Hello again Mike ,
In regards to your roadmap, i have no intention to be a grammar nazi or anything, just... clarifying or perhaps showing a possible "bug". Does "ending" the name of your wallet? It is quite a confusion when people consult to your roadmap and it said "ending web wallet" |
|
|
|
Thank you for your feedback. If you have ever launched a business or startup, then you should know that there are certain stages. And to immediately make a product that costs more than one million dollars without getting feedback from people-this is not good for everyone, for investors, for customers and for the team. If you looked at the road map-there the creation of the game is at stage 4.
I believe there is a thing called demo, or test-phase, or (for a higher and more detailed product) an MVP, that basically offered a fraction of product so the potential customer can see what to expect from the project they're investing on. Ever heard of it? One thing that caught my interest though, suppose the present interest for the product were minimum (based from whatever method you use to get an image of audience's interest) you'll just leave the product, then? Because it is too costly to create a product that has minimum or negative feedback. I'm answering your question about the foundation. -We are negotiating with venture funds.
And you tried to appeal these investors with mere concept, website, and some drawings? Without any prototype or mini product or whatever? Please keep us updated on the attempt to gain these investors because this is interesting. Given the CEO's name and your username bears some resemblance, I'd like to bravely assume you're the same person. If so, could you please entertain me on your background with crypto? Because from what I can summarize from your err... Facebook posts, it was used car sellers, airdrop hunters, and custom-home-made faceshield manufacturer. |
|
|
|
If I may try to summarize before I jump deeper (and please correct me at any parts that I am wrong) the main motor behind the project is an idea that we are at the entrance of new age, and that future generation will integrate tech (and with it, crypto) far deeper than how we do/did. Thus, pioneer who introduced new sector on this "coming-of-new-age" will have benefits for the generation to come in form of (but not limited to) customers loyalty, brand awareness and acknowledgement, and experiences?
Correct. Thank you for the summarize . Jump deeper please . Ok, so that's the long term goal; And in a way, I can see that it is applicable and a good strategy, because (in a way or two) that is how bitcoin stand out against other (and more beneficial) coins. But how exactly do you plan to survive the short term period? We have to agree that, in order to be able to reach that position (being the pioneer on sport crypto), you'll have to be able to survive several years ahead and be accepted by current generation and trend (that'll ultimately brought you to the next trend) first. Let's assume this "next generation" will come with the launch of fully integrated internet into daily basis, or the IoT (or internet v.3, whatever people want to call it), that optimistically speaking, happen in the next three or four years. In order to be acknowledged as the pioneer of sport crypto, and adapted, and used widely you'll have to survive the four years span. Meanwhile, we know how many new projects born everyday, each with their own idea, appeals, and ambitions. |
|
|
|
I'm sorry, but aren't your project itself can be considered as "too good to be true" if we refer to your own statement that "the concept of using pubes as a currency was already known for mankind for centuries" which nicely sat next to the dialog bubble of "awesome! Glad to hear it's possible now"? Were you contradicting yourself?
I'd also like to know the source of statements (certainly it is academic based research, right?) that the concept of using pubes (which I am sure the pubes here are referring to human genitalia hair, from the innuendos thrown here and there across the opening post) were known for centuries as human's desire to be able to pay something with.
I was referring to the humorous desire of 'paying with pubes' instead of cash which is surprisingly present in every culture. The concept of our project is simple and definitely NOT too good to be true compared to other projects you probably invested yourself in the past, promising to create a 'cutting edge product' or the 'next generation something' yet they failed to deliver and the project itself dwindled to nothing. What we offer is not a state-of-the-art product but a simple concept, that with the right viral marketing strategies, will gain popularity and recognition through the mainstream users. Think about Dogecoin, how a meme/parody project suddenly spread like wildfire in social media. And your goal is to be a financial transaction and payment system that's adapted by massive community as well as business entity? I will have to seriously ask, do you prefer people to label your entire product as childish, naive and thoughtless, lacking of long term sight, or simply lacking of manner? I can only think about those three possible category, as the fourth one will be the serious accusation of narrowminded scam attempt. You want to be adapted by business entities for financial transactions, and worldwide community (that, as you said, surpassed doge) as payment system, yet your name bear the very obvious case of NSFW? Please tell me you've think about this thoroughly when deciding to be a project that is "not a joke or scam" and adapted by massive community. |
|
|
|
Is this project dead ? I was looking at some of my old useless investments and found that i had KIT token in my wallet. On investigation, i see their twitter account ( https://twitter.com/Tokenkit ) no long exists.  Combine that information with the fact that the last post on this thread was nearly two years ago, their website is no longer operational, and zero market volume, do we really still need to awaking the long dead thread just to ask something that's quite obvious? |
|
|
|
Of course you are right! We are a startup, before releasing a game, you need to gather the maximum audience that is interested in the project. And let me also remind you that this is an NFT, not an ICO or IEO. Where issued tokens, and then it is difficult to sell them. The whole idea is tied to interest and faith.
Exactly the point, as it has a significantly lower liquidity, people will need to be more careful before investing, and if I may say, so far your action and project development were discouraging, you rarely coming here and replied on a very long interval, which suggest a poor support, and so far we can barely see any project development, not to mention that it seems you tried to play safe by waiting for the market to be certain before taking any further step. Assuming you will take the step instead mof fleeing, of course. |
|
|
|
We are definitely not like those huge projects who are trying to sell a 'too good to be true product'.
I'm sorry, but aren't your project itself can be considered as "too good to be true" if we refer to your own statement that "the concept of using pubes as a currency was already known for mankind for centuries" which nicely sat next to the dialog bubble of "awesome! Glad to hear it's possible now"? Were you contradicting yourself? I'd also like to know the source of statements (certainly it is academic based research, right?) that the concept of using pubes (which I am sure the pubes here are referring to human genitalia hair, from the innuendos thrown here and there across the opening post) were known for centuries as human's desire to be able to pay something with. |
|
|
|
The sport clubs in any region have a problems about their finance management and integration to new changings / technology .Regarding to change of population culture ( means ; incoming new age), the views rates of sport organizations will decrease slightly continue. According to this condtions , reveneus of broadcasting , tickets , adverstisement and sponsorhisp revenues will be decreased . Its because new incoming population will interest more in e-sports rather than traditional in sport organization .
It's effect will seen more in the future .You could research this prediction about this issue by yourself too or if u want i could open another topic of this issue for you .
So we know that the most customer of sport clubs are their fans , Increasing the service quality in line with the wishes and expectations of the
fans will be an economic return , which sport teams will be good relations and catching the new age population will have advantage. Its is all about the economic return , if
the sportive succes cant not be contribute whit economic succes ,growing of sport clubs will not be continues.
While the digital culture is growing in the new age , usage of crypto will be growth .New agers will use them in their economic lives more than you .Sport team who is adapting this digital area will be experienced and onestep forward rather than their opponents.
I am underline again , our purpose to create an infrastructure whit our combined software platform to expand usage of crypto in common life as we described in our website. The more teams generate their own tokens incease the more crypto-ecosystem on sport area. .Creating tokens to sport clubs is not our primary bussines . We just declare that we can support on this issue in order to prevent some people from taking advantage of the lack of knowledge of sports teams. Cretaing their tokens by theirselves will eliminiate to risk that may arise in the future. Right now we just can provide support on ethereum network , until we establish our blockchain. We would like to finish first our softwares according to our roadmap , when they are working effiecent , we will start to build our own blockchain.
Myc will be used as a base token in our softwares as an option , so the teams who are using our software use their tokens as well , but there should be a fee in transactions as well , or a shopping point in retails sector and also will be a base token in our exchange .
Our advantages is developer salarys is more cheaper in our country agaings in other countries regarding low curreny of our country now. We could hire more developers whit the same amount price as like other projects.
We are serious about this project and we cant say fanstactic lies as other projects to get attention .Our team is just exist from 5 person. Just 3 of us is experienced as a software developers , so it makes this process of building softwares longer .My region is my country now but we will not stop in this region when get a movement.
Establishing our softwares will create a more money flow to give us more movement space .Each product will come true step by step , In this road our project will become more knowing and trustable brand whit the time.
Thank you for you attention . Its very helpful to us to converstaion whit smart person as you .
If I may try to summarize before I jump deeper (and please correct me at any parts that I am wrong) the main motor behind the project is an idea that we are at the entrance of new age, and that future generation will integrate tech (and with it, crypto) far deeper than how we do/did. Thus, pioneer who introduced new sector on this "coming-of-new-age" will have benefits for the generation to come in form of (but not limited to) customers loyalty, brand awareness and acknowledgement, and experiences? |
|
|
|
1.According to our Roadmap , when we build our own chain and after migrate , any official sport Clubs will able create the their tokens. Until that time we could provide to create tokens them as erc20 or bep20 , or support them to create by theirselves .
2. Our platfrom is still building now ,we need more developers right now. We have allready meeting whit some sport clubs in our region .We will announce after at least one finalization of our platform. We have to finish our building process first , to reaching big sport Clubs as Manu
This clarifies several things, thank you. One that I can't shake off though, is the psychology behind the decision making to go crypto from the perspective of your end user (namely, the sport team and the fans). The "confusion" (it's not a confusion per se, rather it is a curiosity that keeps banging my mind) gets more vocal with your mention of local sport clubs, that is based on a thinking that (as I mentioned previous on several post behind) if teams decide to go crypto, they'll prefer to go with big and existing coins or created their own. For the case of small and local clubs, though, with a significantly smaller and more focused fans, I think it will be quite hard for them to persuade the fans to go crypto. Thus, they'll open themselves to still accepting fiat payment. And this will stunt the growth of your project. Any thought about this? And still related to this question, as mentioned on earlier part of my post about psychology behind the decision making to go crypto, has an analysis been made to canvass the possibility of end user's (again, that is the umbrella for people who uses MYC, namely the sport team and their fans) decision to go crypto? |
|
|
|
Exchanging ideas with you helps us to explain our project better, so thank you for having time.
The world is in a big change according to evolution of technology . In this condtions, integration to blockchain techology will be more and crypto usage ratio in any sector will expand more in the future. Who is first adapting to this technology have more advantage in Sport Industry.
We offering to sport clubs use their own tokens expect bnb eth or btc , using their own tokens as we described in our project ,will create various benefits as financialy and brand management etc .
As i described above we dont force sport clubs or fans to use our myteamcoin tokens , its is just an option of choice .
Myteamcoin main usage issue become a base token in our digital platforms such as our e-commerce and crypto exchange ( It will be a Dex , fork of Pancakeswap , possibly launch on 2022 January) and as in transaction supplier such as GAS.
We are pleased to your attention to read . Reviews makes us stronger.
Thank you .
To sum it up, you offered a platform for clubs to sell things via DEX, as well as a base token that will enable (let's say) Manchester United to create a Manchester United Token (MUT) that will be used as a payment system on that DEX for MU fans to buy tickets etc.? In a wider scope, it is very possible that there will be MCT, CFCT, UFCT, BellT, LALT (we can throw whatever alphabets here)? Dex will be used as an exchange and investment .The fans could receive the tokens from dex to use it in other platform that we offer. Still there are sport teams which are already created their tokensAnd there will be more in the future .We are just providing an infrastructure for usage of sport teams token in common life . Sorry, I got a little bit unclear. Can you please clarify these two questions, perhaps it'll be better to answer simply in a yes or no, to avoid further misunderstanding. 1. Will sport clubs be able to create their own token using your platform? Namely, like Manchester-United-Token, etc. 2. (For the matter I marked in blue), do you mean some teams already use your platform, or were you talking about token the teams created using ERC, BSC, or other chain? |
|
|
|
Exchanging ideas with you helps us to explain our project better, so thank you for having time.
The world is in a big change according to evolution of technology . In this condtions, integration to blockchain techology will be more and crypto usage ratio in any sector will expand more in the future. Who is first adapting to this technology have more advantage in Sport Industry.
We offering to sport clubs use their own tokens expect bnb eth or btc , using their own tokens as we described in our project ,will create various benefits as financialy and brand management etc .
As i described above we dont force sport clubs or fans to use our myteamcoin tokens , its is just an option of choice .
Myteamcoin main usage issue become a base token in our digital platforms such as our e-commerce and crypto exchange ( It will be a Dex , fork of Pancakeswap , possibly launch on 2022 January) and as in transaction supplier such as GAS.
We are pleased to your attention to read . Reviews makes us stronger.
Thank you .
To sum it up, you offered a platform for clubs to sell things via DEX, as well as a base token that will enable (let's say) Manchester United to create a Manchester United Token (MUT) that will be used as a payment system on that DEX for MU fans to buy tickets etc.? In a wider scope, it is very possible that there will be MCT, CFCT, UFCT, BellT, LALT (we can throw whatever alphabets here)? |
|
|
|
And your team has a complete awareness that the entire project is susceptible to be detailed and buried if those sports team decide to use their own token when they decide to embrace crypto, right? I find it quite difficult to imagine that team as big as the ones within NBA or UFC decide to use someone's token instead of their own, given creating their own will bring more benefits.
Thank you for your participation , Myteamcoin plans to be not just an erc20 token or Bep20, our prediction is to establish Myteamchain , after building our software platforms , It will be unique and serves just for sport token ecosystem. Myteamcoin will be a base token on this blockchain for transaction for fees , etc. such as BNB , ERC20 and Gas etc or fees in retail sector shopping etc by using our platforms.. In this case we would like to help or support any sport clubs to establish their tokens .Building their own tokens will create a bigger ecosystem . Detailed info is written in our white-paper . If you dont like read , Please kindly ask in here Best Regards. On the other hand, from customers perspective (and with it, the sport team's preferences, with the aim to cater their customer's needs), if they don't have any other way to buy... sport-related things and can only do that with crypto, wouldn't they prefer to buy with more known and established crypto like BNB, ETH, or BTC (I'm talking about the coin themselves, not the token generated from their chain)? This will leads to a very possible scenario where sport officials uses those coins instead of your token if they decide to embrace crypto. Thus, another way to derail your plan. I'll probably look at the whitepaper later tonight if I have some time to kill |
|
|
|
I haven't read (or even download) your whitepaper because today I'm not in the mood to burden my brain with detailed info about a project without knowing how stupid (or smart) they were first. So I'd like to know this first, a simple yes or no will suffice:
Basically you offered project that'll be a pioneer on sports-club-slash-industry where they'll use your token for their daily financial needs like purchasing merchandise, tickets, etc.? And the sports club we're talking about here are names like (but not limited to) MU-FC, LA-Lakers, Bellator, etc.?
But not limited to (Yes) Main purpose is to create a digital infrastructure for sport teams tokens ecosystem . Myteamcoin will be just a base token , any sport token will have access to use our infrastructure. And your team has a complete awareness that the entire project is susceptible to be detailed and buried if those sports team decide to use their own token when they decide to embrace crypto, right? I find it quite difficult to imagine that team as big as the ones within NBA or UFC decide to use someone's token instead of their own, given creating their own will bring more benefits. |
|
|
|
|
I haven't read (or even download) your whitepaper because today I'm not in the mood to burden my brain with detailed info about a project without knowing how stupid (or smart) they were first. So I'd like to know this first, a simple yes or no will suffice:
Basically you offered project that'll be a pioneer on sports-club-slash-industry where they'll use your token for their daily financial needs like purchasing merchandise, tickets, etc.? And the sports club we're talking about here are names like (but not limited to) MU-FC, LA-Lakers, Bellator, etc.?
|
|
|
|
do yo think he will support it? More on the opposite, I guess.
Elon Musk is a businessman, and if he is offered a project using his name it is irrespective of the profitability and sustainability of the coin. It's not easy just because you use a popular name and then Musk will be interested. yes, maybe in the short term we can use the game of profit and leave far away. because the risk for the future cannot certainly guarantee. we need to be realistic in contributing. but is a Tesla CEO and also a lover of top coins like Bitcoin or even more importantly, DogeCoin, easily turn away from the temptation of a project like this? I do not think so Musk will get interested and supporting this kind project (tempted if I may borrow your word) because he's (practically) a memelord who loves crypto and this token uses his name? That's what you propose? Have you been visiting the token board lately? Literally his name were scattered all over the place. I am yet to see one that he openly supported |
|
|
|
Thank you for paying attention and writing a comment. We focused as much as possible on the technical work and did not spend much time on this thread on the forum. Plus, we are negotiating with the funds. We do everything to make the project known and of high quality.
What do you mean by negotiating the fund? As in deciding if the plan for tokenomy is open for changes and alteration?
Imagine our Moon, it has a size, a landscape, and coordinates. My team and I are creating a virtual analogue of our moon, which exactly repeats all the characteristics and coordinates. And the task is to make the Moon habitable!
So, to clarify, now it's a game, with an NFT to play it? And as you mentioned team, is there any chance we see them? Far as I know you're remains nameless up to this second We will announce the team soon Actually my post was made from two questions. I'm hoping to hear your explanation for the matter raised on my first question. And while we're at it, perhaps it is also best to clarify that (since it is a game and virtual ownership) the first step to do should not be land ownership (5th paragraph of your long post) but the infrastructure itself, a proof that those "virtual land" (I'll set aside how silly it sounds for now) were indeed has a basis and built on a program |
|
|
|
Thank you for paying attention and writing a comment. We focused as much as possible on the technical work and did not spend much time on this thread on the forum. Plus, we are negotiating with the funds. We do everything to make the project known and of high quality.
What do you mean by negotiating the fund? As in deciding if the plan for tokenomy is open for changes and alteration?
Imagine our Moon, it has a size, a landscape, and coordinates. My team and I are creating a virtual analogue of our moon, which exactly repeats all the characteristics and coordinates. And the task is to make the Moon habitable!
So, to clarify, now it's a game, with an NFT to play it? And as you mentioned team, is there any chance we see them? Far as I know you're remains nameless up to this second |
|
|
|
Sorry guys, but I think that NFT is unjustifiably popular thing today, which will lose popularity very soon. The main reason I think this way is that NFT doesn't give any benefit for society, and doesn't have any practical application. The main advantage of NFT is uniqueness, but it's not enough for further staying in demand.
Basically NFT are for the artist who can sell their artwork through blockchain. There could be many use cases developed for NFTs like tweets being sold in NFT and much more. These days its the NFT trend and you can make good income from NFT. I would rather more keen to know the uniqueness in NFT moon token ? The virtual and conceptual ownership of some portion of land in Moon. Virtual. It is not legally yours as no one is allowed to take ownership of that stone. Have you see how stupid it is after I put them into these words? In other scenario, I can just go to a photoshop app, edit an image of the moon into a card, and gave you them for free for basically a same results. |
|
|
|
This is nothing but a short-lived project, the same as the previously very cheap tokens, suddenly died althought it seems very live right now. With only 1 BNB, people can get 12.845.100.000 Pig token, what big amount of token. It's really true, very risky for investment.
Well, to be fair, 12B is just like 0.0024% (give or take one zero because honestly, it really is difficult to track those line of zeroes) of the total supply, so the amount that can be bought with 1 BNB is arguably infinitesimal to their gigantic total supply and anyone buying with 1 BNB can (again, arguably) hardly control the price. But that doesn't mean any sane human being would (or should) buy something as stupid as this thing. In a few months the dev would get bored and leave this project and the gigantic supply to the bottom of mariana, if they haven't already |
|
|
|
|
"Welcome to decentralized protocol era", "we're now in the brink of something-something-something DeFi protocol", I literally triple checked your thread creation date just to be sure it was not an old thread being bumped. Where have you been this past decade when decentralization boomed? Or last year DeFi first bloomed? Your welcome were so outdated, we're more in the middle or even the end of DeFi protocol instead of the brink of that "new technology".
Finished with my rant of your silly and poor choices of opening line, I'm moving to your technical details. You said you're creating a new environment with BTA blockchain, but you're factually riding BCS?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
