your top fans are 1miau and fillippone, which conclusions should we make of that? My conclusions: GazetaBitcoin has translated many of our topics and GazetaBitcoin has co-sponsored several innovative campaigns like this one: Campaign to improve posting quality for local boardsIt is probably true, but it was years ago. So you admit that he plagiarized LMAO! Probably, he forgot about it as well and as we know from recent cases that's enough to get away with plagiarism nowadays...  And, we need to have a consideration, too: which message is being sent here, if someone can plagiarize multiple times, even gets caught, provides a very weak excuse (which is basically a justification because "posts are 2 years old" and he "forgot about it") and for all of this, he get's away and NOTHING happens, not even a temporary signature ban. What message is sending this to abusers? You can plagiarize, you can do it multiple times, you can be a participant in a paid signature campaign, while doing it, you can get caught - but you won't get ANY consequences... 
1miau This is because these users are examples, indeed. They are also Merit Sources and (with few exceptions) DT1 users. And they act fair and decent. Thanks for the joke OP. Wow, seems like you are still butthurt for the 2 negative trusts you received recently.  So, it's 6 negative trusts for you and still counting. 
After watching all the past days (weeks?), I've really tried to give Ratimov the benefit of doubt here that the whole issue will be settled in a nice way. But after these past actions, it's pretty clear that the outcome is not satisfying and as a logical conclusion, I've no different choice from distrusting ~Ratimov. There are just too many incidents. I would really like to avoid that step but for now, I don't see any valid arguments left to continue to give him the benefit of doubt. |
|
|
|
Ganz glücklich bin ich mit der Lösung aber auch nicht, also wenn ihr noch bessere Vorschläge habt wie man die einzelnen Aspekte sinnvoll gewichten könnte, dann immer her damit.
Die Kategorien gefallen mir ganz gut und alles andere (wie z.B. die bitcoinbasierte Auswertung von letzt), wäre wohl viel zu viel Arbeit für jeden Monat. Den einzigen Vorschlag, den ich noch hätte, wäre lediglich, die Überschriften in der ersten Tabelle noch zu übersetzen, ansonsten ist das eine sehr gute Auswertung. Die Liste mit den Themen, die die größten Mengen an Merit erhalten haben, sind auch sehr hilfreich, wenn man noch etwas Merit für gute Beiträge verteilen möchte. |
|
|
|
Dein Beitrag wird aber wahrscheinlich einfach mit untergehen zwischen den ganzen Seiten Bewerbungen.
Den Kommentar habe ich ja im ANN-Faden dieses Shitcoins veröffentlicht, weil im Signaturfaden wäre das vielleicht als Off-Topic gelöscht worden, weil mein Kommentar nicht über die Kampagne ging. Und bisher kam noch keine Reaktion darauf, nur ein Shitpost von vinc3, der seit Einführung des Merit-Systems sage und schreibe EIN ganzes Merit erhalten hat. |
|
|
|
Thanks @1miau, I'll work on it soon and post it when it's done.
It may take a few hours or see how my free time goes.
A few days, even a couple of weeks would still be fine to do your translation. No need to hurry, I've listed your language (Turkish) as reserved in my overview and you can provide your translation how it's convenient for you. When you are done, you can announce it in my topic. |
|
|
|
@1miau meine suche nach diesem faden war leider nicht konsequent genug, denn ich habe nur den 'Anfänger und Hilfe' bereich durchforstet und dort nichts gefunden.
Kein Problem, alles gut. "Trading und Spekulation" hatte ich bewusst gewählt, weil ich den Schwerpunkt auf den spekulativen Aspekt legen wollte. "Anfänger und Hilfe" passt aber auch.
Ich hab mir diesen Faden nochmals durchgelesen. Dabei muss ich gestehen, dass mich diese Diskussion immer noch und immer mal wieder beschäftigt.
Seit einigen Monaten befinde ich mich in einer Diskussion mit einem Arbeitskollegen, den ich zur reinen Hodlerfraktion zählen würde. Er hält schon seit einigen Jahren seine Cryptos ohne auch nur irgendwas zu verkaufen. Seine Argumentation beschäftigt mich sehr. Er sagt sich, wenn er verkaufen würde, er Angst habe, dass der Kurs danach hochgehen könnte und er so Verluste einfahren würde. Nun, wir wissen im Grunde, dass diese Art der Definition von Verlusten eigentlich falsch ist, denn Verluste sind erst Verluste, wenn sie realisiert werden. So jedenfalls sehe ich das, seine Angst bleibt trotzdem. Ich habe ihm schon vorgeschlagen, dass er doch mal einen Teil verkaufen kann, wenn der Kurs gestiegen ist und danach nachkaufen, wenn er wieder sinkt. Also kurzum, Teile zu handeln statt alles zu hodln. Keine Chance, seine Angst was zu verpassen bleibt.
Vermutlich meint er, wie du weiter unten ja auch geschrieben hast, dass ihm mögliche Gewinne entgehen, wenn er verkauft und der Preis danach weiter steigt. Also das wären ja keine Verluste, sondern bloß "entgangener" Gewinn. Den hat man ja überall, ob Bitcoin, Aktien oder Edelmetalle, wenn man davon etwas verkauft und der Preis anschließend weiter steigt. Wo er aber einen Konsens machen würde, wäre indem er mir einen Teil anvertraut, damit ich (z.B. via Bot) mit seinen Anteilen handeln würde. Der Grund liegt darin, dass er so nicht mitkriegen würde, wenn Chancen verpasst würden. Ihr könnt euch vorstellen, dass ich mit einigen Fragezeichen dastand - ganz abgesehen davon, dass ich mich aus x Gründen grundsätzlich weigere, das Vermögen von Bekannten und Freunden zu "verwalten". Was anderes wäre das ja im Grunde nicht.
Da wäre ich, wie Lafu auch, lieber auf der Hut, weil wie wir wissen, gibt es keine Garantie, mit Trading dauerhaft Gewinne zu erzielen. Da kann man auch genau so gut auf Bayern München im DFB-Pokal setzen. Eine wichtige Frage ist auch, welche "Kryptos" er besitzt. Bitcoin oder Shitcoins? Denn Shitcoins eignen sich schlechter für HODL als Bitcoin. Gerne kannst du ihm einmal diesen Faden und den Faden über inflationäre Shitcoins zeigen: Bitcoin vs. Altcoins – bereinigte Marktkapitalisierung
~
Wer nichts macht macht auch keine Fehler. Und solange der Kurs langfristig steigt ist hodlen ( ggf. noch auf einer CEX) die bei weitem einfachste Strategie. Neiiiiiiin Nicht die wertvollen Bitcoins auf der CEX hodeln.  Nicht deine Schlüssel - nicht deine Münzen. |
|
|
|
Of course, I'm looking forward to your translation. You can link it here, when it's ready. I've reserved the Indonesian translation for you: | Language | translated by | Title | | ___________________________ | _____________________ | _______________________________________________________________________ | | Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian) | Taufik123 | reserved |
No problem, it's added now. | Language | translated by | Title | | ___________________________ | _____________________ | _______________________________________________________________________ | | Türkçe (Turkish) | mindrust | Al-sat vs. HODL - tuzaklara kanmayın |
+1 for your translation. |
|
|
|
At least you have not allowed him to derail it by you bringing it back on track, namely that you had a post of yours deleted by BenCodie in a self-moderated thread which was the reason you created this thread. And, it is about shocking levels of hypocrisy and the justifications/explanations being provided in attempt to try to come across in a better light.
Yes. He's complaining here now about my topic, while he gladly deleted my comment in his censored self-moderated one. Other way round, if I would cause his self-moderated topic to grow more than 4 pages long, my comments would be already gone.
Why not keep it open? People are still voting in the poll and actively engaging in the debate and sharing their arguments and opinions.
Definitely, we will keep this one open. And it's about time to have a screenshot from our poll:  It's 29:7.  |
|
|
|
will this continue to be opened until someone's reputation is damaged?
Probably yes, because obviously some people here are having an issue with my topic because it's exposing their hypocrisy. But speaking of damaged reputation, I can see that Little Mouse already has one neutral DT feedback and one negative, although Lauda is not frequently in DT. Still, it seems to be an interesting case to be explored. If you want to ruin someone's reputation maybe you can tag them negatively, you're a DT, and you have the assumptions of this thread to reference. Of course, I'm at fault again... I'm at fault for pointing out BenCodies hypocrisy - not BenCodie himself is at fault to think about his actions even one second... This thread is no reference for a negative trust, what are you even talking about?  From what I've read, when someone agrees with one's disagreement then it's an agreement, yet here you are insisting that your statement be agreed with by everyone.
You can look at the poll, our position has huge support and BenCodie was called out for his hypocrisy multiple times by many different members... It looks childish
The only ones who are looking childish here are BenCodie and your lack of knowledge about DT. Please, do yourself a favor and get informed about DT before replying here. I don't even know, what your comment is intended to achieve... I'm sure many people agree that gambling is a bad act, and I'm sure all gamblers know that but they still gamble. So?
And thats a pretty legitimate opinion to oppose gambling because many people don't like gambling. I don't know how often I've said that in this topic. They can think whatever they want. But when someone is of the opinion that gambling is unethical, no need to advertise it in their signature to give such unethical business visibility. I wouldn't advertise a fraudulent shitcoin as well because I don't like most of them. But from this discussion I became curious about coins.game so I created an account there. Ah, maybe this is one of the best promotions
According to BenCodie, these services are unethical and destroying lives. So he's contributing to destroying lives with your sign up... But never mind, I don't have enough level to argue with you, I'll step back and feel free to do whatever you like, I know the arguments of low rank members won't be heard
Arguments of lower rank members will get heard. But if these arguments are nonsense, higher rank members will debunk them. |
|
|
|
As a service operator, I would hire him without hesitation because I would consider my advertising funds spent very wisely.
I believe coins.game isn't a service operator owned by you. No shit, Sherlock! Better you stop thinking about what coins.game CM is doing here.
Luckily, it's not your business what I'm allowed to think or what I'm allowed to write here. If you do care, why don't you reach coins.game and explain your point/argument to them and recommend your preferred CM?
You can do that yourself, I dont even know what your strange questions are trying to achieve here except from derailing the discussion because you have no valid arguments left... Explaining here makes no sense as no one from coins.game is here to hear you.
Looks like you've missed that the topic isn't intended to convince coin.game but a clarification topic regarding BenCodie's misleading poll...
..
Just ignore him. It is clear that his opinion is conflicting with the fact that his opinion is not gospel. 1miau what you are failing to understand is that according to your perspective, I am a hypocrite. The evidence about your hypocrisy is visible for everyone in the OP. It's really sad that you don't admit that. But considering your past "incidents", this one is not surprising at all. According to other people's perspective, I am maintaining my honesty and I am not changing my opinion for a signature campaign. The campaign still gets their advertising, while I make valid posts.
Don't you realize that even your own, biased poll backfired and your poll result is tied now? The people defending your hypocrisy is a small minority because for every issue, there's a strange, small minority. If you don't like gambling, you can write walls of text against gambling but then, you should not advertise it in your Signature to get paid every week for advertising that. That's common sense or your opposition to gambling is not credible at all. It's so simple! You should stop causing trouble...
Who is causing trouble here, when he started to bring the issue to reputation because his post was exposed by me and added to the topic of CryptopreneurBrainboss? We are well allowed to point that out or it's not allowed anymore to criticize hypocrisy on the forum? You were the one taking the issue to reputation by taking things out of context with your initial poll. And no surprise, even your own poll backfired completely because your actions are 100% hypocrisy. You can spin that how you want, it won't change the fact that it's hypocrisy. You'll have to live with it, that people will criticize you for that.
will this continue to be opened until someone's reputation is damaged?
Probably yes, because obviously some people here are having an issue with my topic because it's exposing their hypocrisy. But speaking of damaged reputation, I can see that Little Mouse already has one neutral DT feedback and one negative, although Lauda is not frequently in DT. Still, it seems to be an interesting case to be explored. |
|
|
|
You translation is much appreciated and it's approved already, well done. Hopefully, you've learned something about SegWit as well. I've added your translation to my OP: | Language | translated by | Title | | ___________________________ | _____________________ | _______________________________________________________________________ | | Nigeria (Naija) | knowngunman | Na why people go dey use SegWit addresses |
It's always helpful to have nice members translating important content.
I've listed GazetaBitcoin's Romanian translation and my German translation, too. |
|
|
|
What a completely unnecessary shitcoin this is! I wouldn't be surprised at all if this shitcoin is nearly worthless late 2025 (2 years). //remind me 2 years Even their logo is very shitty, which should be key for a low-level memecoin, normally... I'm not a friend of useless shitcoins but I guess I have to accept that scamming foolish people is part of the shitcoin industry... And - possibly damaging my device due to a buggy shitcoin - hell, no! But have some fun with it, if you are willing to take the risk for little reward. |
|
|
|
Wo gab es denn eine Welle der Empörung zur Eloncoin Kampagne? Hast du in deren Faden angesprochen, was für einen durchweg absolut unnötigen Shitcoin sie da eigentlich aufgelegt haben? Nachtrag: habe mal einen passenden Kommentar dagelassen. |
|
|
|
And obviously, someone who openly hates gambling is not a good pick to advertise a gambling brand.
Why do you think BenCodie someone needs to accept your philosophy in his life and can't have his own and vice versa.
Everyone may have different perspectives and opinions. I'm trying my best to give maximum exposure to coins.game through the signature campaign. I'm following my strategy for achieving so. Of course, everyone can have different perspectives and opinions. I don't know how often I should mention this, again and again. Everyone can hate gambling, they are entitled to have that opinion. But then, the person in question should not get butthurt if their hypocrisy gets called out for participating in a paid signature ad campaign and we called that out, backed up by legitimate proof, like the picture I've posted in the topic of CryptopreneurBrainboss. We should always remember that BenCodie started the whole discussion when he acted butthurt that other people called him out for his hypocrisy. So, BenCodie has shown his hypocrisy to everyone (he even opposed cryptofrka's Merit source application) and at the same time, he's not able to face any criticism for his actions.
If you feel like CM isn't doing the job perfectly, feel free to reach out to them and explain.
That's an option, but PMing a bounty manager is something I'm very hesistant because all the other options need to have failed already, like nice explanations for the abusers in question. PMing a campaign manager for such things might result in more unnecessary spam for campaign managers. But yes, it's an option.
And yes, campaign managers not checking his comments properly are an issue too.
This is irritating and unnecessary here I think (not obvious because you are free to say anything you want). It's neither irritating nor unnecessary, it's very important to mention that. Because campaign managers are getting paid to provide a good service and that includes to select the participants, which are suited best to give a service the best advertising. We have had some very lazy campaign managers here but luckily the whole situation has improved. I can personally outline the practices of icopress, whose professionality is key to provide a good campaign management. As a service operator, I would hire him without hesitation because I would consider my advertising funds spent very wisely.
Do you think in the gambling section, everyone is a gambler or likes gambling? Of course, no. There are a lot of users pretending to be a gambler/like gambling just for the sake of filling their weekly posting requirements. The difference between Bencodie and those impersonators is- they are impersonators while Bencodie isn't. He is honest at least.
It's a big difference if someone just doesn't care much about gambling or if he's opposing it openly. What are we even talking about, if someone doesn't like gambling, no need to advertise it for him. That's what we are talking about the whole time. Most gambling sites are know for requiring gambling-related posts and it's just not making any sense to have low-quality posters participating there or even people opposing gambling. For example, as a gambling service owner, I would go for people like Trofo, cryptofrka or CLS63 as participants over BenCodie any time.
@JollyGood just stop. There has not been any past hypocrisy instead of your misinterpretation of whirlwind where
All the comments written by JollyGood here are very legitimate. And not just JollyGood was a bit surprised about your hypocrisy, many more members shared the same view.
And yes, campaign managers not checking his comments properly are an issue too.
A campaign manager is responsible to select suited participants to ensure that the service is advertised the best way. Campaign managers are getting paid for that by the service.
And obviously, someone who openly hates gambling is not a good pick to advertise a gambling brand.
He came back to the forum last December after taking a long break and seemed like he just wanted to join some signature campaigns to earn money. He put in an application with Chipmixer like two days after he started posting again. But before that, I never saw him post anything about gambling on here. Makes me wonder if he's telling the truth that he's always felt this way about it. Hard to get a read on what his deal is. Nice reminder, I totally forgot about it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935179.msg61460727#msg61460727"Full" means "apply now". |
|
|
|
2 Monate mit jeweils -17% bzw. -32% in Summe wäre jetzt auch kein mega Schocker hatten wir Mai 2021 und Juni 2022 schon schlimmer....
Aber das waren jeweils auch Bewegungen in einem Bärenmarkt, da ist das ja normal. Zwei Monate mit -17% hintereinander würden zum aktuellen Zeitpunkt dem aufkeimenden Bullenmarkt direkt eins auf den Deckel geben, und durch diesen herben Dämpfer würde der aufkeimende, bullische Trend mindestens stark verzögert, wenn nicht sogar so stark beschädigt werden, sodass der Kurs wieder auf Level in der Nähe des Bodens von 2022 / 2023 landen würde (unter 20k USD). |
|
|
|
Da cygan an anderer Stelle diesen Beitrag übersetzt hat, der Faden dort aber schon abgeschlossen ist, schreibe ich das hier einmal dazu auf. Gerne gebe ich auch etwas Merit für die Mühe. Soweit ich weiß, habe ich alle meine großen Beiträge auch bereits hier im deutschen Forumsbereich platziert, damals jedoch nicht direkt die Übersetzungen darunter verlinkt, da das erst so ab 2022 / 2023 in Mode kam, interessante Beiträge in alle möglichen Sprachen zu übersetzen. Daher am besten Übersetzungen immer im originalen Faden im internationalen Forumsbereich auf Reservierung anfragen, dann sage ich euch, ob der Beitrag bereits in die jeweilige Sprache übersetzt wurde oder nicht und ich reserviere euch die Übersetzung. Ich habe meine Übersetzung im originalen Faden einmal verlinkt.
|
|
|
|
Sometimes, negative promotion gives better exposure than positive promotion does. Let's say BenCodie is opposing gambling and casinos and believes it's unethical while wear the signature. Which is the reason for creating a conflict or let's say a discussion regarding his point of view. Now, the company he promotes is getting more views from his signature as people pay attention to him. He might have negative thoughts about gambling, but the viewers do not.
Possibly but then, a small reward for anyone else who's disproving his claims would be a nice gesture. Like a special contest campaign (reviews / ad drawing campaign etc.). At least, his revent gambling upheaval has caused some of the "criticism" getting debunked. |
|
|
|
FC Bayern just got eliminated from DFB Cup (German Cup) against a 3rd league team, FC Saarbrücken:   Odds were well over 30.00 for Saarbrücken to win and Bayern might get a heated discussion now. Because Bayern really played an awful first half and was unlucky to catch a late 2-1 in 90+5 against a totally exhausted FC Saarbrücken. Bayern at Galatasaray for Champions League is definitely a game to watch, where Bayern will possibly struggle once again, considering Galatasaray's last upsets against Man United. In addition, Bayern lost De Ligt due to an injury. |
|
|
|
The thing I actually want to say is that BenCodie doesn't keep his thoughts to himself. He is writing them openly. I think that the real problem here is the truth of there are managers who are accepting him to the ad campaign of gambling companies despite knowing that BenCodie is talking negatively about gambling websites.
Yes, it's a legitimate opinion for BenCodie to be against gambling, he can even write a whole topic how "unethical" gambling is or how it can "destroy lives" and express his opposition to gambling. But then, he should not wear a gambling signature at the same time, as his opposition against gambling wouldn't be credible at all. And yes, campaign managers not checking his comments properly are an issue too. A campaign manager is responsible to select suited participants to ensure that the service is advertised the best way. Campaign managers are getting paid for that by the service. And obviously, someone who openly hates gambling is not a good pick to advertise a gambling brand.
Then let me ask you a question like this: Isn't there any fault of Coca-Cola here if Ronaldo shares an Instagram story every day telling people not to drink Coca-Cola and still he signs a sponsorship deal with Coca-Cola?
That would be hypocrisy on behalf of Ronaldo, if he thinks it's an unhealthy drink but still signs a sponsorship deal to get money for advertising Coca Cola. Of course, CocaCola is well advised to nullify their personal sponsorship deal with Ronaldo if Ronaldo doesn't like CocaCola obviously. (I don't dislike CocaCola but of course, we should not drink it every day ) |
|
|
|
Gerne können wir in diesem Faden auch die bedeutsamen Entwicklungen und Ereignisse seit dem 31. Oktober 2008 beleuchten und diskutieren. Wurde der Tag eigentlich mal im Bezug mit Halloween erwähnt? Überall Horror, Spuck usw. und dazu das Bitcoin Whitepaper. Eine schaurige schöne Geschichte? Oder war/ist Satoshi ein Halloween Fan? Waren Gespenster am Werk? Fragen über Fragen ... Wo du es sagst, hat Gary Gensler gestern auf X (ehemalig Twitter) einen wirklich schlechten Spruch gebracht. Er hatte die Frage in dem Raum gestellt das wenn Satoshi Nakamoto sich an Halloween als Satoshi Nakamoto verkleiden würde, ob man ihn erkennen könnte. Was mittlerweile auf Twitter (neuerdings X) geschrieben wird, ist hoffentlich bald eh komplett irrelevant und der rechtsradikale Faschistenfreund Elon Musk tut ja auch alles dafür, dass er den Laden in Rekordgeschwindigkeit an die Wand fährt - das wohl einzigst gute bei dieser Angelegenheit. Lassen wir diesen Kommentar einfach mal im Raum stehen. Macht meiner Meinung nach überhaupt keinen Sinn und unterstreicht seine Haltung gegenüber Bitcoin oder allgemein Kryptowährungen.
Der Kommentar ergibt sogar sehr viel Sinn: Gensler weist darauf hin, dass viele Altcoins immer wieder Bitcoin "imitieren" wollen oder sich sogar selbst als Bitcoin ausgeben. Der Betrüger Craig Wright von Bitcoin SV ist da ein perfektes Beispiel aber auch industrielle, zentralisierte Shitcoins, die Bitcoin "imitieren" wollen.  Seine Haltung ist deshalb ziemlich plausibel: Bitcoin ist klar besser als zentralisierte Shitcoins. Gensler hat - entgegen dem Glauben vieler ungebildeter Kasper auf Twitter - ein sehr tiefgreifendes Wissen, was Bitcoin angeht. Nicht umsonst war er Professor am MIT über Blockchain. Die Videos dazu findet man auch auf YouTube. Daher hat er auch verstanden, dass viele Shitcoins ziemlich betrügerisch sind - und damit spielt er mit seinem Tweet an. Leider wird Gensler immer wieder Ziel von Diffamierungsattacken, die seine Aussagen bewusst fehldeuten, falsch zusammenschneiden und aus dem Kontext reißen, um ihn zu diskreditieren. Seit Musk Twitter zu einer rechtsradikalen Propagandaplattform umgebaut hat, wundert das eh niemanden mehr. Zum Glück muss man sich das nicht mehr antun, weil Musk den Zugang zu Twitter gleichzeitig eingeschränkt hat (Tweets sind ohne Account dort nur noch begrenzt sichtbar, wenn man sie direkt aufruft). Wie gesagt, immerhin fährt Musk den Laden damit an die Wand und je schneller, desto besser, dass Twitter in der Bedeutungslosigkeit verschwindet. Ich stimme dir zu, dass sie dann im Vorteil sind. Allerdings sollte man auch nicht unterschätzen, wie beeindruckend es ist, Coins über einen so langen Zeitraum zu halten, ohne sie nach einem derartigen enormen Anstieg verkauft zu haben. Ich denke, dass nur ein kleiner Teil der Personen ihre Coins seit so langer Zeit noch immer besitzen.
Es kann auch sein, dass "Satoshi" bewusst seine privaten Schlüssel entsorgt hat, um nicht in Versuchung zu kommen, da irgendwann einmal drauf zugreifen zu müssen. So wie man Satoshi einschätzen könnte, hatte er bestimmt bereits damals eine grobe Einschätzung, was ein Bitcoin später einmal wert sein könnte - und er für dieses Szenario geplant haben könnte. Oder falls Satoshi Hal Finney ist. |
|
|
|
Leclerc is talking for extending his contract.
Also the only way that he will end in RBR is that Max will leave.
2 bulls can't reign in one pen as the proverbs say
But I don't know who could replace Perez, maybe a younger talent from RedBull itself? Ricciardo is set to replace Perez, most likely. Not just after Ricciardo's recent performance in Mexico. And how Perez crashed out, once again, of course... A solid second driver is exactly what RedBull wants and Perez did a good job in 2021, most of 2022 and start of 2023. But his recent performance is just awful. Ricciardo currently looks like he's exactly what RedBull wants: a solid second driver to finish on podium regularly, to get a safe constructor championsship for RedBull, to get 2nd place in WDC for Ricciardo and to help Max like Perez did in 2021. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
