Bitcoin Forum
July 05, 2024, 03:59:59 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 ... 126 »
681  Other / Meta / Re: Replacing DefaultTrust on: January 05, 2015, 05:28:52 PM
^^ On top of this, I'd personally implement not being able to remove feedback?

Why? What if you're wrong or you change your mind? Feedbacks aren't always for scamming and people can always change or improve over time.

If you change your mind, you'd simply leave another +1 or -1, respectively.

But what if what you left is completely wrong? Or you made a typo  Cheesy.

You'd be smart enough to check, and state your error in the next feedback you post.
OR
Allowing feedback to be deleted within 5-10 minutes of leaving it.
682  Other / Meta / Re: Replacing DefaultTrust on: January 05, 2015, 05:21:53 PM
^^ On top of this, I'd personally implement not being able to remove feedback?

Why? What if you're wrong or you change your mind? Feedbacks aren't always for scamming and people can always change or improve over time.

If you change your mind, you'd simply leave another +1 or -1, respectively.
683  Other / Meta / Re: Replacing DefaultTrust on: January 05, 2015, 03:40:55 PM
^^ On top of this, I'd personally implement not being able to remove feedback and being able to leave multiple points/feedback.
If someone deserves a negative, you can give one to them. And if they, for example, stop scamming and become a better user - you leave them another +1 feedback and get them back on track, while leaving their scamming history and allowing users to see what happened in the past. Because what's stopping you from scamming someone when you have +10 trust points?
I for one think we should be able to see the entire account history and see what they did - trust-wise - the entire time they've been registered on BT.
684  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Bitstamp - hot wallet problem on: January 05, 2015, 01:32:22 PM

Could also be stamp moving coins to safety...
,
That's probably correct. If those were stolen, I guess Bitstamp would put out an announcement.
They don't have a history of suspicious stuff like MtGox did (yet).
685  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Hrvatistan on: January 05, 2015, 12:48:22 PM
Neg, da vas priupitam, gdje mogu tu u hr kupit manje količine btc-a, cca- 100-200 kn?

Ako si u Splitu, javi se meni.

Inace, imamo svoj subforum, sad mozes otvarat novi thread za pitanja Wink
686  Economy / Exchanges / Re: www.BITSTAMP.net Bitcoin exchange site for USD/BTC on: January 05, 2015, 12:10:28 PM
Any info on what is happening at this point? Why is everything stopped?

Quote from: bitstamp.net
We have reason to believe that one of Bitstamp’s operational wallets was compromised on January 4th, 2015.

You guys are getting goxed Grin

stamped might become the new goxed.  Let's hope not.

It has a certain "touch" to it Grin

687  Other / Meta / Re: Replacing DefaultTrust on: January 05, 2015, 11:15:03 AM
I changed it so that the 60 users with the most points are selected (minimum 20 points), and then 30 of these are randomly chosen to be displayed. The random sort is now weighted according to points, though, so people with more points are more likely to appear in the list and to appear higher in the list. Otherwise there'd be a good chance that the list would be filled mostly with people who aren't so widely trusted. 20 points isn't really that many.

Are we talking about the same point system? 1 point = 1 positive trust rating you got?
688  Other / Meta / Re: Replacing DefaultTrust on: January 05, 2015, 10:27:44 AM
Randomizing it within a list of people that meet the basic requirements ensures some users aren't displayed more often than others

But that's not the case right now, the same 30 users are always shown.
In that case all this will do is ensure those 30 users will get high trust rankings and everyone else will be left in the dust.

The trust depth is still set at 2. Those 30 people have other people in their trust lists.
Yes, but my point is that if those are the only 30 displayed they will be the ones getting funneled all of the new user trust (increasing their trust rating) and it will be an endless cycle of more people trusting them producing a huge rift, and basically just reproducing the default trust list in a slightly modified form.

That's maybe why it isn't good for newbies to choose this. You can and should add people you trust to your trust list.
And do/should newbies trust anyone?
689  Other / Meta / Re: Replacing DefaultTrust on: January 05, 2015, 10:23:40 AM
Randomizing it within a list of people that meet the basic requirements ensures some users aren't displayed more often than others

But that's not the case right now, the same 30 users are always shown.
In that case all this will do is ensure those 30 users will get high trust rankings and everyone else will be left in the dust.

The trust depth is still set at 2. Those 30 people have other people in their trust lists.
690  Economy / Exchanges / Re: www.BITSTAMP.net Bitcoin exchange site for USD/BTC on: January 05, 2015, 10:21:34 AM
Any info on what is happening at this point? Why is everything stopped?

Quote from: bitstamp.net
We have reason to believe that one of Bitstamp’s operational wallets was compromised on January 4th, 2015.

You guys are getting goxed Grin
691  Other / Meta / Re: Why Simple Machines forum & not anything else ?. on: January 05, 2015, 10:20:27 AM
^^ That happened, and CosbyCoin happened Grin
692  Other / Meta / Re: Replacing DefaultTrust on: January 05, 2015, 10:16:57 AM
I agree with Vod, newbies will probably forget about it when it's set. Perhaps writing up a thread about the trust system and forcing newbies to read it? The text on the current suggest page looks good, but it's important and should be made looking more important.
Maybe a sticky in trust-enabled sections too?
693  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Bitstamp - hot wallet problem on: January 05, 2015, 09:12:39 AM
Well, at least they're dealing with the situation professionally.

Or maybe they're trying to keep you from selling? Might they be out of fiat?
694  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Sretan Božić on: January 04, 2015, 09:53:12 PM
puno trejdanja i profita
neka ova bude malo bolja od prethodne :]
Kako ide naša stara poslovica šta se tiće sexa

lani umalo a ove godine malo rijeđe a kako kod tebe?

695  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Trejdate li? Gdje? on: January 04, 2015, 09:35:00 PM
evo nisam jedini došao do zaključka i ovi su došli.
http://bitcoinvox.com/article/1359/bitcoin-prices-under-fire-hit-a-lowest

This falls is preoccupying as it triggers a dangerous vicious circle, because miners may have to sell more BTC to cover their electricity and storage expenses, which could bring even more sell orders.

This heavy BTC prices' drop is probably due to some settlements date for mining farms. The fact that BTC prices have suffered even more on the Chinese Exchanges, evolving under $265 on Huobi, might point out some big BTC mines there.
Lagani savjet držite BTC čak i dokupite još BTC.

Je. Zadnjih par tjedana vec kruze price o smanjenju difficultya, i ukupnog hashratea mreze.
Neki mineri su se vec i ugasili jer postaje neisplativo.
696  Other / Off-topic / Re: Whats the best legitmate way you know of making money? on: January 04, 2015, 09:29:39 PM
Run a casino.
697  Economy / Speculation / Re: Who the hell is selling right now? on: January 04, 2015, 09:17:30 PM
As I've been told, China is selling.

http://bitcoinity.org/markets/list
698  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Trejdate li? Gdje? on: January 04, 2015, 09:03:49 PM
Ne vjerujem sebi, a kamoli tome Grin
Gdje si to cuo?


Evo vidim sad i sam... Nevjerovatno.
http://bitcoinity.org/markets/list
699  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why Bitcoin is dropping and why you should be buying. on: January 04, 2015, 08:56:05 PM
I think bitcoin is dropping because merchants are selling the bitcoins they received during christmas shopping. When those who spent bitcoin replenish their bitcoin holdings, price will rise again.
Most merchants use Coinbase, which means the merchant never owns Bitcoins at all. Coinbase then dumps their incoming Bitcoins on Bitstamp, so they can pay the merchant in fiat. Thus, all the holiday season transactions are over.

Doesn't Coinbase have its own exchange?
700  Economy / Speculation / Re: I'm calling the bottom here at $255.00 on: January 04, 2015, 08:38:59 PM
Winrar! Grin Grin Grin



It held ground!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 ... 126 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!