wrong again.. you are stuck in doomad nonsense scripts of 2018

here i showed you and him(many times and many topics) a nice colourful image of the versionbit and user agents of the era..(you can verify it with blockdata and other stats)

blueline reaching its threshold, triggered the redline to then go from natural wiggles of 45% to unnatural /^-\ 100%

as you can see UASF didnt even get 20% popularity!!

As of now, I have a hard time understanding how that`s a blockchain platform. It looks like a "regular" Livescore website and you have been announcing additions more than half a year ago while at the same time, mentioning some token airdrop. It`s all very unclear and vague.

That's what I meant, even though there is little to no reason to do it elsewhere.

windfury you are soo wrong yet again
you cant even be bothered to read the NYA or the proposals or code, or anything to back up your mentors narrative you copy and recite like a drone zombie


the reality and fact is(which is backed up by the NYA own words and code and versionbits in the immutible blockchain, is that X2 was a FAKE/empty promise to eventually give the community (at some un-dated future vapour time) 2mb base block IF they first agree to the mandate flag of normal segwit first.  and yep after segwit happened the talk of the 2mb did not continue.. core+NYA got their way so 2mb blocks talk ended as soon as segwit activated

x2 was not a deviation away from core, it was made by core sponsors(nya) to bait and switch the community into complying with segwit via empty promises, basically core+nya came up with a faked second option to make it feel like a choice but all paths lead back to giving core and their sponsors what they wanted, try reading things for once. look at who funded and wrote the NYA of the segwit+2mb(x2)

try learning for once

Looking at https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-cash/charts/average-block-size, it's true block size usually below 1MB. But don't forget BCH community did stress test in past, which can be used as reference.

I think it's more appropriate if someone who would create an ANN thread is part of the team so we can get direct answers from them. Since they have a sister site, then for sure they are already awaree that this forum exist and the most popular on crypto discussions, and that includes gambling as well.

I'm not so familiar with "Bitcoin DeFi and Bitcoin on-chain applications." relating to gambling, as personally in my simple understanding, I use a typical type of casino but the payment is just through cryptocurrency, but I'd love to learn though as innovation is unstoppable.

Yes, indeed, oil prices have risen to the $90 area and experts predict that if OPEC won't increase production, prices are going to exceed $100 in Q3/Q4 2024. Perhaps Ukrainian trolls can comment? 

Remember last year the false arguments some users were making about OPEC countries reducing production while price drops? That was false because their reduction was supposed to start this year not back then. They just made the decision then and made it public.

Surely enough as they started cutting supply with the start of 2024, the price started rising and in first quarter of this year we are back to $90 a barrel again. Of course there are other contributing factors as I've already covered them multiple times, but this chart clearly shows the effects of that supply cut:

I've heard some say the testnet is just like using the real things.  However if that were the case, wouldn't the debate for larger blocks and what to change or implement, not really be a debate since you'd be able to test everything out to find out for sure?  Would lead me to believe that it's helpful but not really just like the actual blockchain.

This is why ever since 2017 I've been saying we will always need on-chain scaling alongside everything else we do. This is also why I was a fan of the 2x part of the SegWit2x thing regardless of the other crap that surrounded the proposal.

Would you mind sharing the name of the site? They don't have an ANN thread here but I'm interested to check.

Just because ETH is centralized (even more so with PoS), it doesn't mean that every altcoin is centralized. That's a bit dismissive, don't you think?

Are Litecoin, Monero centralized? Just to name a few...

Regarding Lightning, necessity is the mother of invention.

When on chain transactions are dirt cheap, there is absolutely no reason to use L2:

https://litecoinspace.org/

Bitcoin was like that 15 years ago...

If Litecoin became really popular, then it would face the exact same scaling issues.

you need to learn alot more about EVERYTHING

gavin andressen wanted to retire from bitcoin.. he said in like 2010-11 that he would only spend 5 more years invovled in bitcoin.... so knowing 2015-16 was his retirement plan he took whatever golden handshake he could find and leave.. knowing his reputation didnt matter
so he took the money to say bullcrap. thinking it would not lead to anything big, and thought the drama would die out in months. so no harm no foul
yes later when he was out of contract he come clean..

R.Ver is a business man and with the troubled of bitinstant debacle he needed to pivot. he didnt intend to create BCH, BCH was created for him via the mandated rejection of old versionbit blocks(via the core sponsores(nya) bait and switch). and so he took that opportunity. and then done a deal with CSW a year later to help break BCH to BSV and was bought into promoting CSW. again for a payday..
even calvin ayres and nguyen and others sponsoring BSV dont truly believe in CSW they are just looking for riches from promoting his schemes with empty promises of huge returns

its obvious no one believed in CSW and then wised up..  but instead they were guided by payouts thinking they can get rich and then CSW drama would kill itself instantly thus not cause long term issues, thus didnt care to promote a nonsense story for a while

even your mentor is not guided by information or proof, nor care for things that actually benefit bitcoiners. he is guided by empty promises of his own possible future riches if he promotes stupid stuff like recruiting people to move to other networks.. as for your motives to ignore actual block data, actual code, actual history, actual things that can benefit bitcoin.. to instead just idolise and trust idiots because they show friendliness(or make promises to you).. well thats your own story to tell one day

they are again now claiming BSV is bitcoin made by satoshi so pretending the judges freeze of CSW assets is proof of satoshi

they keep forgetting that bsv came into existence in 2018 not 2009

I disagree with this strategy because it is for those who are in bitcoin for short-term profit. Secondly, this strategy will make you miss out on bitcoin if you sell it for short-term profit because you will have a price where you would like to buy back your bitcoin, and if bitcoin fails to dip to that price, you can't buy back your bitcoin. You have to change your mindset to long-term holding on bitcoin because it is through holding that you can get the real profit.

Theoretically, lightning can work without Bitcoin, but practically, it has little to no purpose. I presume that's what pooya meant. You'd use lightning mostly to avoid paying an outrageous amount of money for a low-value Bitcoin transaction, but beyond that it isn't useful. Litecoin's mempool is mostly empty, micro-transactions can take place there cheaply and get confirmed soon enough. Needless to mention that most lightning software is written to work on Bitcoin and isn't tested anywhere else.

Now even those experts are having problems, the more information we can get about a particular sport, the better prediction models casinos can create and this in return generates more precise odds, so a skilled sport bettor needs to keep improving their system or one day they may find that the system that gave them profits on the past is not able to beat the casinos anymore, an occurrence I have read it has happened a few times before to some of those professional bettors.

Everyone is really overexaggerating I would say. There were huge dips in the past and we can't really deny that, people are free to say it like that because it was real and true. Those huge dips were a great opportunity for us to grab some bags with cheap price and then you had a chance to get a bigger profit when it's the right time in the future. There will be always some of those in the future as well, you can't avoid that.

He is betting approximately 3$ per spin which is very high for a player having a near empty bankroll. Possibly he available a buy bonus since a user that can afford to spin with that amount is usually don’t want to spin manually.

However, there’s a possibility of what you said is correct because I do this sometimes when I have  few dollars left on my balance coming from my bonuses claim. But this is very rare and he is very lucky if he manage to win on this manner. 

No, it's not a progress jackpot.

It all comes down to how you define Decentralized Finance. You could put Bitcoin and what it offers under the category of "Decentralized Finance" and it does offer a solution for the "unbanked". The problem is when these days people talk about "Decentralized Finance" they are referring to the DeFi token creation hype where they create an utterly useless token on a token creation platform like ethereum and pump and dump it. That's not Decentralized Finance at all! That's more like selling dog poop in a pretty bag!