So because they found a loophole you are ok with them taking advantage? I agree that sportsbooks should not offer bets that players can take advantage of, but I also think that people in general shouldn't really be shady anytime they can.
I'm not sure about the whole concept of sports betting. Every casino player wants to take advantage of the casino, that's why they're gambling. If the casino offers a bet that's favourable for the user, and the user manages to find those, doesn't it just mean the user is better at what they're doing than the casino? It's not as if they've hacked the server seed in dice, that would be a clear case of abuse.
As you have shown in the rest of your post, this guy has accusation after accusation against multiple casinos. If he had 1 or 2 accusations I think his story would hold more weight, but when he has accused more than half the casinos on here, something just makes it feel very shady on his part.
I can't really Support or Oppose the accusations. It could be someone takes advantage of casinos, but on the other hand casinos take advantage of users too. Limiting winning users and letting losers play big seems like a one-sided solution.
I see the same thing starting to happen with stake.com and their campaign. Some people have opened up multiple threads about the campaigns participants and instead of trying to help stake improve, they are just getting out the pitchforks and trying to crucify the manager. How long til that casino decides to leave the forum as well?
The Stake campaign has been spamming Bitcointalk for years. It's clear by now they don't care as long as it's profitable.
I do think that instead of looking taking advantage of "loopholes" that the bettors should spend their time helping make the casino operate better vs taking their money.
That doesn't make sense. You can't expect someone to start helping companies. They're commercial businesses and they can pay people for that.
He should realize that casinos all share information.
This sounds like a GDPR violation.
So because they found a loophole you are ok with them taking advantage? I agree that sportsbooks should not offer bets that players can take advantage of, but I also think that people in general shouldn't really be shady anytime they can.
1. The sportsbook chooses the games they offer
2. The sportsbook chose the odds & the maximum bet limits
3. The sportsbook accepted his bets
I can't see how this would be a loophole. I'd like to read @SirJohnVonSlotty's opinion on this.
Disclaimer: I'm not sure how much of what I posted relates to GekkeBelg. It almost seems philosophical to discuss whether or not taking a bet they offer is abuse, even if you'd be certain you're going to win.
Show Posts
