|
Ok, ignoring all the above bullshit by nullius.
This thread looks as to be proving most of the statements by TECSHARE true.
Most of this reputation fighting and abusing of trust was really based on grudges between some users in power. QS never did a scam which was unforgivable overall, it was only him not willing to bow down or beg for his forgiveness to the powerful users around which made him suffer through I would say, imotional truma for years.
I am not double siding or something, but most of the user's and specially DTs around should use this thread as an example of how a gang of users with power could wrongly phrases an person's overall character on the forum. I just hope this is avoided in the future by learning from this huge mistake and by nurturing a bit of an forgiveness which could save years of wars.
|
|
|
|
-snip-
Most of this abuse is just flicked off by theymos under making the system more decentralized and Him not willing to act as an central authority around. Still I think it's BS overall, by looking at the number of users fearing to speak out or even operat a service here without being in an fear of being abused under diffrence in opinions. |
|
|
|
You are a troll. Unless you have any new information... The community includes me. I'm happy.  Don't make a fool of yourself Vod, your trust ratings on TECSHARE doesn't involve any real trading incidences or indicates an overall financial loss to the community. I think reconsidering it would be an friendly step around. You are just following him like CH use to follow users around. |
|
|
|
Experiencing the same error from some hours, it's a cool to experience being active at an active DDoS attack. Hope it's blocked and handled soon !  |
|
|
|
|
One would not imagine how much time many of the user's around were waiting for this peace treaty. Have a nice honeymoon you both !
|
|
|
|
|
I support this suggestion, I always go there to check something new as an upgrade for computer but it's really hard to find between excess number of ASIC hardwares threads.
|
|
|
|
I don't see that way as you see, you should check my trust list. Anyways, that are things I got entangled for a newbie mistake I did in the past which I even apologized to the users sending me ratings, but "forgiveness" doesn't seems to be much spread out around here even after repeated reminders of our dear theymos. I think even you should take the same advice and let go your grudge on Eddie. Looks like he is already ignoring you for good. |
|
|
|
|
Really, 8 pages of back and forth with most of the circus show by nullius with his outstanding english skills, with having under average knowledge of trust system usage in total.
Any sane person with minimal brain cells would see the ratings in the OP being not based on any trade experience. What an waste of energy really.
|
|
|
|
You can just report his post for low quality or spam, and let moderators handle it. You should even consider moving your thread to meta as it better suits there. |
|
|
|
|
Looks like the whole thread is bullshit and with repeated info.
Where is Eddie being explicitly scamming people ? He being in contact with a known scammer for some time doesn't mean he was involved in it without evidence in anyways.
I don't think such scammers even want to reduce there share of scam by exposing about it more if you think logically.
Just an advice: Invest your time in investigating something which is really an harm to the community overall.
|
|
|
|
Oh FFS... That's a DT2 member despite getting a bunch of red trust for trying to scam 100 BTC here: https://archive.is/QG1AJI quickly checked the list, but overlooked this one and was called away before I could check more. Mindrust has some editing to do. Mindrust doesn't seem to be including alevlaslo rather excluding him. This should not make the user in question a DT2. Could there be something wrong in scrapping the data ? |
|
|
|
I think you were a bit rushed
I agree, it would be a rushed decision to red tag or support a flag here, as the guy in the question is yet to be proved offering fake service. A DT could use neutral to alert about the service being unassured by anyone until it's proved.
My bad, I thought it's okay to create a flag in such a risky situation. I will now delete it.
Just to let you know flags can't be deleted. |
|
|
|
I believe the guidelines are for trustworthy people and DefaultTrust. There were never any guidelines for non-DT members (for the old or the new system), you could send as many frivolous ratings as you've wanted.
Ok, then we disagree what is valid for DefaultTrust or not. I don't think red trust for trolling etc is a good use of DefaultTrust privileges. I think I have to agree with someone who ditrusts my judgement and uses proper ways to show it using the trust list exclusion. It is fully logical that trust ratings should only be used if a person is high risk to trade, but not just if you think his opinion doesn't matches yours hence he would scam in future even if he would have not done it explicitly until. Makeing the use of trust ratings more dynamic than it just being an indication of being high risk to trade with makes it open to "selective enforcement" as everyone thinks any enemy in thoughts is a bad person overall and risky to trade with even if he is not in doing transactions in reality. |
|
|
|
Username: Kakmakr
Post Count: 8776
BTC Address : bc1qgnn4z0kk48tz2p49r8sakk9uvdn063cywde7nz
Replacement address : 1Q87ZaysuerQhNFeVwZmpMCHyJHn1ST25D
Username: madnessteat
Post Count: 2284
BTC Address: 19yFGJ22SiMAkvzvNpoTtdXJGpGNUtc2hv
Accepted.
OPEN SPOTS:
3X SR.MEMBER |
|
|
|
Free promotion with fake volume! This is their dirty game for getting more and more new customers. How much they have succeeded with this system is unknown, but it is understood that they have lost their reputations.
And coinmarketcap is required to provide original data. These exchanges are easily manipulate coinmarketcap with fake data. It's misleading newbies.
Do you have a solution or technique that will allow only genuine data to be listed by Coinmarketcap? They will list whatever data is being sent to them, they are not going to try to investigate anything. It's much more related to the money this tokens pay to CMC. If they pay high amounts they would be shown higher on the list of tokens by manipulating the volume. So, just money speaks with them, investigation before listing is nothing in there criteria. |
|
|
|
I suspected there is something wrong with account hacker1001101001, I just didn't have time to look at it deeper, some evidence were posted in hacker's meta topic, you literally came to that thread to troll soo...
Ok, so what triggered my apology to my past mistakes being meaningless to you ? Me posting my views about some mobbing going on around ? Really is the trustworthiness of a person is that transparent to you from just some opposite views towards a topic. I really thought you took my words of not repeating it again. Get deeper dude, you are catching some big fishes around. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
