I'm not familiar with how TradingView rewards its publisher, but do you really need to pay them and must have at least 20 subscribers before you make a profit? The numbers seem to come out of nowhere. I never heard similar things from others who create new threads and wanted to share their strategy with others. Personally, I also feel less inclined to join a random group just to know if it works or not, especially if the members are so few.

Why would it need to advance science? Bitcoin is not scientific research, so obviously it will just incorporate the most secure algorithm available at the time it was developed. I wouldn't be surprised if a new algorithm comes out and is stronger, without a ton of drawbacks, people will fork or move to that. Besides how does it help to avoid scams even if satoshi or others make a new algorithm? Most retail users don't really care about the nitty-gritty tech.

Where does this hating science narrative come from? Due to the fact that many disprove the narrative that mining consumes a lot of energy or produces a ton of waste? That doesn't make sense. Most arguments that they bring to disprove this also use scientific research. Why would anyone hate science if it can improve Bitcoin or help its adoption?

The mod can probably pin one or two of them if the wallet is popular and there's tons of discussion around it. Although the question would be probably what kind of topic needs a new thread instead of posting it on the mega thread. From my experience pinned thread tends to get more views even from beginners, so that's that. Kinda hard to prove since it is based on my gut feeling in the end though.

I mean, both can be true. The previous news could be fake and the one who shared the story is just lucky that his fake news has more weight now. I'm also surprised to see the rally this morning, at the very least this proves that people are very easy to get into fomo when there are some speculative changes on the market. Nothing wrong with securing their profits though, it is impossible to make money if you don't follow the market to begin with. CMIIW.

Where does this conversation happen? So basically your goal is to solve this port-blocking issue? I think the point that the government can easily block your access is quite overstressed here. While they can force your ISPs to do it, I doubt it would be faster than people moving to different ports or randomizing it. CMIIW.

Anyway, I second the suggestion to move this to development & technical discussion instead of the mining board. You can do it by clicking the move button on the bottom left of your thread.

Looks like your platform is already running and has some projects already. I tried to see the contributors list on some projects and some of them have no name. Are they anonymous or is that a bug? It looks a bit weird when you have a list of named users and then a blank one with some random profile picture.

Why not make an ANN thread on the Service discussion board if you want to attract new users or looking for feedback? Not many people visit this board afaik, so you'll get less exposure here.

If I'm not wrong, segmentation fault usually occurs when there are one or two missing libraries/not installed correctly. Some errors in the past also suggest this[1]. One of the users fixed it by installing pycrypto on his own.

How do you install python and pywallet? Maybe experienced people can help you more if you also post the full logs and your installation steps. CMIIW.

[1] https://github.com/jackjack-jj/pywallet/pull/13

Can you do an ELI5 of your idea because I can't really understand how it actually works or how it is competitive over other solutions to "decentralize real-world assets"? If your goal is just tokenization why not use stuff like side-chain or something similar? I don't think most people would agree to change how the system works just because you want to print tokens of your cow.

Kalau lokasi agan di Jakarta sepertinya ada kemungkinan bisa kopdar sama member di sini, cuma yang ane kenal sih kebanyakan tinggal di luar Jakarta. Mungkin bisa agan main di Telegramnya SFI, tapi jangan kaget kalau tetap ga ada yang mau ketemuan. Rata-rata yang mau kopdar biasanya sih udah kenal duluan di forum, alias kebanyakan kopdar itu lebih mirip kumpul" member yang saling kenal, bukan kaya seminar atau sejenisnya yang terkesan lebih formal. Bisa dimengerti juga sih, khususnya kalau agan diajak orang yang ga dikenal buat ketemuan juga pasti bakal ragu" sekalipun mereka ngaku member Bitcointalk sekalipun.

Mau nambahin aja, ane pengguna Ryzen dan prosesor AMD itu sangat suka sama RAM yang frekuensinya tinggi. 3200 MHz itu baseline untuk penggunaan yang nyaman menurut ane, kalau mau lebih tinggi lebih baik. Ane punya 4 RAM yang identik dengan profil yang sama dan kalau dibandingkan dengan 2 vs 2 dengan profil yang sama, memang ada perbedaan sedikit kalau agan melakukan kerja yang membutuhkan aktivitas memori dan prosesor yang tinggi. RAM yang ane pake GSKILL Trident, ane ga tahu kalau VGEN yang mau agan bayu beli gimana. Kalau chipnya sama mungkin ga beda jauh, masalah pendinginan mungkin yang beda karena biasaya Vgen heatsitnya biasanya lebih murah, CMIIW.

Senada sama agan taufik di atas ane gan, kebetulan saja itu. Kalau sudah jadi target phishing pesan kaya gitu juga bakal tetap datang mau agan deposit ke bank atau engga. Agak heran juga sih karena ane hampir tidak pernah dapat pesan seperti ini, malah Telegram ane yang lebih ramai dapat pesan aneh dari user tidak dikenal. Entah apakah penyerang ini pake database yang dijual di black market atau dia crawl nomor HP agan di sosmed atau bagaimana.

Btw, ane baca barusan ada malware khusus yang secara spesifik menyerang hardware laptop tertentu[1]. Sepertinya di Indo ga ada sih yang seperti ini, tapi ga ada salahnya kalau agan hati" dan selalu cek apakah ada security update untuk perangkat agan atau tidak, siapa tahu ada zero-day exploit yang baru ditemukan oleh pengembangnya.

[1] https://thehackernews.com/2023/10/qubitstrike-targets-jupyter-notebooks.html

Congrats gan. Btw ane rasa bukan masalah salah atau kurang pengetahuan dalam beraktivitas kalau agan salah nyebut pembuat ekstensi forum dan sejenisnya, ya memang karena kurang tahu atau salah baca aja. Problem yang menurut ane cukup mudah asalkan agan giat membaca. Jangan terlalu berkecil hati juga toh yang udah banyak umur di forum juga bisa salah kalau dia ga selalu up to date dengan perkembangan forum. Ane sendiri jarang main di Meta dan beberapa perkembangan/situasi forum kadang telat tahunya. Sering" main di berbagai board aja kalau agan ingin memperluas pengetahuan umum agan seputar forum, kripto, dst.

Idealnya sih agan juga bisa memverifikasi kodenya sendiri. Untungnya untuk ekstensi BPIP cukup mudah karena tinggal cek thread yang bersangkutan untuk memastikan link atau kode yang agan pakai sama dengan yang dishare oleh pembuatnya. Meskipun begitu jangan lupa kalau di store Google sendiri kadang ada yang mengaku-ngaku ekstensi BPIP. Jangan sampai download di store karena itu biasanya jalan utama penyebaran malware.

Sepakat. Kalaupun masalah keamanan tidak ada, setidaknya agan harus waspada mengenai kemungkinan masalah privasi. Ane sering nemuin orang jadi target phishing gara-gara IPnya diketahui lewat aplikashi spyware yang cuma ngoleksi IP saja. CMIIW.

Is there really no law in the US that can hold them accountable for doing terrible journalistic work? My search related to fake news usually ends up with information about defamation lawsuits. I don't think people can sue news agencies for that if they are sharing misinformation not related to any person. CMIIW.

I guess the only way to solve this is to stop relying on terrible journalistic websites or read at least three independent sources before you assume the information is legit. In an ideal world, Cointelegraph or other websites would die quickly after they share misinformation like this.

What is the name of the law that governs this? Sounds a bit similar to the defamation law above, but I'm not sure if we're referring to the same thiing or not.

So basically you're looking for calculator website like whattomine? They also have an ASIC section IIRC. I tried to access the cn domain for Bitmain but it seems their certificate has expired. I'd stick with Bitmain.com as of now. You can also verify it through their social media afaik. As for Iceriver, the website on their social media is the .io one. CMIIW.

From what I read online, most miners have cheap access to electricity, or they never sell their Bitcoin directly and speculate that the price will increase later on and then sell their mining results at that time. If you just start right now, it is naive to expect that your mining results would lead to profit directly. It is impossible unless you somehow spend nothing to get your RIG and energy.

Your strategy assumes that Islamic traders are a huge force in Bitcoin trading, all Islamic traders follow the same interpretation of the law, or Arab traders are key influencers on the market. I don't think all of those are true. At the very least, their influence on the market is arguably low compared to the US or Chinese market. Not to mention I doubt most of those traders will follow the interpretation that directly affects their means to make money.

There is really no need to force people to sell Bitcoin as low as possible if your target is just to make a profit. Just keep buying and DCA your way and stop being panicky every time there is bad news. If my experience tells me anything unless you have a ton of capital trying to change the trend instead of following the trend is futile.

From what I understand, these rules apply to companies that are EU-based. So does this mean companies that are not EU-based can just ignore it, or will the government force them to either stop people from using their services or force them to do KYC too? Based on how the SEC handles their lawsuit against Binance etc, I suppose the second one is more likely.

It would be quite funny if those DEXes suddenly started implementing KYC because they have a legal entity behind their website, which means they are not decentralized at all.

What kind of safety are you looking for in the first place? It definitely improves your security if you want to prevent some random person from spending your money with one key if they manage to exploit it, at the same time it also introduces risk if you (and your co-signer) lose their keys. But if you store your keys recklessly I doubt it would help you that much. Multi-sig or not, it can't help you from being hacked due to social engineering or something similar. As far as I can remember, most Bitcoin hacks are related to those things (storing keys on cloud storage, etc). CMIIW.

This is a basic marketing strategy for a service like this. I've seen at least three projects in the last few months that require API access say the same thing, but can't completely convince me that they can secure the API data. I'd advise people to be cautious if a centralized service requires your API key, especially if an open-source trading tool becomes freely available.

Btw, OP just woke up from a long period of inactivity, his last post was in 2018, and then he made a promotional post with a referral link like this. Anyone should be aware about that issue before they try the service. Better to be safe than sorry.

Have you checked the thread and see if Bitcart serves your purpose? I'm not familiar with them but it sounds like it can be an alternative if you want to accept Bitcoin and Altcoin on a lightweight server. From what I understand, running a full node is optional, unless you want full control[1]. CMIIW.

I'd definitely try them out first before you try a relatively unknown processor in the market. While both of them are quite unpopular, I think an open-source alternative is preferred.

[1] https://github.com/bitcart/bitcart/discussions/277