets. Enough time has passed; so it is clear that neither the Mona team or the Monero team is going to cover their losses. It is high time that they explore the other option that they outline in their terms of service. Yes, making their clients take a haircut will piss some clients off; however, I am sure many will understand since in both cases, it does not appear to be an inside job. They can do what bitfinex did when they got hacked. They offered their customers a token, and devoted a small portion of their profits to distribute compensation to their clients who held or bought the token.

The current Medicare system has part C, which allows for a participant to have a private insurance company take over their Medicare benefits, (a Medicare advantage plan.) Furthermore, a participant can opt out of part B. ( A participant should have other insurance if they opt for this.) Furthermore, Medicare claims are usually handled by government contractors. (These are private companies.) However, what many of the Democratic candidates are actually pushing resembles this very little. In fact, it appears what they are offering is closer to VA health benefits for all. This program is totally run by the government and like most government run programs is totally inefficient. I'd be all for a "Medicare for all" program if what they offer is actually closer to what Medicare currently offers. However, I am feeling like many democratic candidates are actually pushing for something that I think would be disaster and labeling it "Medicare for all," since Medicare is a popular program, and they are trying to bamboozle their voters.