Bitcoin Forum
June 05, 2024, 10:42:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ... 155 »
341  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Economic sanctions are not a war declaration on: March 24, 2022, 04:57:44 AM
I don't know about Russia's retaliatory capabilities against countries that don't border them but Putin will likely try something.
Putin today announced the sale of gas for rubles to unfriendly countries.

True. And it also applies to existing contracts that actually estate the payment in USD or Euro. The obvious target is Germany.

As strategy to support the "rubble", mean the ruble is fine. The only slight little problem is that it completely contravenes the international law - and yes, I know that Putin does not care much about it and thinks he is the law and all that, but as silly as it may seem, it does create very serious concerns on his Russia as a trading partner, as contracts from now on are wet paper (or wet digitally signed PDFs).

That is a massive increase of risk to any trade conducted with his Russia, which usually mean that prices of products coming from Russia will be paid at a discount and investments are likely to carry a massive risk premium.

Do not be fooled, there is a price to pay for this and it is hefty and long lasting.
It is interesting that you remembered international law now, and not a month ago, when the currency accounts of the Central Bank of Russia in dollars and euros were frozen, as well as after the parade of economic sanctions and the withdrawal of many companies from Russia with the refusal of their obligations. There is no more international law. And yes - this is primarily a blow to Germany, as the locomotive of the European Union. Now Germany will support the Russian ruble, or plunge into medieval darkness without heat and light. Perhaps the decision of the UK to leave the European Union was wise, because the fate of the European Union is very vague, it is likely to face an inglorious collapse into small European states - tolerant of refugees, homosexuals and decarbonized. Europe will get what it wanted and what it deserved.

West should just stop ALL business with Russia, confiscate assets of all Russian citizens, strip them of any western citizenships, expel them back to Russia, and close its borders to Russian citizens.
342  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How long ukraine could survive? on: March 23, 2022, 01:50:08 PM
Meanwhile in the real world
Easy, illusions don't interest me. Curiously, you are more concerned with what kind of planes the Russians will fly than what you will eat. While valiant Ukrainian soldiers are inflicting untold losses on Putin's army (according to Ukrainian propaganda), the disruption of the sowing campaign in Ukraine has already taken place. And Ukraine is the breadbasket of all of Europe (was).

LOL, you're right, flying is going to be the least of Russia's concerns. It's just one of many examples for how fucked Putin is. He had to steal foreign-leased airplanes, otherwise he'd have nothing.

How about sugar, figured that one out yet? Paper? Everything else that goes 2x up in price and/or disappears, including things that are supposedly made in Russia? Looks like someone didn't think through the whole "invade another country and fingers crossed for no sanctions" plan.

All according to the 'plan'. 'Special operation' to turn Russia into the Soviet Union, lol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vS6NJASrGI

'Spetsoperatsya' my ass. Everything is 'po plan-oo', lol.
343  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress] on: March 23, 2022, 01:39:31 PM
The success of the operation is largely due to Russia's dominance in the air and preventive strikes with high-precision weapons on military infrastructure.
Tell me more about their high-precision weapons... Is that Grad, Uragan or Smerch? These "high precision" weapons probably hit civilian objects way more times than they hit military infrastructure. Offcourse, you can always use excuse that civilian object was base of nationalists.
In short, it always arrives strictly only at the place where reconnaissance drones or space satellites recorded firing at the positions of Russian troops. An exception to this rule is military infrastructure objects confirmed by intelligence (military airfields, fuel and ammunition depots, etc.). This operation is also Putin's performance for NATO combat generals, who are closely watching what is happening and they are not brainwashed by inspiring propaganda, they soberly assess what is happening. Putin shows NATO the capabilities of modern Russian weapons and how to fight - without general mobilization, without numerical superiority and without burning entire neighborhoods with fire.

NATO does not get involved in this war - so the lesson is learned correctly. Biden said yesterday that the Kinzhal hypersonic missile is basically nothing special, it's just almost impossible to stop. It flies for 1000 kilometers at a speed of Mach 10 in a cloud of hot plasma, invisible to missile defense radars and at the same time able to maneuver. It is capable of hitting buried objects protected from nuclear weapons or, for example, an aircraft carrier. NATO thought it was a cartoon, because they have nothing like this in their arsenal, but it turned out to be a reality. Didn't the Russian Solntsepek system impress you? This is the one that destroyed the barracks at the express training center for reservists the night before yesterday. For the townsfolk, what is happening is a tragedy, but for the military, it's just work. And the Russian military is doing a good job.
Success?
Of course it's a success. What makes you think that a blitzkrieg was planned? From Russia, about 200 thousand soldiers take part in the operation, against 300 thousand soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (whom the West has been pumping up with weapons for many years and trained by NATO instructors) and with a total length of the front line of 3.5 thousand kilometers. Now look at the map of hostilities (if you do not believe the data of the Russian Defense Ministry, take the data that is published in the West). Or is it presented in the Ukrainian media as a tactical lure of Putin's soldiers to their territory before a decisive march on Moscow?  Grin

So basically, Putin is trying to do the opposite of de-nazification.  
Really?

Inside A White Supremacist Militia in Ukraine (by Time)

Ukraine Neo-Nazis Infiltrate EVERY LEVEL Of Military & Government (by The Jimmy Dore Show)

Ukraine's far-right children's camp: 'I want to bring up a warrior' (by The Guardian)

This is not Russian propaganda, these are investigations and reports from the Western media. Enjoy.

Just google the same thing on Russia.

There are neo-Nazis in EVERY country in Europe.  In Ukraine, they have absolutely no political power, ZERO.

Known Russian neo-Nazis were sent to Ukraine to deNazify Ukrainians, lol.
https://khpg.org/en/1608809502

Your mafia boss is running out of ideas. Just a matter of time before his abused, hungry, frostbitten 'special forces' limp home.
Most of them will stay in Ukraine and become fertilizer.

Watch this 351 episode on lotuseaters:
https://www.lotuseaters.com/the-podcast-of-the-lotus-eaters-351-17-03-2022
344  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Signing a petition against Putin on: March 22, 2022, 09:08:53 PM
IMO, petitions is one of the most pointless things ever. Nobody is paying attention to it in democratic countries and now we are talking about mad dictator who don't care about people lifes, sanctions that kill his country economics and long term consquences of war. But no, he will stop war because of petition. Petitions is good thing only to show people's position.

Everyone concerned about people affected by the war but still the president of Ukraine is not showing any sign of oeace talk with neutral moodz he is still on the side of NATO join so probably Putin won't stop unless Zelensky comes down.
What do you expect Zelensky to do? Give up and let Russia to occupy country. And if you follow his statements, Ukraine has already lost hope to be ever accepted in NATO or that they will announce no-fly zone over Ukraine.

Setting aside this worthless petition, how would you propose capturing Putin in order to make him stand trial? He is nearly 70 and he's declining in health. Let him die of natural causes and then worry about the next Putin who is set to take over Russia. The successor will adopt the crisis in Ukraine, and there is the gamble that this person is more unhinged than Putin himself. A deleterious successor is more concerning than Putin.
70 isn't that much. War or genocide criminals were punished even at 90 years or even more. Though, I hardly see scenario how to capture him. But anyway, Putin didn't deserved to die in natural way after all he did.
And I afraid that next president after Putin won't be much better, considering that majority of Russians support their current politics direction and this war too.

That is why the free world needs to go into Russia and dePunitify them, lol.
345  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How long ukraine could survive? on: March 22, 2022, 03:59:05 PM

Makariv recaptured.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKWKDyDKGzw
346  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress] on: March 22, 2022, 03:49:37 AM
Ukrainians will be fighting Russian aggressors to death.
Well, that means they'll die.

Yes, Captain Obvious, aggressors will die. That's the whole point.
In Kyiv on May 9 2022, a traditional parade will be held in honor of the victory of the USSR over Nazi Germany. It is naive and foolish to doubt it.

OMG. You are clueless.

Russia might not survive economically until then.  A huge payment on sovereign debt is due on Apr 4. So by May 4, rubble will be in a free fall.
I mean 1000:1 or lower.

Putin and his buddies kept the money in the West, now that money is seized and will be used to reconstruct Ukraine once this adventure is over. That was their fundamental error before they decided to run this special operation. Some chess players, lol. Fucking drunk retards.

Replacement for Putin has already been selected. The KGB elite will change the regime and try to re-establish economic ties with the West.
Too much money is at stake.

This Soviet propaganda for old babushkas is cheap talk for the masses, but it makes everyone poorer and the smart siloviki in Russia will not
allow this for too long.

BTW, I think all temporary occupied territories will be returned to Ukraine after this military mishap is over.
347  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress] on: March 22, 2022, 02:45:05 AM
I am not even going to bother answering your shitty propaganda.
And yet you just did it.  Smiley

I think in Ukraine everything will be about the same as in Georgia, after the armed conflict in Abkhazia and North Ossetia, which Georgia still considers to be occupied territories. Abkhazia is now almost like Russia, you can enter there without a visa on an internal Russian passport and the currency there is the Russian ruble. In Abkhazia, they love and respect the Russians, who saved them from the attack of Georgian thugs. Russians are also loved and respected in Georgia. Although the Russian military is still in Abkhazia, which Georgia considers its territory. This is a paradox and at the same time it is true.

Russia does not need the love of Ukrainians and their flowers for Russian soldiers. Ukraine is a heterogeneous country - eastern Ukraine is historically Russian-speaking and traditionally loyal to Russia, while western Ukraine historically gravitates towards Poland and is in opposition to Russia. So did Poland, although Russia liberated it from Nazi Germany. These are the features of the national mentality in which these nations find their self-identity. This is acceptable for Russia as long as the anti-Russian rhetoric does not go into action and become a source of strategic threats to Russia's security.

That is the exact mistake Putin has made. Russian-speaking Ukrainians are Ukrainians, not Russians.
They have a completely different culture, different values, morals, and ethics. They are Europeans.

Russians are Mongols, aka Kacaps.

Ukrainians will be fighting Russian aggressors to death.
348  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Rumours on Anonymous about to leak a ton of Putin's dirty secrets on: March 22, 2022, 02:21:11 AM
There is a rumour running around that anonymous is about to leak a massive dump of information that would seriously damage Putin's war effort. This also comes along an apparent "mistake" from a Putin's controlled media outlet stating the losses of Putin's army at more than 9.000 dead and more than 16000 injured. This is unconfirmed, but likely true.

https://www.unilad.co.uk/news/russian-state-media-briefly-publishes-death-toll-numbers-20220321

On Anonymous, they tend to attack organisations and individuals that abuse power or threaten innocents systemically. In the Ukraine war, the group seems clearly inclined to target Putin's Russia and now has declared the intention of attacking companies that do not pull-out of Putin's Russia.

https://www.hstoday.us/featured/anonymous-hackers-fire-warning-shot-at-companies-refusing-to-pull-out-of-russia/

Older news...
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60784526

Quote
Of all the cyber-attacks carried out since the Ukraine conflict started, an Anonymous hack on Russian TV networks stands out.

The hack was captured in a short video clip which shows normal programming interrupted with images of bombs exploding in Ukraine and soldiers talking about the horrors of the conflict.



and how do you know that anonymous didn't lied, its doubtful you can even believe jews anymore (look at zelinski). anonymous has been exposed as being a left wing woke hacker, he is likely just an invention of left wing mainstream media workers in the west.

its pointless to take "anonymous" serious he is a joke like the woke mainstream media staffers in the west.

https://www.facebook.com/navy.mil.gov.ua/videos/449757700230135
349  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How long ukraine could survive? on: March 21, 2022, 02:17:44 PM
They do not have a choice, and they will fight to the last grandmother with a jar of pickles.
Only far-right nationalists with swastika tattoos have no choice.

Ok, now, I know you do not understand who is actually fighting in this conflict. Put down the Soviet kool-aid.
350  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress] on: March 21, 2022, 02:14:10 PM
On Mariupol... it seems that Putin could enter the city. The obvious problem is that there is no longer a city in there, he has conquered a flat plain full of rubble, dead and hungry people. He has simply flattened it and that only leaves ill will and hate. I guess that is not an immediate problem for Putin, yet controlling a territory that is hostile is a costly effort, so this "victory" may become his new Afghanistan, but hey, feel free to consider it a victory if it happens.
The occupation of Ukraine is not the purpose of the special operation. Ukraine will lose its army and ultra-right nationalists, just as it has already lost Crimea, Donbass and Lugansk. And then she will begin to build a new peaceful life, while maintaining neutrality and loyalty to Russia. Because the blood ties between our peoples are stronger than the current ideological differences.

The only way there will be peace in this world is when all pro-Soviet imperialist enthusiasts are killed, in Russia and abroad (Belarus, Crimea, Donbas, Chechnya, Ossetia, Transnistria, etc).
351  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How long ukraine could survive? on: March 21, 2022, 02:07:49 PM
I see you are far from understanding such things. The Kinzhal hypersonic missile blah blah blah

Again, shelling civilians is hardly a defining or desirable attribute of a military victory. The question now is whether Putin has enough missiles to level Ukraine and kill every Ukrainian.

These are not democratic elections, when the population is asked about something.

Of course. Putinists wouldn't know democracy if it hit them in the ass (with a Javelin).
Without control over airspace, the Ukrainian army is doomed to defeat, with or without Javelins. And NATO prudently refused to close the airspace. I do not think that the Ukrainians are so stupid as to fight to the last Ukrainian without a chance of success.

They do not have a choice, and they will fight to the last grandmother with a jar of pickles.
352  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How long ukraine could survive? on: March 21, 2022, 02:04:26 PM
And yet this amazingly powerful hypersonic military force is stuck in the mud and getting smoked with rotten capitalist Javelins. How many missiles does Russia make per day? I bet it's less than they launch.
I see you are far from understanding such things. The Kinzhal hypersonic missile was recently successfully field-tested to demonstrate the capabilities of modern Russian weapons. And I think that the Pentagon's generals correctly interpreted this message (and it's not hypersonic missiles that European generals need to worry about, if an old Soviet reconnaissance drone launched from Ukrainian territory flew unhindered through several European countries and self-destructed). There is no good reason to fire cannons at sparrows in normal mode, so they mainly use proven reliable weapons and ammunition with an expiring shelf life, which are more expensive to dispose of than to use for their intended purpose.

Just like they "minimized" Grozny to a pile of rubble. As I said, that's the only "winning" strategy they have when the population doesn't want to be "liberated".
These are not democratic elections, when the population is asked about something. Ukrainian soldiers can lay down their arms at any moment and go home. Donbass and Lugansk asked Russia for help and they will receive it in full.

You really don't know what is actually happening in Donbas. Right now, RUSSIANS are taking young men at gunpoint from the streets
(literally) and enlisting them in the RUSSIAN army, and sending them off to the front line to use them as cannon fodder.  They are used to
locate Ukrainian army positions. Independent republics my ass.

The population of Crimea, Donbas, and Luhansk have been terrorized by Russian gangs and the regular military for 8 years.

Right now, and probably never, the Russian army does not have any strategy. The only 'strategy' is to level everything and drive-in, rape, and plunder. Kill unarmed civilians.
 
They don't know how to fight, that is why they are losing big time in this conflict.

The way they are equipped looks like they were teletransported from WWII.
It looks like this was done on purpose so that Putin can re-live his denazification WWII movie.

We all know the answer: rampant corruption in the Russian army.
353  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How long ukraine could survive? on: March 20, 2022, 10:31:48 PM
The main purpose of Putin is the demilitarize Ukraine, they are not there to completely destroy the country. Ukraine is a strategic region for Russia, it's beneficial if they intend to make use of the country for improving economic activity especially because Crimea's coast is a large part of Ukraine.

I haven't read such big nonsense for a while. If they want to ''demilitarize'' Ukraine, why they are targeting civilian objects - aprtment houses, schools, hospitals, theatres, churches and so on? Is it military objects? There was report that 90% of buildings in Mariupol were more or less damaged or destroyed by Russian army. If they will want to use Ukraine as strategic region for their economic, first they will have to spend many billions to rebuild country. And I hope that they will have to spend these billions as war reparations, same as Germany did after WW2.

The objective was to convert Ukraine to Russia. Putin is just surprised that there are so many non-Russian Russian speakers in Ukraine, lol.

That is not what he read in his 1800s history textbooks.

He is effectively demilitarizing Russia and its satellite countries, Chechnya, Syria, Armenia, and Belarus.
On top of that, he wants to drag China into his adventure.
354  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress] on: March 20, 2022, 10:26:34 PM
There is plenty of history on the formation of any estate, and Ukraine is no different. In modern times, it is the people that live in a region or country that have the right to decide their future and their organisation. It is just silly pretending that you have to go back decades or even centuries and then wage a war on those grounds and certainly Putin does not give a ****k about that.

This war is only about Putin loosing their geostrategic grip and exclusive access on a large part of the former USSR republics, including some of the most strategic and financially critical regions such as the Black Sea and Azov Sea. All the rest is the trolls trying to make noise and trying to blame the war on things that are absolutely irrelevant to Putin and his entourage.

The sad truth is that Putin has failed to seduce, use diplomacy or economically influence those territories and he is using the last resource of the incompetent: war.



And as for how to stop the guy



War is a team sport.

From what we have seen so far, it looks like Putin is making all military decisions by himself.
355  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What are the US' true intentions for themselves and Ukraine? on: March 20, 2022, 10:23:23 PM
The Russia-Ukraine situation really brings to light a few questions; why did NATO continue to exist after the fall of the Soviet Union, despite the downfall of the USSR being the goal of establishing NATO in the first place? Now, the same people who cooked up the Iraq War, are now driving another war, this time in Ukraine - apparently now the US' greatest ally, by the way the media have portrayed this. Give thanks to Putin, as he has ended COVID-19 - you don't see it on the news anymore.

Ukraine don't even qualify for NATO, nor do NATO even want Ukraine to join in the first place, because of Ukraine's corrupt history. Ukraine joining NATO would be more of a liability than a military asset to the United States and NATO. Yet Congress and the US seem(ed) pretty intent on wanting Ukraine to join NATO, not because it would be a strategic advantage, but just to spite the Russians.

In other words, the whole situation is a mess. It serves no strategic advantage to the United States whatsoever by pursuing defence of Ukraine, whilst simultaneously igniting economic warfare with Russia. Joe Biden at his State of the Union speech bragged about how the Ruble lost 30 points in a single day, and that it was a moral victory. This was not a victory, it was a sign of how the USD can be used a weapon. Everyone in Russia, 99.99% of those in the population had nothing to do with this conflict, suddenly became much poorer in a single day - they impoverished an entire nation, yet you are told this is a moral victory. It begs the question, are the US actually trying to ignite all-out war with Russia?

It is yet another manufactured crisis. As we have seen over the past few years, the US Government love to give themselves emergency powers in response to crises that they have sensationalised and created. Power-hungry neocons in Washington DC want another war. War makes money.

Clint Erlich, recently said that a former Obama Administration official wants the United States to invade Crimea to drive Russian forces out of there. What exactly do the US want in Ukraine?

We now know that they house military-funded bio(warfare) laboratories in Ukraine, which in itself is suspicious. Ukraine are one of the poorest and most corrupt countries in Europe, and are not known for their biomedical engineering prowess, so why have the United States set up "research facilities" there, and why did they not secure them in anticipation of an invasion, which they themselves knew was going to happen? A few years ago, you could freely view a US "research facility" based in Odesa, Ukraine, on the State Department's website. Now though, that link is undefined and the page was taken down - interesting.

-=+=-

Alexandra Chalupa | @AlexandraChalup | 18/01/22 | : "This isn't journalism, it's an ongoing FARA violation. Tucker Carlson needs to be prosecuted as an unregistered agent of the Russian Federation and treason under Article 3, Sec. 3, Clause 1 of the US Constitution for aiding an enemy in hybrid warfare against the United States."

Couple things odd about this:
1) He did not take a pro-Russia stance, he merely questioned the US Government and their intentions. So much for free speech.
2) "Hybrid Warfare against the United States"? Keep in mind, this tweet was on the 18th of January, long before Russia stepped into Ukraine. Does this elicit that the US planned and wanted this?

-=+=-

It seems as though the Biden Administration care more about the sovereignty and border integrity of a poor Eastern European country bordering Russia, compared to how much they care about their own borders back home. Someone might want to tell Joe Biden that opening up the borders and ridding Title 42 may not be such a good idea, as there is a violent Civil War occurring as we speak in Mexico - more than 100,000 young men disappeared in Mexico last year. Automatic rifle fire was exchanged in Texas last week, courtesy of an immigrant who crossed the Mexico-US border, who did not want to be arrested for carrying lethal fentanyl across the border. There was a violent war between Azerbaijan and Albania that ended approximately half a year ago, but I bet you didn't hear about this, all you've heard about is Ukraine. You have probably not heard either about the Ethiopian Civil War, nor about how the United States practically contributed to human slavery now occurring in Libya.

Question them or speak the truth, and you'll be labelled Pro-Putin, and subsequently censored.

The imminent threat to the United States is China, not Russia. The US Military, as impressive as it is, cannot hold stature in both Eastern Europe and Asia, so by pursuing defence of Ukraine, by definition, the US are not focusing on China. This entire situation, has pushed Russia and China into an alliance, not just against the US Military, but against the USD itself. When the USD is replaced as the world's reserve currency, whether it's replaced by Digital Yuan or potentially Bitcoin, the majority of the US population, will become poor and impoverished overnight. The US' Foreign Policy on Russia in the last year has driven Russia and China closer, the US' two biggest threats, are now working together, in spite of the USD. People do not and will not understand the genuine ramifications of this, until it eventually happens.

Are the US trying to destroy themselves?

Because the West never believed the Soviet imperialism was dead. And, they were right.

This war between good and evil will not be finished until Russia becomes a truly progressive social democracy.
They never had that so my only hope is that Russians are capable to structure their society like the rest of the developed world and abandon
their medieval ways.
356  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Strategic defeat for Russia? on: March 20, 2022, 10:11:13 PM
It's for sure that Putin has no intention of largely holding Ukraine. Putin just wants to make sure that Ukraine stays away from NATO and Russia can supply gas to Europe without any transit fees. If he really wants to do something like he has done with Crimea then we could see Kyiv been pounded by thousands of missiles already. RF trying to keep civilian casualties as low as possible but still unwanted incidents happen in the war zone.
NATO was formed in order to collectively defend against Russia. Before the invasion, there was no realistic chance that Ukraine was going to join NATO. Provided that Ukraine is not occupied by Russia, it will be pushed to join NATO after the war is over.

The Russian invasion is Ukraine is likely to result in Russia being unable to supply gas to Europe, as Europe will be unwilling to buy Russian gas over the long term.

Not only that. More importantly, what this invasion did to Ukraine is to culturally separate her from Russian culture, or more precisely from Soviet imperialism. It united Ukrainians of all ethnic and religious denominations, it crystalized Ukraine as a nation.

After this war, there will be a clear distinction between a Ukrainian Russian speaker and a Russian speaker in Russia, in how they view the world,
what human values they revere.

Ukraine will undergo ethnic cleansing in more than one way. It is a spiritual awakening of Ukraine as a nation.

There will be no reconciliation with Russia after this war.

This war will separate good from evil. Homo Sapiens on the left, Homo Sovieticus on the right.
357  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How long ukraine could survive? on: March 19, 2022, 08:29:48 PM
Ukraine country will survive this war soon because they are fully ready to make peace with Russia despite what Russian soldiers has done to their resources.
Peace? Honestly i don't want anything but just peace, so things can go back to normal. But are there actually plans in motion to make peace? I have not seen or heard much about that, from what i can gather, the war is still going on in its full force, to make peace will mean one side will have to surrender, do you think Ukraine are going to do that? I honestly do not know what is going to happen, but i just want a stop to all of this wreckage.
Ukraine president will do everything possible to print more money that will allow the citizens to improve their businesses in the country.
Printing more money eh? Well that could be the only option, but i am pretty sure we all know what the negative effect of that is, as inflation/hyperinflation is being felt almost worldwide right now after there was so much money-printing to fight the covid pandemic. Well Ukraine would not be thinking of that at all right now, they will just want all of this to end, so the rebuilding process can begin, in whichever way possible.

Russia offered it a long time ago with this conditions:


Donetsk, and Luhansk people already decided many times over what they want and they decide and not some corrupt drug addict far far away.

 Ukraine says no longer insisting on NATO membership
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/nod-russia-ukraine-says-no-165955908.html
Exactly what is so bad about a neutral country like switzerland, austria or sweden

Any contract signed under duress is void.

Remove your army from the territory of Ukraine, then we'll talk.
358  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Who will lose in Ukraine? on: March 19, 2022, 08:26:23 PM
NATO unnecessarily escalated the situation and then fled the scene, claiming that they'll take no part in the war, after creating absolute chaos. War sucks for both sides, both countries' resources will be depleted and their citizens devastated, leading to a financial depression throughout the whole European continent. People are always the true victims of war.

They are saying they will take no part in the war but at the same time, they are supplying Ukraine with weapons. Not only both countries but also the whole EU's resources will be depleted because of the war. Other NATO members are also proving help to Ukraine and even many countries are thinking about sending peacekeeping missions to Ukraine with will lead to a direct conflict between NATO and Russia.

If NATO really sent a peacekeeping force or declare Ukraine air space as a no-fly zone then Europe will be responsible for another world war.

Putin started this war. Check your root cause analysis, lol.
359  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Strategic defeat for Russia? on: March 19, 2022, 08:16:23 PM
Putin doesn't need to win the hearts and minds of the Ukrainian people. He will install a government that is pro-Russia. So the Ukrainian people will pledge loyalty to a puppet government, not him.

Take it as you will, as there is so much propaganda being thrown by actors culpable of stirring the pot, but here is Putin being cheered by a stadium of people in a recent public appearance: https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1504821631675473922

Quite the contrast from the videos and clips of small groups of protestors that are being arrested by Russian police. The international community is on the same page against Russia, but as long as Putin can sustain confidence among his own people, I see no reason why Putin would withdraw from Ukraine.

So that is the plan? LOL.

Hmm, you have no idea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzRls0WSW4c

Yes, it is his plan. That is only if he is able to murder Zelenskyy. See the number of hit squads/mercenary groups that have attempted to assassinate him: https://nypost.com/2022/03/09/zelensky-has-survived-more-than-a-dozen-assassination-attempts-aide-says/

They can't be cheap, must serve a purpose eh?

Do you think Ukraine will become part of Russia? How else would you expect they be governed? If Zelenskyy survives, then no problem for Putin. He will murder enough citizens until a concession is forced from Ukraine. Either way, Putin will be in control of the Ukrainian government,

If he kills all Ukrainians who will remain in Ukraine, then sure, I agree, he will accomplish his ethnic cleansing plan.

I just don't know where he is going to get all the cannon fodder.  I think when the number of killed Russian soldiers approach 200K
it will be the end of Putin's political career.  Maybe even sooner. I would not be surprised if he does a false flag bombing on his own people
to justify martial law and the military draft.

I don't think he knows how to accomplish what he wants to accomplish.  At least Hitler knew how to design concentration camps, but this
guy cannot find people who can coordinate an attack, perform military maneuvers, etc. his army has been taught WWII tactics.

At this point, it does not matter, if Zelensky lives or is assassinated.  I think the opposition will be even stronger if he is assassinated, and
the western response will be harsher. His 'plan' will turn into a complete disaster, if it is not there already.

Give Ukrainians a martyr, and watch your back. No pro-Russian person will ever be safe in Ukraine after that.
360  Other / Politics & Society / Re: UN condeming Genocide in Ukraine Could we See the rise of a Second UN on: March 19, 2022, 08:00:06 PM
Talk about genocide.

Russians are killing people who escaped to Russia from Mariupol.

https://twitter.com/kyivindependent/status/1505258123434639360

These people will not be heard from ever again.  Part of Putin's cleansing plan.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ... 155 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!