Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 09:43:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 [367] 368 369 370 371 372 »
7321  Economy / Speculation / Re: Just hit a triple top with an interleaved double bottom. on: April 02, 2014, 09:57:30 PM
Indications are we could be heading for a double troop loop which I have not seen since 2011.

Nope, you sir have the analysis all wrong.

The charts clearly show that we are heading into a double bubble triple looper under and over inverse / extroverted whale splash curve trending to the moon then using a left handed smoke shifter to go to mars, not seen since early 2010.
7322  Economy / Speculation / Re: China or No China, Here's My Prediction for the Long-Term... on: April 02, 2014, 06:35:18 PM
Wait, weren't you the guy that said: "BTC will rise to $2000 by end of March 2014." Huh?

Yeah, he was.   Roll Eyes

Since my last prediction went so well Smiley, I am going to make another "most accurate" prediction ever:

BTC will rise to $2000 by end of March 2014.
….
Wow, censorship and negativity abound here today!!!

Do all specualtion have to be based on some tehcnical mumbo jumbo that explains nothing and predicts nothing?

Lighten up, folks!

Let's be positive, be merry and have fun. This is the end of 2013, let's await the arrival of 2014 with positive attitude and mental acuity. Let's get rid of this negative poisonous toxin you carry in you. Let IT go!!! Let us surround btc with positive energy and hope and pray that btc will rocket up!!!


….
I was wrong before but I believe I'm right this time. Let me explain:

Btc's fundamentals are strong (I have to throw in technical mumbo jumbo here, you know),
Rise in value in anticipation of overstock.com's adoption of bitcoins staring in July'2014,
Twinklevosses ETF will be approved, sooner than expected,
Wallstreet's flood gates will be opened soon afterwards or even before (insider info, you know),
China Syndrome has been effectlvely factored in already,
March'2014 marks the 6months time since the dramatic increase in hashrate and difficulty, which, some believe, causes dramatic effect on btc price (This is a tough one, there's a school of thought that says it has no, zero, nada, effect; and another school that says otherwise)

 
7323  Economy / Speculation / Re: China BANNED BITCOIN! This time for real! on: March 31, 2014, 09:01:53 PM
Thus I asked, are we letting China, or more fundamentally, one country to dictate the value of Bitcoin? Should we be thankful to the Chinese for driving the price of Bitcoin up?  Remember, if they can drive the price up, they can drive the prices down, and that means having control. Isn't Bitcoin supposed to be decentralized, free of any authoritative control? apparently it seems the Chinese is in control of Bitcoin

This type of selfish I have seen enough in China, and it makes me feel like home seeing it on an Enlish forum.

Chinese people use Bitcoin because it gives them something they otherwise should beg from the government. You praise bitcoin for beinng decentralized, so Chinese government, a centralized power, should be out of the picture. Why should not Chinese people enjoy the same advantage? Why when you are trying to free yourself from your big powers, we should be slaves to ours? And when we (Chinese) fail at our foe, being victims of a centrlized power, you just ask us out of the picture together? WHY YOU THINK CHINESE ARE THE ENEMY of decentralization, when WE ARE THE VICTIM of centralization?

Stop externalize China by PERSONALIZING China, as if we are a single big guy confronting you. It's a big country with lots of people, and there is a war going on here too.
-1

While I understand your frustration, please remember that it was your people that caused the crash back on Dec 5th out of FEAR of your government's actions.  And every time some silly rumor comes out about China halting Yuan deposits into Chinese bitcoin exchanges, again your people panic sell out of FEAR of your government's actions.  Yet again, time after time after time.  And because they know it works, your government will keep pulling that lever over and over until your people decide to stop being sheep.

So if native Chinese want the respect of those bitcoiners in other countries, then they need to earn it by:

1.  Stop panic selling every time your government or the PBOC sneezes or scratches its backside.
2.  Stop panic selling on false rumors of a ban, or even a true rumor of a ban.  China, or any country, cannot "ban" bitcoin.
3.  Stop treating bitcoin as if it is just a "get rich quick game."
4.  Stand strong, be proud holders of bitcoin, put up a fight.
5.  Demand that Chinese merchants be allowed to transact in bitcoin.
6.  If all else fails, then foster a Chinese grey market for bitcoin (or black market if need be).
7.  Did I mention HODL!?!?

Bitcoin is serious business, so only serious countries need apply.  Wink
7324  Economy / Speculation / Re: My proprietary Average Joe(tm) indicator has changed on: March 30, 2014, 06:34:23 PM
Selling to buy back lower to increase ones position is one thing (provided your hunch is right and it does indeed go lower).  But anyone that panics sells when 30%-50% underwater and "locks in" their losses just baffles me... I'm at a complete loss for words.  All because they have zero patience??
7325  Economy / Speculation / Re: rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;) on: March 29, 2014, 11:15:55 PM
The discussion on China is intriguing. You all appear to be looking at it only from the perspective of Bitcoin. You all appear to continue to have this tunnel vision which is forced on you by your vested interest. I think we need to fight our vested interest in order that we don't miss the bigger picture.

Am I correct that Chinese masses are more open to black market investments than Westerners? They have this shadow banking underground sub-economy wherein relatives refer each other to non-standard investments.

Thus is China forced to react more strongly because unlike in the west where Bitcoin appears to mostly limited to white males who hate central banking, in China perhaps they see the seeds of a mass movement towards Bitcoin, i.e. not as a currency for normal purchases but as an investment vehicle and an investment currency?

The differing regulation might tell us the different adoption demographics in each country. This might be a very insightful proxy.

If that assumption is correct, then apparently the Communist party are pushing Bitcoin further towards the underground economy.

This seems to play perfectly towards decentralized exchanges and anonymous coins.

I had already pondered that China (Asia) would be potentially the largest market for an anonymous altcoin.

Interested to read your thoughts. Hopefully someone can dig up some data.

AnonyMint, actually I don't see it just from the bitcoin perspective, but have read a lot of different articles on the subject of China's shadow banking system.  Do you believe that it grew out of frustration with the government-blessed conservative banking agenda around standard low return investments, or that the Chinese entrepreneurs typically are just greedy as hell and have way more appetite for risk?  

Sometimes I get the feeling that it's a cultural thing.  That typical Chinese are not conservative minded at all, but are like WallStreeters on steroids.  That they all feel they are entitled to be wealthy, and will do anything to get there, no matter who of their own people might get hurt along the way.  And that they feel that their government is just holding them back.  Sometimes it seems to me that the Chinese government knows this of their own people's engrained behavior (just look at their politicians, they see it in the mirror), i.e. that they can be irresponsible/corrupt with money and power, and wants to basically babysit and protect the Chinese people from themselves before things get out of hand.  Hence their government's popping of bubbles every time they pop up, like playing whack-a-mole.  Also, anything in China that approaches something that resembles a "mania" (e.g., Falun Dafa, Tiananmen square, etc.) is immediately squashed like a bug.  I'm sure their gov't is worried that bitcoin mania may start to go down this path as well.

Regardless, I think the shadow banking system in China is starting to show some serious cracks from being so over-leveraged.

On altcoins, I hear that there are now hundreds of Chinese-flavored alt coins, and that this is what they all now talk about on QQ instead of bitcoin.  True or..?  Not sure how anonymous any of them are though.
7326  Economy / Speculation / Re: rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;) on: March 29, 2014, 10:02:52 PM
I was wondering if Bobby Lee is correct about how the average Chinese exchange operates, and his observations do seem to be valid explanations of odd marketreactions in China, how can you still make any kind of usable market prediction considering all that fraud. To name a few, he lists, exchanges padding volumes with zeros, selling to itself, repeating past sales to hide low activity and phantom liquidity (via fake buy and sell orders that cause flash crashes when someones marketorder falls right through them), add to that zero fees and you've got a rather explosive mix, that's more destructive than helpful to the market.

If you consider this, then I'm having a real hard time seeing what is supposed to be so bad about the news that China is banning exchanges. If what Bobby says is even a little true, then the ban can't come soon enough in my opinion, in the mean time it might be a good idea for the market to completely disregard any market prices from China, because it looks like they do not have even remotely the marketshare or volume that everyone seems to believe they have and therefore should not have the same impact on marketprice either.

I think this is a good point.  Data providers should be advised of it.  Bitcoinwisdom, bitcoincharts, bitcoinity, etc.  The case is something like this:

(1) Once, it was important to add Chinese data, because it was a large and growing free market.

(2) The facts have changed, and like Mt.Gox before them, the Chinese markets are no longer free, nor growing.

(3) The Chinese data is now tainted.  Propagating it hurts the Bitcoin economy and the users of your service.



Tainted might be to nice a word for what's going on, we're talking faked numbers that are off by multiple factors of 10. I'd like to know where the current 10% CNY BTC-marketshare numbers are coming from, because if you can divide that number through 10 then what remains of the total volume then?

I'm starting to believe that the Chinese stake in the bitcoinmarket has been severely overestimated and even more damaging than the whole m-t-Gox fiasco.  It might indeed be advisable to just scrap the Chinese exchanges from all charts until it can be proven that they are trustworthy enough to be listed. It's one thing if it's a local joke that a few Chinese are into, but I don't see why the rest of the world should play along with that little game then.

It's very refreshing to see a few people openly acknowledging something that I have been thinking about myself since November.  With the exception of BTC China which may be on the level (for now Bobby Lee seems to be an upstanding guy, at least until proven otherwise), my fear is that the other Chinese exchanges are masking a world of fraud.  Fraud in the Chinese culture is not as frowned upon as it is in the U.S. and other countries, because they don't see it the same way... over there it is survival of the fittest, so many there would be willing to "bend the rules" if it gives them an edge.  Things that we found to be completely outrageous and unacceptable with Mt Gox, such as running a Ponzi, cooking the books, likely inflating BTC prices and volume levels, etc. might be seen in China as "business as usual", since there is no regulation to stipulate that they have to do anything on the level.

So what happens if it's proven that they are all inflating prices and volumes, running Ponzi's with phantom BTC, etc.?  What then, another extreme crash?  The more time that passes, the more extreme such a crash could be.  And more importantly, why should the rest of the world's bitcoin exchanges trust them enough to follow their price patterns?  Why should we allow them to pull the rest of the world's exchanges down?  Until someone credible is allowed to go in and audit the Chinese exchanges, I'll always remain dubious.  I guess the same could be said of having suspicions of Bitstamp and BTC-e, but I'm more inclined to trust a Bitstamp or a Kraken at this point than I am BTC-e or any of the Chinese exchanges.
7327  Economy / Speculation / Re: Too all those saying "China FUD" on: March 27, 2014, 09:59:31 PM
Well TERA, I think you wanted some decent discourse on this so I'll oblige.

I think when people scream FUD, it just means that they feel the Chinese government is cowardly for it's behavior in not providing clarity on their stance of bitcoin.  Right now if the Chinese government and PBOC wanted to clarify their stance, they could easily do that couldn't they?  But ambiguity is a form of oppression, of mind control, a way of inspiring panic and fear in their people.  And they seem to do that very well, in fact revel in it.

The news could very well be true, and most likely is at this point.  Whether it is or it isn't, the Chinese panic sellers believe that it is and that's all that matters to them.  Their actions today speak for themselves.  If they want to be sheep and sell everything, then so be it.

Personally I hope that the PBOC weighs in on this definitively in the next few days and I hope the news is true.  I hope that China dumps for good and goes away from bitcoin forever.  Right now they are a liability in all of this.  I think that's what the rest of the world is thinking as well.
7328  Economy / Speculation / Re: All these people claiming 1 BTC = 1 million+ on: March 27, 2014, 08:44:03 PM

1. The ~10 minute confirmation time
2. The reliance on set encryption protocols which could be broken in the future (EC and SHA256). For something to become as big as a world currency, it needs to be trusted that the technology would last hundreds of years.
3. The blockchain size.
4. The amount of resources that the client uses on a device.
5. Other scalability issues, such as the amount of transactions which can be handled per minute.
6. Irreversibility of transactions.
7. The extreme ease of the average person losing coins due one of many vectors of mistakes and hardware failures, or hackers.
8. The technical difficulty for the average user trying to even use it.
9. Bitcoin commerce and usage has mostly formed within centralized entities even though it is supposed to be decentralized.
10. There are still humans who ultimately control Bitcoin and who must be trusted by its users, even though the system is supposed to be decentralized.
11. Volatility - it is not an attractive store of value for someone who just wants to use it as a store of value or a currency and isn't into investing or speculating.
12. The present distribution of wealth.
13. The reliance on the internet in order to function.
14. Also, what happens if the internet is split apart due to government firewalls.
15. Governments, corporations, and hackers could ultimate control and restrict Bitcoin usage if they really wanted. And mass adoption will not be reached when users have to do it illegally, run tor, and run checks on every client they download to make sure it isn't a hacked client. Even tor traffic or bitcoin traffic over tor could be blocked too by smart routers.
16. Some of the worlds most powerful contries have already banned or restricted it.

** add more here ** - anyone else is welcome
TERA - All of these points/deficiencies can eventually be overcome with time and development, as you already know.  Except for #14 through #16, which I agree with you... it may get crazier still in the next 2-3 years.  #15 could happen if digital currencies becomes enough of a threat to gov't/banks throughout the world, but the U.S. and other democratic leaning countries already know that trying to stifle technological innovation, even in the finance industry, is just a really bad idea and wouldn't go over very well with the populous.  It would backfire if they came down hard, because they loathe to take things away from people without cause.

Let's look back 15 years ago.  Remember when you still had to purchase web browsing software?  Remember when the free/open source software movement began?  Remember the Java/J2EE vs. .NET wars?  Remember when Linux came along to shake up IT in the Enterprise?  I do... and I remember when folks were shouting at the top of their lungs that free, open source software would NEVER trump non-free, proprietary software.  It would never work, they said, and would die a slow painful death.  Well look how that all turned out.
7329  Economy / Speculation / Re: Do not expect value-based investors in China to hold a bottom on: March 27, 2014, 04:36:38 PM
That is very likly arbitrage that's going on.....  Force price down on Chinese exhange.. buy.. sell on others.. prices level out.. rinse repeate.

I understand the concept and realise that there will be individuals set up to take advantage of arbitrage across all the major exchange which is why traders on each exchange tend to follow activity on the other exchanges, cos if they don't act in accordance with activity on other exchanges, then the arbitragers will and will get bigger profits and they will lose. Considering that most trading is done by bots that will be pre-configured to respond to correlative price action on other exchanges, and this relationship becomes even concrete.

So, we have this very simply understood relationship between CNY Bitcoin and USD Bitcoin, yet there are still fkn clowns like Torque around who feel the need to hit forums with their defiant tough talk.....that completely flies in the face of the present and historic reality.

Ok, that's really it for me MattTheCat.  If anyone is a fkn Clown on this forum, it's you.  You throw your weight around this forum like you are some big shit, and constantly feel the need to level profanities at anyone you don't agree with.  Well fuck you.  I've watched you over the past several months botch trades, call bottoms that never came, fk up leverages that didn't swing in your favor.  Hell I'm no day trader, but I've cleaned your clock just selling at $850, patiently waiting 2 months (while you continued to day trade and barely scrape by), and buying back at $550 and again at $520.  No one here respects your opinion because you are always picking fights and acting like a complete asshat.

If you don't like what's going on in the bitcoin world or on this forum, then my advice is to get out of the bitcointalk forum, sell everything, fuck off and go back to snorting coke or whatever it is that you do for a fkn hobby.
7330  Economy / Speculation / Re: Sub $530? on: March 27, 2014, 04:08:40 PM

The smart people are getting out as high as they can.


Smart people get in and hodl.

It's just a correction. Look at price movements in the past. Volatility is constantly decreasing. Movements of 10-20% are nothing.
Yes, but we are in a downward trend from the ath in December lasting months. It just keeps going lower and lower and lower and


Positive or negative trends are all relative.  Take a look at this:
http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/bitstampUSD#rg60zczsg2013-08-30zeg2013-10-05ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zv

That sure looks like a slight negative trend to me, with a very negative crash toward the end.  Although anyone that sold everything in October because of this had no idea what was coming, and are probably crying right now...
7331  Economy / Speculation / Re: Do not expect value-based investors in China to hold a bottom on: March 27, 2014, 03:27:41 PM
Every time your country panic sells, we buy.  Pretty soon, the majority of BTC will be back in U.S. hands.  And long term, the U.S. will have the predominate amount of bitcoin holders of any other country.

So yeah China, please keep panic selling.  The new currency war has begun!!  <insert dramatic musical score here>

 Grin
7332  Economy / Speculation / Re: $300 or $800 next? on: March 27, 2014, 03:18:14 PM
If you listen to the bullshit coming from this site you could assume that bitcoin is going to 1,000,000 a coin. I hope it goes to 1c to show you how your own ignorance CAN kill something good.

Without optimism, there would not be more adopters of bitcoin, but less.  And without more adopters of bitcoin, the price would not rise.

Would you rather pessimism and negativity be the pervasive attitude of bitcoiners?
7333  Economy / Speculation / Re: china bans bitcoin again. on: March 27, 2014, 03:10:46 PM
ban again, idk why china gov are too sentiment with BTC
Man I'm so angry I'm gonna dump again  Angry Angry Angry Angry
sold now and buy later when $450 Grin

Big mistake.
7334  Economy / Speculation / Re: Reuters: Bank Run in China! on: March 27, 2014, 03:04:43 PM
That's not a bank run in China.  This is a bank run in China!



This is a famous pic that I saw in a best of Life magazine book as a kid.  It probably had more than anything to do with my interest in financial matters and specifically financial failures than almost anything.

^^^
That picture is EXACTLY what I picture every time some fake China news gets posted about the PBOC banning bitcoin, and then the Chinese bitcoiners start panic selling.  

Sorry to sound racist, as I'm not at all, but it sure seems like some cultures are so ridiculously skittish, paranoid, and scared that any time their government so much as sneezes they drop their shorts in an instant.  It worries me because bitcoin is a little like the EUR, we're all in this together, and some countries can pull us down.  I'm starting to see that some cultures of the world really have no business in investing in bitcoin.  Who's gonna be the next panicky, paranoid culture to get involved in bitcoin?  India?  Indonesia?  South Korea?  How will the price ever rise if all it takes is for one of these groups to publish fake FUD about banning and they all panic sell?

What a circus.
7335  Economy / Speculation / Re: Reuters: Bank Run in China! on: March 26, 2014, 06:25:17 PM
I agree, and firmly believe that the Chinese shadow banking system is one giant Ponzi scheme.

Incidentally, I went to my U.S. bank about 6 months ago to withdrawal $10k USD in cash.  The bank teller said they couldn't give me that amount because they didn't have it available, said that the most she could give me was $3k.  She said the rest would have to be "ordered" a full week in advance to have it available for me.

Now I realize this has become standard practice at most banks these days.  Their reasoning is supposedly to thwart bank robbers making off with loads of $$$.  But we all know it's BS, it is because of fractional reserve banking and that they wouldn't have enough physical money to cover everyone in the event of a true bank run.

Another horror story: My fiancee also once had her out-of-state bank account frozen by the State of Wisconsin, over a dispute of supposedly unpaid gains taxes on the sale of a prior home there (she was quickly found innocent of the charges, as she had sold the house at a loss).  I personally witnessed this happen.  The fact that the bank just rolled over and allowed the State of Wisconsin (not even the same state where her new bank account was!) to seize her bank account and funds without prior notification and with no evidence is just un-freaking believable.  She was so pissed off, that when the freeze was lifted she promptly went in and withdrew all her remaining money, immediately closed her bank account (it was with Chase btw -- evil, evil bank, don't trust them!) and opened up a new bank account with another bank down the street.

TL;DR - We all need to wake the F up and open our eyes to the corrupt banking systems of the world.

7336  Economy / Speculation / Re: IRS Ruling = Floodgates Open for Wall Street? on: March 26, 2014, 05:29:03 PM

How are you supposed to calculate the gains on a transaction that may be spending hundreds of small inputs mined over several years?
First In-First Out, like when calculating gains for any other asset (at least in Spain). It's as if you had sold the oldest inputs you had.

I still don't think FIFO is going to work.  I can set up a hot wallet and buy/sell bitcoin hourly just to fund my daily micro transactions, keeping the daily balance at or near 0.  But I can also send small amounts of BTC to that wallet from another anonymous wallet (or series of random wallets) that contained BTC that was much older.  No one could ever accurately track/calculate how old that incoming BTC was, and if there was any gain.  And with tumblers it could be made even more obscure.

Not an issue.  You don't account for the specific coins.  If you bought 1 coin a month for a year, then spent 1 coin a month, they would all be 1 year old FIFO coins for IRS purposes.


That doesn't make sense to me. If that were the case, then why would anyone in the U.S. buy BTC at all to use as a daily currency?  No one in the U.S. is going to buy BTC for daily currency use if it continues a trend of 10X gains a year for the next 2-3 years.

Also it encourages U.S. Merchants to dump BTC immediately upon receipt instead of holding, or not touch it at all, so they can avoid having to pay any gains tax yearly, yes?
7337  Economy / Speculation / Re: IRS Ruling = Floodgates Open for Wall Street? on: March 26, 2014, 03:49:46 PM

How are you supposed to calculate the gains on a transaction that may be spending hundreds of small inputs mined over several years?
First In-First Out, like when calculating gains for any other asset (at least in Spain). It's as if you had sold the oldest inputs you had.

I still don't think FIFO is going to work.  I can set up a hot wallet and buy/sell bitcoin hourly just to fund my daily micro transactions, keeping the daily balance at or near 0.  But I can also send small amounts of BTC to that wallet from another anonymous wallet (or series of random wallets) that contained BTC that was much older.  No one could ever accurately track/calculate how old that incoming BTC was, and if there was any gain.  And with tumblers it could be made even more obscure.
7338  Economy / Speculation / Re: Should I buy $10,000 worth of BTC right now? on: March 26, 2014, 03:15:40 PM
I'm an idiot, whenever I get a large chunk of money I go all in at the current price.  And I have gotten a little burned here and there from that strategy.   Tongue

So don't do what I do.  Invest 10% of your total funds now, and then invest another 10% every time the price moves up or down 5% from the last price you bought.  

Although I believe we are recovering from the last downcycle, so if you went all in at the current price and just held for 3-4 months, I think you would be a very happy person indeed.   Grin
7339  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gartner Hype Cycle on: March 26, 2014, 03:08:35 PM
It would be cool to see a Gartner Magic Quadrant (TM) with BTC, LTC, etc. on it, but the number of asterisks on an annually updated report would be insane right now...

But does that really make sense?  The GMQ charts companies in a space, not protocols.  That would be like putting HTTP, SMTP, FTP, etc. on a chart.

Instead, it'd make more sense for the GMQ to show companies like BitPay, Coinbase, Circle, Blockchain.info, Bitstamp, VoS, etc.
7340  Economy / Speculation / Re: IRS Ruling = Floodgates Open for Wall Street? on: March 26, 2014, 03:27:45 AM
This is exactly the clarification they needed to not make the move.
Elaborate...

I think that he means that many Wall Streeters have been involved trading in bitcoin for some time now (perhaps the last 3 years), the attraction being that they have been able to make quick easy trades and enormous profits basically tax-free due to the lack of clear guidance issued from the IRS.  Now that guidance has been issued on taxable bitcoin gains, and being required to hold bitcoin for at least 12 months to avoid income tax, it may scare some WS players away.

I don't think it makes much sense when trying to use it as a currency.  If I buy bitcoin at 3pm to use for a cup of coffee and go to buy coffee at 4pm and my bitcoin appreciated in that hour, I'm not going to make a record of every single buy/sell and determine if it is a gain or loss to report to the IRS.  Stupid.

But maybe it'll encourage the investors to HODL large amounts of bitcoin for at least 12 months.
Pages: « 1 ... 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 [367] 368 369 370 371 372 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!