That is true, a lot of inputs make the transaction size bigger, hence a bigger fee is required to carry it to the other side promptly and unconfirmed funds in previous transaction adds more delay.


Could have been a little deliberate but hey! its confirmed, OP you got the money, everybody is happy (except for the casino maybe) but all's well that ends well. Congrats to you, now spend it wisely.

I received the 0.01 as well and here are the things I noticed while testing:

1. The letter of Guarantee says "We hereby confirm that WWW.BITMIXER.IM has generated the address" when infact it should say "[banned mixer] " but the address shown on the FAQ Page "For your peace of mind we always provide this and sign it from our main bitcoin account 1CrypMixXWtTjYGCM5ZJmyQYP1Y39P7aLM You may verify our digital sign using your Bitcoin wallet. " is the one it was signed from (verified the signature in Electrum), so I went ahead with the mixing.

2. Another thing I noticed in Letter of Guarantee is, it says "100% to -- after 30 minutes." But on FAQ it says "Your bitcoin mixing will be done instantly as soon as we have received your coins.", So one of those needs to be edited. Apart from that, this also needs correction: "with minimum amount of  BTC per single transaction and maximum amount of 2001.02 BTC total", it should say "minimum amount of  BTC per single transaction 0.01".

3. The QR code and the address shown to send the coins to, mismatch, which could cause problems, although sender should only send to the address listed in the Letter of Guarantee.

4. After sending the coins to the site, the page still shows "Waiting for Payment", when right below that it says "Received 0.01 BTC", it should change to "Waiting for confirmation(s)", OR maybe since the address is valid for 24 hours, it can say that since I can use the same address to mix more coins, so not a big problem.

5. Received the coins seconds after it was confirmed on blockchain, which is good and it did showed a confirmation on the webpage that the mixed coins were sent. The calculator works right, the coins I received were exactly as it showed.


6. Ran Taint  Analysis and coins don't show any signs of the original address, which is again good and it passes the mixing test.

The site so far works like it should but requires little tweaks here and there and some correction in QR Code generator and text in Letter of Guarantee. Apart from the things mentioned above, didn't had any other problems.

Thanks for letting me test and please let me know should you need more testing done.

Yesterday, Fritz Mueller, the Strip Club director told media, that somewhere around 50 and 60 benefactors of the Globe near the Swiss city of Zurich, in Schwerzenbach, were being threatened by a group of “moral” hackers. It seems that the hackers somehow got hold of the clients’ personal information and are now threatening to send their pictures to their family and companions.

The nightclub manager Fritz Mueller said the sender may have gotten the personal information of the Club clients through their car license plates since it is perfectly possible for someone to request the names of Swiss vehicles owners.

The hackers were also able to get pictures of the people attending the club, but Mueller said that the photographs might only be from outside the club because the strict rules of the club don’t allow customers to use cameras and mobile phones within the building.


Source: http://www.newsbtc.com/2016/02/24/hackers-demand-swiss-strip-club-clients-a-2000-bitcoin-ransom/

This I think is worse than the Ransomware, hacking systems is much difficult than just taking photos of people going into strip clubs and more copy cats will soon follow this trend, is my concern.  

Bitcoin Uncovered is a good name and imho should be used for more greater use then just a site explaining about bitcoin to newbies, there are already a lot of that and newbies don't even bother to read those.

Since Uncovered means to ​discover something ​secret or ​hidden, maybe it should be about things about bitcoins which aren't too basic or maybe just explaining things which are too complicated in a simple manner.

I was already clear about this but your explanation made it even more clear. Its basically, the 30% of the profit site makes (which is 4% from the winning side) from your referral, simple as that.

Case of master-p was different but how is this escrow's fault?

Anyone can PRETEND to be anyone, the simple solution to this is, talk to the person directly and ask for signed PGP + BTC address message and verify those before conducting any business. Infact this rule applies to anyone you're dealing with because this is clearly an attempt to scam and/or harm other person's reputation.

By found you mean its your site and you don't want to take any responsibility for it and are therefore just advertising it as a third person?



It looks like the penny auctions scam to me.

Everyone can have different reasons for using Bitcoin but most people use it because of convenience and control it provides.

So instead of asking others, ask this to yourself, which actually you should have done prior to joining this forum.

Sent you a PM with my BTC address.

Just find a charity and send it their if you're feeling really generous, that might buy food to more than one person who are in need.

You're not breaking any rules per se but I am just wondering why should your reviews matter? Are you like BTC gaming and software expert of some sorts?  And you seem to be giving trust ratings, how did you arrive at those?


Are you getting paid to write reviews?

Why not just post it here, make a post in service section, letting people know exactly the steps they need to perform and the pay for when they complete the task.

Better yet, have an escrow hold the funds.

After seeing SA's performance yesterday and their successful tour in India last time, I think they have a fair chance too.

http://thecommonwealth.org/sites/default/files/press-release/documents/P14195_ROL_Virtual_Currencies_D_Tait_V5_LoRes.pdf

Read the full report (its big!), it has some great points as to why these countries should legalize and aware people of their nation about digital currencies. If they do legalize it they can somewhat control the bad aspects of it and it makes sense.

This is the best news I have heard this year!! Let's hope that these countries take a positive step forward.

Right now, all my coins are on Electrum, they aren't that many that I need to put them on cold storage but when I do, I plan to buy a hardware wallet this time, just checked out coolwallet and it does looks cool, though a little costly, as them all.


Bad idea. Just pray that the exchange doesn't decides to get hacked all of sudden.

I don't have a plan either but I am looking for projects and if I find something which is legit, I'll put all my effort and money into it to make it work but sadly I can't find anything that interests me.

Sorry to say but without the Seed and/or Wallet/Private-Keys back up there is no way to get hold of your Bitcoins. Seed is presented when you first make the wallet and it is used to generate keys in your wallet.

From 12th over to the 17th they were great but they choked in the end, if they had not lost wickets the score could have been mammoth but this looks like within the reach of S.Africans.

I spend whenever/wherever I can, though its hard to trust new services but you can't tell people to do what they should/shouldn't with their money, everyone is free to make their own decisions.

Haven't heard of fixing in tennis matches, atleast not with the reputed players, the low seed players? .. maybe! but no body bets on them anyway.