Play a game? Show me your laywer receipt and I'll show you mine?!
You don't even understand why the ex-CEO of the company puppetting you wanted it nor how stupid it was, and yet you keep walking deeper into the fire. Spondoolies no longer exists; they lost and its done. At least now you can be free! |
|
|
|
Maybe I should ask you more questions so you can edit your posts again...
You're the one with pending questions: I removed it so simpletons like RoadStress don't get confused again
5. While you're saying dumb stuff, would you like to make clear what remuneration you have received to date from Spondoolies?
|
|
|
|
It is my understanding that one of the requirements for the new forum is for 2FA to be available, so once the new forum is officially rolled out, 2FA should (at least in theory) be available for everyone to use.
It was stated as such in 2014, although I am unsure if there is a more recent update. [...] Any plans for implementing some sort of a 2FA in the new forum? (this is especially important for people conducting trades over the forum) Yes, there will be 2FA. [...] |
|
|
|
Giant sad face. I guess when you do not allow DHCP on the unit they get more default pool configs so you mine on to the bitmain pool x whoever is trying to configure their miners total hash.
Delayed response: Assuming you changed from the default setting of DHCP to a fixed IP, it is possible that you missed some of the additional settings below the fixed IP. These settings must be entered otherwise the device will not be connectible, which may be what happened in your situation. |
|
|
|
110 volt circuits with a 15 amp breaker can only handle about 1400 watts continuous draw  You could swap the breaker to a 20 amp one BUT,you can overheat your wires or outlets doing this.DO NOT DO THIS!!!! Definitely do NOT do this, your home insurance would be invalidated immediately while putting your life at risk. If unsure then consult a qualified electrician about the possibility of adding a 220V circuit. |
|
|
|
I have a better suggestion that should help prevent any future mistakes: Let's just all stay here and carry on the discussion on the unmoderated thread.
Agreed. This is what I recommended in March 2014 about the use of self moderated threads. *This was in response to some racist posts* Btw, the thread is self moderated, do you think we should remove them - or it will make more damage and we just should ignore them?"
Typically I'm not a fan of self moderated threads as it can mask what is really the feelings of the experienced members. That's only really a factor on preorders where scams are rife and the newer buyers may not be as alert. In your case this will become important if/when you have any unit issues or delays, its important that you don't try and silence negative opinions.
For this racist stuff, ignore it for now as its very low volume. No one is commenting on it nor is papamoi returning to this particular thread. If it continues then you remove it yourself but leave a post when you do saying "x posts by y person were removed because we believe they were OT to bitcoin mining and were potentially racist". Then you can't be accused of anything.
But for now, ignore it.
|
|
|
|
Is BTCS still mining?
It was as of last filing. |
|
|
|
Think a lot of people simply used your links for easy access to the spondoolies site
The conversion window was very short so it had to be almost a direct conversion every time. Loads of sales were denied because they'd time out and I think even more that were overwritten by other affiliates. |
|
|
|
Probably what they've come up after doxing theymos.
I don't think Theymos has ever tried to deny his identity. |
|
|
|
I'm very disappointed , this is a very 'strange' situation and a good lawyer is really necessary. @dogie, so they owe you this amount of money http://archive.is/Zwfqp , right ? That's the bare minimum that they admit to in papers. So SPTech had no farm??
[From the other thread but I can't post there] SPTech said they had no farm, but had a farm. I do hope you get your settlement before all that's left is dust, Dogie.
Thanks, I will get it one way or another. I'm very disappointed , this is a very 'strange' situation and a good lawyer is really necessary. @dogie, so they owe you this amount of money http://archive.is/Zwfqp , right ? Good lawyers are working fine for me so far, hence Guy's flip-out. That is an approximation of the lower bound of money they've agreed to owing, but I am still owed significantly more. Full claim text is here, its not that long of a read: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=521520.msg13695311#msg13695311in all fairness, i think spondoolies failed to think the campaign through properly. 5-10% commission for directing people to the site is just crazy - even bulk purchasers barely got a 10% discount. It should ave been more like 1% (which would still be >$10,500 for dogie)
It was tiered commission, 5% up to 100k per quarter, 10% up to 500k per quarter and 15% over. My sales accounted very roughly for 3% of their revenue based on the little information we have of their sales. They could argue that it was a "gratuitous promise", and perhaps that it was not properly revised as the sales price dropped towards the manufacturing cost. Its a shitty argument, but its likely a card in thier deck should this go to court
This went to court 4 months ago, and precourt jousting has been happening since last September. They can not argue that and failure to drop the price is on them. |
|
|
|
This is getting interesting -> Spondoolies out Avalon back in  They were never out |
|
|
|
Because Guy can't delete my posts in this thread, he instead keeps posting the same giant post again and again. In order to prove that (3) is the right scenario as he claims, dogie needs to post such receipt + invoice. So far dogie refused to post such a receipt + invoice.
I don't need to do anything of the sort. You still haven't explained why you want to see that I've paid solicitor's fees, it literally makes no sense other than you've gone off the deep end. Why don't you post your invoice for all four of your solicitors? Note: It's highly irregular (read: never heard of) to post security of funds deposit to one's lawyer as dogie claimed.
This just in, CEO of a company has never heard of paying creditors! What a weird concept. This is why we asked the court to force dogie to deposit the security of funds directly to the court.
You asked the court to do many things and newsflash you're still on the hook. Dogie's lawyer tried to prevent the security of funds deposit with all sort of arguments initially
That's how it works? You were trying to request security of funds for a case you were never, ever, EVER going to win. Ever. Where are your security of funds? The funds were indeed deposited before a liquidator was appointed and now the case is frozen.
You say that like you're proud that managed to ruin your company so much that even your ex-employees had to sue you. You screwed your employees, your investors, your creditors, BTCS and BTCS's shareholders but you show no remorse at all. PS, if anyone should be posting receipts, it should be you posting your pay stubs along with an explanation of why staff and creditors were going unpaid.
|
|
|
|
Oh so you now want to have the conversation now that you can't post missleading stuff than delete my replies? How cute. Instead of doing that, he chose to attack Roadstress and me (I removed the 2nd post in which he attacks me).
The post you deleted is the post I've quoted in the OP, in its entirety. Again you've been caught lying and so you deleted my reply claiming it was "attacking you", but you didn't think I'd open an unmoderated thread. Dogie is suing Spondoolies-Tech, so I can't engage him.
Not sure you know what "can't" means. The invoice + receipt Dogie posted did indeed include his lawyer fees.
If you can find a lawyer handling an entire case for $8,600 then let me know. That receipt is for money on account, not for lawyer fees. The problem here is that the entire payment to the lawyer was titled 'expenses' and therefore he did not pay VAT (as he should have).
If you're accusing my lawyer of VAT fraud, you're going to have a bad time. Dogie can easily prove that this explanation is wrong by posting another invoice + receipt to his lawyer which is properly titled 'lawyer fees' and include VAT payment as required by the law.
Request it via the lawyer of that company you run... oh wait. If you're really that desperate to see an irrelevant piece of paper (Pekatete 2.0) then you could even call my lawyer and ask. And while you've finally decided to ungag yourself, why don't you answer the 30 unanswered questions in your own thread? PS, if anyone should be posting receipts, it should be you posting your pay stubs along with an explanation of why staff and creditors were going unpaid. |
|
|
|
Update: Assets are for sale to aid the employees, creditors and potentially investors.
Previous: After a liquidator was appointed to handle the assets of Spondoolies-Tech, Guy Corem has now started deleting critical posts from multiple people from his self moderated thread. As per instructions, I have opened up a sister thread so open discussion can still take place. We all know what happens when a mining company resorts to censorship. A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Hey dogie with your lying past you don't expect us to simply believe you. Post the invoice with your lawyer fees too because otherwise your words are worth nothing!
1. No one cares if you believe me or not, you are no one. 2. No one else is required to believe me or not. 3. As I said many months ago, nearly everything in this case is open to the public. You are more than welcome to pull the actions of my lawyer using the case code "191050116" as I previously provided. 4. I'll bite; what have I lied about previously? 5. While you're saying dumb stuff, would you like to make clear what remuneration you have received to date from Spondoolies? RoadStress raised an interesting point. dogie posted an invoice + receipt from his lawyer and claimed that it "Receipt for filing court fees and security of funds [like a deposit in the case of loss to help pay the defendant's fees]" Dogie removed the original image of the invoice and receipt and changed his previous post to remove this description. Now it's only "Receipt for filing court fees..." disclaimer: dogie is suing Spondoolies-Tech, so I can't engage him. I am posting the evidence of dogie's edit and wonder what dogie is trying to hide. Guy I removed it so simpletons like RoadStress don't get confused again, and its pretty disingenuous for you to claim that there is some conspiracy going on when I literally sued your company with the court fees that receipt contains. You even know first hand of the security of costs because you tried to use that post to get the judge to impose them. But games aside and lets be serious for a second, Guy. If you'd spent less time crying on forums and more time actually running your business, you might not have run it into the ground. Or you know, not continued to run it for years past when you should have shut up shop. Doesn't matter what happens to your creditors (or BTCS) just as long as you can milk out a salary, right? |
|
|
|
I dont get it though, if so hard pressed for cash why not plug in all the inventory and gnereate BTC?
Found the problem. |
|
|
|
For reference each 12038 loads at ~1.9A at 4000rpm, making each fan up to 23W.
12038 is just a generic reference to 120mmx38mm fans, it's not a specific model. I was under the impression the fans were similar to the AFC1212DE 3900RPM fans which draw 3.0A max each. Not that this is remotely on topic or anything. It is a generic reference, which is also what Bitmain calls that fan. I had the data sheet at one point but I can't seem to find it now. The fan you linked is full rotor with no 'prespin' so uses more power. |
|
|
|
SP20s are legends of a HW generation.
Why the SP20? It strugged to reach its stock speed, was loud as hell and not particularly efficient. The real game changer was the SP10. |
|
|
|
Guys please don't quite the 9 previous messages, it makes the thread impossible to read  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
