wtf, now it's going back up again?!
EDIT: Ah of course, price went up 1 $... GPUs are back online...
And because of those coming back to BTC mining after giving LTC mining a try. But yes, with the exchange rate up 10% and difficulty dropped by a small amount ... today it is marginally better than it was two weeks ago. Though the ASIC onslaught continues unabated. Not every promised ASIC design needs to ship to finish off GPUs, ... just one actually shipping will do that. Or even some souped up FPGA monster. Such as what yohan says they've got. From another thread: Before we ask for money you will be able to see the inital small system results in the network hash rate. It will be big enough to be noticed.
|
|
|
They credited them to my new account.
Of people reporting having made this mistake (accidentally sending to the wrong address), every one that I know of has ended up recovering the funds (less bounty / etc.). Contrast that to how nearly no thief has been tracked down through info obtained through the blockchain.
|
|
|
I am conducting an experiment that I am hoping will generate some discussion about the way bitcoins are traded.
On the occasions that I put a buy offer on #bitcoin-otc marketplace I use the "{mtgoxlast}" macro substitution so that the exchange rate will fluctuate with the market rate. Though you had put out a fixed exchange rate, this fluctuating rate could still be offered. This is because the mtgox trading history is publicly available and has a timestamp (i.e., can be independently verified). But I hate seeing a third-party data source being relied on in ways it wasn't designed to be. There's no service agreement from blockchain.info that the timestamp displayed won't change (e.g., if had to re-index the database perhaps). And the quote data from Mt. Gox has historically not been pure as well (trades getting cancelled). But these things occur with other trading systems and agreements so there's ways to deal with them, including acknowledging there is the risk someone will sell to you during a trade spike way above what ends up being the VWAP or similar less-volatile price method.
|
|
|
These are the ten most spoken languages in Africa
1) Arabic 2) Kiswahili 3) Hausa 4) English 5) Amharic 6) French 7) Oromo 8 ) Yoruba 9) Igbo 10) Zulu
Is it time to push for mobile wallets to be translated into those other seven major languages and start a bitcoin campain in those languages too?
Does even Kenya's M-PESA (where Pesa is Swahili for "money") even offer a mode where it can be used in Swahili? Fortunately, bitcoin is universal. A 500 mBTC is the same in Nairobi as it is in Newark. But yes, no doubt, localizations will help increase bitcoin's reach to the rest of the world.
|
|
|
If NotHaus is your anti-FED hero well you need to pick better heroes. Did you know the "Liberty Dollars" were inflationary. They contained less than face value of silver and as the value of silver rose the coins became more and more debased. Greed pure and simple. Just to make sure that isn't misunderstood, you don't mean traditional coin debasement methods where alloys are introduced like how a 1964 U.S. quarter had 90% silver content, but a 1965 quarter of the same shape, size and appearance had been debased with a copper and nickel coin with no silver content whatsoever. Instead what the Liberty Dollar did was change the denomination stamped on the coin. The earlier 1 ounce silver coin was stamped $10. The later 1 ounce silver coin was stamped $20. The price charged for an item in terms of Liberty Dollars though would fluctuate depending on the exchange rate for silver. So a 2005 (1 ounce silver) $10 Liberty Dollar pictured above would (presumably) buy the same amount of goods and services that the 2006 (1 ounce silver) $20 Liberty Dollar would.
|
|
|
Just an FYI, Dwolla added "Guest Checkout". What this does is allow someone without a Dwolla account to enter their bank details and submit a transaction without registering through Dwolla. - http://blog.dwolla.com/guest-checkout/ - http://developers.dwolla.com/dev/docs/gateway#submit-directlyWhat I haven't been able to figure out is when the funds become available to the merchant. I'm presuming this does not occur until the bank transaction completed several business days later. But this can provide a method for someone here with a Dwolla account (configured as a merchant) to accept Dwolla funds from people who might not yet already have a Dwolla account. [Edit: Thought keep in mind the chances of a fraudulent payment is likely higher with these type of "guest checkout" transactions.]
|
|
|
I am looking to make my first bitcoin purchase, interested in purchasing 2-3 coins to start. I'm interested to know what the best(and cheapest) way to turn cash into a small number of coins would be.
The factors that matter in order to give you the best answer include: - Where are you located (country)? - How much are you looking to buy? - What payment methods do you have available? - How soon do you need access to the proceeds? - Is privacy important? A fairly comprehensive list of options is compiled here: - http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Buying_bitcoinsIn the U.S., if there is a Chase bank branch around, BitMe.com is probably your best option for a purchase of $30-ish of coins. If you are in the U.S. and have a bank account you might want to get started on a Dwolla account, but that won't help you for 30 days due to Dwolla's 30-day probation period for new accounts with respect to Bitcoin exchanges. But after that, Dwolla gives you the cheapest method to buy coins in the future.
|
|
|
For instance if I buy them off my card
I think that's probably where you are misunderstanding what options are available to you. There are nearly no sellers who accept a payment card for the purchase of bitcoins. The few that do will definitely have their merchant account name appear on your bank statement. For instance, VirWoX: - http://www.VirWoX.com <--- Buy Second Life Lindens (SLLs) then trade SLLs for BTCs. LiqPay is another, used by BTC-e.com for instance. Here's another ... but they have a delay of delivery from five to eight days: - http://www.bitcoinroad.com/bitcoin-store.html
|
|
|
Hello, I'm very interested in Bitcoins and bought a couple a month or so ago. I'm getting more confident in the potential that Bitcoin has and I really want to buy a bunch more. However I'm not completely confident with my security set-up
If your USB drive is a LiveOS (e.g., Ubuntu), then use that and copy copy of the html from BitAddress.org Then disconnect internet and boot to the LiveOS and load the html. Print a few pages of paper wallets. Print 2 copies of each. Reboot. Fund each with sane amounts (e.g., no more than 25 BTC each). Store one copy in a secure location. Store a second copy in another secure location or give to a loved one to hold on for you. When you want to spend, from a secure computer (or using the LiveOS but connected to the internet), grab one of the paper wallets and redeem on Blockchain.info/wallet (import private key). Done. If you are talking more significant amounts of funds, there are additional approaches: - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=123727.msg1331697#msg1331697
|
|
|
I hadn't seen Jon Matonis' article from Forbes in this thread: Prediction Market 'Bets Of Bitcoin' Available To U.S. CustomersInstead of seeking regulatory approval, Bets of Bitcoin focuses on financial privacy and anonymity so that it’s irrelevant where the customers are geographically located. Anyone can create a bet statement and new bets are vetted by moderators to eliminate unwanted bets or bets whose outcome can’t be easily determined or is easily manipulated.
- http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonmatonis/2012/12/06/prediction-market-bets-of-bitcoin-available-to-u-s-customers/Also, Bets of Bitcoin was just references in an article by Verge's Adrianne Jeffreis on Intrade: Intrade shutdown disrupts betting market on elections, air strikes, and celebrity arrestsHardcore Intrade addicts can also turn to the tiny prediction market Bets of Bitcoin, where some believe converting your dollars to the internet currency Bitcoin circumvents laws around commodity options because the site isn't using a government-recognized currency. - http://www.theverge.com/2012/12/11/3753082/intrade-shutdown-cftc-us-december-2012
|
|
|
BitcoinVideoPoker has been updated with new features and bug fixes. My Games doesn't show any results.
|
|
|
It's trying to be something that it isn't and can't be.
And I'm on the opposite end of the spectrum. Single-use paper Bitcoins are even better than paper currency. The QR code is scanned and and the document discarded. Either there were funds from it or there weren't. For the change I get my local currency and coin, just as if I had paid cash. Or I can show the public ("load & verify") QR code for my the next one and get a receipt from the merchant showing the address and the transaction id.
|
|
|
I guess it is in the addr field I should be searching, right?
Yup. If 1PyDNpaHGaAxazG13Xa7sESVeQbympLrHw is in there, you can take the corresponding private key over to another wallet or client and import it there and you'll have access to the funds.
|
|
|
While the app wont have any ads in it and wont cost a penny I am going to collect some donations to effort the microsoft licensing. This is serving as a front-end for transacting against a blockchain.info/wallet account. The app asks for the username ("alias", I'm assuming, since blockchain.info/wallet only has "identifier" or "alias") and password. Will this client be open source? I would have serious concern over providing my Blockchain.info/wallet credentials to an app that is not open source. Because even the Blockchain for Android app itself is closed source, I will only use it with a Blockchain.info/wallet account that doesn't hold a significant balance.
|
|
|
As a bank, if they can just cut off payments/support to anything bitcoin-related, then they save themselves some headache and won't lose any significant business, because bitcoin is small.
^^^ that's how a bank sees this.
Since banks don't make much money from people who don't earn much money, as a bank if they can just impose enough fees to cause those account holders to close their accounts and go elsewhere, then they save themselves some headache and won't lose any significant business, because low income earners don't save much. Does that seem acceptable to you? The reason banks can't simply "cut off" these account holders is that the banking industry is protected from competition -- they are essentially granted a monopoly. (i..e., You or I cannot start a bank [edit: even one that does not lending] because there is no way outsiders can put together the ginormous capital requirements required by the regulations). So this is a righteous fight. How dare they suppress a competitor in this manner. In taking this action they are limiting my options as a consumer and as a monopoly player they can work together making it impossible for this competitor to serve its customers. If I can open a bank next door, then I say fine let these financial dinosaurs serve their dying days milking their profitable customer base and whatever else they do, but until then we cannot allow banks to choose to serve only their most profitable customers and force the rest to go elsewhere. Be polite, explain politely that it's not acceptable, explain politely that you are losing business because of them, insist heavily on this fact. Insist that this absolutely not acceptable, that the issue is on their side, not yours.
Silence is acquiescence. Thank you for not backing down.
|
|
|
|