|
Evo je Ghash.io udario u 51%.
Jebeno.
|
|
|
|
|
Have they started double spending yet?
|
|
|
|
CEX.IO together with GHash.IO are not intending to capture the 51% of the overall Bitcoin hashrate.
Our team consists of dedicated Bitcoin adherents, large investors into this cryptocurrency and people who get their wages in Bitcoin. Thus, there is logically no point for us to crash the system and kill the coin.
CEX.IO has been working on possible ways of decentralising Bitcoin mining since February. We will present our solutions to the Bitcoin community in the nearest time and ask you for understanding our intentions in the right way.
Have you blocked users from adding additional hashrate already? |
|
|
|
In a free market economy, u cant expect the leader to step down. The competitors should step up. Or it should be regulated by authority (in this case bitcoin protocol itself). It should be possible to force anyone from amasing hash power like that on protocol side. It's not Ghas that should fix this, devs are ones that need to secure network on protocol level. You can't just blacklist an entire pool. You cant blacklist, but u can cease its mining power programmatically with protocol level modification. Please read the proposition => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=650778.0But you talk about leaving it at 49%. That's still way too dangerous. It can be set to any "max" level...even "only p2p" can be forced on protocol level. Best and only way to protect network is portocol, not hardware. Exactly and I dont understand why 49% is at risk, though its just a max variable that the community can decide upon. But whether a protocol level modification is possible and be accepted is a bigger question. I believe except for GHash.IO all other miners will accept it. Probably the independent participants at Ghash.IO too. 51% means that double spending would be at a 100% success rate. You could still endanger Bitcoin in such a way with 49% as well. I'll again repeat myself and say that Ghash could keep all the hashing power if they were to split to independent pools. |
|
|
|
In a free market economy, u cant expect the leader to step down. The competitors should step up. Or it should be regulated by authority (in this case bitcoin protocol itself). It should be possible to force anyone from amasing hash power like that on protocol side. It's not Ghas that should fix this, devs are ones that need to secure network on protocol level. You can't just blacklist an entire pool. You cant blacklist, but u can cease its mining power programmatically with protocol level modification. Please read the proposition => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=650778.0But you talk about leaving it at 49%. That's still way too dangerous. |
|
|
|
Time to bring the ddos lasers out of retirement?.........  Launch the LOIC! Nope, I'm not doing that. After all, it's against the law. |
|
|
|
In a free market economy, u cant expect the leader to step down. The competitors should step up. Or it should be regulated by authority (in this case bitcoin protocol itself). It should be possible to force anyone from amasing hash power like that on protocol side. It's not Ghas that should fix this, devs are ones that need to secure network on protocol level. You can't just blacklist an entire pool. |
|
|
|
They find the most blocks.
and it's a useless way of mining ... a pool that win more block don't pay more !you win BTC with a constant GH/s speed. even in a little pool ... you win the same amount even if it don't find more than 5 block per day. I know, I just wanted to say that people find that attractive and have the wrong opinions. That's what lead to these 50%. |
|
|
|
Brazil - Croatia Have you watched the entire match? That Nishimura gifted the win to Brazil. There wasn't even a real foul yet he decided to give them a free penalty kick. Also when Croatia scorred and he said that Olic played with his hand but the ball hit his head..  I guess Brazil will win the WC this year. Probably. I'm Croatian. But I've relaxed, and have thought about it. If Brazil lost, there would be riots on the streets. Who knows if the tournament would continue. The bad side is that Croatia played this opening match, could've been anyone else. |
|
|
|
|
They're switching with 50% and 49%. It's dynamic.
But I believe it's gonna be okay for now. They should take care of it in some way though.
It's so popular just because of this reason. It's the biggest pool and everyone goes there. They find the most blocks.
|
|
|
|
BUY BUY BUY BYU!
Get your cheap coins, we're going to 1k.
Let me guess. You are one of the same people earlier who said "SELL SELL SELL we're going to $400"? I never sell unless I'm gonna buy later, nor I ever tell anyone to sell. |
|
|
|
|
BUY BUY BUY BYU!
Get your cheap coins, we're going to 1k.
|
|
|
|
I just woke up like few minutes ago, and already feel much better after I do checked charts  Volume is amazing .... Price is waiting Today is a good day. Bitcoin was saved, we're back on the choo choo train, and the weather is beautiful. |
|
|
|
Ja sam kupio na 620. Nisam uopce mislio da ce doc to do 550. Al nema veze, sve ispod 10000 je kako kazu "cheap coins". Da i ja mislim da je to dobra cena . Mogao si bolje ali i to je dobro. A koliko si kupio po toj ceni ako nije tajna ? 20 i kusur. Evo nas nazad u 600, bit ce sad super |
|
|
|
|
It's okay now. GHash seems to have temp-fixed it. Stuck at 49% now. So far so good, but they should still split it all into smaller independent pools because this is just too much.
|
|
|
|
LAst night 10k of sold BTC dropped price of BTC for 100$. It all depends on market deapth in that time what will happen with price. If someone puts buying wall it can all be sucked up w/o price ever noticing it. If there is no wall, it can bread price down to whatever...but thing is, it would rebound quickly (like it's rebounding right now)
Yup! Look, we're back in the 600s Time to start buying again. |
|
|
|
To da moon! Back to $600. This was quick |
|
|
|
You do realize that THAT happens all the time. Yeah, but now they started paying attention. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
