1083
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo ICO - Zcash Zero Knowledge Privacy Secured by Bitcoin
|
on: October 05, 2016, 07:21:59 PM
|
KMD-BTC price is expected drop not BTCD-BTC. If anyone is buying BTCD now for 0.0042 then converts into KMD and dreams to sell at 0.0053 then the price will drop. Also, what you have recommended is not what others plan to do. And that's where problems arise.
Buying-wise, there are three ways to get KMD: - Invest BTC during the ICO. - Buy BTCD and swap it. - Buy it after the ICO. If one thinks that the price of KMD will be lower than its ICO price then it is better to wait. Otherwise, I don't see any reason for BTCD not to reach prices >= 0.00425 unless all the BTC investors invest on day 1. As long as the price of BTCD is less than its equivalent in BTC for the different phases of the ICO (counting bonuses), it seems preferable to buy BTCD and swap it later. This will make the BTCD price rise (at least for the duration of the ICO).
|
|
|
1084
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo ICO - Zcash Zero Knowledge Privacy Secured by Bitcoin
|
on: October 05, 2016, 02:01:21 PM
|
BTCD holders swap their BTCD for KMD, that means they lose their BTCD coins. We don't expect the BTCD to have much value without any devs or plans. However, it should be linked to the KMD price for one full year, as it can still be swapped for KMD. All the BTCD that is swapped will just sit in a BTCD address and not go get sold or go to circulation. So there is no reason to expect the BTCD price to dump during the next year. Every BTCD holder will have plenty of time to do the swap.
So a BTCD holder has no reason not to swap within a year after the ICO, otherwise they will be holding a coin that is no longer maintained ... Can you please explain what would be done with the swapped BTCD once the year is over? I mean what will be more profitable? Btc or btcd on ico on the first day.
Do you need ico current price possible advantage?
According to https://steemit.com/komodo/@komodoplatform/komodo-ico-questions-and-answers: The following was calculated based on the BTC bonus:
Oct. 15 - 25% bonus = 0.00425 BTC/BTCD Oct. 16-22 - 20% bonus = 0.00443 BTC/BTCD Oct. 23-29 - 15% bonus = 0.00462 BTC/BTCD Oct. 30-Nov 5 - 10% bonus = 0.00483 BTC/BTCD Nov 6-12 - 5% bonus = 0.00506 BTC/BTCD Nov 13-20 - 0% bonus = 0.00532 BTC/BTCD
This means that as long as you acquire BTCD for less than 0.00425 BTC each, then once swapped, KMDs you'll get will cost cheaper than what they would have cost you if you were a first-day BTC investor.
|
|
|
1085
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SNS]Sensus: Mobile Incentivized Crowd Wisdom and Prediction Market (Bounty+ICO)
|
on: October 02, 2016, 09:49:13 AM
|
ICO structure and bounty is not attrative, it created 2 months ago, so ICO is over? I never see your signature. Your marketing does nothing?
Well the structure of the ICO is not yet known as it didn't start yet. For now, the bounties are for the beta-testing phase (installing the app and testing it), there is also a bounty for following on Twitter and translating, the other bounties listed on the first post will be available in the future (signature included). For the moment, this is a pre-ICO phase, no investment was requested yet.
|
|
|
1086
|
Other / Meta / Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?)
|
on: September 30, 2016, 08:30:17 PM
|
My rank member not changes for a longer time.
You will become a Full Member once you reach an activity of 120. Activity is increased by a maximum of 14 every 2 weeks. Your activity is 84, you need at least three more activity periods (6 weeks) to get more than 120. If you get the max for the current period, you'll have 98 once the next period starts. If you get the max after that, you'll have 112 once the following period starts. And then you'll need 8 activity points to reach 120, those points will be added to your activity once the following period starts. So, you can expect a rank change starting from November the 8th, 2016 at 15:46:40 UTC (according to the activity spreadsheet found in this thread).
|
|
|
1087
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ICO] Minuo - XMO, A Blockchain Environment - CROWDSALE LIVE on CCEX NOW! JOIN!
|
on: September 30, 2016, 07:32:32 AM
|
@kaicrypzen you are free to open whatever accusation you would like as we are free to delete your spam message in our thread. This is the meaning of a sm thread, to avoid people like you whining around with no reasons. If you could stop a second and read some post above you can see the explanation for that little mistake.
Thanks for your comprehension.
We hired a web developer to make out website, maybe he worked also for this "ncl", but I don't know even what it is, so this is just a mistake from him. I will advice him to fix the error. Thanks for letting us know it.
I wouldn't call warning people about this coin, whining ... My reaction is based on multiple facts: - You say you hired someone to do your website, if that's correct, I advise you to try and find out about the previous work of people you hire. If they are/were involved in shady projects, then that's definitely bad for your business. - Apart from the presence of the word Nucleus on your website, your team is the exact same one as the Nucleus one (Joshua Walker and Emma Jones (with a different photo)). - Your project has no escrow, no road map, no source code, no white paper, no wallet. This coin and its distribution have the exact same setup as Nucleus, there are too many red flags for me not to warn people. Of course you are free to delete spam (and you should). What I posted was a warning based on the evidence I listed above. I wouldn't call this spam ... I am willing to reconsider my position if you provide anything that can make this project seem legit. Thank you.
|
|
|
1088
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Minuo - XMO ICO is very likely to be a scam
|
on: September 29, 2016, 06:10:30 PM
|
The self-moderated thread of the ICO: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1630940. The user promoting the ICO: Pbitcoin. My first censored message: A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
|
|
|
1089
|
Other / Meta / Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?)
|
on: September 28, 2016, 08:25:15 PM
|
The spreadsheet is correct. I said before that it started at 03:26 PM (yesterday) but your last post yesterday was at 05:03:35 AM and that's why your activity didn't increase until after you posted above. I think you might have misunderstood my post.
Yes I've misunderstood it , now, it seems clearer to me. What I understand is: It is the first message posted once the (new) activity period starts, that triggers the activity update. Thanks for bearing with me .
|
|
|
1090
|
Other / Meta / Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?)
|
on: September 28, 2016, 06:25:17 PM
|
14 days, 6 minutes and 40 seconds to be exact. At least that's what I read here (you can also find the spreadsheet of all activity periods there). Thank you for the reply and the link. So, I examined the spreadsheet(s) and for the current period it is written that it should've started (yesterday) on September the 27th at 15:26:40. How does this add up with the fact that it seems to have started (today) on September the 28th at 17:26:40 UTC?
|
|
|
1091
|
Other / Meta / Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?)
|
on: September 28, 2016, 05:48:17 PM
|
That's because this activity period began at 03:26 PM UTC and you posted before that. Your activity should increase soon (up to an hour).
Thx for the reply (I understood 05:26 PM ), indeed it just changed. So, does this mean that each activity period begins at 05:26 PM UTC each 14 days or does it change depending on some factors? (Sorry if this info has already been provided). Thx.
|
|
|
1092
|
Other / Meta / Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?)
|
on: September 28, 2016, 05:09:39 PM
|
but as for activity you can only get 14 activity points every fortnight. You wont be able to get another 14 until the 11th.
Hi, The last time my activity increased was on September the 13th, I was expecting it to increase yesterday (on September the 27th) by min(14, posts), however it didn't happen. Can anyone help me understand why? Thank you very much.
|
|
|
1094
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] DECENT Announcement - Decentralizing Content Distribution
|
on: September 27, 2016, 04:55:11 AM
|
Can someone explain DCT Iou's to me plese
Basically DCT IOUs is a scam. So don't do it. IOU (i owe you) coins are virtual coins. What Liqui says is: You, as their customer give them money that they will invest in the ICO, depending on your investment, they will credit your account with the corresponding number of DCT coins (you would have after the ICO) so that you can start trading them, however these coins are still not in circulation (they do not exist). You can exchange IOUs but you can't withdraw them. Once DCT goes live, your IOUs will become real coins. Basically, you are trading an asset that you don't possess yet. Nobody (apart from Liqui) can know now if this is a scam, this information will be available once the project goes live. If people can withdraw their coins then it is not a scam, if not, then it is. I doubt Liqui would risk their reputation over this. Having said that, I personally wouldn't trade assests that I don't own yet. Then it will be interesting to see if it turns out not to be a scam. Non the less, their spamming of this thread, with multiple fake account talking about how it's the greatest thing since slice bread trading DCT in liquid is a very scammy thing to do. For that reason I won't trust them, even if they are legit. Actually, they are telling users (with a Member+ rank) to advertise them here, they are giving 0.003BTC equivalent of DCT for that, they did the same with Antshares ... I agree that this pollutes the thread, but it seems to be somehow working in their favor => We are still talking about them here .
|
|
|
1095
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] DECENT Announcement - Decentralizing Content Distribution
|
on: September 27, 2016, 04:29:50 AM
|
Can someone explain DCT Iou's to me plese
Basically DCT IOUs is a scam. So don't do it. IOU (i owe you) coins are virtual coins. What Liqui says is: You, as their customer give them money that they will invest in the ICO, depending on your investment, they will credit your account with the corresponding number of DCT coins (you would have after the ICO) so that you can start trading them, however these coins are still not in circulation (they do not exist). You can exchange IOUs but you can't withdraw them. Once DCT goes live, your IOUs will become real coins. Basically, you are trading an asset that you don't possess yet. Nobody (apart from Liqui) can know now if this is a scam, this information will be available once the project goes live. If people can withdraw their coins then it is not a scam, if not, then it is. I doubt Liqui would risk their reputation over this. Having said that, I personally wouldn't trade assests that I don't own yet.
|
|
|
1100
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
|
on: September 23, 2016, 03:14:09 PM
|
This worked well when I paired both my phone and my desktop, however pairing two of my desktop apps didn't work. I copied the pairing code from device1 and emailed it to myself, I then added it as a new device on device2, however, device1 appears with the name New (in device2's list of paired devices), whereas it should've been the name device1 was configured with.
The name should update when device1 comes online. It is true that I paired my devices when one of them was off-line, however, now that device1 is online, nothing has changed. I was wondering if this could've happened because I mistyped the pairing code ... (well I copy/pasted it so that's not very likely, but you never know). After pairing my phone with my desktop, I requested a payment from the phone, when I clicked to execute the payment from my desktop, my phone displayed this error: http://imgur.com/a/Riafp. And now it is displayed each time I start the app. Please update to 0.3.1. Thank you, the update solved it. On the mobile wallet I have two issues: - When the wallet is synching, the blackbytes screen overlaps on the bytes screen, it comes on top of it then goes back then comes up .... - I also did get this error once: http://imgur.com/a/gzQ7TI've noticed that the chat history is deleted when I restart the wallet. I suggest to store the history locally, you can add a delete button to clear it.
Yes, I agree. Or, for simplicity of display, show the last 10 messages and have a History section, sorted by date in Descending order. +1. At the moment the payment request and the address seem to be the only persistent messages, however before asking someone for a payment, you might wanna say "Hi" . (This is not an issue when both devices are online.) Also something that I find inconvenient is that even when a device is paired with another, their address are not automatically added to the address book, moreover there is no send payment button (in the chat interface). Can someone send me some byteball to check wallet out, I will not post address in the thread (bct rules), send me a pm.
you can request bytes from Testnet Faucet: After installing the wallet, visit https://byteball.org and click the clink to receive free bytes to play with. if you want bytes (or blackbytes) then pm me your address(es) if you don't wanna post it (them) here. (I wasn't aware there was a rule against posting addresses.)
|
|
|
|