Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 03:16:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 155 »
1161  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County on: September 08, 2019, 03:43:22 AM

This guy is unstable.  He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression.

Blaming a judge, WTF?  The judge was not near the baby.  The baby died because of his previous health condition.  Police found no fault.

The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others.

The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife.

This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides.  It is what it is. Baby died.  Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back.

Move on, meet another woman, make another baby.


And where did you get your psychiatric certification to be able to diagnose this man remotely with nearly no information and having never even seen him in person? The judge is 100% undeniably at fault for violating his rights to free speech and redress of grievances. This part is not up for debate. He is not required to be correct in his assertions in order for this to be a violation of his rights, though I think there is a good chance he is. The police as well as the court system have a well established bias against men towards women ESPECIALLY in domestic and family court related matters as well as many other areas. If you want to go over the stats I would be glad to demolish any opposition to this point. You are nothing but an establishment parrot repeating the status quo with no critical examination of the situation. Your solution to this situation is to avoid conflict at all cost by simply imprisoning a father that just lost his child, because he is a man, and who gives a fuck what he thinks or feels right? Throw him in a cage, women are strong, independent, and blameless, and if you question this off to the gulags with you!

It was reported that he suffered from depression after his son died. It is understandable. It can happen to anyone.  Google it.

The guy is delusional blaming the judge.  The judge was not near the kid.

Talk about not thinking straight! If you want to blame someone, blame the mother, not the judge!

Fuck, some people are so stupid to think the guy was justified on taking it on the judge.  

BTW, he will be jailed because he broke the condition of his bond.  The law is the law.

He fucked up.  It does not matter that he lost his son, father or mother. Ignorance of the law is not a defense.


You are just making shit up to avoid confronting your own cognitive dissonance from the situation. You have ZERO evidence he is unstable or a danger to others. This is just a pathetic excuse to wipe out a free man so you don't have to address the difficult implications of the situation.

Why was a bond placed on him to begin with? Oh right for criticizing the judge. What law did he break? The judge WAY overstepped her authority arresting him for this in the first instance let alone a second time. This is 100% tyrannical behavior and is in no way justifiable. You are probably one of those people who thinks it is a valid charge to arrest some one for resisting arrest.

I read about his story (depression) here:
https://usareally.com/4090-a-father-who-has-lost-his-son-will-end-up-in-jail-due-to-criticism-of-the-judiciary-judge-spits-on-first-amendment

Anyway, this guy is a little boy who cannot handle his emotions.  He has psychological issues, that is for sure.
What was his 'game plan'?  To scare the judge?  Well, it worked. LOL.
1162  Other / Politics & Society / Re: This frozen chicken “had a rich, emotional life.” on: September 08, 2019, 02:43:12 AM
We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

First step:

Recognize that humans are animals.

Next step:

Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal.

However, animals eat other animals.  So do humans.

Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat.

Except human life IS more important than animals. This concept that humans and animals are equal is nothing but a backdoor way to lower the standing of humans to that of an animal so that mistreatment of humans is excused. There is no way to give animals equal protection to humans and not do so. This is an anti-humanist viewpoint covered in a thin veneer of cute little furry creatures regardless if you recognize it as such or not.

Are you sure?  Why do you think human life is more important than the life of other animals?
Because we can kill any animal on the planet anytime we want?

Is the life of a lion more important than that of a gazelle?

We are the most dangerous animal on the planet, not the most important.  All life is equally important.  Step out of your 'human thinking box'.

BTW, humans are a plague.


I don't give a shit about any of your relativist bullshit. THE FACT IS that making animals equivalent to humans lowers the value of human life down to that of an animal, and this is anti-human and totalitarian. I don't need any other reasons, that single reason is horrible enough to reject your postmodernist tripe.

Your value system is completely arbitrary.  It is based on nothing but your wants.

If you kept the values the same you would not have to lower anything. 

From your posts, I see you don't give a shit about animals, (some) humans included.

BTW, I said nothing that is anti-human.  You are really fucked up in your twisted, 1st century way of thinking.

It is exactly that way of thinking that leads morons like you to genocides.  If you think one type of animal is more valuable than the other, what will stop you from assigning different values to different types of humans, based on race, ethnicity, gender, etc.?

Your classification is arbitrary.  Mine is just based on science (biology).
1163  Other / Politics & Society / Re: This frozen chicken “had a rich, emotional life.” on: September 07, 2019, 11:32:57 PM
We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

First step:

Recognize that humans are animals.

Next step:

Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal.

However, animals eat other animals.  So do humans.

Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat.

Except human life IS more important than animals. This concept that humans and animals are equal is nothing but a backdoor way to lower the standing of humans to that of an animal so that mistreatment of humans is excused. There is no way to give animals equal protection to humans and not do so. This is an anti-humanist viewpoint covered in a thin veneer of cute little furry creatures regardless if you recognize it as such or not.

Are you sure?  Why do you think human life is more important than the life of other animals?
Because we can kill any animal on the planet anytime we want?

Is the life of a lion more important than that of a gazelle?

We are the most dangerous animal on the planet, not the most important.  All life is equally important.  Step out of your 'human thinking box'.

BTW, humans are a plague.
1164  Other / Politics & Society / Re: This frozen chicken “had a rich, emotional life.” on: September 07, 2019, 11:22:12 PM
We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

First step:

Recognize that humans are animals.

Next step:

Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal.

However, animals eat other animals.  So do humans.

Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat.

Humans are not animals. Research is showing us that even though humans and animals have many similar systems within them, they are two different kinds of creatures.

Human life is way more important than all other life. People are the owners and controllers (at times) of other life. However, wanton destruction of other life by humans does not generally benefit humans, and should not be done.

Humans, not being animals, cannot eat other animals. Cannibalism does exist, however.

Humans who are simply living, kill multitudes of individual bacteria organisms within their bodies. If you really want to be completely just, kill yourself, so that you are not found guilty of killing off the multitudes of bacteria in your body. If you don't commit suicide, you are a mass killer by your own standards.

Cool

Take a biology class, come back and report your findings. 

We are mammals, we belong to the Great Apes family together with chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
1165  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County on: September 07, 2019, 11:11:42 PM

This guy is unstable.  He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression.

Blaming a judge, WTF?  The judge was not near the baby.  The baby died because of his previous health condition.  Police found no fault.

The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others.

The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife.

This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides.  It is what it is. Baby died.  Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back.

Move on, meet another woman, make another baby.


And where did you get your psychiatric certification to be able to diagnose this man remotely with nearly no information and having never even seen him in person? The judge is 100% undeniably at fault for violating his rights to free speech and redress of grievances. This part is not up for debate. He is not required to be correct in his assertions in order for this to be a violation of his rights, though I think there is a good chance he is. The police as well as the court system have a well established bias against men towards women ESPECIALLY in domestic and family court related matters as well as many other areas. If you want to go over the stats I would be glad to demolish any opposition to this point. You are nothing but an establishment parrot repeating the status quo with no critical examination of the situation. Your solution to this situation is to avoid conflict at all cost by simply imprisoning a father that just lost his child, because he is a man, and who gives a fuck what he thinks or feels right? Throw him in a cage, women are strong, independent, and blameless, and if you question this off to the gulags with you!

It was reported that he suffered from depression after his son died. It is understandable. It can happen to anyone.  Google it.

The guy is delusional blaming the judge.  The judge was not near the kid.

Talk about not thinking straight! If you want to blame someone, blame the mother, not the judge!

Fuck, some people are so stupid to think the guy was justified on taking it on the judge.  

BTW, he will be jailed because he broke the condition of his bond.  The law is the law.

He fucked up.  It does not matter that he lost his son, father or mother. Ignorance of the law is not a defense.
1166  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County on: September 07, 2019, 05:37:42 PM

This guy is unstable.  He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression.

Blaming a judge, WTF?  The judge was not near the baby.  The baby died because of his previous health condition.  Police found no fault.

The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others.

The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife.

This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides.  It is what it is. Baby died.  Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back.

Move on, meet another woman, make another baby.
1167  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Effect of amazon fire ? on: September 07, 2019, 02:31:49 AM
When someone talks about the destruction of the Amazon, all I hear is this song from way back when:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejorQVy3m8E
1168  Other / Off-topic / Re: What is your constructive hobby? on: September 05, 2019, 03:03:16 PM
We all have different hobbies. What is one hobby that sets you apart from your friends and also has a constructive usage.
Mine is to learn how to code in various languages by accepting jobs. That makes me work better under pressure of submitting my work fast.
P.S: Making memes doesn't count.

Watchmaking.  I love to repair/build/rebuild mechanical wristwatches; learn everything there is about mechanical watches, new materials, technology, etc.

It is a fascinating hobby.
1169  Other / Politics & Society / Re: This frozen chicken “had a rich, emotional life.” on: September 05, 2019, 12:56:14 PM
We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

First step:

Recognize that humans are animals.

Next step:

Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal.

However, animals eat other animals.  So do humans.

Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat.
1170  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How to stop paying taxes, and get out from under government control. on: September 04, 2019, 03:10:07 AM
People who try to skip tax payment might end up in jail it ask to pay higher from fine with is quit higher than the previous amount to be paid

Taxation is stealing. In America, if people use the law right, they don't have to pay taxes. The law is against stealing. The only reason why people pay is that they don't know the law, and most government people are trying to hide the law from them.

Cool

If you were ever issued SSN, you have to pay taxes on your passive and active income.

If you don't, you'll end up in jail and lose all your net worth.


You aren't exactly right. There is more to it.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA) are two different agencies. The reason the IRS issues SS numbers is that these two agencies have an agreement.

When anyone signs an application for a SS card and number (SSN), does the application ever state that anyone owes taxes? How about the IRS? No! The most that it might say on the app is that the SSN should be used for paying income and SS taxes if any are due.

This means that there has to be a different method for determining if taxes are due.

If the method for determining that taxes are due has found that taxes are owed, it is only right and legal and honorable to pay them. There isn't any question about it. If taxes are due, the one who owes should see to it that they are paid.

But that isn't what having a SSN is about. It's not about stating that someone has taxes due. It's about paying into the SSA system IF SS taxes are due.

IRS taxes are a different thing. How does one find out if IRS taxes are due? There is only one way, even though there may be several methods to get to that one way. The person voluntarily admits that he owes taxes. That's the only way.

A W-2 form is hearsay. It has no signature on it. The odds are exceedingly small that an employer will ever step up to the witness box in court and state that he knows for a fact that the amount on the W-2 form is the gross income of any employee. He won't do it because he doesn't know for a fact that he would be right. The most he might do is state that the amount on a particular W-2 form is the amount that he put there.

The point is, the only way for income determination, and taxes owed determination, is by voluntary self-assessment. There is no agreement or contract that taxes are owed until someone signs such an agreement or contract. You do it when you sign the 1040 form or the W-4 form (or other IRS forms). Otherwise you owe no taxes.

Cool

If you have an SSN, you are either a US citizen or a permanent resident and you are liable to pay income taxes to the IRS. No ifs or buts.

Nobody cares if you agreed to it or not, whether you like it or not.  

IRS will come down on you like a sledgehammer.  I would not fuck with them if I were you.  They will clean you up real good.  You and all your extended family.  You will forget your name once they are done with you.
1171  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How to stop paying taxes, and get out from under government control. on: September 03, 2019, 06:09:21 PM
People who try to skip tax payment might end up in jail it ask to pay higher from fine with is quit higher than the previous amount to be paid

Taxation is stealing. In America, if people use the law right, they don't have to pay taxes. The law is against stealing. The only reason why people pay is that they don't know the law, and most government people are trying to hide the law from them.

Cool

If you were ever issued SSN, you have to pay taxes on your passive and active income.

If you don't, you'll end up in jail and lose all your net worth.
1172  Other / Off-topic / Re: Largest religion in 2050? on: September 03, 2019, 02:18:48 PM
What will be the largest religion in 2050?

No religion (atheism) will gain ground in most civilized, well-developed countries.

By 2080, the scientific world view will be widely accepted.

All faith-based positions will be classified as mental disorders.
1173  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: August 31, 2019, 12:31:09 AM
Dust accumulation over 10,000 years is a millimeter?  What.

1000 years. 10 times faster than was previously thought.
https://www.space.com/23694-moon-dust-mystery-apollo-data.html
I'm not buying that. There are several sources of dust on the lunar surface (A) monthly static creating "dust fountains" which go up and down, no net dust gain
(B) dust drifting in from space, causing microscopic craters when it hits
(C) dust clouds from new asteroid impacts

In the short run, anything like a solar collector would be a victim of "static cling", (A). But that equilibrates, and there is no net gain.

In the long run, (B) and (C) are the creators of new dust, and the primary cause of its accumulation.



That's garbage. It's trying to argue that in a couple billion years, such things could happen. But it totally ignores the major event happening in the solar system over that time frame which affects the planets's orbits. That is the gradual expansion of the sun into a red giant.

From this process, when solar flux to the Earth increases about 10%, most life or all life here will cease. That's about a billion years off.

But as the sun expands, planets are swallowed up. Planets within the sphere of a red giant star are part of the star. They are no longer planets as we think of them.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/0801.4031.pdf

Oh, puh-leaze. Standard archaeological science has so many holes in it that it's more hollow than the moon full of caverns might be.

Electric plasma stars shows us a universe that is way more logical than nuclear stars.

Gobekli Tepe shows us that science was well developed back in the time that science says we only had ignorant hunter-gatherers... 14,000 to 11,500 years ago.

All this BS about suns expanding and swallowing planets is just a story. Nobody has been around long enough to watch it happen on a regular enough basis, so that we can know that it is the norm.

A billion years into the future? LOL. We don't know that a billion years into the past even happened. The whole space-time continuum math and physics has changed into the past, that we don't know how far back we can apply the math or physics of today with even reasonable accuracy.

All this garbage in textbooks about the distant past is completely unknown to be factual. It all exists so that some scientists can gain control over the feeble minds of average people who really couldn't care less. And they have you suckered in right among them.

The moon landings were engineering way more than they were science.

Cool

I think the problem for guys like you is that you have no way of determining what is true and what is bullshit.  You have no reliable epistemic tools in the toolbox between your eyes.

You will continue to believe any ad-hoc theories and conspiracies of the day. 

- vaccines causing autism
- flat Earth
- young Earth
- Moon landing hoax
- flat Earth
- religious myths (in your case Jewish Zombie myth)
- ghosts
- life after death
- demons and angels
- hell and heaven
- any other supernatural BS
- UFOs
- Luminati
- Jews controlling everything
- the government wants to poison everyone
- chemtrails
- evolution hoax
- homeotherapy
- astrology
- US 'state citizens' are not US citizens

etc, etc.

The list goes on...
1174  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump should raise tariffs to 50% on: August 30, 2019, 07:13:21 PM
Tariffs are passed to the consumer, they aren't hurting China at all, other countries just move in to buy their cheap goods they developed from the US happily and shortsightedly handing over their IP.

I mean, it hurts consumers yes -- but it is also lowering the amount of revenue that China is getting from selling these products in the US, as people are turning to other products to purchase instead of purchasing Chinese goods. So the way this helps is that it forces China to actually look into policing intellectual property related issues, which is something that they've turned a blind eye too while they've been able to make an immense amount of money from.

China will literally allow their companies to simply steal from other companies, with nothing being done to stop this behavior.

Yes, maybe there is a better way to force China into dealing with this issue -- but to say that China is the 'good guy' in this situation is unfair.

Definitely not saying China is the good guy here, particularly regarding the forced transfer of IP. However the tariff policy is misguided and hurts the US consumer far more than China. China will not lose money here as they will find ready consumers in Europe and elsewhere for all their goods, and indeed there is evidence this has already happened in some markets.

Actually, tariffs don't hurt the US economy. Why not? Because tariffs bring jobs back to US people. In addition, tariffs exercise America, and exercise makes America strong just like exercise in a gym makes people stronger.

This doesn't mean that a transition back to power is going to go smoothly. But it is sure better than reducing American power as a one-world government does. And such a government is achieved through suckering Americans to accept foreign tariffs without having many of their own.

China and the rest of the world won't do anything against America. Why not? Because nobody really wants war. Especially the kind of destructive war that would happen today.

Perhaps the world could unite and take America down. But the cost would be great. That's why the world has been using American freedom to dump people like Obama and Ilhan Omar into American government. Because they know that direct war with America would be too costly. So do it through covert tactics.

Cool

Western democracies need to decouple their economies from China. 

Tariffs will have a temporary negative impact on corporate profits, will dampen the demand somewhat but in the long-term, the political goal of decoupling from China will be accomplished as companies will look for non-Chinese suppliers and in the end will look at the domestic market.  But the tariffs will kill the Chinese economy and hopefully will bring the desired political 'Perestroika' in China.

What American and other Western companies were allowed to do in the last 30 years is criminal, especially where it comes to IP.  Militarily and politically West was on the suicide march.

West should not trade with China.  Period.

Maybe Trump's endgame is the regime change in China.
1175  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump should raise tariffs to 50% on: August 28, 2019, 03:54:52 PM
President Trump should raise tariffs to 50% on every Chinese piece of shit imported to this country.  He should also raise Taxes to U.S. Companies that use Chinese slave labor to build their merchandise.

Fuck the Chinese Government.

Before doing that, he should allow American companies to get their capital out of China, then expel all Chinese "students" aka spies, delist all Chinese companies from the US stock exchanges, freeze assets of Chinese nationals and companies, etc.

Then he should raise tariffs to 500-1000%.

This is war.  The CCP is a criminal gang it should be treated as such.
1176  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: August 27, 2019, 10:06:49 PM
^^^ Really!


Actually, ancient prehistoric peoples of earth landed on the moon thousands of years ago. Some people think that the moon landing was a conspiracy, but an even bigger conspiracy is that 10,000 years ago people were simple hunter gatherers. Ten thousand years ago, the technology of earth was far ahead of ours.

Just go to the Temple of Hathor in Egypt. Or look at pictures on the Internet - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Temple+of+Hathor&t=h_&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images. Notice inside the Temple, the pillars have capitals made of 4 faces, one to each of 4 sides of the capital. Notice the Egyptian headdress on these faces.

These pillars are simply attempted remakes by much later primitive Egyptians, of the real pillars from beyond 10,000 years ago. The original pillars weren't pillars at all. They were rockets. And the sides of the headdresses were the rocket engines - at the tops of the pillars/rockets, rather than the bottoms like we do it.

Notice that in the Temple, the capitals are holding up the sky (the ceiling) of the temple. This shows us that the ancient peoples of way back then had regular rocket flight.

We have been to the moon. NASA and the governments of the world are trying to turn the moon landings into fake stuff. They are doing it because they found the artifacts of the ancient moon landings from around 14,000 years ago. And if they let it out that people had that kind of technology way back then, it would inspire all kinds of people to break loose from their government enslavement, and head for space and beyond.

So we just gotta keep the idea of fake moon landings alive so that we don't become free, right.

 Roll Eyes

So now you think Earth is older than 7,000 years? 

You are a Christian heretic.

Actually, both the Septuagint, and the writings of Josephus which he took from even more ancient Hebrew Scriptures, show that the earth is about 7,500 years old since creation.

Our Bibles are almost 100% taken from the Masoretic texts from about 1000 years ago. And the Masoretes, themselves, say in their writings that they weren't quite sure about what they were doing. This is where we get the 6000 years from... the Masoretic text. See https://arizonaorthodox.com/masoretic-text-vs-original-hebrew/, if you are at all interested.

Since you are not even focused on attempting to find God, you are way worse than any heretic.

Cool

I suggest you take a trip around the world, LOL.

http://www.oldest.org/culture/archaeological-sites/#targetText=G%C3%B6bekli%20Tepe%20is%20over%2011%2C000,of%20the%20world's%20oldest%20temple.
1177  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: August 27, 2019, 06:52:40 PM
^^^ Really!


Actually, ancient prehistoric peoples of earth landed on the moon thousands of years ago. Some people think that the moon landing was a conspiracy, but an even bigger conspiracy is that 10,000 years ago people were simple hunter gatherers. Ten thousand years ago, the technology of earth was far ahead of ours.

Just go to the Temple of Hathor in Egypt. Or look at pictures on the Internet - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Temple+of+Hathor&t=h_&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images. Notice inside the Temple, the pillars have capitals made of 4 faces, one to each of 4 sides of the capital. Notice the Egyptian headdress on these faces.

These pillars are simply attempted remakes by much later primitive Egyptians, of the real pillars from beyond 10,000 years ago. The original pillars weren't pillars at all. They were rockets. And the sides of the headdresses were the rocket engines - at the tops of the pillars/rockets, rather than the bottoms like we do it.

Notice that in the Temple, the capitals are holding up the sky (the ceiling) of the temple. This shows us that the ancient peoples of way back then had regular rocket flight.

We have been to the moon. NASA and the governments of the world are trying to turn the moon landings into fake stuff. They are doing it because they found the artifacts of the ancient moon landings from around 14,000 years ago. And if they let it out that people had that kind of technology way back then, it would inspire all kinds of people to break loose from their government enslavement, and head for space and beyond.

So we just gotta keep the idea of fake moon landings alive so that we don't become free, right.

 Roll Eyes

So now you think Earth is older than 7,000 years? 

You are a Christian heretic.
1178  Other / Archival / Re: I'm really leaving the U.S. for a 3rd world country because of politics on: August 27, 2019, 01:02:18 PM

I chose the Philippines for 2 reasons, mainly: cost of living was low and I like the women.
...

I chose The Philippines because I met a woman who I thought could help me with some things I wanted to do.  I didn't know initially that she was Filipino because she was working elsewhere.  Only when I found out did I start to study the place and decided that it had a lot of positives for me.

I'm not sure why I didn't consider The Philippines more strongly earlier.  I think that there is a dedicated effort world-wide to shit-talk The Philippines and I was partially a victim of it.  It is especially strong in the country itself.  I suspect that the reason for this is related to the 'demoralization' that Yuri Bezmenov talks about as one phase in destabilizing and overthrowing a country.  Unfortunately it has worked pretty well.  Lots of Filipinos consider their country hopeless.  I'm more and more convinced that it is not.  Obviously it's got some problems, but so does every country.

My hope is that Duterte and future presidents increase the concept of nationalism among the people and address some of the main problems that the nation has.  I'm quite convinced that many of the problems are artificially inserted, and the drug problems specifically.  Probably the communist problems and the radical Islamic issues as well.


The wealth gap is unfathomable. People complain about it in America, but its like 5x wider here. The middle class are about 100x richer than the poor. I can't understand how some people can make 180 pesos a day (approx. $3.60) and some make 5,000 per day. That's the width of the middle class. Millions make even less than 180 per day. All I can do is be thankful that I was born where I was born - which allowed me to have the privileges that I do - and try to be humble about it. The last thing I would ever do is be a douche nozzle to the locals because of it.

I left the U.S. in part because I wanted to try to make a positive contribution and wanted my money to NOT go toward causing worldwide misery and death.  These things and general depravity are, in my opinion, about the only exports that the U.S. does any more.  In a place like The Philippines where there is so much need one can make a tiny positive contribution in peoples lives about a dozen times per day just being alive.  I like the feeling of living this way.

Another reason I set up for a '2nd option' is that I do think there is a certain well-more-than-zero percent chance of some real problems in the U.S. of the type that few people can really imagine, and it could realistically happen within my lifetime.  I think that my country has sunk so low because our leadership has been captured by some real scumbags.  Worse, I don't think that these people have any more care for the U.S. than they have for any of the other nations which we are in the process of imploding.  We are just a useful tool for now.  When our usefulness is over it will be our turn in the barrel, and we may get it even worse than, say, Libya because that will be the most useful and 'safest' outcome for our tormentors.  'Controlled Demolition', bitches.

If the US will have problems, the rest of the world will have "problems squared".  North America will always be the mecca to go to, in good times and in bad times.

People who bitch about the US don't have any idea what they are bitching about.  The US has the best universities, the best hospitals, best high-tech companies, the best financial system, it is the place where the smartest people on the planet want to go to live and study.
1179  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How to stop paying taxes, and get out from under government control. on: August 25, 2019, 05:17:03 PM
There are several ideas here, as I am very experienced with these questions, I can give some much needed explanations.

1/ It's absolutely impossible to stop paying tax.

You sure can avoid paying income tax, but if you drive a car and buy gas, sleep at an hotel or buy a sugary drink, you will pay some tax doing any of those acts.

2/ You can get out of government control.

I know because I've done it. The last time I've paid income tax was in 1997, and nowadays, I don't even bother filling a single tax form. I wouldn't not even know in what country I should fill one as I'm traveling all the time. I'm writing this from Chisinau, Moldova. I've arrived in this country yesterday, and I'm leaving next week. But not paying income tax is only one side of the question, I've stopped being a citizen. I don't vote. I couldn't even register to vote as I don't have a fixed address in the country which grants me a passport.

That's the point, you must stop being a citizen.


Even as a non-citizen, most countries withhold taxes on passive earnings form your financial instruments in that country.

There are some countries where you pay no tax on dividends or capital gains but for the most part, if you have substantial assets in stock markets around the world, you'll be paying taxes to the countries where those securities domicile.

If you a legal resident of a country, you are liable for property and income taxes, in addition to any value-added taxes on goods and services, duties, license fees etc.
1180  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How to stop paying taxes, and get out from under government control. on: August 24, 2019, 12:03:59 AM
Evading tax is illegal so don't do it but actually we can avoid taxes by investing on the right thing which makes the investor more rich and rich whereas the salaried person give some part as tax to the governments.Doing business and registering expenses is one of the best and simple way to avoid taxes.

The thing is, that nobody who doesn't pay taxes is evading, except when he says he is evading.

Anybody in government or outside of it can accuse anyone of evading. But that doesn't mean they are evading. They are only evading when they agree to it in court. Reasons why they might agree include that some judge convinced them, or a plea agreement, or they are ignorant of court procedures, or a jury convicts them, and others. But one of the things the paperwork in the OP sites shows them is how to aim for getting out of it all right from the start.

The initial thing to do is to sign every document: all rights reserved, non-assumpsit, By: Signature, Agent. Do this one, simple thing, and watch how fast they change their tone with you. Throw in your claim to face your accuser, and watch their prosecutor throw out the complaint against you.

There wasn't any evading until you agree that there was. Your freedom allows you to agree, but to also disagree.

Cool

If you have an SSN, IRS knows about all your earnings both active and passive, anywhere in the world.

All US citizens are required to provide their SSNs when they open bank accounts anywhere on this planet.

IRS gets annual reports of your passive earnings, your account balances, etc.  You are liable to pay taxes and will be prosecuted if you don't report your income and they catch you.

Sooner or later.  No matter what you say and do.  Please stop this nonsense.
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 155 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!