TL;DR : the tags you got are wrong use of trust system and you alone should not be targeted for campaign promotion.

I too think more DTs being professional about it and holding some standards for there tags would make an positive effect for sure.

I was just curious about what are the views of our administrator about the recent ongoing use of trust system and the issues around it ? as it always helps us to be inside the line of the views of the creator of the system. As you used one of his quotes to define improper use of red trust.

Let alone this get my vote on you. I support this application.

I mean I am not in control of any accounts accused above others than this ( not logged in from 2 years ).

I am pretty open to criticsm, but even after accepting my past mistakes some users put this up as an hunt as I mentioned the link's of incidences here.



I don't control any other account than this on the forum now, me being on an quest to DT is just your vivid dream. I was dragged into speaking about this darma due to the abuse of trust ratings on me if you see it clearly. Your advice seemed to me as keeping quiet even after looking at people getting harassed under some group thinking, which I can't resist speaking about. None of this makes me disturbing or an harm to the community.

Really you know to many things about others alts here, what a Sherlock brain.

@JollyGood, I think it is not appropriate use of red trust to tag campaign participants. I agree it looks very shay for someone on DT1 to promote an exchange with an infinite number of complaints never solved. I even understand your intentions which is unabling the signature promotion around. But still it is not a decent reason to tag someone with red trust as an more larger group of users are already engaged in similar signature promotion. Let alone administration handle it as theymos did it last time by banning all the signatures, that could be the best way possible.

Same can be said to @marlboroza if they are willing to consider.

Sorry but I had to mention as the person claiming you as his alt also seems to be involved in such activities. So was just giving an hit.


Moreover, you should check the full requirement in the rules.


Imagine how a newbie would see those rules, which I changed acting on later and started posting more in other sections like Speculation, Speculation (Altcoins), Altcoin Discussion, Economics and Bitcoin Discussion you can see as you have already scanned through my post history. But this was only when I get to knew slowly about the rules. I am very clear here about my intentions back then and now so that everyone could judge the change. I have agreed being naive but proved not being the same now.




Sorry for going off-topic but as you thought I being his alt, I would like to let know, I don't find him harmful to the community overall not now and not back then. What pulled him in a trap was just him asking if he can escorw the funds, and him running with that funds are just guess. Other things are just part of witch hunts, show me the man I will show you the crime.



Jumping from defending an abusive feedback case here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182530.0 to again due to defending on more abusive feedback from the same incident here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.0 and again defending myself from an abusive feedback from the same incident here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213377.0 to this thread again digging up my past incidents which I have left years back. ( Don't know what to say this, as it's very high level of coincidences if one tries to look at it that way )

I act because I don't enjoy my character being discussed this way.

+1

A view about it from theymos would be more clearing to many users here as even after a string of incidences and pointing of some major and minor flaws in the system in various threads, there is no comment from theymos realted to if it's working fine as per him or not. He has not even commented about it from months now, hence the curiosity.

Don't have solid proofs so can't go on (could have in future). I don't prefer half baked accusations.

They are not occasional but frequent good deeds of mine. Anyways, your 5000+ valid ratings are already duplicated by many other DTs around last time when you were off DT IIRC ( don't know if it was filtered with the abusive ones ), so they are no more needed to be shown under trusted to default trust users like me.

No one can imagine a person like you blaming others for playing political games on you, that's the only thing you do frequently on the forum, other than your occasional cherry scam busting.



You know what I am talking about just don't let it slip from your hands this time.

I am sad that someone like you had to involve yourself here to fight for the abuse on me, as I never expected such still I respect you from the past.

But, the extent of such abuse is to were you are referring to the good deeds of there scam busting, but on other hands, they don't even think twice to tear apart the repo of another scam buster like me. One can surely see these goods deeds really doesn't outweigh the damage caused on another side.

(I don't intend to involve you in any type of drama, you could just stay away and still act right).

Ok, yes they were targeted reviews but as I said I use to follow many ICOs back then on telegram. A normal user like me and many others could never say which projects were going to fail at the time of hype, I have personally lost funds in such ICOs back then.


IIRC it was KEPLER, as I said I even use to follow those projects I was posting in.



It was naive because a newbie to the forum could surely not always know that posting for ICO projects on their thread is an unaccepted activity here, later when I came to knew such things and the risk involved, I have never ever engaged in it again from years and even discouraged it as much as I can to others.



I have not bought any accounts here and no successful trades happen in the posts you quoted.


Funny to put up names for you right. God Bless that guy with a nice life, he left the forum due to the same torcher.  


Again funny for you, I already agreed I was involved in posting for ICOs and following them even on telegram, which I left when I got to know it is forbidden on the forum.


Some user has already vomited some shit on in a thread for something I am grateful to the theymos and administration around. You could get more info there.

The fastest UNBAN for plagiarism

---

As explained above, I being engaged with these peoples and activity for very early times of mine on the forum and for short interval too which I left and discouraged too when I got to knew the risks and occurring damages to the crypto environment in all.

---

---

This is my last explanation to the ICO bumping topic in hand, I have agreed my involvement years back for a very short period of time which I stopped when I got more grip on the rules and understood its forbidden here if IIRC I was just newbie or member rank at that time. I see a string of accusations and digging up of my past incidences to tear apart my repo in any way possible. I have addressed the issue at hand and I leave the rest for the people to judge from my current activities on the forum. Your good out weights bad argument in one way.

---

@Lauda

This Forum is just a fun tool for you and you are the same for people like me who know your ways to use anything here how it suits you.



@marlboroza just catch up with your said alt, he seems to be involved in more shady activities than what you are accusing me about, you could catch more dangerous scammers.

Your rating was just an example. You could round me up to anything scam realted which I am nowhere involved in and didn't even cause any financial damages to any real victims and use the trust system as you see fit. This thread was never about you alone anyways.

I am defending it here without any personally indulge benifits.It is more targeted to the betterment of the use of red trust in an more organized and explanatory maner. Don't try to bend it towards me alone, there are many others who are facing such type of abuse and there is an list of examples I tried to avoid mentioning in the OP as I myself was an recent example.



Shady shit in relation to trust ratings is limited to really scamming with funds or trying to scam with funds, rest of things are just opinions about if they would scam or not observed just from there views towards the system which is wrong, even that could be indicated with the use of a neutral rating. TECSHARE is nowhere near an harm to the DT network not even to the forum overall.

---

Thank you for acting right, it's really not that difficult to judge an act right but only things that are avoiding people to do so boils down to 1. Hidden agendas. or 2. Fear. It would be dam effective even if the second group starts acting on it.

We need more people like JollyGood here, who would never put there intrigrity down and always follow the right path towards making this place free from real scammers and not free from people having unpopular opinions (he rather tries to inform it's unpopular by discussion). Keep catching big fishes and saving community from frauds.

I even find your wishes for 2020 highly visionary, which not most of the DTs here have now a day's !

Wishing you a very energetic and wealthy full 2020, keep up the good work !

It is more like a witch hunt some times and the accused in analyzed until the inside of his pants to find out anyways to put him to multiple trust ratings, and curbe the abuse by blaming him as risky without any real victims complaining of such. Just like show me the man, I will show you the crime attitude.


Or what if just an upvote feature is added?  ( if upvotes of DT1 are more the rating would appear under the trusted feedback, else if downvotes are more it would appear under untrusted feedback )

All of the votings could be made anonymous so that no drama would arise and DT1s could up or down vote on ratings without being afraid of other judgment.

I think, to hit the reset button for the trust list is surely an interesting and effective idea in some sense.  Inactive accounts, using probably never updated trust lists could be flushed up so that, they are forced to reput their trust list together with the latest conclusions or it would be left on default trust if they are inactive even further.  This way only the votes of the people judging others actively around would be increased at least.

I am talking about the rules and operating of the forum not about crypto overall.



OK, I agree it looks like bumping but I had no incentive from that posts more than increasing my weekly post counts back then. IF you want to blame me as a scammer by looking at some nave activities of mine in the past which I left 2 years ago rather working towards making the forum a better and scam-free place now than so be it. I cannot stop you from doing what you just did with TECSHARE.



None of the above-quoted accounts is mine or was in control of me in the past.

---

thank you for enlighting it here, but it was just suspected, I am the only owner of this account right from the date of its creation.

I was newbie on the forum, but not in an overall crypto space, I use to use the same telegram from long time ago. I really had no notice of that reddit account and the post before I got notified here.


The truth is, that post and the account was made without my notice, if I would have knew who did it, I would have already asked to them to remove it, I know it is forbidden on the forum !



As I said, that was the only level of contents I could produce on the forum back then to reach my atlcoin signature bountys post requirements weekly and I read the rules as post in altcoin sections as accepted which encouraged me to stumble over there. It was pretty much hype time for crypto and pretty much everyone came here to shill from atlcoin bounties, I was one of it. I have never repeated such shit there after, not even did any annoying long quotes.

I agree, sMerits data scraping is Ok, but making that public to the level of viewing it under user's profile seems a bit off the track. Theymos would always appreciate keeping it as much as hidden as he can if you see.


Still a good peice of work, and I appreciate the efforts of the OP. But ya making more info easily accessible is not always profitable to the community overall. Merit Sources would just be fed up with begging requests.