Melihat harga Bitcoin dan altcoin biasanya saling berhubungan, agak sulit kalau bilang ketika Bitcoin lagi turun maka altcoin lain bisa menutupi hal tersebut. Diskusi di sosial media atau forum juga biasanya ane lihat menyarankan kalau agan ingin risiko yang lebih rendah sebaiknya fokus di Bitcoin dan diversifikasi ke aset jenis lain selain kripto. Dengan kata lain, Bitcoin dianggap sebagai aset kripto yang paling tepat untuk target investasi kalau modal agan tidak terlalu besar dan toleransi risikonya rendah. ETH atau altcoin besar lainnya juga susah lepas dari pergerakan harga BTC kan.

Saran ane sih tetap saja mengunjungi forum tiap hari gan, kunjungi board yang agan sukai nanti ide bikin post atau topik juga bakal muncul. Untuk masalah sig memang konsistensi biasanya jadi faktor utama. Kalaupun agan punya 100 merit dan rank masih member tapi riwayat post agan ga ada, ya susah kalau mau dipilih manajer. Kalau salah satu tujuan agan ke situ, harus rajin kontribusi walaupun satu post satu hari.

Ane dulu pernah sebulan make hp buat ngeposting, dan sama seperti yang dibilang sama om abhi di atas kalau sudah terbiasa ga terlalu bermasalah lagi. Terlepas dari layar kecil dan tempat buat ngetik terbatas masih bisa bikin post. Kalau terpaksa banget bisa pake tablet sama keyboard kalau emang agan punya budget. HP pake keyboard eksternal juga bisa kalau HP agan mendukung.

Buat pengguna Windows yang sering download software modelling/desain dan download crack sebaiknya hati-hati karena kabarnya banyak malware crypto yang menyusup di package installasi Windows (Windows Advanced Installer)[1]. Dari berita yang beredar sih kabarnya kebanyakan yang ditarget adalah mereka yang ada di Eropa, seperti Pranscis dan Swissm, tapi ada potensi menyerang pengguna lain seperti di Asia (Singapura). Intinya tergantung agan downloadnya di web apaan. Lebih baik pakai software open-source saja daripada download software bajakan yang potensi virusnya gedhe.

[1]  https://cointelegraph.com/news/windows-tool-targeted-hackers-crypto-mining-malware

Setahu ane kalau agan ingin ambil untung yang besar, maka risiko juga secara alami akan naik. Tidak ada istilahnya agan potensi untung gedhe tapi risko mendekati nol, kecuali agan nikah sama anak pejabat atau dapet warisan. Apalagi terkait Bitcoin yang harganya sangat tidak stabil, darimana bisa diambil itu jadi satu-satunya opsi yang tepat buat semua orang? Jujur ane pribadi tidak menyarankan keluarga ane buat bermain spekulasi di kripto karena toleransi risko mereka biasanya rendah dan pada ga sabaran. Ngambil reksadana saham yang potensi profitnya mencapai 5% per tahun saja kadang perlu mikir" lagi mengingat riwayat tahun-tahun sebelumnya kadang ga bagus.

Where do you get this idea from? Sounds overly optimistic and ignores a ton of problems the USA has with crypto right now. SEC has been suing people left and right, while their next target is clearly stablecoins in the near future. Even if those coins did survive, why would you think people need to move to the USA just to use them? I'm not going to lie, it sounds like you're just pulling things from the air and doing US propaganda.

I checked the trading history and it seems like most orders are created by bots. Kinda surprising that they openly show small orders that are likely a bot yet failed to reach at least hundreds of dollars of trading volume. It seems like the volume also went down recently?

The UI itself is quite okay, other than a lack of interest from the targeted market or lack of marketing/competitiveness, I don't see other reasons why the exchange would fail. Kinda reminds me of one exchange I followed in the past. They spent a ton of money buying ad slots on La Liga, then went bankrupt just a few months later.

I can't seem to find a way to register a new account. Do I need to upload files before it shows the new account registration? I saw a similar profit-sharing model in the past, but the project no longer continues its service due to a lack of interest from the market. IIRC, it was called Files.fm or something. What is your strategy to avoid similar results? Your competitor is not limited to any crypto-based file storage provider, but platforms like Mega and so on.

So basically you've managed to edit and run it on your own? What kind of features are you looking for that you are looking for in a script-based trading bot? I suggest making a new thread on services if you want to commission someone to edit or make a bot for you. There is no way you can find a free one that is designed specifically for your purpose. Even if you do, there will always be some restrictions like limited API calls and so on.

It sounds like you're talking about anchoring on the Bitcoin blockchain. To be honest, I've heard similar discussions in the past, although it is not focused on smart contract platforms but just altcoin anchoring. I'm also on the neutral side, if anchoring is the goal I don't think it will affect any security or fees. It is difficult to encourage users to use smart contracts if it is difficult to use or understand/verify though. At the end of the day, any spammy projects will likely die since their users will need to pump out a lot of fees, just like what happened to ordinal. CMIIW.

I remember a project called Max Property or something, don't know if they changed their name by now. They buy real estate and show the ownership of each member based on the token they own. The idea is similar, the members give them money to buy and then they will buy the real estate and manage it. Blockchain and tokens don't give them much edge though, since they request KYC with details that is no different than traditional real estate crowdfunding. At the very least, OP should build an MVP first before he ask for money if he's serious about this.

Not sure how root access is being processed if your device is infected with malware. Regardless of whether it is possible or not, using a secure device should be the priority for most users.

The best protection is to use a secure device as mentioned above. Whether the malware will target new open-source wallets or not, you should be able to prevent any hack if you don't click on malicious links. For this specific malware, the distribution method is quite unclear based on the news that I've read. Safe to assume it is distributed through similar means like fake app downloads, phishing links, etc. If you use a phone as your main device, then you should focus more on improving your security practices. At the end of the day, you should make sure your device is free from malware etc regardless if you use a crypto wallet or not.

I personally think it is too soon to talk about any changes in the supply. People can still use sats just fine, there are other issues that are likely more urgent in the near future such as the decrease of block reward and so on. I'd rather focus the discussion over there if people really need to argue over something. That being said, the limited supply is definitely one of the key reasons people invest in BTC. Still, you can still use BTC as a currency if your goal is not investment at all.

I believe that is the key problem. No regulation certainty allows many things to happen, either abuse from the government or just scams running around with little to no incentive to stop them. Things like this should not last that long. I don't know why it takes so long for regulations to come out either, considering other countries already propose many bills to be approved. On the other hand, people need to improve their awareness so they don't have to rely on the law to avoid easy-to-spot scams like NFT airdrop, etc. CMIIW.

I think it is possible that they don't want to trouble themselves setting up a payment system so they just use PayPal instead. Not to mention it is also possible that PayPal gives them some incentive in one way or another. I don't think the average joe really cares about which payment system they use. At the end of the day, this is not that much different from paying with fiat, you just risk your crypto if you store it on PayPal, to begin with. CMIIW.

I don't think it fails, just that people are trying to find more use cases for their own purpose. You can still directly buy/sell things with crypto without any middlemen anyway.

So if I read this correctly, the company already asked for permission and the regulation is allowing them to do it? Sounds like the key issue is the terrible regulation related to environmental concerns. Whether they want to use it to mine or not, a similar debate will arise if the law is not changed. Looks like this is not the first time either. Another company already did a similar thing in the past, which begs the question if the lobbying is not strong enough or if the company went bankrupt before any harm was done. CMIIW.

Is it possible that the attacker rewrote the code to specifically target Electrum devices, or just expand their attack targets in general? Even if that is not possible, it is still unsafe to keep running your Electrum on an infected devices. Who knows what kind of malware it will download in the future, not to mention they still collect data about you regardless of what wallet you use.

It also brings negative PR to the crypto community as a whole. I've seen way too many people register NFT = scam = crypto, although I don't think relying on regulation is the best choice. At the end of the day, people's awareness is key to solving this issue, sadly most people just fall for them easily. As long as the SEC doesn't blindly define every token as NFT or every NFT needs their control, I also think what they are doing with this is okay. Not sure how long my opinion will stay the same though, since the SEC is unpreditable nowadays.

So how do you improve the accuracy? Do you feed new data or is there any tweak to the algorithm? I believe some coins are just wildly volatile since their fundamental changes quickly like XRP after the SEC case, so it is not surprising if your current model failed to stay within 90% like other coins. People should be aware that this 'prediction' can't correctly express any change in fundamental values if I get your explanation correctly.

People should look for a decentralized alternative like DAI if that ever happens. It is possible that they will also try to limit the movement of such products, but I believe it will be impossible to kill all of them. That does sound bleak, but you can also opt to hold BTC only. There might be some sacrifice like slower trading speed but it should protect your privacy to some extent, unless you're trading on a KYC platform. That being said, it is not surprising that Binance is getting attacked left and right.

At the very least one group distributes this malware using a debugging tool[1], probably by packaging it through some debugging tool for those who are interested on Android debugging. It is also possible that is spread through the Google Play Store as usual since they are terrible at filtering malware apps. Just recently there are fake Telegram and Signal apps being removed because they contain malware[[2]. CMIIW.

[1] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/31/sandworm_infamous_chisel/
[2] https://www.welivesecurity.com/en/eset-research/badbazaar-espionage-tool-targets-android-users-trojanized-signal-telegram-apps/