Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 02:27:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 »
881  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 05:55:53 PM
Yes Crumbs/Eduardo, you  have registered multiple accounts in the past week. I've been here as I keep saying 4 MONTHS.

Hey Eduardo, who is the lady? Does she know what you get up to on here?



Is this your other half Eduardo?

 
882  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 05:47:58 PM
Good job outing yourself as StuartUK.

You posted "zumzero lives in another part of the country to me" as Stuart a while back.  It must get annoying trying to remember which sock said what when you are talking to yourself all day long.

This gets crazier by the minute. So I am zumzero AND Stuartuk? OK am I anybody else while we are here? I've also been called a Slaughter I think.

As you might know there are only a few Brits on here. Some of us chat. And I know where zumzero lives, he's told me. Does that make me Stuartuk?!?!? Please explain how.

EDIT the way this is going I will be everybody who supports the company. There is only 1 shareholder? Are you insane or just stupid?
883  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 05:44:36 PM


A bit of a short-arse aren't you.

Yeah, but look what I got! Tongue



@Bargraphics:  How's that Terrahash deal going, Those kids pay you for your loyalty yet?

Quoted for posterity.

This is a clear admission that Crumbs is Mr Hashfast. I hope you have a good lawyer Eduardo?
884  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 05:03:13 PM


A bit of a short-arse aren't you.

Edit - And you have a squint.
885  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 04:46:45 PM
Errrrrrr

You signed up a week ago and everything you say and do has Crumbs written all over it. You really are very dumb crumbs.

I am aware IP's can be masked. Mine hasn't been. It's the same today as it was when I signed up. Hence I'm not zumzero and I'm not banned.

886  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 04:40:08 PM
You keep calling me Zumzero. If I was zumzero my IP would be blocked. It is not. Theymos knows exactly where zumzero lives. It's over 400miles away from me. If zumzeros multiple accounts have been deleted and given lifetime bans why am I still able to post?

Keep calling me zumzero, I've been here for four months posting regularly. How long have you been here again? I just checked - a week.
887  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 04:22:50 PM
The Admin on this ridiculous site will have everyone apart from the Trolls banned at this rate.


Zumzero was a big supporter of this company and of Ken. He researched and created the timeline that DTS uses as the opening post of his ACtM thread - lifetime ban.

Stuart was also a big supporter. He tackled the Trolls and created detailed predictions based on dividend yields already seen in this industry. Another valuable asset lost - lifetime ban.


What the hell is this thread supposed to be for?? A talking shop for the Trolls? It's pathetric. They are now the dominant force in here.

Thanks BTC Admin. You have really allowed free speech to flourish. Well done for defending large investors inalienable rights to free speech on the thread of the company they are invested in.

EDIT - and VE aka Canadian guy is spreading lies about Zumzero that go unchallenged by Admin! No proof offered. VE can say what he wants, lie and destroy another big investor and long time posters reputation but provide no proof whatsoever - but he's still here. What does that tell you about this site's Admin?? Are they corrupt?
888  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 04:13:29 PM


Zumzero:
If you do not like Bitcointalk, feel free to try your luck elsewhere.  If you feel that the powers that be are conspiring against you, consider voicing your concerns in the Meta subforum.  This is not the right thread for airing your grievances.

If I was zumzero I would be banned. Why the hell do you think I am zumzero when I've been posting on here for 4 months? Is everybody zumzero?

You are a fool. Admin has access to my ISP address and zumzeros, mine has remained the same for 4 months, zumzero lives in another part of the country to me and his IP is banned. Do you get that? Too much for your little brain crumbs?

Tell us how many weeks you think are in a year again, last time you worked it out to be 48 didn't you.
889  Other / Off-topic / Re: If someone can find who this woman is, I would love to donate BTC to her on: January 06, 2014, 03:17:27 PM
It does raise the question about a public appeal for BTC funds for dubious causes. In this case I agree the second assault is a crime and a court would punish it. You are not allowed to systematically beat and humiliate someone for being a bully and making threats. It would be OK to take her to the floor and restrain her using force until the Police arrive but a beating is illegal and the wrong thing to do. Two wrongs do not make a right. If the Police had turned up and given her the same beating what would people be saying then? They would likely be rioting and burning Police cars.

But quite a few people think it was the right thing to do and should be rewarded. And so the question is - should we be worried about the ease with which BTC makes for the raising of funds for nefarious or illegal activity?

If a terrorist group widely distributed their QR code, what would we and the wider public think?
890  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 03:04:52 PM
...
People are so delusional, If he wanted to rip everyone off he would be focusing on the shares and not on the core business. We would be listed on some shitty exchange and he would be selling shares.
...

Matt_S:
While some here may be delusional, you're just straight-up incoherent.  Why would Ken list this disaster on an exchange?  He has no financial incentive - he has your money, it doesn't matter to him if the shares are trading.  He would also expose himself to risks - attention from the SEC & other TLAs.
I agree with you that bawwing on this forum won't help, but asking for 2 more weeks 'coz this ain't a scam is...

He sold enough shares to keep his kinfolks farting through silk for a while - that's enough for him.  If the coin runs out, then he'll relist & dump his shares on the market.  Simple.

Yep - crumbs keeps posting while Stuartuk and zumzero are banned. I love Bit Coin Talk.org - it's so.....fair.
891  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 12:58:27 AM
An existing account with a credible post count can be a valuable commodity around here.  


4kUSD for a few little posts? Do you think people on here are that stupid??

So meanwhile Ken is denying to share ANY evidence of shipped product, he wont even comment on it - but he pays you 4k to say something different? How the hell would that make sense VE? Have you taken too many pills today?
892  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 12:38:36 AM
My guess is that he was perhaps even part of the eASIC team, or even a slaughter himself. Why else would he have paid me 5BTC to post that garbage??

No-one had heard of you on here 2 weeks ago. Are you SERIOUS?

So Ken paid 4 thousand USD to a no-name with no rep to post a few short posts, with no pics or any evidence?

Couldn't he have logged in on a new account in 30mins and just posted that for free?

You are a laughing stock.


EDIT - contacting eASIC will achieve nothing, they will tell you nothing. But you could put the contract at risk. And for what?
893  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 12:35:17 AM
@Minerpart:  zumzero is YOU.  Sad but true.  Face the facts and deal with it.

How can that be true if I can still post you numb-skull.

I've been posting for four months at the exact same times as zumzero, we don't have the same IP at those times because we live 400miles apart. If he's banned I should be too then right?



894  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 11:54:12 PM
crumbs continues to post
zumzero lifetime ban


yeah you can trust BCT Admin.
895  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 11:47:47 PM
And to top it all I heard from zumzero via email today that he has received a lifetime ban from bitcointalk. He says his IP has been blocked. Yet crumbs and VE are still posting FUD like crazy.

This place is not fit to host the ACtM thread. It's bad for investor morale and bad for business. Imagine what a prospective buyer is going to think after reading what is going on in here today. Are they going to order? No. I wouldn't either based on the lies in here.

This company will succeed but there is the potential for a loss of customers and the creation of ill-will between our suppliers and ourselves through the dirty work going on here. eASIC might not be so keen to keep supplying us if their name is dragged through the dirt like it is being. Where would we be then?

THINK people.

896  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 11:31:44 PM
WOW

What a huge pile of shit from Canadian Guy.

This time last week he had a fully functioning ACtM machine and was watching it pump out BTC while he supped beer. He even offered to sell it for big bucks using Eschrow. Now he says there are no chips and the whole enterprise is a scam!

What is going on? Seriously the FUD on here has never been so high.

And some of you believe it and are going to kick up a stink at eASIC? Get a GRIP.
897  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: google sponsored result for mtgox is fake on: January 05, 2014, 09:58:24 PM
Ye of little faith:



'Your request (#188339) has been received, and will be reviewed by our support staff shortly.

Please be noted that the Mt.Gox Support Desk operates 24/7/365, however with limited weekend support.
Kindly wait and we would respond shortly.'
898  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 09:40:22 PM
Yawn. Night all.
899  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 09:38:18 PM

We know more about Area 51 than this project.

Indeed, Area 51 has a detailed wiki page.

We all have our own opinions then. I'm more than happy with how this is going, you are not, that's life.


900  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: google sponsored result for mtgox is fake on: January 05, 2014, 08:07:37 PM
Reported to Google and mtGox - although the contact form for Gox had no 'security issue' as a submission-type so they might not check the mail for many hours.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!