We can supply around 150k USD ( 200k SGD ) worth of bitcoins at live market rate daily. This supply would increase next month. I'm based in Singapore and SGD is our local currency, Singapore Dollars (aka FIAT), like USD for the US. Prefer to meet up and transact if we're in the same country. If not, we can use online escrow services like localbitcoins or remitano. For large deals, one of us travelling can be an option, preferably in the Asian region but if the deal is substantial we can definitely consider further locations. For which, I can prepare around ~50+ BTC/ETH and if the first transaction went pretty good will be willing to trade the remaining balance to make the travelling worthwhile.
Will be selling at market floating rate +6%, of which you get to choose the timing you wish to buy the bitcoins. Preferably looking for a frequent buyer but one time times are welcomed as well. Kindly add me on telegram @Shabbs18 to discuss further, this forum has an annoying 6min post limitation.
what's the rates of bitcoin and any others member of this forum take your this service??
Add me on telegram to discuss more @shabbs18 CMC price +6%.Which is it? I may have an interested buyer to conduct $50-100K USD per month, but I highly doubt that they'd pay +6%.
so, how are we ?
RESPECT
Whatever happened with your arrangement? Your last message was that you'd look for an escrow and see what happens, and then you disappeared for over a month? I'm not taking any sides here, but based on what's publicly posted here on this thread, your behavior is extremely untrustworthy. Maybe something else happened behind the scenes, but perception is everything.
|
|
|
Don't forget to apply for Round 2 (begins Sunday at approximately 9:00PM GMT -6)Round 2 application cutoff is on Monday at 9:00PM (GMT -6). We have almost two days remaining for this round, and giving the participants' posts a brief scan, I'm pleasantly surprised with how much they're trying (most of them, at least )! I will make sure to provide my personal feedback about each of the participant's best posts for the week, and tips on improvement (based on my [mysterious] criteria) when the round ends. Great job, everyone! NOTE: I will be revising and adding a few new definitive rules, so make sure to read the updated top post upon the start of Round 2.
|
|
|
Is there such a thing from a trusted party?
That's an oxymoron at its finest: Trusted parties do not sell user data to random forum members.
|
|
|
Double-clicking the button perhaps?
Ah the fat finger bug, I hadn't thought of that. It could be, now I need to find a post worth two merit to see if I can replicate it. No need. Your top post is well worthy of [at least] 2 Merits. I just double-clicked the send button on the Merit page. I can confirm that double-clicking does indeed double-merit. See you in next week's stats!
|
|
|
I'm digging the simplicity of your website's user flow, but also the complexity of how much detail went into providing this mixing service. I'll use your service this weekend for a small transaction of around $20 and provide my feedback at that time. Question: Is the default miner's fee automatically updated? If so, which recommended fee structure are you utilizing? I currently see 110 sat/b, which seems very high for a SegWit transaction. Random request (I know, I know; this is prior to utilizing your service): Would it be possible to add an auto-converted field that allows me to enter a USD amount rather than a BTC amount, or vice versa? Example:
|
|
|
Are you selling the double chance method? If so it's a stealing and scamming method IMHO
Unless you're talking about a double chance method that's different than hedging your bets, such as on sports betting, there's nothing scammy about using it. I don't see how this method would work on gambling sites, though. Either way, it sounds like OP found an exploit, which is scammy to sell to others. While it's not really illegal, I'm sure, it's still highly frowned upon, and I hope that whoever buys this method really considers what it is that they're doing.
|
|
|
my biggest mistake was to request merit under one of them and I can not join any signing campaign at the moment. I recommend you do not run away easily. otherwise your account will be garbage like mine.
Hey man, yeah, you made a shitty mistake. You don't beg for things here. But you aren't banned from joining a signature campaign. The general rule is "red trust" is the trigger to preclude you from joining a signature campaign. You don't have red trust yet. Now, that doesn't mean your post quality is worthy of participation in a signature campaign, but you're still eligible. He actually does have red trust, but it was left by a user that theymos has recently removed from his Default Trust list. I'm not sure how the default trust is displayed according to whatever options that you choose to display them, but I can see that Komorhan, indeed, has a big ol' fat -2 DT tag.
|
|
|
I don’t have too much to contribute but I do want to remind you that your invest,ent into crypto ONLY becomes a loss if you decide to sell it at a loss. Do what you have to, but you should try to remind your wife of that.
|
|
|
Of course, the merit system is really helpful in this forum because if they did not implement this system, users will continue to spam until they rank up. So far, spammers have been reduced due to this system so this forum will be flow better than before. Right now, it's really hard to rank up because many merits are needed. So let us make a quality post and a glamorous topic.
You don't say! If only someone else would have said the same thing as you on any of the previous 5 pages of this thread! Yes ofcourse it is working like how it should work, the spam are getting much less than usual. Also the account farmers cant really farm that fast now since they'll get stuck if they dont get merit. So i'd say that the merit system really works perfectly fine.
Of course, the merit system works well. The shit poster slowly decreases and everyone tries to improve the quality of their post in order to get a merit for ranked up. Its make the forum going better than ever.
Yes i think it really help a lot, it reduce the shit poser just want to rank up, in addition merit really require quality post that really helps the forum and the reader as well.
Yes, merit has a good effect in this forum. I can say that Merit System is successful, but i think this system can still be improve to be fair for all.
Merit system will help people to make a good quality post and make a challenge to level up. For me merit system is good. We can improved our self to make good post and be useful, meaningful post for people. Must work hard to get merit and has minimum merit for level up.
Of course, merit is very helpful in this forum. Because of the Merit, all of the members became careful and much constructive to what he/she want to comment. Merit gives more quality post from participants/members.
The merit system is very effective and what to expect, first to reduce spammers and improve the quality of the topic every day and be increasingly critical, great for improving the quality of work and especially the quality of the forum.
The merit system is very effective and what to expect, first to reduce spammers and improve the quality of the topic every day and be increasingly critical, great for improving the quality of work and especially the quality of the forum.
With the merit system is implemented on this forum it is a big challenges to us to rank up but still it is every effective to the good poster and hunt some spammer who will do shitpost. I think many user are still shitposter and they need to improve their post to rank up.
I think, yes the merit system is helping the forum. It eliminates spammers and encourage members to post and contribute useful information that can benefit and users can learn from. However, I think it's really hard to gain merits because a "constructive / quality" post is based on one's own perception. So we should really work hard and research some more to obtain it.
Its already have a good impact in the forum, more members are now starting to post more quality and some of the spammers are now getting tagged specially for account farmers who are taking advantage to earn and not helping the forum. Even there are many members continuous complaining about how hard to get merit but still they are trying to get that and starting to change their posting style from poor to more constructive post.
Yes Merit works really well. This forum has a lot to knowing thing. Many newcomers here come only for work. Many people do counter-work without knowing it. Forum are losing popularity with unwanted writings. Merit can only provide one person for good work. So I think Merit is one of the ways to know and understand everyone's personality.
I think it's time we should introduce a demerit system. But not one where it takes one person to simply demerit another user (for having shitty posts like the ones quoted above), but what about if the demerits aren't publicly available for viewing on any post, but if a certain post receives n amounts of demerit votes, the user is demerited... For example, if a user's post gets voted to be demerited by 5 separate members, the user then has a merit removed from their account. All the while, it would never indicate publicly that the user has been demerited (to help reduce hive mentality), but it would be visible from the user's merit stats page after they have had a full merit score reduced. If the user is at 0 merits upon getting n votes? How about if the account is temporarily banned from posting on the forums. Maybe 1 week for first offenders, 1 month for second offenders, and permanently for third time offenders? I know it's still too early to discuss a demerit option, but I really am getting sick of the repetitive (sly) shitposters like the ones I've quoted above. You know, the ones who can actually construct a decent (and I use that term loosely) post, but still do not have the ability to review the context of the topic before posting... Maybe I'm getting way too detailed in the nitty gritty, but I'd give anything to be able to help contribute to the fine-tuning of this forum
|
|
|
It feels good when somebody calls you dev, sir or just begging you, right? (dev digaran, do you need translator for your scam token, sir?).
fixed that for you.
|
|
|
my biggest mistake was to request merit under one of them and I can not join any signing campaign at the moment. I recommend you do not run away easily. otherwise your account will be garbage like mine.
Given your post history, I would say you made your biggest mistake in BCT history on December 17 when you registered your account. You haven’t contributed anything to the forums, and are only interested in utilizing the forums to shitpost so you can rank up to earn bounties. While this is a great incentive for members, it shouldn’t be the sole purpose of joining the forums, which is exactly why the merit system was introduced. I guess you can not link to them if you do not look at it. you are so full of people who think you are such a shit. yes you are experienced in this business and in the end you do not do anything but despise the beginners Again, posting more shit you know nothing about. I love newbies. I even put up $25 of my own personal money to award to them every week for actually posting constructively in the forums. Take that chip off your shoulder, and try to remember why this forum exists in the first place. It’s not to breed campaign junkies, which seems to be the only reason you are here. I challenge you to prove me wrong, but given your post history, I doubt that you’ll be able to do so.
|
|
|
Q: If Bitcoin isn't bad, why do famous financial gurus like Warren Buffet warn us to stay away from it?
A: First and foremost, anyone who is a financial advisor like Warren Buffet could never advise the public to invest in an asset that isn't regulated by the SEC. He could be sued, or even jailed for giving such advice. But, and I am showing my paranoia here, the reason people like Warren and Bill don't advise going into bitcoin is because they are the main beneficiaries of the current CENTRALIZED economic system we are living under. They are the richest people in the world! The system made them this way! So why would they want to change it? Bitcoin is a risk. A MASSIVE risk. The risk of a completely changed economic landscape for billions of people...And the truth is, even if the world adopts decentralized crypto as a major asset/currency, YOU may never make a penny on your investments. (But that won't stop me from trying) This is extremely similar to the way I personally answer this question. Great answer! Enjoy the merit and top-post fame
|
|
|
You see the little button on the bottom right of the private message that says "Report to Admin"? Click on that to report it directly. Thanks for bringing this up; I'm sure a moderator will look into it. But for now, make sure to report him via the pm, as well.
|
|
|
Let's just hope that this is nearing the last we'll hear of Mt. Gox. The sell-off method in which they approached is very selfish, greedy and irresponsible, but it goes to show how volatile the BTC industry is. I'm okay with it, though. It just means that we're having yet another firesale on Bitcoin at the moment At the end of the day, as much as Mt. Gox is at blame for all the stolen bitcoin, it was a valuable lesson for users not to store their coins in exchanges. While I'm not justifying the actions of MG, we need incidents like this in order to help shape the security and safety of bitcoin in the future. Regarding the volatility of the coin anytime a big sell-off like this happens? This may be a one-off. Most huge bitcoin hodlers aren't going to irresponsibly flood the market with massive amounts of bitcoins. I'm assuming that if they want to move a large amount of bitcoin, they would do it off-exchange, meaning they'd conduct a private sale, in order to protect the market from sudden plunges. But nigh is the day that we will not have to hear about Mt. Gox again. *fingers crossed*
|
|
|
I want this thread to be a tool for users to arm themselves with information that isn’t wildly technical. The majority of questions that newbies ask aren’t technical, so the questions you’ve asked aren’t generally popular ones asked when trying to learn about what bitcoin is. Regarding your answer, when I’m asked this, it’s usually because they have no idea that you don’t have to buy a full bitcoin. The answer that I’m looking for is one that includes that you can buy any amount of bitcoin that you can afford. Want to restructure your answer and post again so I can merit somebody in this thread? Q: Why is Bitcoin so expensive? I can't afford a bitcoin. A: Yes, Bitcoin is expensive and that is what most people think of when they see the actual current price and most of the reactions from my friends were seemingly shock how big it is and they were amazed and excited that they wanted to earn btc. So, in the case where some can't afford to buy it, I would suggest these people to join bounty campaign and gradually earn btc in the later time. All they have to do is pursuing the goal to earn btc through their dedication and time in this forum. Most people you talk to for the first time about Bitcoin won't have any idea what this forum is. Or what a bounty campaign is. Or how to create a bitcoin wallet. Or how to accept bitcoin. Did you not read my suggestion about what kind of answer that I'm looking for in the very post that you quoted?
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Today is March 9th, 2018 and I confirm that bitcointalk account Adriano2010 (u=514126) belongs to this address 15kiC3Z6NTuyici2iYqi5oTZLWDsYpDgV1 -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
IJe7y9uHZwSs3PD4O1Z+Ta7yW6ZqJDP4FL0gE1GMvzr4B3OGh12i7bIEVg+VqqXivUv6subt6HmQV573kBJjBiw= -----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Try now. I signed the message with Mycelium. I don't know why after i paste message here and copy from bitcointalk , is failed to verify
Although your address is valid, your signature verification has failed using both Bitcoin.com and BlockExplorer.com
|
|
|
Why do we need to discuss this since we all know that there are a lot of people who will apply on something as long as they know they will be paid even though they are not eligible. Maybe they can't read or they are just dumb.
Because if even one potential shitposter reads this topic and changes their mind about blindly applying to a bounty campaign, then this topic will have served its purpose. The changes start with one user st a time, and I actually commend OP for taking the time to record and publicly announce his observations.
|
|
|
my biggest mistake was to request merit under one of them and I can not join any signing campaign at the moment. I recommend you do not run away easily. otherwise your account will be garbage like mine.
Given your post history, I would say you made your biggest mistake in BCT history on December 17 when you registered your account. You haven’t contributed anything to the forums, and are only interested in utilizing the forums to shitpost so you can rank up to earn bounties. While this is a great incentive for members, it shouldn’t be the sole purpose of joining the forums, which is exactly why the merit system was introduced.
|
|
|
1.How to calculate bitcoin fee? 2.mention 10 of bitcoin developers?
Q: Why is Bitcoin so expensive? I can't afford a bitcoin. The financial crisis in 2008 led to a shake-up of people's trust in banks, and Bitcoin emerged as the first currency from peer 2 peer without having to go back to the financial system "the future currency".
I want this thread to be a tool for users to arm themselves with information that isn’t wildly technical. The majority of questions that newbies ask aren’t technical, so the questions you’ve asked aren’t generally popular ones asked when trying to learn about what bitcoin is. Regarding your answer, when I’m asked this, it’s usually because they have no idea that you don’t have to buy a full bitcoin. The answer that I’m looking for is one that includes that you can buy any amount of bitcoin that you can afford. Want to restructure your answer and post again so I can merit somebody in this thread?
|
|
|
|