I wish people would stop calling it my Coin as I only do work on the codebase along with other people.
The post in question was a reply in which they said it was a fake Coin and I should make a Scrypt.cc Coin so I posted why it is infact a real Coin and what should be done to prove the claims being made because I can and do prove everything cryptographically. I did not say to buy it and they wouldn't anyways nor are the instant gratification types beneficial to any real project. My point in this thread here was that my post was deleted as being off-topic but everyone promotes the projects they are interested in and in the same thread were also promotions for hashnest, bitgold and all kinds of other Staking Coins as alternatives and those were not deleted.
If you are going to moderate and decide what is alright to post then why not moderate and shut down the scams that won't prove the claims they are making?
The Gethashing forums has a watchlist section and if a service is posting but cannot prove the claims they are making then they move the thread there, that would be a fairly easy solution without directly shutting down threads.
You could also do a type of rating system for threads based on weight a person has (number of posts, forum ranking, time spent) and let people rank threads. I am aware of the market for buying and selling accounts but that would not have enough of an impact compared to the amount of people that hold onto their accounts.
The post in question was a reply in which they said it was a fake Coin and I should make a Scrypt.cc Coin so I posted why it is infact a real Coin and what should be done to prove the claims being made because I can and do prove everything cryptographically. I did not say to buy it and they wouldn't anyways nor are the instant gratification types beneficial to any real project. You've done so in manner that rather than proving it is a real coin, showcases it's features, cluttering the topic up with off-topic images. My point in this thread here was that my post was deleted as being off-topic but everyone promotes the projects they are interested in and in the same thread were also promotions for hashnest, bitgold and all kinds of other Staking Coins as alternatives and those were not deleted. I've deleted numerous off-topic discussions about other services in the discussed thread. Your post was brought to my attention via a report. If you notice any kind of spam, use the report feature. If you are going to moderate and decide what is alright to post then why not moderate and shut down the scams that won't prove the claims they are making? Way too much subjectivity (which you already are complainging about without said policy), the huge volume of possible situations, the time required to investigate a single situation, often shaky evidence and lack of anyone reputable in the situation. You could also do a type of rating system for threads based on weight a person has (number of posts, forum ranking, time spent) and let people rank threads. I am aware of the market for buying and selling accounts but that would not have enough of an impact compared to the amount of people that hold onto their accounts. You clearly don't seem to understand that hero accounts are being sold en masse by account farmers rather than individual users. The system you described would allow for anyone who's somewhat wealthy to essentially control the content posted on the forum with relative ease. Thanks for answering all my questions and hope you understand deleting posts with content made as a point feels like a slap in the face, especially when users are allowed to posts hundreds of Monero threads and clutter up the forum with no recourse and no content other than "Monero is going to the moon!" So what is the line? Can you please clarify the differences and why one is tolerated over the other? |
|
|
|
just when i started with the v ...0.7 here comes the v.2.0  ... i will download it... i got looots of orphans with the v ....0.6, but with the v ... 0.7 just one, so with he v 2.0 i will get none xD... hope so  you are doing a great job. Ok I will look to not create updates so close together. The stuff I want to focus on over the next little bit will be node and network strength (getting more TOR nodes up), marketing, and refining of small fixes. |
|
|
|
i think they already releasing scam coins daily anyways
What if the coin could only be mined one-to-one with a BTC ?? Problem with these new AltCoins is they are backed by a promise and very little asset. NameCoin is already merge mined one-to-one with BTC. Im just typing out loud here, nothing promised but just a side chain discussion. Imagine ZZZ coin without any means of PoW or PoS. The only way ZZZ coin is rewarded is with a peg to BTC, and the only way to release the BTC peg is the destruction of the ZZZ coin. Miners receive the Fees. You can already do that with Coinprism and create colored Coins or is what you are talking about significantly different? I think Blackcoin already has something similar with Bithalo and that works through bitmessage where you would create a redeemscript through BTC. I've been thinking about how one would create a type of android app in which your wallet would connect through SSH and passwordless login (recent QR type cryptography) to connect to where you are hosting from. The same could be done for all types of OS so you can connect with your entire basket of Coins and rely more on Linux which is the easiest to build for. |
|
|
|
can we expect paycon in bittrex ?
I don't like how Bittrex expects that someone needs to fork out 3 BTC to get it listed along with constant warnings about delisting Coins if they do not meet their volume requirements. To put it in perspective, the entire amount of money spent so far on development has been about 4 BTC (which is actually really good) so the question is who would pay for that 3 BTC and would that justify paying for it to be listed? |
|
|
|
i think they already releasing scam coins daily anyways
What if the coin could only be mined one-to-one with a BTC ?? Problem with these new AltCoins is they are backed by a promise and very little asset. NameCoin is already merge mined one-to-one with BTC. |
|
|
|
I think one of the things holding back so many long-termers getting together is the fact that all the ones really capable are already working on different Coins and do not want to abandon their own projects or create new projects in which would further dilute the investment base.
^^^ This and also probably that there are enough coins already. Let's start making some of the good ones great, and quit making new coins. I see all this talk about legends, but all I see here are heroes.   Hi Friend! Yes and this is a good example because you have been working of Goldcoin for ages but not about to just abandon all the people that rely on you for a new Coin and creating many new Coins becomes a negative aspect. We can take iGotSpots for example in that he's made nearly a dozen different Coins and recently has come under fire for all the abandoned Coins and mergers. I would like to work together with more people, there are lots of great people around the forums so how could that be achieved without creating new Coins and further diluting the total investment base? |
|
|
|
I liked coinssources Dev recognition http://www.coinssource.com/coins-source-introduces-proof-honor-poh-nominate-vote-win/ Proof of Honor was an excellent program. The next phase of Bitcoin is SideChaining, secure public one-to-one sprocket to bitcoin. Currently, a new pegged coin would require a central coin holder to distribute as people peg their alts to BTC. The problem lies in creating new coins without centralization. Best solution I can come up with is creating instance of a new coin each time you peg to BTC, and weaving these instances around our individual alt coins. If we can create a group on GIT, starting with a hackcoin SHA256 (Bitminers) and all agree on the leading integer not related to our coins, we could make a hell of an adapter for BTC with AltCoins. I think one of the things holding back so many long-termers getting together is the fact that all the ones really capable are already working on different Coins and do not want to abandon their own projects or create new projects in which would further dilute the investment base. I really liked the Proof of Honor program myself, I had nominated Kingscrown from Exclusivecoin but voted for Sunny King (creator of Proof of Stake). What I didn't like about it was that you only had one choice, I would have liked to have been able to vote for more than one person. |
|
|
|
3. The Monero Community has this vendetta against Dash and many spend their time slinging childish insults, I don't care about which is better, same goes for Dash. What frontier would be complete without a Hatfield-McCoy-type feud? This is true in many respects and can be beneficial in many ways but should atleast be funny so if there are two parties calling each other fuckwits, retards and idiots it makes me want to take my business elsewhere. 2. Massive amount of Bloat that makes the Blockchain unsustainable for local users to hold, mining and the platform is centralized among Mymonero.
You could say the same about BTC, majority of users aren't running a full node storing the close to 40GB bitcoin blockchain, but some care enough to do it. Same with Monero. Ya talking about the blockchain-size and use it as weak-spot is pretty useless when almost everyone on btc is running electrum, multibit, blockchain.info and etc. It was mentioned early on about the very large size growth yearly from the Cryptonote Coins (multi-gigabytes per year), and if I remember correctly the growth of Monero was something like 6 GB a year (a correct figure would be nice). Such large growth per year centralizes the mining and the majority of the mining tends to happen through Mymonero as a result and if you have a Blockchain with more than 10GB of data then people do not bother to host nodes for it or local wallets. It is more anonymous with ring signatures but much more centralized because the majority are going to use their wallets through Mymonero, that increases rick and a central point of failure. There was mention of wanting to do pruning of the Blockchain in the original whitepaper but to date there has not been anything of the sort. In short, if Monero was as widely used as Bitcoin, the growth of the Blockchain would be completely unsustainable growing multi-gigabytes in size a month. Does Monero have electrum wallets? What are it's key strengths besides ring signatures and it's emission curve? |
|
|
|
Perfect, the newest release won't include TOR integration yet but will come with 3-4 new themes, new features, and general fixes. I will still need a little bit of time to do testing for full TOR integration but will be part of upcoming additions. |
|
|
|
1. TALK is the bitcointalk coin and has been around for 16 months. Any legends wanting to talk the time to download can have a fistfull (from me). Heros can have some too. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=864994.02. Cannabiscoins are in talks towards getting together and support one project. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=874423.03. If CON wants to focus on the extremely famous and/or notorious persons of BCT, I support that idea. It looks like there is a growing team of talent actively working on CON. I would really like that to have the more famous and/or notorious people to help me with working and shaping CON. I do not want to have it where people assume that it is my Coin because that would ultimately hinder it's progress, it only tends to be that way because I put so much work into leading it. I want people to throw down ideas and help make it great because the people that hold it and have been involved are the already the most upstanding people in Crypto. Any information you guys might want I can provide if you think it might help facilitate the process. |
|
|
|
|
I think whatever you choose to do, it would be better to just get involved in a current Coin rather than starting a new one or to do a project that can benefit current Coins and create profit as a result.
Just a bit of information, if you want to get listed on Bittrex, they want you to pay them 3 BTC, Block explorers generally cost 0.2 BTC and then hosting of nodes and mining (if POW), and then advertising, paying for developers and then the whole question of how it will be able to create profit after the initial pump.
|
|
|
|
https://blockchain.info/address/19mcjofGwKxGwhaZwDwPjdWd1KrFCZgoJJTransaction 945d04cfe0e057d416dfbaa1e87c3a946e11936490703cd4f9462d3db0dfc45920 . 15-07-17 21:17:28 . (1CcqxBd3peBVsiPve7UMyVwNzjraoiYQd9, . 19SjxkbXGpyAFyHDvCPJqJhGWWMEoAYazB) . ==> 19mcjofGwKxGwhaZwDwPjdWd1KrFCZgoJJ . 78.17727431 BTC Buy Orders: Price (BTC)....KHS..........Total (BTC) 0.00000268.....506,131.....1.35643108 0.00000267...1,072,674....2.86403958 0.00000266...14,004,755..37.25264830  Next price (tomorrow): 0.00000400 Cryptodevil, D4RK5T4R, ThePhwner & Crestington buying Nope, I will never put money into this because I believe that it's a SCAM and until Scamello himself proves with iron clad proof of his identity, his mining farm, all past and present mining stats and all previous and current payouts I will continue to call it as such. |
|
|
|
Are you running this on 32 bit? or 64 bit?
This is on a raspberry pi?
Yup. Pi has a 32 bit processor. But i figured the problem was in my build kit, as i might have had a qt5.3 build that i got off the internet, but all the other deps were limited to Debian Wheezy. Because of reasons if i tried to get all the build kit from jessie repos it would've upgraded all my system along with it and that is bad for a pi. In fact i compiled it on my Vps which is running debian 8 and it went smooth. Yeah you need 64 bit for TOR integration, lost a couple days on the build getting stuck on 32 bit. So I checked over the Cryptsy markets and the results have been quite surprising. Maybe it's a bit early to judge but we've seen more development (quality commits) in the past 6 months than 99% of all Coins listed at Cryptsy have had in the entire life. The only Coins I saw listed that had comparable amount of real work are. Clams Crave Blackcoin Dash Diamond HyperStake Mint NavajoCoin NetCoin NXT PPC Hobonickels To be honest I haven't really been following too many other Coins, is PayCon really one of the top designed Coins in existence? |
|
|
|
|
I would not buy Monero because
1. It's POW which would make it unsustainable to reach heights of $20, $100, or $1000 per Coin.
2. Massive amount of Bloat that makes the Blockchain unsustainable for local users to hold, mining and the platform is centralized among Mymonero.
3. The Monero Community has this vendetta against Dash and many spend their time slinging childish insults, I don't care about which is better, same goes for Dash.
The ring signatures is a nice feature for anonymity but the sheer amount of bloat outweighs the positives. I would definitely not be buying right now because of the many threads, many threads spamming is always the best indication to sell if you have it.
|
|
|
|
What the F** is Crypto Fagets?
Can I have the link please so I can check up, might be interesting.
LMAO. I believe *I* am the 'CryptoFag' referred to by the oh-so-clever use of substituting the word 'devil' in my username for the homophobic slur 'fag'. What the hell, you are facing the next problem.... Feel sorry for you, from all the people here there are only two that like you. Hmm actually not to bad for an Crypto fagget, maybe you should start the Homo or Gay coin. You will succeed whith the gay community, they are really into that "shit". You can even stop wanking in front of you monitor, you will find someone whom will do that for you. What an opportunity, ass smart a person you are why didn't think about that before? Wow. You want to be taken seriously and defend your right to invest, and this is the best rebuttal you can come up with. You make me sad for the human race. You're getting scammed as I type, and the only thing you can muster is homophobic drivel directed at someone who disagrees with you. And to the guy who named himself after a dog boner, we don't have a "hidden agenda." The scam site is the one with referral links and an affiliate program. We get nothing for promoting legitimate investments. Hey, naming me words and I can not reply or what? You are just the same dick head like your devil police friend. All about negativity, as many others I am still happy with scrypt and that will not change until they go down. I am not promoting them I am saying that they are still paying. You guys say what you like so I do....the more you will abuse me the more I will you. If scrypt is a scam or not, they are still paying. They can not take my money but they can a part of my profit if they like to, I cashed in already and so many others whom can sleep well with the rewards, yes still now. But most of them also have other investments with stable companys and just have an extra ride with scrypt You are incorrect, you sent BTC directly into Scamello's wallet so he own your money. You don't have any BTC, you have numbers on a screen and can only get his BTC if Scamello decides to send you some when you put in a withdrawal request, or just disappears with it. |
|
|
|
yes problem is crypto is just full of scamcoins now, too many to clean up, and many scaryingling doing every well on the crypto charts, sometimes the more you expose them the better they do  now my definition of a scamcoin is one created for the purpose of making the devs fiat. all ico, premines fit this category. only premine that is acceptable, is when by design its distribution methods is via (properly controlled and documented) giveaways or similar. Has this ever happened? Good point, I'm not sure that it has, never perfectly too my knowledge. clam could be something like that or at least closer than most other distribution mdoels so far. though it's not possible to tell if the devs did create some kind of ninja-premine for themselves by choosing a certain date that would benefit them. To my knowledge Clam couldn't have a Premine since it was distributed among addresses equally by a certain date The only way to premine in the developer sense was to have a significant list of transactions to withdraw clams from at distribution That said staking offsets a lot of that as the clam supply has grown a fair bit since then. Clam could have very easily had a pre/ninja/instamine if the developers (who set the cutoff date), created a shitload of dust addresses in doge, ltc, or btc blockchain. It probably would have cost them less than a penny to create thousands and thousands of doge addresses above the dust limit. I think it's a pretty poor distribution model. I thought the point of this thread was to carry out 51% attacks on the shittiest of the shitcoins just to rid them from the earth. Not to shout about this or that person's distribution method. From what I can tell, CLAM seems to actually have a fair number of miners/users---probably mainly because of just-dice---but in either case it seems like it hardly qualifies as the daily pum-n-dump coin that's all too common. I don't think Clams qualifies as something that should be cleaned up or hardforked and I doubt that you could hardfork it even if you wanted to. It's only really theory to say that they would have unfairly benefited from the distribution and has done well in both price and development anyways so I think it's a moot point. |
|
|
|
QObject::connect: No such signal AddressBookPage::stakeForCharitySignal(QString)
QObject::connect: (sender name: 'AddressBookPage')
QObject::connect: No such slot BitcoinGUI::gotoBlockBrowser(QString)
Jul 15 15:32:04.664 [err] tor_assertion_failed_(): Bug: src/tor/memarea.c:127: alloc_chunk: Assertion realign_pointer(res->next_mem) == res->next_mem failed; aborting.
Jul 15 15:32:04.664 [err] Bug: Assertion realign_pointer(res->next_mem) == res->next_mem failed in alloc_chunk at src/tor/memarea.c:127. Stack trace:
Aborted I think the fatal one is the tor one, and for instance i had the same problem with TRI, though i wasn't able to fix it. Thinking it might be a dep problem? Edit: found this in the interweb https://github.com/razor-coin/razor/issues/2Edit2: found this in the code (lines 60-65), i'll try to uncomment and build again uintptr_t x = (uintptr_t)ptr;
x = (x+MEMAREA_ALIGN_MASK) & ~MEMAREA_ALIGN_MASK;
/* Reinstate this if bug 930 ever reappears
tor_assert(((void*)x) >= ptr);
*/
return (void*)x Edit3:Doesn't work, i get the same error. Are you running this on 32 bit? or 64 bit? This is on a raspberry pi? |
|
|
|
#2 whale now , attacking #1 soon™
Wished my mother not plugged out the electric cable by mistake while i was i thailand *gggrrr* few weeks staking missing :/
That`s a lot CON,CAP, HYP, etc
You could have setup a VPS or another instance of the wallets somewhere to Stake where you could have access to, I have some guides on setting up a fairly secure VPS in the guide dump on the Gethashing forums. With your own hosted VPS or connection to your private server you can connect even through the command line and daemon. Yeah i know Never tought the power cable would be plugged out of my INTEL NUC. Happend while cleaning the floor, i guess. 33 active connection(s) to PayCon network. WoW never had that much. And my staking weight over 1 Million Hopefully it won't get too expensive once I start buying back in, I'll see if I can challenge you for top spot  |
|
|
|
Is there any website?
There was to begin with, Muddafudda had made a joke website but didn't keep it up, paycon.pw now redirects to Cryptsy lol. I've been wanting to create a new one but have been focused almost entirely on the Blockchain and the wallet itself because that is the thing that is the most important. There are the PayCon subforums as part of the Gethashing forums which is beneficial as well https://forum.gethashing.com/c/sub-forums/payconStill lots and lots I want to do. |
|
|
|
Allright tell me about that major updates maybe i can make a quikflip?
But still i know whats gonna happend at the end.
No but really you got my attention i wanna hear about updates
First update was a hardfork that completely changed the rewards at the end of the POW cycle and a change to the minimum difficulty, from 50% per year to 30 Coins per Block static, the change to the minimum difficulty was increased because the difficulty was so low that Stakes would try to hash too quickly. Later additions to Staking was an inclusion to a minimum time (atleast 10 seconds before another Stake can be included), as well as LiteStake which I had help from presstab to implement which drastically reduces the CPU load. As far as I know PayCon is the only other Coin in which has the LiteStake feature. Further POS alterations was an increase of the minimum Fee to match the new rewards and a reduction of the time drift from 30 minutes down to one minute which effectively closes possible time warp exploits. Features added or things changed -Fixed the IRC chat -Added links to all exchanges, links to the PayCon youtube channel, Forum link to the PayCon section on the Gethashing forums -SplitBlock - SplitBlock allows you to take a single Block or multiple Blocks of Coins and split them up into sizes of your choosing -Stake for Charity and Multisend - Stake For Charity allows you to have up to 50% of your Stake sent to a single address, Multisend allows you to automatically send Stakes to as many addresses as you want. -Refined estimated Staking times on minting notifications, estimated time to Stake, sorting by Weight and Age in Coin Control. -Select Blocks in Coin Control less or more than an amount, age or weight -Deleteaddress RPC and GUI -Moneysupply RPC (relevant money supply growth information) -setstakesplitthreshold (set the amount at which your Blocks will split when they Stake) -combinethreshold (set the amount at which multiple Blocks will combine once older than max age) -rescanfromblock -repairwallet removes orphans -Date range for sorting transactions (useful for viewing how many Coins you Staked on a given day, week or period) -Coin Control RPC (use Coin Control on RPC and useful when using the daemon) -Hashsettings RPC (adjust your time drift and hashing settings) -getstaketx RPC -getconfs RPC -addnode RPC (add nodes through RPC) -getweight RPC (view current weight) -DNS seednode added so clients connect to the network without needing a PayCon.conf file -TOR connection by default (hides all IP's and reroutes the entire network through TOR) -6 Themes, icons and moving the menu to the left side for easier access I think that's the majority of it, some small fixes as well so that you are not viewing orphans as part of balance, fix to unlock for Stake, addition of number of transactions to balances and probably some stuff I have missed. Also 5-6 promotional videos, Slack channel, Facebook (although I don't have time to keep up to date with it) and also did Stake week and a massive giveaway on the Gethashing forums for all those who lost money on PayCoin (I bought and Staked until I had 16% of the Coin and gave all of it away which also created a much more decentralized network, increased difficulty and security of the network). You can view the giveaway here https://forum.gethashing.com/t/paycon-muggle-relief-fund-giveaway-may-1st-8th-2015/3158/602All with no premine, fair launch. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
