However, based on that thread I don't think brainboss exhibited judgement that was severely lacking. What he posted was basically a summary of community standards that already exist but which were unwritten. In other words, he didn't make all that stuff up himself. He wrote down what are essentially unwritten rules for leaving feedback.
To be honest that is exactly my point. It is more of a list of things he was able to scramble up, but hasn't gone through any "filtering" if you will. And there have been some people trying to adapt, or give feedback on the list, with no action/answer taken or given. I stand by my point. I could make a list of great ICOs and only list scams, not being the author of said ICOs wouldn't make my judgment any less deficient. |
|
|
|
Most simplest solution that I can suggest you to change the requirement as below.
"You have earned "X" amount of merit in last 120 days but merits gained after publication of this OP will not be counted "
This is also a good advice, with this rule you can prevent merit abusers to adjust number of merits for new announced campaigns. However impossible to follow practically when new users are required if the campaign does last over 120 days. If one participant drops out of the campaign after 4 months (ie 120 days) the amount in the last 120 days, before publishing the thread will be 0 for everyone  However as said before, it has to be handled on a case by case basis, and since HHampuz was thorough enough to spot these abusers, I trust him to be as thorough in the future as well. |
|
|
|
He indicated by the use of " " that the italicized text was a (n unattributed) quote, but he claims as his own personal reasoning the larger part that I have bolded by prefixing it with "So, in accordance with GDPR" and then adding further comments of his own, with no reference to distinguish the bulk of the post as non original, thus it is plagiarism.
You appear to be correct. Didn't read thoroughly enough. Looks like the only added value he had were the two last lines. |
|
|
|
Not much you can do against the accounts themselves. - Of course don't accept them
- If you have the time, check if you can proove that merit sender and receiver are alt accounts
- Alternatively you can ask someone to look into it. There are some pretty smart "detectives" around
- Participate in the SMAS blacklist. Lutpin used to use it with the previous bitblender campaign - LINK
- If the merit abuse is blatant, cf the example for the sales thread, tag them read, or highlight me, I will happily oblige
|
|
|
|
I would hate to see you become a source. This topic shows your poor judgement: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100675 - you are just throwing rules in the air, that are at best not true. Bumping them all the time won't make them any more legit. |
|
|
|
snip Dude. He did quote it (using " ") Not providing the source (wikipedia) is different from trying to get the credit for it. This is NOT plagiarism. |
|
|
|
En tout cas, bien jouer de la part de Apple. Avec 2% c'est bien mieux et pas uniquement limite aux billets d'avions comme la mienne.
Cette carte n'a pas l'air si magique que ça apparemment, je n'ai pas gratter le sujet, mais par exemple j'ai vu passer sur twitter comme quoi le CashBack 2% n'était pas applicable en Europe. Ca me semble évident. Les frais payés par le commerçant sont beaucoup trop faibles en France/Europe. Ce ne serait pas fiable. En Amérique, le commerçant paye plus de 2% de frais, qui te sont ensuite reversés en partie par ta banque. En Europe on est a 0.2% max en débit et à 0.3% max en crédit. Le cashback serait donc nécessairement inférieur à ces niveaux. |
|
|
|
Oui c'est impressionnant, mais personnellement je trouve ça complètement bête, il finira en charpie un jour ou l'autre... Quand l'envie d’adrénaline te fait faire n’importe-quoi...
Se préparer de façon adéquate pour un défi n'est pas bête. C'est un but que l'on se fixe. Etre suffisamment sur de soit et connaître son corps et ses capacités, vaincre la peur, c'est un exercice extrêmement difficile et intéressant. L'exécution de l'ascension en elle même n'est même pas la plus grosse difficulté. D'ailleurs pas de place pour l'adrénaline dans ce genre de voie. Il faut garder son sang froid, être méthodique et ne surtout faire aucune erreur. |
|
|
|
J'ai vérifier ma visa, ce n'est que 1.33% de cash back sur toutes les dépenses. J'ai edit mon post Earn 1 Airpoints DollarTM for every $75 you spend on eligible purchases. There is no limit on the number of Airpoints Dollars you can earn. tax payments Tu récupères quand même sur la TVA ? |
|
|
|
Elle me coute $150/an amsi j'ai toutes mes assurance voyages d'incluses et aussi garantie 24mois sur tous les appareil electronique que j'achete.
Et en plus de ca je gagne 2% de cash back en credit sur billet d'avions ( 700 a 800$ de credit avions par an).
Une amex quoi ? Les assurances sont aussi incluses dans toutes les visa premier/Master card gold et celles ci sont gratuites. 2% sur toutes tes dépenses ? Même en amex black j'ai pas vu ça. Tu as un lien ? Enfin l'assurance 24 mois en Europe c'est la loi. Après en effet si t'es dans un pays où on chie sur le consommateur... Fait attention ce n'est pas une vraie garantie en plus mais bien une "assurance" si est bien loin d'une garantie légale. |
|
|
|
Wow ce genre d'exploit me laisse toujours sans voix !
L'exploit c'est pas qu'il le fait a main nues, c'est plutôt qu'il n'est pas assuré. Il fait du free solo. Sinon c'est quand même assez vieux comme exploit, pas vraiment une actu donc. Mais je chipote. Étant grimpeur moi même c'est hyper impressionnant. |
|
|
|
Snip
Good to see that the site is getting a lot of users. Proof that the concept is working! |
|
|
|
0.0001BTC withdrawal fee on BTC.
The fee is 0.001. So it's way higher than miners fee, but it is below the "standard" withdrawal fee in the industry. I think it is just fine where do you see the fee 0.001? as i just visit the withdraw page and it shows the withdrawal fee 0.0001 btc maybe the 0.001 btc you see was the minimum withdraw Actually you are right. This is an amazing low fee. |
|
|
|
0.0001BTC withdrawal fee on BTC.
The fee is 0.001. So it's way higher than miners fee, but it is below the "standard" withdrawal fee in the industry. I think it is just fine |
|
|
|
Self-moderated in services is necessary option, It is not. a lot of people used threads for no sense spam. If you have any accusations you can create own thread in special board (reputation, scam accusations. etc)
This is what moderators are for. Self moderated is when you want to delete perfectly valid posts. About non sense spam, you mean your very post? |
|
|
|
We value the voice of our users with priority.
Wow that is some proper fast reaction. Listening to your customers will just increase the credibility of your project. |
|
|
|
Yep this was more for mindrust Quoted the wrong bit hehe. Fat fingers on mobile. |
|
|
|
If you don't mind that BTC0.0005 fee then good for you, what I'm trying to imply is that the required tx fee of rocket.run itself doesn't go all in the bitcoin network for a much faster confirmation, actually my last withdrawal only cost BTC0.00001839 tx fee so they've got BTC0.00048161 from it.
The 0.0005 transaction fee only works for Bitcoin withdrawal though so it seems to me that it's much better to deposit altcoins for a much lower withdarawal fees.
The withdrawal fee nevers goes to the miners. Not on exchanges, and not on any service I have ever used. What planet do you live on? |
|
|
|
|
Most profitable for who? The casino? Or the paid affiliate?
That said it highly depends on the amount of referrals/the volume of users the casino is targetting.
If the product is bad, nobody will play on it, and the revenue on rev sharing will be 0.
|
|
|
|
Thank you guys for confirming the first payment as well, this won't be necessary in the future (try and just message me in case of issues, to keep this thread as clean as possible).
Confirmed. Hoping this campaign goes for a long time to offset the withdrawal fee  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
