Owner of a scam coin who stolen over 1 billion $ is an admin of polyx exchange telegram.
To me this is enough to say, POLYX is overall a ponzi and trying to get as much as funding as possible to run away. Them hiring a manger who already scammed 1 billion $ from another shitty project in past clearly makes them untrustworthy and unsafe for any investment or engagement too. Really, there is no way to put someone as shady as this guy as a manager, it sucks ! I can bet a horse on this project being shady AF, and expect someone from DT to tag the thread start here, which seem to be the account of this dick headed manager and even there official account Polyxchange. I see it very stupid for someone to pull out a big scam and come back with the same identity but as a bounty manager of another shit project !  |
|
|
|
You have been judged guilty of not agreeing with everything him and his friends say.   nutildah: Doesn't it sound like hacker1001101001 is trying to get into TECSHARE's trust list. Because TECSHARE said this: Even if it didn't benefit me personally, I would still be happy including them simply based on the fact that the resident clown car passengers excluded them. Given their history of abuse I would say anyone they are targeting is worth considering for inclusion.
I am going to bang you for trust list abuse ! LOL. |
|
|
|
Even if it didn't benefit me personally, I would still be happy including them simply based on the fact that the resident clown car passengers excluded them. Given their history of abuse I would say anyone they are targeting is worth considering for inclusion.
Again, not a great reason to add someone to your trust list. Again, you too don't have any great reasons to exclude someone in your trust list. Example: ME. |
|
|
|
This becomes more and more relevant now that more and more veteran Bitcointalk users collect a small amount of negative feedback.
Yes, dude..  you really got that a bit early. It's turning the same now with many members around who are not really an harm to a newbie here. As you already know the main moto of theymos behind it overall is warning newbie visitors of the forum from probable scams around, but its seems to be changing the direction towards a system to attack arising in personal disputes. ( No real trade happened, and no funds are lost in most of the recent back and forth of feedbacks between reputed members here if you see. ) Hope your suggestion would make a difference ! |
|
|
|
This claim still needs some development, but the OP of that thread would be able/allowed to open a type 1 flag against GP.
With sufficient support, it would give GP the "!!!" tag next to his trust score, and show a red notice (instead of neutral yellow) above his threads.
You are wrong, as type 1 flag would not give GP this tag " !!!" you are talking about. GP already has 2 active type 1 flags on his profile. You would have to go with starting a contract violation flag, which would give the user a " Trade with extreme caution" and " !!!" sign on his profile. But there is a thing to be followed , to start such type of flag against anyone. Just to confirm, you are not allowed to create a contract violation flag unless you were personally harmed, correct?
Correct. So, if the victim in the mentioned thread would do so, it would be better. |
|
|
|
To be clear - I'm stating that TECSHARE's trust ratings should not be considered honest and there is an agenda behind his trust list manipulation. He is scamming the trust system. :/
I think one can use ~TECSHARE to solve this issue and to avoid his ratings. He is in DT due to the community inclusions he has received, it cannot be stated as scamming the trust system nor manipulation. Or you could solve this issue by using ~Vod, I would think that would be a more effective solution, especially since he is abusing the trust system again to play his little petty games of retribution. Vod 2019-09-09 Reference " This profile has fundamentally abused the trust system, trading positive trust with as many others as possible to get on Default Trust. See reference and the BPIP DT Change Log for examples. Do not trust this profile's trust of others by adding ~TECSHARE to your personal trust list. " This feedback left by VOD is total mess here, I don't know how he thinks this would help newbies to stay safe, as TECSHARE is not an harm to newbies here rather much helpful as it's seen. He has not even traded positive trust, and has reached DT due is own ways of dealing around with the issue's here. One can use trust list to handle such issue, really all this conspires as made up drama to hit TECSHARE, and get him off DT with whatever childish made up accusation you can. I didn't like some of his recent trust list changes so I removed him.
His most recent change was by rallier no longer distrusts Last of the V8sLook, perfect example of twisting the situation as per your agenda, its clearly stated by TECSHARE that he did this because he didn't like some of the changes in rallier's trust list. He said some changes and accuser's still starts cherry picking, to fit some agendas. This reflects really bad on you dude ! |
|
|
|
To be clear - I'm stating that TECSHARE's trust ratings should not be considered honest and there is an agenda behind his trust list manipulation. He is scamming the trust system. :/
I think one can use ~TECSHARE to solve this issue and to avoid his ratings. He is in DT due to the community inclusions he has received, it cannot be stated as scamming the trust system nor manipulation. |
|
|
|
Its relevant because it explains why OP's neg shows up as default now.
It is irrelevant because, TECSHARE already addressed the issue in an mutual manner, before you add some drama into it. Er what? You combined two thoughts into one here. If you must know, I distrusted you because I don't trust reformed shitposters that suddenly decide to take an interest in forum issues. You're trying too hard.
That looks like a solid reason from some on DT1. Still, everyone is a reformed shitposter here, if you see. And if that's how you see me I am more than happy to be someone who has at least reformed. You could never do this with your merry go round shit posting about judging and hunting people's around here yet.. Yes, you're exactly right. TECSHARE wants to fight trust abuse while regularly engaging in it himself.
You too do the same, its just you don't see yourself fitting in the example. |
|
|
|
What does that have to do with him including 7 Turkish DT1 users in his trust list within a week or two of them being added to DT1? Please, let's let him answer for himself.
What you are asking him is not even relevant to the issue in the OP. You never bothered to explain why you added me to your distrust list, and you are lecturing about someone else's inclusion, which is totally off topic here anyways. It always looks like how he says dude ! rules for thee but not for me
|
|
|
|
He's never interacted with these users as they all post exclusively on their local boards (except when they make the exception to visit Meta or Reputation to address trust-related issues). I'm going to assume that he doesn't speak enough Russian or Turkish to understand the ratings left by these users and (for the most part) they don't speak enough English to understand his, and the only reason he included them was to gain enough votes to be back out of the negatives on DT. Without them, he would be back at -4.
That's pretty simple dear, they like how Mr.TECSHARE handles some forum situations like this one with mutual conclusions..  |
|
|
|
It doesn't appear on my profile until today... (it was in "untrusted feedback" before)
It is because someone from DT1 has included @ABitNut to there trust list, which made his feedback as someone from DT2 and it appeared under trusted feedback this week. As you can see, according to last Saturday's trust list update, no one from DT1 included him until then, hence the feedback appeared under untrusted feedback. http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-31_Sat_06.04h/331100.html. Please how to remove it ? If i start a thread for a project i'm gonna be labeled as a "probable scammer" which is innaceptable....
I see no solid, evidence ( like connected address ) of you being an alt of someone in the reference thread link posted with your tag so I am inclined to think it is a abuse. But the only way to get rig of it is to ask the persons himself to remove the tag from your account, or convince the DT1 who have included him in there trust list to remove him. And yaa, that's not a bannable offence, so don't stir it !
Secondly, AbBitNut isn't even in the DT2/DT1 list so there's no way that "that" old trust rating will show by default.
So from my point of view, if you get a false feedbacks that doesn't affect your account, you let it go and continue your activity on he forum.
He is in DT2, due to some inclusions from a DT1. I see it under trusted feedback on OP, I am using default trust list FYI. |
|
|
|
~snip~
Did you forget something? he asked for someone to create a new transaction with $5 fee bump, so he can sign and broadcast it since no one here seems to actually provide him with such transaction, but his dev created it he doesn't have to pay/reward anyone, unless I'm missing something here You are right, he is not inclined to pay anyone here as none of them helped in the solving the transaction problem, and asking about it is somewhat stupid. Anyways, he has already paid the bounty ( funds to help ) to his dev, as he stated here.
@StackGambler, I am more than interested to know, basic details about how your dev managed to change the output address ? It would be nice if you can let us know.. Thank You ! |
|
|
|
My initial thoughts, given his history is speculation that he may be planning on depositing coin onto a casino that accepts zero-confirmation txs, make a single high probability bet, wait for confirmation if he wins the bet and withdraw, and to double spend the tx if the bet looses.
That is not possible, most of the gambling sites would only update your balance once the transaction has some minimum amount of confirmations. What @StackGambler did was just recovering it before it was confirmed by some miner. I don't think this tricks could be used to scam a casino, or even I do not believe, he was faking his problem by asking for help here, but still anything can happen and yaa NO SYSTEM IS SAFE ! It's great that StackGambler managed to get back his funds with the help of some dev, but it's bad to see most of the members here dragging him into speculation, and yet no one here was able to help him in solving the transaction problem. |
|
|
|
Both the accounts are most probably alts of each other under many evidence's you mentioned above, but I would also like to add, both of them are merit fans of each other, one of the top merit senders and receivers of each other as you can see here: Kalemder : https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=KalemderEl-cezeri : https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=El-CezeriThis also takes them to merit abuse. Eventhough, if they are participating in the same bounty with alts, they should be banned sooner. |
|
|
|
That being said i am not a fan of doxxing people and dragging their family members, have some maturity when you do that because India is not a bitcoin friendly country and that could get them in real trouble.
I agree with this and it is very true, people could get in trouble by this online doxxing in many ways in real life. I think there should be some moderation in effects here, as this just hampers the community around and is not good on anyone's part. Still, this is posted outside the investigation section, so the thread is already in a wrong place. |
|
|
|
if you can't post it and you can't see it then how the hell you linked investigation thread with this account? I am too pretty curious about this, as it only points to having another higher ranked account. ( I am not accusing anyone here but that's just how it looks ) You logged in using that account just nine days ago, so I assume you still have the login credentials.
He doesn't, it could be a impersonator. I thought this account was locked with the password posted publicly?
He posted the password of mdayonliner publicly. Not his alt. |
|
|
|
~snip~
You could just straight away tag him, that's not someone here could stop you from anyways. I agree he did a bad move by using others work, it would surely be considered as very shady activity in real animation industry. But on the other side there should always be a way to correct the mistake or atleast do better work next time and most of the people here would agree he is pretty trusted with large amount of funds and would probably not repeat the same mistake again. Rest is just your move, which would cost in some ways destroying a hard built account. |
|
|
|
^ With all due respect to both of you suchmoon and Lutpin, you guys did wrong when you both changed your feedback to neutral because it's on entirely wrong argument. It should remain to Negative, so I am leaving my rating to this account. In case this thread gets locked then follow this,my reply in main threadNegative trust would be harsh use of trust system and wrong sense of judgement from someone in DT. It would more effectively just increase the drama around due to a years old mistake. Some are already stating it as drama in some sense : Been out for a week, must have missed some drama There is some kabit9 VS legendster doxxing drama going on. Just move on @JSRAW, you should know what theymos said about forgiveness around the forum. And I can say, by seeing at his recent history here, that mistake could be the last mistake he did about copying portfolio. |
|
|
|
Is there a particular reason why admin is not very proactive here?
I wouldn't say the admins are not proactive, rather it is based in priority, lots of cases are in the pipe line needing to be fixed and yours could get added but it would have to wait for the queue to be cleared. Coupled with the day to day running of the forum I would say they got their hands full. This is a 2 year old thread dude, you can't even say that ! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
