|
Better set a stop loss! Don't try any hero moves here
|
|
|
|
Real price is zero because of the endless supply of cryptos that can be created out of thin air. In a rationale world bitscam would be free like air or email, but this lunatic subculture/cult will prop it up a bit longer in the double digit area.
But its backed by math. And fundamentals the fundamentals aren't in its favour tbh I was being sarcastic. I believe its going to near zero but maybe some darknet budinesses will support it for illicit purchases |
|
|
|
 I predict that people are going to wake up and start demanding wage payment in bitcoin. The "hero adopters" will be those that setup picket lines to pressure companies for the option of paychecks in BTC. Yeah good prediction. People are gonna demand pay in internet funbux that lost 70% in one year. Keep drinking the koolaid buddy |
|
|
|
Real price is zero because of the endless supply of cryptos that can be created out of thin air. In a rationale world bitscam would be free like air or email, but this lunatic subculture/cult will prop it up a bit longer in the double digit area.
Cash can be printed out of "thin air" and there's still a big demand for bank notes lol I don't know if you understand the advantages yet... 4.5 billion dollars is already in this "thin air" and its growing stronger every week Theres a demand because we have to use them. You know for something called taxes. Also its not exactly thin air. They sell bonds |
|
|
|
I haven't seen this one in a while:
Just shaking out the weak hands.
It will start to appear when we reach new recent low prices, that is, when we get lower than 300 for more than a day or two Strong hands HODL to zero. Take that fiat lovin statists! |
|
|
|
Real price is zero because of the endless supply of cryptos that can be created out of thin air. In a rationale world bitscam would be free like air or email, but this lunatic subculture/cult will prop it up a bit longer in the double digit area.
But its backed by math. And fundamentals |
|
|
|
|
Serms to me the butthurt is strong in Devin Chow rather than bears. Hows that long position treating you? 70% down? Yikes! Better dump soon
|
|
|
|
Capital gains is capped at 15% and it used to be 30%.
Thats why Warren Buffett pats same tax bracket as his secretary. He's on record somewhere stating tax laws are broken
He ignores the fact that corporate profits are already taxed at 35%, and his total tax rate is actually 50%. It doesn't work like that. I'm too lazy to explain basic corporate structures & tax codes. Just look it up or stay ignorant Also, LOL if you think Warren Buffet doesn't know http://money.cnn.com/2013/03/04/news/economy/buffett-secretary-taxes/ |
|
|
|
|
Capital gains is capped at 15% and it used to be 30%.
Thats why Warren Buffett pats same tax bracket as his secretary. He's on record somewhere stating tax laws are broken
|
|
|
|
It depends. What's your exact argument? Geographic? Genetics? Culture? Economics? Historical? How are you measuring laziness? How are you measuring intelligence? I can tell you that Richard Lynn practice poor economics and is largely dismissed by academics |
|
|
|
Did realize that there are communist on this board.
Do you really think we are all "global citizens' haha?
Africans can provide for themselves, but they're too lazy/stupid to do it.
For those who call it racism, I call it realism, remotely intelligent people wouldn't starve the on the world's most fertile soil.
Ignorant bigot. |
|
|
|
A lot of people here find taxes tyrannical. But who will commit to not using the services they pay for? That would strengthen the case for not paying. I can respect that. If you are using all the benefits of taxation but not paying, then you are just sticking your bills to another person who will have to make up for you. I can't respect that.
I don't mind paying my share, but I want the government to go after dead beats if it means I will have to pay for them.
The problem isn't all services and all taxes. The problem is the cruise missiles that cost $1 million each, and all the other military hardware that only makes us less safe. Our enemy has become a body of ideas, and by waging a war of force, we are creating more orphans, who are the most vulnerable to radicalization. I'm with you on that bro! For me there is a difference between the idea of taxation and how it is spent. now imagine if there was no taxation and you could control 100% what you are funding when you give the government money. and if they abuse your money you don't give it to them anymore. what a world that would be, where the government is held 100% accountable to the people who finance it. This would not work. We would encounter a tragedy of the commons and no one would pay any taxes but everyone would expect to receive the services that the government provides Its also a terrible idea because it'll be almost impossible to execute. Besides you vote for your representative candidate. If your guy loses too bad. That's the system |
|
|
|
Full employment economy ended in the mid 1990s when NAFTA was signed and it became socially acceptable for companies to outsource their manufacturing plants to China and Mexico. This is when the "depression" started for people on mainstreet and it has been going on strong for over 20 years now.
If the cost of labor is cheaper overseas then the rational decision for any company would be to produce their product in the place where labor is cheapest/gives the best value. Also the result of globalization is that people in the US are able to have a higher standard of living as they now have access to cheaper goods then they would otherwise have access to Following this logic, only the people who didn't lose their jobs have a higher standard of living |
|
|
|
|
Double entry accounting is how our credit money system works. You might be able to use blockchain for this. But the difference is that bitcoin is artificially limited, credit has no limit
|
|
|
|
If the argument is that the driver must carry insurance because they might cause damage through accident or neglect, why does that not extend to making the driver also carry insurance to cover damage they might do through crime? By what principle do you draw the line?
Car insurance covers accidents not criminal intent. No insurance company will insure someone that might "accidentally" commit a crime |
|
|
|
|
I bet the people belly aching about taxes are the people that barely pay any taxes.
|
|
|
|
A new multilateral framework and 'multi-polar system' for managing capital flows and national debts That describes shadow banking pretty well. Bancor is reserve currency for central banks to use, not consumers. Its value is pegged to SDR. Bitcoin is none of this |
|
|
|
|
Hahaha. Bitcoin is nothing like bancor or SDR
|
|
|
|
I pay my taxes and I'm certainly not afraid of my government. I don't always like how they spend it, but the basic idea of taxes is an idea is so successful that it is used in almost every part of the world.
For me the biggest problem is that we all pay wildly different taxes. Furthermore, the wealthiest people often pay the lowest rates. And corporations have gamed the system to a point of corruption. They get tax breaks for sending jobs out of the country and are rewarded by paying almost nothing (or nothing). Of course the bills still come in and that leaves you and me to pay for their breaks.
if you could freely choose how much you would like to pay to the government for the services it currently provides to you, would you pay the same amount as you are forced paying today? Nice try but presenting false dilemma is a poor debate tactic |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
