Those accounts are not associated with mine. GET IT??
If they are not associated with yours, it will be easy to check it. The probability that someone at exact same time frame (or few days apart) from same IP (same city and same country) signed up is pretty low, so I think independent panel can easily reach the right conclusion. The probability is very low even for tor, but it's possible to check if the flagged IP is a tor. |
|
|
|
Is this what is causing this. I ALWAYS use TOR when Im on the internet. Does this have something to do with this?
They have exact IPs and can pretty easily figure out if it's Tor. Besides, it's possible for javascript client to bypass Tor and do direct connection to their server. |
|
|
|
Aladin
Prosperux
John holmes
PtBrennan
LexusFly
JCann83
Obarr88
Kolomoy
Am I understanding this right? This means all this people are me?
They have pretty strong evidence. The exact time and IP of the users that created the account on their server, so if they say these are puppets, they are likely yours puppet. No question about that. What about Tor? There are limited number of IPs. It's even possible to bypass tor if the programmer of the client wants to do that as it's javascript client running in your browser  Not sure if they took care of tor, but in this case, I am pretty sure these sock puppet catches are real. I saw it as they caught mine, so I won't be stupidly denying like an "idiot" like others are doing in this thread. I actually like they caught the sock puppets. It's good for the coin as sock puppets were going to dump anyway |
|
|
|
Aladin
Prosperux
John holmes
PtBrennan
LexusFly
JCann83
Obarr88
Kolomoy
Am I understanding this right? This means all this people are me?
They have pretty strong evidence. The exact time and IP of the users that created the account on their server, so if they say these are puppets, they are likely yours puppet. No question about that. |
|
|
|
|
NFD needs a block eplorer
|
|
|
|
If I buy the asset, can I redeem it right now? Is simcoin totally functioning right now or is it just on testnet?
You can only redeem it to your simxchg.com account, because there are no real wallets yet. Three days later, and nothing from Nxtblg. I sent him simxchg.com account |
|
|
|
EDIT: I wrote the above in jest, but it's taken on a slightly different nuance now. My SimGate IPO sold clean out in fifty minutes.
[Yeah, I know, too low price, but that's okay: I figured losing a million Sim for 15,000 Nxt would be good for Sim's distribution into the Nxter world.]
If I buy the asset, can I redeem it right now? Is simcoin totally functioning right now or is it just on testnet? |
|
|
|
The question is basically what's the shortest passphrase that's secure using only numerals.
40 numbers should be fine. |
|
|
|
I like these two ideas.
I'm not sure if the pin option should be added, because there will be people
that will find it complicated too and seroiusly, security is not a simple concept,
I think that pin number would be simple concept to grab. It would be just any 4-6 digit number the user would choose at login, then they won't have to type (or copy & paste) the long twelve word password again for the session. |
|
|
|
A site that doesn't even have https Could be total scam site |
|
|
|
Meh... I just don't click the check box, and I use lastpass to fill in the password when I do a spend. No muss, no fuss.
This is true, but we are talking about general users, not everyone uses password managers. A pin number for session would be more user friendly and could be just as secure if it's disabled after a few incorrect attempts. |
|
|
|
Is this a good idea or not?
It would be more user friendly to have "remember secret phrase for this session" checked by default on login so the users won't have to enter the secret phrase sending a message/bid each time. If that isn't secure, maybe there could be a 4 to 6 digit pin number that the user could use instead of entering the whole password again. The app should disable the pin number and require full password after 5 unsuccessful pin numbers are used. So the login screen would look like this: "Remember password during this session" checked by default Under it, a text field that would say "pin number for the session" (only 4 to 6 numbers allowed) Nice Idea, Just keep it up. I will in fact revise this idea Remove "Remember password during this session" totally and just have "pin number for the session" (only 4 to 6 numbers allowed) |
|
|
|
Is this a good idea or not?
It would be more user friendly to have "remember secret phrase for this session" checked by default on login so the users won't have to enter the secret phrase sending a message/bid each time. If that isn't secure, maybe there could be a 4 to 6 digit pin number that the user could use instead of entering the whole password again. The app should disable the pin number and require full password after 5 unsuccessful pin numbers are used. So the login screen would look like this: "Remember password during this session" checked by default Under it, a text field that would say "pin number for the session" (only 4 to 6 numbers allowed) |
|
|
|
|
I tried transferring one of my Nem token to a different account and see
"NEMstake - 0 available for transfer (1 total)"
Why is that? I know I have 1 token in that account. Why does it say "0 available for transfer"
Edit nevermind: I have open order for it (200,000 Nxt) I forget I put an open order long time ago
|
|
|
|
Web site seems pretty slow. I hope the wallet isn't that slow. How is this different from the mynxt.info wallet? I like it better so far as one wallet can have many Nxt accounts. They are also planning to add more features like asset exchange. It looks pretty safe (if correctly implemented) as wallets are encrypted client side plus 2FA would help |
|
|
|
There's actually a huge difference. With NXT you have 70 stakeholders who forge gobs of NXT daily just by holding, and with NEM you have 3000 stakeholders who are incentivized through POI to do the exact opposite of holding.
Given the world population is 7 billion who never received any Nem, the difference isn't that much. Next year Nem2 will show up claiming to be "fair" as it will distribute to 10,000 And Nem distribution isn't "3000" yet as how many will be unclaimed is still unknown. |
|
|
|
I am an expert in cryptofinance and I cannot ignore(or deny) the fact that NXT is a total fraud.
You are an expert in stealing money, as you stole 1 million Nxt but pretending to be a developer. You never had any skills to develop anything. As for big holders dumping, let how what will happen to BTC prices if top 100 holders (who still control something like 40%) dump BTC, or two top addresses of litecoin (who control 20% of litecoin) dump their coins, If big Nxt holders start dumping, they will be immediately bought by other Nxters. Simple as that |
|
|
|
These accounts need to be closely monitered imo.
Someone with a lot of money would have bought them anyway after the launch. As far as I am concerned UF new rule that he introduced at launch of AE that only 2 stakes can be redeemed per Nxt account is idiotic and should be scratched. These people bought the stake in open market from other nem stakeholders. There should be no "rules" on how many Nem can someone buy in an open market from other nem holders. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
