That are the number of posts I find constructive and with some efforts overall. If you want detailed reasons regarding the decline of some posts PM me.

I don't think it's that easy to reach legendary as you are framing it, I think you have that view because you got most of your merits from the Bitcointalk Art Compition and it not that easy to earn 1000 merit's anyways. I am sure many would agree.

Although adding a new rank after legendary could be an better option IMO.

Come on dude, you already know the chain of events behind this hunts, if not ask wolwoo and Vispilio. Both speaking something against the political agenda here, and leading up as you see again. I am not a short term luckers if you think so, I have observed this chain of attacks hence speaking the same and even have gone through one by @JollyGood recently attacking me for speaking about both of the tags on there profile being unjustified in a manner. Truning it to something a mistake of mine which I have even apologise to him in the PM and even in the thread he linked in the feedback, but got nothing back in reply.

I don't see this as merge coincidences but rather blant curbing of freedom of speech here to the bottom of using trust system.

A spreadsheet link has been added to the reserved post and even adding it here for the clearance of the participants.

SPREADSHEET LINK : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/1NJvwgDF4XHIe7sP9PZxv8PPXCfrQZBViDwW3fpFiunc

PAYMENTS SENT : https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/e5892b43ed330233c2bcf7a23d215e116b03445ec2a3d2d3863bef20f8d3febe

---

Thanks for informing me. Good Luck!

---

Open spots:

3X SR.MEMBERS.
1X HERO/LEGENDARY

As I said, previously applied participants may not apply again they are still into consideration and I will send you a PM if accepted likewise.

Thank You.

This thread is an great example of how mobbing could happen here on an mass level, and trust system is used as an tool for it even if the person in question is in no way an harm to the forum ecosystem financially or has scammed anyone, with real victims. Let alone critizing or questioning the bheviour of ChipMixer and it's participants made an openly speaking DT ruin down his repo to the level his own profile got painted in reds.

I think this has just made more people afraid of speaking concerns of not only ChipMixer but any other campaign containing DT powered members in that amount, as it could result in tearing down your own identity here later. Patahic approach.

You could probably tag them for promoting phishing website, it could be removed only if there are clamis of account getting hacked as that would be the only explation I think.

Stop pretending others reputation threads as your ground to squabble for merits with your long walls of mostly one sided assumptions, as later after getting defended by others you try to use trust as an tool to show your anger. I would rather go with other side of the story and feel ditrusting you for using trust system to shit on others trust wall clearly because of your personal online grudge with the user would be an wiser move for the community.

I could on an edge agree you are like 10 legendary around here, but don't feel said this campaign is just of Sr.Members and above. And there are even some pay rate to advertisement signature size issue which are hard to adjust so I am really sorry , I can't accept a full member. But keep up the spirit in you.

---

Really good to see geniune account recoveries solved that quick. Atleast it's reduced to a month of time span from year's of wait.

I am not trying to mislead, the above statement of your was what you used against me to call me a lier. Me clearing this up just triggered you to bring up my accusation which was merely solved by my apology and willingness to not repeat it in there respective thread.

I thought that it really contradicts what you said earlier hence enlighted it. I don't have any hidden motives against you nor you should deem too. My feedback on your trust wall stands about you fighting the scams from the bottom of your heart but you are really pushing users into your grudge against YoBit overall. Did you ever thought of complaining to theymos about it once ? IIRC he banned the campaign last time when it was creating spam, this time there are clear evidences of listing scam tokens. I think he would consider. Just an advice.

I agree, crushing it would need a person like Putin to take it seriously.

You should link some of this scam accusations in the OP and consider moving there thread to the scam accusation board.

I am sure some DTs would tag him quick if some evidence is linked.

Red trust on @Vispilio by @JollyGood.


Recent statement by @JollyGood.


Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5211902.180

I don't know if lier word suits here better or with me.

I don't think he would reveal or even really know how much he has earnt from it until, as mostly he would have wasted all that on his beer or not something of an long term asset hence he is still doing the same even after the bull run.

But good find OP.

WTF, is this true or am I tripping on the pills ? :

Are you @Timelord2067 ?

From: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5217273.msg53605287#msg53605287

Come on dude, you are more than this.

I like your presence around here, hope you see, all the users here are not assholes, but majority in power are, I agree. Keep fighting for good throughout your life.

Come on bud, do you really think I am someone untrustworthy overall, if yes it makes your sense of judgement very weak and I even don't trust your judgement from it.

It's clearly seen as your attempt to put more oil in the drama, nice move.

I admitted I don't have unknown alts here.

I am not willing to post anything for anyone with money, that's just one of the misleading statement in the feedback by Lauda.

I am not involved in account farming, it's hard to maintain one account around here.

Yes, the ICO pumping seems right, but as I said in the other thread, it was my early days mistake on the forum, even apologized for it and never did it again.

I am not a lier. Yes I lied first about not getting incentive to post but agreed later on the same thread.

I am not untrustworthy and never scammed anyone, again it is like buliding your own story and misleading in itself.

So now, if you are satisfied with your grudge, stop trying to witch hunt me because, one of my view doesn't match yours about the feedback here. I was out of that thread already.

---

I was newbie while getting engaged in this, I have said and explained this around dozens of times in the thread and even in PMs to many.

Anyways, if some users are never upon accepting apology around here, I don't think we are buliding a constrictive place overall. Yes, I could publicly and loudly say I find it hard to see people forgiving around here.

---

I am not lying about it, I agreed to you in the same thread about I being involved in it. Nowhere else, I have tried to lie about it around.

Don't you think what you are claming as worthy of tag is also non-repeatable mistake from my side.

---

I don't know what made you conclude that am not to be trusted, I am totally against your judgement if you don't have any specific cases of me scamming funds from someone. This show's the flawed judgment of yours about me.

---

Locking this thread for now.

---

If someone wants to rant about me, create a new thread.

I was not lying, I understood your tag was not based on promoting YoBit but overall judgement of the user. That was mostly because he started to create an army of YoBit promotors to fight against red tagging them as per I see. But your trust rating still contains promoting YoBit as one of the reason of him being untrustworthy which is totally false hence was my above comment.





Again, I was not lying, your feedback still stands hence my argument, you thought adding that statement about promoting things for pennies doesn't makes difference, I think it makes.




Because that is realted, and I wanted to avoid making it as an trust system usage issue there. You are an DT and there should be some solid danger of scamming or loosing funds mostly indicated by DT tags. Which doesn't seems the case here.



I mean, that there are some vaild explainations behind some participants promoting YoBit through there signature hence one can't judge users judgement from it overall.

---

I am out, I was not upto accusing JollyGood of anything, above was just an advice from me regarding use of trust system, but it's everyone's own opinion.

Accepted.

---

OPEN SPOTS:

2X SR.MEMBER