This is the one major risk that Polo doesn't like. Yes, you can do margin trading. Like you say, if the price suddenly explodes, they will have a flash crash or flash boom. GDAX happened this way even with ETH. I think others want to avoid that.

I have thought of a strategy. But I will not try it. It is almost like playing Dice at 1% chance, hoping you hit with 100 rolls. We all know that won't happen,,,

But 100 alts with 1 satoshi price or less. If 1 hits 100 satoshi price,,, you cover loss. If 2 hits 100 satoshi,,, you make double.

What do you think?

Don't know why delisting on Poloniex is the end of the world. So many coins delisted from there are surviving well. The more centralisation like polo, the more people get lost about how decentralised currency work.



Wrong project. This is not byteball. This is Bytecoin.

This is a simple breakdown, fair enough. Yes, it is not correct 100%. But for everyone else who does not pretend to be an expert, this is more than enough. Thank you for the,,, alternative viewpoint.

The financial might of the team behind it. We all care actually only about profit, let's be honest.

If the team is known to be able to get the token listed on big exchanges, plus 1.

If the team is known to be able to pump failing price, plus 1.

If the team can raise millions, plus 1.

Oops, did some people forget to ask this before the ICO? Even if the existence can be confirmed, who can say whether the project is fake or not? Some fake projects are running today after more than two years, with prices boosted and fake developments.

Most sites tracking altcoins should have a 1-year timeframe adjustment. On coinmarket cap, just choose your alt. Then choose the "Zoom" to 1 Year. The same even can be done in exchanges. I only know Poloniex but it worked for ETH,,,

It is funny that I see this about Roger Ver. I looked him up a few times when I first saw his name. He is called Bitcoin Jesus,,, or maybe he calls himself this. And now he is against Bitcoin. What does this say? He "invested" into Bitcoin, and now he has a lot of money he wants to kill it?

I did not trust any ICOs when I first saw them, because I am new mainly. But also because I saw their advertisements always very near or on the same sites as HYIP. It leads me to think: they are the same people behind,,, but I see so many of them with large profits. Am I wrong?

I did not know this before. Very, very useful. Shall use this method already bookmarked to test on my transactions for the next time. I am now just curious: why does the input size look 4 times the site of output? Should not the logic require them to be almost the same size? Or is a lot more data included in input?

Thank you for the original question. The resulting answers are a source of learning. I have some values of Bitcoin that I have been holding in a website for some months. This fork that everyone is worried about is beginning to worry me. So am I correct to understand,,, No one has met success hacking Electrum. Yet.

I look at ICOs and the returns for many are high, but also for many you lose them. It seems to be as if ICOs are like HYIP: promise of high return, but when everyone wants to get out, then last person sells for 1% of value because the big ones dropped early.

Why is Waves more convenient than BTC? Doesn't anything that makes you change BTC into alt and then changing the alt back into BTC when you want out,,, make it less better than just directly? I already lose if I buy sell BTC. Why to lose more.

Technology is always a matter of time. But only if you remove money as one precondition. So, with the assumption of unlimited financial means, all technology is possible. But yes, Bitcoin is not stagnant. It is its nature to respond and adapt. It is not invincible. It is always vulnerable. But Bitcoin is moving, just as tech is.

You can get more free Bitcoin, that is, smaller units of Bitcoin, in a few minutes than you can of this ONECoIN, I am sure. There things called faucets. I start with them and now do other things like small jobs. I even sent a story on this forum for 15 minutes of my time and got 0.01 BTC,,, you can check my history, it was what brought me here.

I don't know ONECOIN and I don't even want to look to see what it is all about. I know it is not worth anybody's time.

Then it is a mistaken title or misleading. It is not an ICO ban for US citizens. It is investment opportunity ban for US citizens who are not accredited investors. But trust me, so many US people avoiding this. HYIP is the best example:)

Two Singaporeans here. Are they linked to the location of the developers there or this is just coincidence? Not so important but good to know. Sometimes it would be good to know there are real people behind the project.

Interesting coin, sorry for new question. Just a lot of posts to scroll, I have read some, not all. Is there any adult affiliate programme that you have approached, for the usage of SXC, instead of normal methods? It may be a way for some who are excluded to become part of this adult industry.

Good idea for ticket selling. Let us see if organisers will like the idea. Problem is many insider ticket sales with intention to jack prices up. Concerts are bad. Worst are sports tickets. How you can solve this will be interesting. Lifetime members,,, season ticket holders sell tickets.

But if there are more than one sports related crypto assets, then can we agree all of them will go "crazy"? I see footy for the first time here. I have heard of more than one other sports crypto, even on this bitcointalk. What's the diff?