Actually, it mainly depends on your drive. Even with a fiber optic internet connection, if you don't have an SSD, then syncing just gets insanely slow at some point. If you want a full node, you must use an SSD.

Maybe it would be nice to consider (if it hasn't already been considered) distributing blackbytes as well. I agree it needs more work and that they might be dumped but maybe it will give them some exposure.

Devs can not provide an answer concerning the continuation of mining on the legacy chain ... Simply put, a chain lives as long as there are people mining (on) it. A chain lives means that there is a coin. So, either the non-obelsik miners stop mining and then the legacy chain will die, or they continue mining and it will live. Obelisk miners will mine on the hard forked chain (the new main chain). Given the fact that I don't think non-obelsik miners will be willing to throw away their equipment, it's highly probable they will continue mining on the legacy chain.

My understanding is that the sia client version 1.3.5 will support the legacy chain, and that legacy chain users are always welcome as long as they hold siafunds. Regardless, mining a coin that no one needs wouldn't be a first, and there will always be people/bots ready to trade it as long as it's on an exchange ...

There could be a new coin if a part of the community continues mining on the legacy (before the fork) chain. The fork is going to invalidate blocks mined by equipment that is currently holding ~45% of the hashrate, I don't see this mining equipment just going to trash and miners using it just accepting to throw away their now main-chain-useless miners, so in my opinion, there is a very high chance the legacy chain will be maintained hence giving birth to a new coin.

Interesting how you seem to feel that you did a good thing selling this "useless shit token" as you say to those users who you seem to be sad about ...

The only information you could expect is that the last exchange enabling BTCD trading will hopefully disable it as it should have been done ages ago.

And for newcomers, please do your own research before buying into a pump.

You can try and see if you can get any help in this discord https://discord.gg/A32uMt. Back in the ICO days, there used to be an official Antshares slack, but I don't know whether it's still active or not.

Yours is also a bit broken ... A thread is a collection of posts, what we each write is a post and not a thread. leoneltouhidul1 probably did their best (I guess), and for what it's worth I do understand what they wrote. They probably know they have to improve their English as you probably also do, no need to advise (you) on that I guess.


The same could be said about your post and maybe about mine. I just can't help replying when I see the pot calling the kettle black.

No existing database that I know of. Last time my wallet got stuck, I had to sync the entire blockchain from scratch using a new wallet, then once it finished, copy wallet.dat and finally run checkwallet and repairwallet.

I don't know if this will happen someday but you are not taking into account the growth of the whole crypto market in general. It is quite obvious that if SC reaches 20 cents, the whole market would've recovered and a majority of the mainstream coins would've gone up in prices. So no, SC going to 20 cents doesn't mean its mcap will be more than BCH (or any other coin whose mcap is higher today), because there is a high chance its mcap will also go up. It doesn't make sense to compare the potential-growth mcap of a coin with the current mcap of another (unless you are sure this other won't go up/down anymore, which is impossible).

You certainly did miss it. A post with a link to the newbie restrictions thread is just two posts above yours (yes two), is the first of this page, is in several posts in the previous page and finally in the first post of this thread as a bolded update ...


Now read the new restrictions and you'll understand why and what you should do (hint: wait for someone to give you a merit).

Here they are:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3110765.msg38279809#msg38279809:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3110765.msg43713245#msg43713245:


Thank you.

No worries really. And not looking for (empty/false) promises. Just a couple of questions that remained unanswered, I don't mind if the answer is "we don't know", it's better than nothing and shows that they care about what people say on this thread.

Well, it highly depends on whether you continue posting as you are doing now or try and post constructive stuff. I mean, (literally) all of your posts are tweets and facebook links, nobody will ever merit those posts. I'd like to believe that you probably can engage in discussions in your local board and/or (improve your English to) engage in English boards discussions. You can also take a look at merit stats https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats to get an idea about merited posts and maybe get inspired. Having said that, you probably should just forget about it and use the forum for what it's actually supposed to be used for: Discussing cryptocurrency related matters with your fellow human beings.

You can use cryptox.pl. It's been a long time since I used it but it was pretty dependable back in the days, it probably still is (no complains as far as I know). The only issue is that the volume is relatively low.

Since they don't seem to be inactive (last connection of Aurum Project was Sept the 1^st), I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt, not that it really changes anything ... Anyway, we'll see how this works out.

I don't know what to think since the Xaurum guys don't answer what seem to be valid questions. It surely doesn't help in keeping/acquiring users ...

There is no reason, pumpers and dumpers playing that's all. The development team has officially abandoned BTCD, as long as nobody is working on it and as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't seem wise to buy it.

If they sell some of their gathered funds, maybe they will try and do it OTC before going to exchanges.