yes, friend of mine. I was asked for help via telegram.
It would be better if he could sign a message from one of the old address posted stating the date and the issue in short. |
|
|
|
Many consider his transgressions as irredeemable, and would only relish in the opportunity to tarnish his alt account.
Up until this very day, his transgressions haven't stop and this includes this very case. Where do you see him asking or being worthy of forgiveness? Fool me once is alright, but fool me > 100 times is what we're playing now? He could/should/would have at the very least stopped what he was doing years ago were there any intent for honesty in him at any point in time. Do you believe people like this change overnight? I really wish he had stopped many years ago, but he didn't.. Would you have forgiven me for this many transgressions? Surely the fuck not. So why are we talking about this? You were already forgiven long ago. QS was not ! That's why DireWolfM14 talking makes sense. |
|
|
|
The post you refer to is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214462.msg53507078#msg53507078The reply I made is posted here. I replied stating why you were wrong about the accusation because I did not tag any user because they displayed a particular signature. I asked for your views on that same post here but you did not reply: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214462.msg53513158#msg53513158You asked marlboroza and myself to "reconsider" but I corrected you because you were wrong by stating I tagged a user for their signature alone. After I corrected your error, you did not post back to me. Another thing you missed, in the link above I also stated that I disagree with tagging users on the basis of them showing a particular banner such as in the case of another user who did it to those showing Yobit banners but for some reason you did not post back accepting that fact. I was aware of your post, the thread was locked just the next day hence lost the track there. I appreciate your explaintaion there about not tagging wolwoo for the sole reason of promoting YoBit but more likely I even disagree with the rest of your comment as it not being something high risk to trade with that user hence it could have even been stated with a neutral tag too or just by using the exact feature made to show your disagreement with somesons judgement : Trust List exclusion. I am even not willing to slide with YoBit promotors, as I don't feel promotion it is ethical in itself but still there are some vaild and acceptable explanations behind doing so. |
|
|
|
I agree with you, OP. But so long as nobody comes on here and makes a nice well documented thread about how they were scammed by yobit nothing will change (in regards to their reputation here). It is sad but true.
You don't necessarily have to be outright scammed by Yobit to point out and identify their shady practices. This post is well documented enough showing their shitcoin scams. Seems like Yobit is only running this exchange as a cover up to keep releasing these altcoins as a ponzi like scheme where they make the money off naive investors through false notion promises. No reputable exchange is going to keep an investment box with altcoin ponzi's. More likely YoBit is scamming users under the name of "Trading Loss", but on the real side this losses are maupilated by there own trading volumes. Hence, no real victim can document it as an scam or something like breaches in contract and all the risk is transferred to the trader or the one who uses the exchange. Overall they are scamming under different cryptos, so this scamming in a way doesn't correspond to YoBit itself directly. But then promoting those coins through email clearly shows there intrest and participation behind this volumetric manipulation practices. |
|
|
|
I lost all my Bitcoin to a hard drive failure, do I still have to pay taxes to the Reptilian banking cartel?
I don't think so. |
|
|
|
|
Best advice would be try using another browser, it's problem with the Chrome itself.
|
|
|
|
Yes, it is totally out of the way to get fake reviews on Play Store. User Ratings, Reviews, and Installs
Developers must not attempt to manipulate the placement of any apps in Google Play. This includes, but is not limited to, inflating product ratings, reviews, or install counts by illegitimate means, such as fraudulent or incentivized installs, reviews and ratings. Source: https://play.google.com/about/storelisting-promotional/ratings-reviews-installs/ |
|
|
|
snip
what was the point of your post other than denigration? It could be more like an advice ! I agree with Vispilio about many educated and intelligent people's still thinking, Yobit as at least levels a decent exchange. ( It could be because they personally never had a problem operating on it ). It doesn't seem right to tag participants of the campaign right away and I have already said the same to JollyGood. No one criticized him or something as no doubt he is doing all this as good for the community overall and to curbe the promotion of shitcoins around. But just judging around based on signatures and using trust ratings is not a good option to let people know about it. |
|
|
|
Could you add ignore option to the poll if you consider it as an vaild solution ? Using trust system to indicate your grudge on others is not an proper use of trust system and doesn't set as an good example for others if you see.
There is somehow equal number of votes and opinions for neutral, negative and ignore. Why the fuck are you paraphrasing TECSHARE? There are more two peoples in this thread suggesting you to ignore each other to solve the issue other than TECSHARE. I am not paraphrasing anyone, that's just my own views. Anyways, I agree with what he said though. |
|
|
|
Username: AakZaki
Post Count: 1325
BTC Address: 3JANDA33MsfsVUS3xFmA3wN5bQJ2RJYv8k
Accepted at Sr.Member spot. Starting post count : 1331.
OPEN SPOTS:
1X Hero/Legendary
2X Sr.Member
I have applied to participate in this campaign before, but unfortunately my application seems to be ignored.
As you said, there are 3 places for senior members that are still available. I can delete my current signature (yobit airdrop) and place a signature from the EARNBET campaign if I am accepted. Could you consider my request @hacker1001101001?
None of the application posted here is ignored. As I said earlier, previous applications are still into consideration and there is no need to reapply. Anyways, if a manager doesn't accept you it doesn't mean you are a bad poster or something like that, it's just your posting style is not what's probably needed for maximum promotion of the project in hand. Hope everyone applying here understands this. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
Could you add ignore option to the poll if you consider it as an vaild solution ? Using trust system to indicate your grudge on others is not an proper use of trust system and doesn't set as an good example for others if you see.
Btw, I don't think you should be misguided by the great judge nullius. He seems to like adding highly inflammatory substances to the already burning fire in the drama. This colud even be solved by no one apologising and by ignoring each other.
|
|
|
|
Those that applied aren't allowed to reapply?
There is no need to reapply previously applied participants would still be into consideration. |
|
|
|
ACCEPTED PARTICIPANTS :HERO/LEGENDARY :Username: kawetsriyanto
Post Count: 1762
BTC Address: bc1qkm9ult3ngd3302fs3cmyyldxkeg7jm5jlm4ygl
Username: ryzaadit
Post Count: 1956
BTC Address: bc1q7kyljrdqueq2ymlrxy0aeqvn0nmtrfdrtcgg9v
Username: khaled0111
Post Count: 2474
BTC Address: bc1q86rclrx6dme5zd9u4qnvl9e4p9wfnn4aj3pyka
Username: eaLiTy
Post Count: 4041
BTC Address: bc1q9rk7sge8c402lek9fna2talwwq8ajvnw49vv53
SR.MEMBER :Username: BitcoinTurk
Post Count: 3.392 (Including this)
BTC Address:bc1qckzr8v6jsumqmnkzsfml963ysgngjcswd382pe
Username: Trofo
Post Count: 3344
BTC Address: 1xSv9ZcwZ9NYjW3Fs7jSykybGjmpzR4Uj
Campaign will start at Friday, January 17 23:59:59 UTC, and posts would be counted further as per mentioned in the OP. Please were/update the signature from the OP as I have updated it with some new links. Thank You.
OPEN SPOTS : 1 - HERO/LEGENDARY 3 - SR.MEMBER
|
|
|
|
We never tried to work with a company who can recover money, yet. We just asked since I read online about groups who "can".
Crypto transactions are irreversible ! If anyone says you that he can do the same DONT TRUST. The only way you can recover your funds is by tracking that individual, you already know he lives in India and can you can get more info about him from the social media accounts you linked. With this you could just take a legal action as cryptos are a bit forbidden in India. Don't make your taste bad for the whole country because of one individual. |
|
|
|
it worked from mobile device and I got my BTC out. After the 3 days I guess they will lock my account, because I told people what they do
Gald you got your money back ! FYI, please check if an exchange requires documents verification before hand, it's not always safe to send IDs online. They are locking the account after you have verified the ID which looks like an identity fraud too me, but can't say. They have atleast not scammed your money. |
|
|
|
not justifying what they did by any means, but other than the fake pictures -- was anyone scammed in any other way?
If yes.. how and when?
Really ! Is it OK to use fake team pictures for an project by your means ? Why do you think they would not scam the other way around later ? |
|
|
|
|
I think it is because you are using Chrome on the Lite mode. Try doing it in another browser it would work.
|
|
|
|
|
You should think him just an inventor and an highly visionary personality, who gave us an gift of this overwhelming Bitcon. His dispresennce is even important in some aspects and makes sense towards the moto of making Bitcoin decentralized in a manner and it was even designed the same from the start or about saving his own identity from damaging individuals in the world.
Just an advice, don't trust anyone around here claming himself as real Satoshi, there are around 0% chances of it being true.
|
|
|
|
Question to those, who tagged red user Best_ChangeDo BestChange bounty campaign participants risk to be tagged red? If they don't make payment to participants, then they are tagged for reason and it turns out that participants were promoting scam. I've made an application post to participate in social media bounty campaign before BestChange was tagged. What should I do now? Do the tasks or not? What will happen if I made weekly report ? Because right now everything is turning into 1) do the tasks = risk of being accused of promoting scam = red tag 2) don't do the tasks = not receiving payment / possibility to be kicked from campaign. The whole situation turns to be a "lose-lose" situation for participants... You should just do what you think is right, use your own due intelligence about it. If you think that that BestChange would pay you than why not participate ? It's your own risk. I don't think you would be tagged for taking part in there campaign and promoting it, even if someone does it would be deemed as wrong use of trust system overall.
-snip-
Completely agree with 1miau, If this is the criteria with which tags are being given out then why don't we head over to the altcoin bounty section too and tag each and every campaign that is being run and is not using any trusted escrow, because they are "untrustworthy and we are trying to protect forum members", right? Exactly, there are tons of projects running campaigns on bitcointalk without any escorw, just tagging one in red would not go universal around. Although using a neutral trust would do the same effect. |
|
|
|
korner's alt - Alert! banned This idiot is setting himself up, and nobody pays attention to him in the Russian locale.  Good too see ban evaders are banned again without blockchain evidence. I thought it was just a thing of past. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
